Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The past tense of the verb "lead" is "led." (Original Post) BWdem4life Apr 29 OP
Yes!!! LauraInLA Apr 29 #1
those who disagree... ret5hd Apr 29 #2
That's heavy. Hermit-The-Prog Apr 29 #3
It's not 'leaded'? EYESORE 9001 Apr 29 #4
And people wonder why it's hard to learn English. mucifer Apr 29 #5
'Led' is also the past participle. And, Never Forget, the... SorellaLaBefana Apr 29 #6
I think I red that somewhere. nt sl8 Apr 29 #7
Perhaps Ritten on the Subway Walls? SorellaLaBefana Apr 29 #8
Yes! It's rite under the wurds of the profits. nt sl8 Apr 29 #9
Let us then Prey... SorellaLaBefana Apr 29 #10
Lose vs. loose. Dulcinea Apr 29 #11

SorellaLaBefana

(162 posts)
6. 'Led' is also the past participle. And, Never Forget, the...
Mon Apr 29, 2024, 07:38 AM
Apr 29

…age-old aphorism: “You can lead a horse to water, but a pencil must be lead”

Tho oft ascribed to the Ancient Greek philosopher Mediocrates, recent study suggests this might actually have been noted by the somewhat more contemporaneous observer: Stan Laurel.


Dulcinea

(6,695 posts)
11. Lose vs. loose.
Mon Apr 29, 2024, 04:50 PM
Apr 29
Lose is the opposite of win.

Loose is the opposite of tight.

They're NOT interchangeable. Drives me freaking nuts.
Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»The past tense of the ver...