Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Jarqui

(10,123 posts)
1. I worry about this rhetoric - not just because of potential violence
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 07:03 PM
Oct 2016

but some of the Senate races could go weird on these machines and then the GOP say "the fix isn't in. You told us elections can't be rigged!"

This is the most messed up election ever (except Florida in 2000 ...)

Festivito

(13,452 posts)
2. Good, but, it's not a voter fraud problem, it's the ELECTION FRAUD!
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 07:25 PM
Oct 2016

What is wrong with these people at the M$M?

yuiyoshida

(41,831 posts)
3. For sure When Hillary Wins, He will scream and shout that he's had the
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 07:29 PM
Oct 2016

Election stolen from him and will probably incite Violence in the forms of Riots, looting, and trashing of public property. I am pretty much expecting it, and wonder if the cops will Allow it or try and actually arrest people involved.

bucolic_frolic

(43,128 posts)
4. All this noise about rigging elections
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 08:07 PM
Oct 2016

is coming from one loudmouth

make me nervous he could be the one doing the rigging

Why has be concentrated so much on Pennsylvania ... it would only
benefit him if several other states fell into place and they are not there

Overseas

(12,121 posts)
5. Actually, if corporate media covered GOP voter suppression more, including CrossCheck,
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 08:37 PM
Oct 2016

That might help the public see that it's Trump's party, the GOP, doing the rigging.

If corporate media discussed the GOP's tool CrossCheck, in which they drop voters with same first & last names off the voter rolls and don't go on to Level 2 cross checking of middle names and Level 3 Social Security, that would help the public understand which party has been actively engineering the vote results in their favor.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/the-gops-stealth-war-against-voters-w435890

On its surface, Crosscheck seems quite reasonable. Twenty-eight participating states share their voter lists and, in the name of dispassionate, race-blind Big Data, seek to ensure the rolls are up to date. To make sure the system finds suspect voters, Crosscheck supposedly matches first, middle and last name, plus birth date, and provides the last four digits of a Social Security number for additional verification.
In reality, however, there have been signs that the program doesn't operate as advertised. Some states have dropped out of Crosscheck, citing problems with its methodology, as Oregon's secretary of state recently explained: "We left [Crosscheck] because the data we received was unreliable."

In our effort to report on the program, we contacted every state for their Crosscheck list. But because voting twice is a felony, state after state told us their lists of suspects were part of a criminal investigation and, as such, confidential. Then we got a break. A clerk in Virginia sent us its Crosscheck list of suspects, which a letter from the state later said was done "in error."

The Virginia list was a revelation. In all, 342,556 names were listed as apparently registered to vote in both Virginia and another state as of January 2014. Thirteen percent of the people on the Crosscheck list, already flagged as inactive voters, were almost immediately removed, meaning a stunning 41,637 names were "canceled" from voter rolls, most of them just before Election Day.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»How Media should counter ...