Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(33,542 posts)
Sat Apr 20, 2024, 10:32 AM Apr 20

That scene in "My Dinner With Andre" About a Sexy Picture, and Looking at Pictures of My Wife When She Was Young.

Last week I wrote how my wife was going through a box of her late mother's pictures, and I found myself remarking on how beautiful she looked in a picture someone took of us at the North Rim of the Grand Canyon, just before we married, a picture that somehow ended up in my mother's-in-law collection and wasn't in ours.

My wife finally got around to going through her late Mom's photo albums.

A strange feature of the picture is that in it she actually looks younger than she was at the time; she was in her early twenties but looked like a teenager. By contrast, although I had hair and it was dark, and in the picture relatively long and wild in what may have been a wind, I looked older than I actually was; I was in my early thirties. (Because we looked as if the distance in our ages appeared to be larger than it was - my wife got "proofed" in restaurants and bars into her thirties - I used to get some dirty looks from time to time, as if I were an Epsteinish/Trumpish/Gaetzish sort of pervert.)

Well, in any case, I scanned the picture, and I've looked at it a number of times since doing so over the last week, fascinated by it. As I was doing so this morning, it suddenly struck me, looking at that picture of myself, that the man in the picture, me, didn't at that time know very much at all about the world; I was ignorant, even more arrogant than I am now, kind of smug, and although I was merely formally educated, but largely unacquainted with the deeper reality of the things to which my education merely exposed me.

Then I looked at my wife in the picture, and thought about who she was at the time, the Mona Lisa type smile she had on her face concealing the fact that she'd just emerged from a very unhappy upbringing and was possessed of a deep insecurity, and uncertainly - wisely I think - unsure whether it was actually a good idea to be with me, there and then.

In that beautiful movie My Dinner With Andre there's a scene where Andre Gregory discusses a picture of his wife, Mercedes "Chiquita" Gregory. From the script:

...I have this picture of Chiquita that was taken when she…I always carry it with me, it was taken when she was about 26 or something, and it’s in summer, and she’s stretched out on a terrace in this sort of old-fashioned long skirt that’s kind of pulled up, and she’s slim and sensual and beautiful, and I’ve always looked at that picture and just thought about just how sexy she looks. And then, last year in Israel, I looked at the picture, and I realized that that face in the picture was the saddest face in the world. That girl at that time was just lost. So sad and so alone. You know, I’ve been carrying this picture for years and not ever really seeing what it is, you know, I just never really looked at the picture. And then, at a certain point , I realized I’d just gone for a good eighteen years unable to feel except in the most extreme situations...


Script, My Dinner With Andre

The first time I went away with my (then future) wife, I took her to what was my favorite place in the universe, to Big Sur. We stayed in this beautiful small cabin in a grove of redwoods, a night I have never forgotten, and about which I often muse. I consider it the best night of my somewhat pathetic life up to that point - although in the years of marriage, many similarly beautiful moments would happily entail over and over again.

In the morning after that night in the cabin, we went on a hike up a small mountain in Pfeiffer Big Sur State Park, and we came upon a grove of pin oaks, and I took pictures of her up there in that grove.

There is one of those pictures in particular that has thrilled me ever since I took it and developed it almost 40 years ago, because in the picture, my wife has exactly the same expression she was wearing the very first time I saw her, the same pose, her legs stretched out, looking down almost shyly at her feet, detached from the outer world, but seemingly deep in an inner world, a kind of impenetrable look of something that could, should perhaps, be recognized as having an aura of buried pain, a resigned sadness strangely contrasting with a sublime physicality. In the Big Sur picture as opposed to my memory of first seeing her, she is sitting on a low branch of a massive oak the Big Sur grove, naked. I must have called that picture up a thousand times, but today, I find myself asking myself if I ever really saw it, I mean, saw it for real.

