HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Video & Multimedia (Forum) » A very Blunt Ad- vote for...

Fri Dec 1, 2017, 04:20 PM

 

A very Blunt Ad- vote for the Candidate without a Penis

6 replies, 1195 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 6 replies Author Time Post
Reply A very Blunt Ad- vote for the Candidate without a Penis (Original post)
tomhagen Dec 2017 OP
marble falls Dec 2017 #1
CTyankee Dec 2017 #4
marble falls Dec 2017 #5
CTyankee Dec 2017 #6
Sneederbunk Dec 2017 #2
CTyankee Dec 2017 #3

Response to tomhagen (Original post)

Fri Dec 1, 2017, 04:51 PM

1. So having a penis or not having a penis is the single most important issue in this race?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marble falls (Reply #1)

Sun Dec 3, 2017, 12:15 PM

4. that's not the only case she is making.

She makes the case based on her qualifications. Sad that we all have to deal with the issue of sexual predation, but we do...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CTyankee (Reply #4)

Sun Dec 3, 2017, 02:05 PM

5. With the tenor of the times, I am much more likely to vote for a woman than a white male ....

all other things being equal, sex assault just being one of the issues I am paying very close attention to. But it is not the only or driving issue.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marble falls (Reply #5)

Sun Dec 3, 2017, 03:31 PM

6. I think it goes to the issue of basic decency. Most of the cases involving sexual

predation of women involve republicans, with the exception of Franken and Weiner. So right there you have Democratic values and issues that we agree on as Democrats.

So far, our Dem senators, Murphy and Blumenthal, have been stellar and Murphy may be considering a presidential run at some point which is exciting to me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tomhagen (Original post)

Fri Dec 1, 2017, 05:07 PM

2. Sexist. Not helpful.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tomhagen (Original post)

Sun Dec 3, 2017, 12:05 PM

3. I like this ad. Yes, she does "go there" on sexual harassment, but

she also lays out a good, strong case for her candidacy.

At this point, we have to deal with sexual harassment in the workplace. It is sad that we do, I agree, but women didn't pull this down on themselves. The workplace must change.

The other point she makes about having three women run for top spots in state government is important. If it were three men, no problem. But three women? That's sexist.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread