Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

inanna

(3,547 posts)
Mon Dec 25, 2017, 01:14 PM Dec 2017

Oh My!!!! Darkest Hour: (Churchill movie) Trailer!!



“We shall fight in France, we shall fight in the seas and in the oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills. We shall never surrender…” – Winston Churchill, June 4, 1940


Hop on a plane, jump on a bus, scramble down the stairs to a subway, slam your foot down on your car’s gas pedal and go see Darkest Hour, the new movie about Winston Churchill in the early days of World War II. It is one of the best history movie of the decade, and the last decade, too.

The film, that opened nationwide Friday, begins as the British Parliament, staggering from Hitler’s early victories in Europe in 1939 and 1940, forces Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain out of office. Most of the high-ranking parliament leaders want Viscount Halifax, a close friend of King George VI, to succeed him, but he does not have enough support. They turn, reluctantly, to Winston Churchill, 66, longtime, blustery member of parliament, who has a lot of enemies and is a curmudgeon who is hard to love, as admitted even by his American wife.

Churchill plunges into the leadership of his country in the spring of 1940, a year before the U.S. enters the war, and as he sits down that first day the British army of nearly 400,000 men is stranded on the beaches of Dunkirk, in northern France, with no visible means of escape and Belgium and France are about to be overrun. The political and military situation is as bleak as it could be.

What do we find Churchill doing? He drinks (he DOES drink), he tries to woo his cat from beneath his bed, he squabbles with his new secretary, argues with his wife and puffs away on a thousand cigars.

cont'd...


http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/167798




I cannot wait. THIS will be the film that actually makes me want to take my damn ass out to the cinema!

WOW!!!!

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Turbineguy

(37,383 posts)
1. A family friend who was in the British Army
Mon Dec 25, 2017, 01:18 PM
Dec 2017

told me that following the the June 4th speech, British soldiers on the east coast were yelling at the Nazi's across the water daring them to invade.

Irish_Dem

(47,557 posts)
3. Would Americans today fight this hard or just resign themselves
Mon Dec 25, 2017, 01:24 PM
Dec 2017

to an invading force as their new overlords?

Ironically all the gun nuts hoarding guns would probably just roll over.

inanna

(3,547 posts)
5. If you've actually seen the movie already...
Mon Dec 25, 2017, 01:30 PM
Dec 2017

a few reviews would be welcome.

I mean there really aren't any spoilers for this one - we already KNOW how this movie ends.

CTyankee

(63,914 posts)
16. I saw it a few days ago. It was wonderful. I think Gary Oldham will get an Oscar for
Fri Dec 29, 2017, 09:07 PM
Dec 2017

his portrayal of Churchill. His make up job was phenomenal.

I loved the whole movie. Everyone was wonderful. My daughter and I saw the movie and then came home and watched "Dunkirk" on one of her movie channels. Wow! It was a perfect duo for us.

I did, however, tell my daughter to be sure and get "Atonement" as a kind of follow up of these two movies. "Atonement" has a sad but very true fictional "moment" that follows on to "Dunkirk." It should be seen as an historical novel that encompasses Dunkirk and the whole war effect on Great Britain.

underthematrix

(5,811 posts)
6. I can't wait to see this. I don't go to movie theaters because of the
Mon Dec 25, 2017, 01:44 PM
Dec 2017

stupid people danger so I have to wait for it to come on pay per view.

inanna

(3,547 posts)
7. Last time I went to the theatre was with my daughter in 2012:
Mon Dec 25, 2017, 01:52 PM
Dec 2017

We saw The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. It was awesome.

There's not much that can convince me to go anymore. Most films being put out are remakes or totally uninspired knock-offs of other movies.

As a history FANATIC, this is what I want to see more of. It looks well made and well written. Gary Oldman!

So I'll put my money where my mouth is - expensive as it is to go these days.

I'm certain this film will bring many - who haven't been to a theatre in YEARS - back.

underthematrix

(5,811 posts)
8. Oh I so agree with you. I love love movies that focus on historical events.
Mon Dec 25, 2017, 01:59 PM
Dec 2017

I have Churchill's collected works. He's a great storyteller. He recognized the complexities of making decisions in an unpredictable dangerous world.

Most movies are terrible, a mindless selling of narratives that keep us consuming things we don't want or need.

