The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support Forums45 Photos Which Are Hard To Believe Aren't Photoshopped
Last edited Mon Oct 14, 2019, 01:02 PM - Edit history (1)
They say that a picture is worth a thousand words. Well, some photos are so astounding that a thousand questions bubble to the surface of our thoughts the moment we see them. In the 21st century, one of the first questions usually is: Was this photoshopped?
Whether you think that Photoshop should never be used to edit pictures ever or you believe that its an inseparable part of a photographers existence in the digital age, the fact is, more and more pictures are being post-processed than ever before. Simply because of how easily accessible cameras and editing software is nowadays. However, once in a blue moon some very intriguing photos pop out from the woodwork. Photos that look photoshopped, but that arent.
We love collecting stunning eye-candy for you to gaze at all day long. And todays no exception. Weve gathered the finest examples of fascinating pictures that definitely werent photoshopped. Grab a cup of tea, coffee, or cocoa, get your scrolling finger ready, and enjoy what our team of hard-working Pandas prepared for you. Upvote your favorite photos, share this post with your buddies, and let us know in the comments what you think of each picture. And check out our previous posts about incredible photos that weren't photoshopped right here and here.
Scroll down for Bored Pandas exclusive and in-depth interview with professional photographer Anna Chii about the morality of editing pictures, her take on all-natural photos, her philosophy of photography, what clients usually expect, as well as the importance of trust between a photographer and their clients.
Many more amazing photos and descriptions at the link above. Enjoy!
hlthe2b
(102,263 posts)Ohiogal
(31,996 posts)Floyd R. Turbo
(26,546 posts)Fla Dem
(23,666 posts)Mosby
(16,310 posts)Duppers
(28,120 posts)So much worth the click!
Thanks for posting some here.
👍
mountain grammy
(26,620 posts)StarryNite
(9,444 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)USALiberal
(10,877 posts)Dem2theMax
(9,651 posts)Thank you so much for posting this. I'm going to share it with some friends who are really into photography. I'm going to sit and stare at the photos in awe.
LiberalFighter
(50,921 posts)DemoTex
(25,396 posts)I shoot RAW files, to maximize the data in the image. RAW files are kind of like undeveloped film, in that they need processing. That processing, to extract all that data, must be done in a computer application such as Lightroom or Photoshop (or many others). The images shown in the O/P were probably RAW files, and as such were extremely dull. They were almost certainly processed in Photoshop or a program like it.
"Photoshop" has taken on a perjorative connotation in contemporary parlance. What it is often considered to mean, usually erroneously, is the significant alteration of the original image with the intent to pass it off as the real thing. A oft seen internet photo of a "rare" double moonrise over the Taj Mahal comes to mind. Or the photo of Nessie swimming in the streets of a flooded Houston.
So, my guess is all of these fine images were indeed "Photoshopped," but not in a bad way. Here is a "Photoshopped" image of mine from the Deschutes National Forest in Oregon:
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Many of the processing methods in photoshop are carryovers from traditional film processing. Various filters were applied for color correction and exposure adjustments were made at a minimum. There were countless tricks applied and the choice of paper you printed on could make a huge difference. Even with slide film you had the potential for modifications at the development stage.
Photography isnt about making a ditto copy of what the eye sees. Its about creating an image which starts out as what the eye sees.
Beartracks
(12,814 posts)I can experience a beautiful, saturated landscape with surreal light, take a picture, and be completely let down by how dull and washed out it seems -- mainly in the way the camera captured the light, or in the way the lens only exposed properly for part of what's in the frame (like maybe just the well-lit parts) and not everything else. In person, your eye moves across a scene, automatically adjusting for light and glare and focus, but the camera has one fixed combination of aperture and focal length at any given moment -- including the moment the shutter is pressed. And the emotional impact of, say, a sunset does not necessarily get captured by the lens the same way your mind and eye witnessed it together. Thus... what the camera recorded may need some "fixing" so it become the scene you personally experienced. Then, for another viewer, the photograph conveys the same you-are-there feeling as you felt when you were, indeed, there.
Well, that's my musings anyway. I'm actually still at work.
=============
Nitram
(22,800 posts)understand exactly what you are talking about. It is also clear to me that a number of these photographs have increased saturation and probably made other adjustments to the original image. That's not "cheating" unless the result is significantly different from what the scene looked like to the naked eye at the time they were taken.
IronLionZion
(45,441 posts)it never looks even close to what they have in postcards and online images. Yet sure enough, they take a picture of me standing in front of what I saw, and make it look so much better through long exposure and wide open aperture among other stuff.
Karadeniz
(22,513 posts)Gorgeous photos!❤❤
IronLionZion
(45,441 posts)Dog covered in Holi powder, not on fire
Black car that is so shiny after a wash it looks like a mirror
Black and white Santa costume
From inside a tent
English viaduct
Try to get bored panda working, maybe a different browser or disable some plugins. There are amazing photos every day.
LeftInTX
(25,316 posts)paleotn
(17,912 posts)Ugh! That last one. Winter is coming.
CloudWatcher
(1,848 posts)BHDem53
(1,061 posts)Buzz Aldrin left his binoculars up there.
Nitram
(22,800 posts)to alter many of these photographs. Perhaps there is a conflict between the meaning of "photoshop" that means to make a fake picture, and the meaning of Photoshop which is to edit the photo in ways that improve the clarity, contrast, color balance or anything else that was deficient in the original image.
LAS14
(13,783 posts)pansypoo53219
(20,976 posts)there were multiple short rainbow segments around below it.
Canoe52
(2,948 posts)underpants
(182,800 posts)lapfog_1
(29,199 posts)Horsetail Falls Yosemite
malthaussen
(17,194 posts)No ads, no page scrolling, no pop-ups, no videos... just a page of really cool pics. How refreshing!
-- Mal
johnsolaris
(220 posts)Hi,
Nice photos, but everyone in the hobby knows that a good photo like these is 90% waiting for the right light & 10% being in the right place at the right time.
As my old teacher said, Get out & enjoy nature, learn your craft & make some magic. You can make photos just as good as these photos.