Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumKellyanne Conway: "How is (Russian interference) an issue of potential national security?"
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,947 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)never answers the question posed
Squinch
(51,075 posts)Quanta
(195 posts)Like, sneer at her, cut the feed and then say solemnly to audience, "So sorry, but our network refuses to deal with or give a platform to those who choose to lie and mislead the general public. Ms. Conway won't be back. Thanks for bearing with us while we go to this unplanned commercial break. Next up - Steve Bannon and his bizarre yoga practices! Back to you."
TrollBuster9090
(5,955 posts)Rhiannon12866
(206,592 posts)machoneman
(4,016 posts)really losing it now. I'll admit she's a master of deflection, a gas-lighter, etc.
But, she's starting to give huge openings to her interviewers by saying some as stupid as how could the Russkie's election efforts effect our nation's security. I'll bet after seeing her statement later on TV she wishes she could take that one back.
That or....she's accidentally (or at least too early) revealed Trump's next chess move to deflect or minimize Mueller.
Here's a thought: their strategy may be to tell their supporters more or less, so what? Even if they admit or are forced to admit Russkie election help, it had no bearing now, or in the future, on America's safety, military, etc.
So don't worry West Virginians, we got your back!
Hardly!
Rhiannon12866
(206,592 posts)The news media may call her out on her ridiculous statements, but the Trump supporters don't care. She could say anything - the same as Trump - and they'll still be in her corner.