The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsMy family thought for generations that we had a Cherokee ancestor.
We even new her name, Susie Redman. She was a family story and I grew up very proud that me ancestor was a Native American.
Long story short, my sister did a DNA test and we have zero Native American blood. She did some research and found that Susie, was from Germany. She couldn't find the origin of the family legend. Lmao, true story I just found out.
DFW
(54,051 posts)Republicans will start calling you Pocahontas.
I was so disappointed. I would have been 1/16th Cherokee according to family legend.
DFW
(54,051 posts)One was descended from a deadbeat Mississippi riverboat gambler who fled noth to escape his debts, and the other was the son of a South Carolina tailor who worked his way through college as a janitor. Pocahontas aint got nothin on me!
Nay
(12,051 posts)was on the run in Scotland, chased by the sheriff for horse thievery. He jumped onto the first boat out of Glasgow and it happened to be coming to the New World. This was in the mid-1600's.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)I wonder what book its actually from.
Nay
(12,051 posts)was doing genealogy research in the hope that we were descended from a lord, earl, prince, etc., and it turned out we were a bunch of thieving bums brawling in the dirt. Hysterical!
trueblue2007
(17,138 posts)you know who i mean. Gees, I wish i had "the good guys" in my family tree.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)suddenly had a Cherokee ancestor slip into the family history, right around the time a lot of families started to accidentally forget some of their ancestors from south of the Mason-Dixon Line.
Our family always claimed some Scots lineage with the name McDiarmid (something like that) popping up a bit, but when online ancestry searches became possible I learned that it was actually Madeiras, and that we had a chunk of Portuguese background that was, for whatever reason, embarrassing enough that it got hidden.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,276 posts)There was also a GGG grandfather, a Presbyterian minister in those parts, who was defrocked for officiating at a wedding between a Protestant and a Catholic. I was hoping to find more disreputable ancestors but so far that's about it.
DFW
(54,051 posts)In New York, it's a good thing our daughter had a justice of the peace do a civil ceremony. She has a mother from a 600 year old German Catholic family, a father who is an Eastern European mongrel (me), a husband who is from a Russian Catholic family (born in Moscow), but grew up in Israel and is still a Catholic Israeli citizen in the USA with a green card. They both fortunately have no use whatsoever for religion, though they both are perfectly aware of their multi-cultural backgrounds.
SCantiGOP
(13,856 posts)Americans are mongrels, but some of us were kicked out of some of the best countries in Europe.
DFW
(54,051 posts)Docreed2003
(16,817 posts)SCantiGOP
(13,856 posts)was like a nice apartment on the 2nd floor over a meth lab.
Arkansas Granny
(31,483 posts)someone married an Indian "princess". The DNA test my sister took proved that wrong. 0%
WePurrsevere
(24,259 posts)8 generations ago would have a very slim chance of showing up as is explained in the part of the article that I link to and quote below. The full article has embedded links that are also helpful.
http://www.rootsandrecombinantdna.com/2015/03/native-american-dna-is-just-not-that.html
Three Reasons Why Native American DNA Does NOT Show Up On Your Test Results ...
(1) Your "full-blood" Native American ancestor may have lived so far back in time that your NA ancestor's DNA has "washed out" by the time it reached your generation.
According to 23andMe, Native American DNA has been known to "wash out" in a few short generations (about 5), especially if none of your other progenitors introduced it along the way. Wash-outs usually occur during Random Genetic Recombination, when DNA gets randomly remixed as it passes from parent to child --- some of it (ethnic components/DNA sequences from our direct fore-parents) eventually gets lost over time. This is because each child inherits random DNA contributions from his/her 2 parents (50% each); 4 grandparents (25% each); 8 g-grandparents (12.5% each); 16 gg-grandparents (6.25% each); 32 ggg-grandparents (3.125%); 64 gggg-grandparents (1.56% each), etc. as the table here illustrates:
As you can see the farther your NA ancestor is removed from your generation, the more likely your average DNA contributions from this NA is to show up in low admixture percentages or none at all. For example, if one of your 32 ggg-grandparents was full-blood Native American, you stand to inherit up to 3.125% of that ggg-grandparent's DNA. Since the DNA you will inherit from your parentage is RANDOM and your ancestors will rarely be 100% of any one ethnicity, it is theoretically possible for you to inherit non-Native American DNA from this ancestor if other ethnic components are present and according to when this NA ancestor was introduced to the bloodline. For example Native Americans are known to have varying amounts of East Asian and Eurasian admixture due sharing ancestral populations with them. And after 15th century, Native Americans became admixed with Europeans and Africans.
NOW HERE'S THE TRICKY PART! You don't inherit your reshuffled DNA in fixed percentages as the chart above suggests. Rather you inherit your DNA sequences in chunks or segments of varying "lengths" (aka CentiMorgans) as shown in this illustration:
So starting with your grandparents, you will actually NOT get 25% DNA equally from each one. Instead the contributions per grandparent could be more like:
15% from grandparent #1
35% from grandparent #2
40% from grandparent #3
10% from grandparent #4
Now imagine if we apply my "genetic formula" to your grandparent #4, who in turn was descended from your hypothetical Native American ggg-grandparent mentioned earlier. Your grandparent #4 could have only inherited about 12.5%(+/-) NA DNA from his g-grandparent (full blood Native American) and it might be less than average amount.
Question: How much of the 10% DNA you inherited from your grandparent #4 will consist of the 12.5%(+/-) Native American DNA contribution that he received from his g-grandparent (= ggg-grandparent)?