CrispyQ

(36,544 posts)
13. I go on Sunday mornings. There are hardly any people then.
Tue Dec 26, 2017, 11:45 AM
Dec 2017

I love seeing movies in the theater. My husband does not. So I go alone, on Sunday morning & treat myself to my favorite bagel shop on the way home.

I saw an interview with Gary Oldman about this movie. He said, after they got his makeup done, he didn't recognize himself in the mirror. What a wonderful actor! This is gonna be good!

HeiressofBickworth

(2,682 posts)
10. I've seen it
Mon Dec 25, 2017, 02:24 PM
Dec 2017

It was a wonderful movie and I predict an Oscar for Oldman. The movie portrays a complex man with one determined goal: not just the protection of his nation but the utter destruction of Hitler and Nazism. He had to fight other members of Parliament who believed an agreement could be reached with Hitler that would save England from invasion. Churchill believed Hitler could not be trusted, even with an agreement. Watch for a very interesting conversation Churchill had with Roosevelt in May. 1940, long before Pearl Harbor and America's entry in the war.

inanna

(3,547 posts)
11. Thanks!
Mon Dec 25, 2017, 02:27 PM
Dec 2017

I appreciate your comment - especially the part about FDR. Waiting for a movie on him - I'd love Spielberg to direct.

To my mind, this is a MUST SEE movie! Especially for the younger generation.

appalachiablue

(41,184 posts)
12. We're very interested in seeing it soon, just talked to an Irish-Amer. friend,
Mon Dec 25, 2017, 09:48 PM
Dec 2017

a film expert about it last night. The coverage and trailer look excellent, esp. with superb Gary Oldman in the role. Thanks for posting. We have a date set this week to watch the new film "Dunkirk" on Pay-Per View TV.

I've wondered when we'll see a quality production on FDR and his administration particularly during the Great Depression and WWII.

There've been several dramatizations of US presidents in the last decade- 'Lincoln' by Spielberg; LBJ in 'All the Way' on HBO TV; and 'W', a biopic of Bush. Long past due is a quality work about the Hyde Park, NY and New Deal American legend.
------
Author Lynne Olson's new book, "CITIZENS OF LONDON" (2017) focuses on the relationships and times of prominent WWII American figures Edward R. Murrow, the London-based CBS Radio News Head; wealthy FDR appointee Averell Harriman; and John Winant, US Ambassador to Britain. Also included, Churchill's personal circle, Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower and more.

CITIZENS OF LONDON: THE AMERICANS WHO STOOD WITH BRITAIN IN ITS DARKEST FINEST HOUR, By Lynne Olson



Powells Book Review

"The Anglo-American alliance in WWII was not inevitable, writes former Baltimore Sun correspondent Olson (Troublesome Young Men). In this ingenious history, she emphasizes the role of three prominent Americans living in London who helped bring it about. Best known was Edward R. Murrow, head of CBS radio's European bureau after 1937. His pioneering live broadcasts during the blitz made him a celebrity, and Olson portrays a man who worked tirelessly to win American support for Britain. Most admirable of the three was John Winant, appointed American ambassador in 1941. A true humanitarian, he skillfully helped craft the British-American alliance. And most amusing was Averell Harriman, beginning a long public service career. In 1941, FDR sent the wealthy, ambitious playboy to London to oversee Lend-Lease aid. He loved the job, but made no personal sacrifices, living a luxurious life as he hobnobbed with world leaders and carried on an affair with Churchill's daughter-in-law. Olson, an insightful historian, contrasts the idealism of Winant and Murrow with the pragmatism of Harriman. But all three men were colorful, larger-than-life figures, and Olson's absorbing narrative does them justice. 16 pages of b&w photos." Publishers Weekly (Starred Review) (Copyright Reed Business Information, Inc.)

Synopsis: From the acclaimed author of "Troublesome Young Men" comes a major new World War II history that describes the developments of America's crucial wartime alliance with England that became so decisive in defeating Hitler. MORE...
http://www.powells.com/book/citizens-of-london-the-americans-who-stood-with-britain-in-its-darkest-finest-hour-9781400067589

EllieBC

(3,043 posts)
15. This will definitely be worth us finding a sitter to go see!
Wed Dec 27, 2017, 05:35 PM
Dec 2017

Not many movies have looked like they'd be the worth the cost of a babysitter for 3 kids but this one does.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Oh My!!!! Darkest Hour: (...