Of course, when I saw my wife for the first time, I was just another of the many puerile men possessed of less than noble erotic fantasies about her looks; I had no idea who she actually was. Of course, ultimately I did get to know her, and see her divorced from any kind of vanity, somewhat distressed about the somewhat dangerous situations into which her looks had gotten her although she managed to emerge largely unscathed. (Of course early on in our friendship, she could of suspected me of being another dangerous man of the type, but happily she didn't translate those things into suspicions of me or my intentions, although she might well have done so.)

Away from all that, the attentions of puerile men including me, she was always warm, kind, generous, funny and bright, surprisingly accessible and down to Earth, although the deeper things were kept to herself. I could not help falling in love.

But the point is, that in my admiration for these pictures of her youth, like Andre Gregory confessed in his own case, it's not act of seeing, but definitely an act of not seeing anything at all.

We were younger, better looking then, but frankly and honestly, as life winds down, I prefer who we are now. We hadn't lived at all then. We didn't know anything then. We've lived now. We know something, perhaps not a lot, but something now.

Most importantly, something we know now is what it is to have lived at all. That matters.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
That scene in "My Dinner With Andre" About a Sexy Picture, and Looking at Pictures of My Wife When She Was Young. (Original Post) NNadir Apr 20 OP
After 48 years married... S/V Loner Apr 20 #1
I enjoy reading your posts. Deuxcents Apr 20 #2
Thank you. That's very kind of you to say. NNadir Apr 21 #3
I LOVE "My Dinner With Andre" and see it's still on YouTube and must watch it now! betsuni Apr 22 #4
It's a good flick... malthaussen Apr 22 #5
It's amazing that the movie is now 43 years old. We watched it again this weekend because my son is complaining of... NNadir Apr 22 #6
Jackson Browne's "Fountain of Sorrow" comes to mind. malthaussen Apr 23 #7

S/V Loner

(9,000 posts)
1. After 48 years married...
Sat Apr 20, 2024, 10:41 AM
Apr 20

I still see my wife just as the woman I married.
Of course my eyesight isn't as good but...

Deuxcents

(16,330 posts)
2. I enjoy reading your posts.
Sat Apr 20, 2024, 11:45 AM
Apr 20

Something very telling about you, the author, being in love with your wife thru the years and I think it’s that you’re more than just in love. These years you’ve spent with each other seems to have made the bond you committed to more passionate and meaningful. Very few are so fortunate to be able to experience a happiness that you so eloquently share.

NNadir

(33,542 posts)
3. Thank you. That's very kind of you to say.
Sun Apr 21, 2024, 12:47 PM
Apr 21

I do realize that my good fortune is rare, but wish it were more commonly realized. I'm not entirely sure I deserve this good fortune, but I gratefully accept it.

I'm a lucky guy.

malthaussen

(17,216 posts)
5. It's a good flick...
Mon Apr 22, 2024, 11:33 AM
Apr 22

... but I have a negative reaction to the Andre character. He's relatively articulate, but obviously (to me) almost wholly self-indulgent, and if he shows flashes of suddenly discovering empathy, he's well behind the curve for a man of his age.

But hey, everyone is a different data-point on the bell curve of life, and to make matters more interesting, the position is constantly changing. One fellow's insight is another one's statement of the obvious, and a third one's blasphemy. Again, it keeps things interesting.

-- Mal

NNadir

(33,542 posts)
6. It's amazing that the movie is now 43 years old. We watched it again this weekend because my son is complaining of...
Mon Apr 22, 2024, 02:56 PM
Apr 22

...the life of an artist - he is one - and, of course, as stated in the OP, I was personally responding to what I was missing when looking freshly pictures of my wife that I hadn't seen before, pictures of when she was young and the object of so much attention that was all about being sexy in the eyes of men, myself included.

In particular, when I looked at the picture taken at the Grand Canyon, of all places, I was in it as well, and as an old man I have a perspective on who I was then. I'm hardly proud of who I was then; and after 40 years of being my wife's friend and lover I do realize who she was then, not that I really saw it at the time.