At the 5th generation for YOU, chances are equally likely to be anywhere 0.00% to 3.125%(+/-) NA DNA depending on how much NA DNA grandparent #4 gave your parent, and if your parent passed any of it to you (see How Much Of Your Genome Do You Inherit From a Particular Grandparent). While you will definitely inherit DNA from your grandparent #4 (@ 10%), it may not include any DNA that can identified as Native American. In my own family I have a relative who did not receive any NA DNA from his parents, even though his father has a NA mtDNA haplogroup (B2) and whose DNA-tested close paternal relatives (aunt, uncle, cousins) scoring 2%(+/-) NA (inclusive of shared NA DNA segments). Instead my relative got 4% Southeast Asian (SEA). He just didn't get any of the NA DNA from his father, noting the SEA component in this branch of my family is related to Malagasy peoples (see Sergio Tofanelli, et al and Teresa Vega's blog) ancestry, and much stronger than the Native American. Go figure.
(Con't at link above)
PandoraAwakened
(905 posts)Niagara
(7,406 posts)Buckeye_Democrat
(14,846 posts)These probabilities are in reference to autosomal DNA tests -- the ones from AncestryDNA, 23andMe, MyHeritageDNA and others that focus on the DNA that's inherited from both parents and all branches of the family tree.
There's also Y-DNA and mtDNA tests which can indicate relationships and ancestry along the all-paternal and al-maternal lines MUCH farther back in time. Those trees are always traced back to African roots, of course.
WePurrsevere
(24,259 posts)While your sister may have found records showing that Susie was from Germany it's still possible that you do have NA ethnicity back in time and it's just not showing up.
Here's a great article that explains why this can happen with NA DNA:
http://www.rootsandrecombinantdna.com/2015/03/native-american-dna-is-just-not-that.html
For a decent explanation about ethnicity in general not being reliable this is a good one:
https://www.legalgenealogist.com/2019/01/27/and-still-not-soup/or
DNA for ethnicity, as a science, is not as accurate as it is for matching.
As an adoptee searching I'd tested at the big 2 plus uploaded my raw data to GEDmatch, MyHeritage and FTDNA. Now that I'm 'in reunion' with both sides I have a decent family tree started that's based on records (plus DNA) so I can tell you from experience ethnicity definitely can vary quite a bit between testing sites.
lark
(23,003 posts)I really hate the idea of these DNA tests, don't trust the government or industry to not abuse them. However, now for the first time ever I wonder if I should? I'm pretty sure my Cherokee ancestor is real and my great great grandmother. Her husband was a french trapper who got injured and was nursed to health by a Cherokee tribe and mainly my great great grandmother. It's insufficient Indian blood to mean anything, but I love the story and it still means something to me. I don't know how accurate these tests are and I know I'm mostly a mix of lots of various European blood, but definitely more English than anything else with German, French, Spanish, Irish & Swedish verified as well. Still don't trust the government or industry not to somehow abuse these tests so will just stick with the story about my grandfather's origins for now.
RobinA
(9,878 posts)but my 23 and Me DNA test was extremely accurate. We know our genealogy back to the various old countries from which all but one branch emerged in the late 1600s through the mid 1700s. We know what towns they are from and the test really hit the nail on the head. Now, we are strictly northern Europe and UK, which is probably the biggest share of their database, so we hit their accuracy sweet spot, but still they did a damn good job. It is possible.
Farmer-Rick
(10,072 posts)Did not find their version of what they consider American Indian DNA in your sister's blood test that I would not trust it. If you have pictures (as my family does) or other evidence of American Indian ancestry, I would trust that over a DNA test.
applegrove
(118,018 posts)proved to a certain extent.
nolabear
(41,915 posts)and the fact that we have exactly one ancestor we cant trace, the father of the purported Choctaw g-g-grandmother I still hold on. That and the fact my grandmother, great aunts and grandmother knew her well and she wasnt some legend.
Who knows...
Kashkakat v.2.0
(1,752 posts)Modoc or Potawotomi? Kinda reminds me of people I used to know who claimed to have past lives - it was always something like ancient Egyptian priestess or queen of Atlantis, never anything like a peasant on a farm in China or a somalian Pirate or .... oh there was this job in 18th century England going around and collecting the contents of chamber pots. How come no one was one of those in their past life?
Anyway Im glad you see the humor in your humorous story - actually its a better story than if Susie Redman (red man, seriously?) had been a real Cherokee!
Kali
(54,990 posts)Merlot
(9,696 posts)"Susie Redman (red man, seriously?)"
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,746 posts)You'd think that if there really were real Native American ancestors, the various different tribes would all be named more or less equally.
As for past life stuff, people who have actually done past life regressions always come up with things like being a peasant somewhere. The royalty/famous person/life in Atlantis is invariably among people who've never done an actual regression.
Plus, of course, Atlantis is pure myth, and too many people really don't get that.
RobinA
(9,878 posts)myself. My cousins had an Indian grandmother and she was Choctaw. I saw her because she lived with them, she was clearly native. I didn't know she was Choctaw until I did some Ancestry research. Is it just the eastern US people that claim the Cherokee relative? Maybe it's the only Indian tribe they know lived in the area. The Choctaw lady in my family came from Arkansas and she met my relative when he was stationed down there.
Brainstormy
(2,380 posts)happened in my family. My ex-husband had always said his great grandmother was full-blood Cherokee. Well, not a drop of Native American blood in anybody. But a good bit of mid-eastern and Northern Africa. I'm loving it!