It was interesting to watch the movie again; it's probably been a decade or more since last we saw it.

My wife had pretty much the same reaction as you did; she thought the movie reflected a lot of bourgeois cluelessness on the part of both protagonists.

In the last 43 years things unimaginable then are now realities, but in a way, from my perspective, despite this, I think overall the movie aged well.

Last my son saw it, he was an art student, and he was young and filled with admiration of the film. I recall him talking about it at the time quite a bit, and I remember mocking Wally's voice, which I can mimic quite well when he was trying to discuss the film seriously. Now, in some minor sense, although he works far harder than Wally seemed to do as portrayed in the film, he is definitely in Wally world where the issue is art and money, a peripheral but real part of the movie.

As it happens, my son has one degree of separation from Andre; one of his professors was a close friend of Andre Gregory and spent a lot of time with him.

This time, seeing the film, my son remarked on why Andre carries on so much about Nazis, interpreting it as being because of his father's record of collaboration during those times. I think though that we all have increased sensitivity to issues in fascism now, and probably many Americans are fans of the collaborationists of the present day, at least half of the Republicans now in our Congress. Possibly in this country the choice between collaboration and decency might rise again. We're no longer in "it can't happen here."

My wife remarked on how bourgeois New York art scene was (and may still be), and definitely had a negative take on Andre; but let's face it the world is far more dire than it was in 1981; then it was possible to be naive and self absorbed without as much ethical consequence as there is now. She was offended by the remarks about secretaries, even as Wally was expressing horror at how people saw Debbie in that role in the smug upper East Side world of that time, as my wife had been a secretary herself.

As for me, I was passively amused on the "artsy" criticism of science, typical of art intellectuals of that time (and perhaps still), criticism by people who don't know anything at all about what science is.

Andre is self absorbed throughout, but at least he knows it, and calls himself out, albeit from a perch of material comfort to which few of us can even aspire.

For me though, I'd forgotten a lot of the movie, but Andre's self critical comments on how he had never really seen who his wife was at the time she, like my wife, was young and beautiful, still rang true; it's why I watched the movie again. They popped into my head as soon as I measured the wan smile of my wife in the photograph at the Grand Canyon. Now, at last, I know who she was then.

Those remarks of Andre's are almost at the end of the film. They're spot on, been there, done that. They definitely came to mind when I looked a photograph in which I was a younger, slightly better looking, fool, and where my wife was a very beautiful young woman of whose secret pain I was more or less unaware at the time; it wasn't even on my mind. To me she was all about a kind of perfection, but perfection I now understand as extremely shallow, almost the point of obscenity.

She stuck with me, but I regret that I wasn't a better man then, that I took so much and gave back far less than she deserved. I wish I'd been more aware of who she really was beyond the romance, the love making, and my silly admiration, bordering on obsession, of what proved to be the least important thing about her, her looks.

That part still strikes home.

My wife was struck by Andre's final remarks, as we have grown old and lived to see our sons become men:

A baby holds your hands, and then suddenly there’s this huge man lifting you off the ground, and then he’s gone. Where’s that son?


She repeated that, "Where's that son?"

My son was in the room, of course, but he'll be on the other side of the planet all summer, studying Asian art, and he's now in love with a woman from Mexico, and it's possible that the question - already applied to my younger son - "Where's that son?" will be crossing our lips all too soon.

As any characters in any good film would and should be, they are flawed. Still, after all these years, it's a lovely film.

malthaussen

(17,216 posts)
7. Jackson Browne's "Fountain of Sorrow" comes to mind.
Tue Apr 23, 2024, 09:32 PM
Apr 23

I love that song. Especially the (maybe unconscious) juxtaposition of the lines "And while the future's there for anyone to change, still you know it seems it would be easier sometimes to change the past," followed immediately by "I'm just one or two years and a couple of changes behind you."

-- Mal

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»That scene in "My Dinner ...