Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
131 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton Is Not The Right Candidate to Face Donald Trump (Original Post) GoLeft TV May 2016 OP
Oh well... Shit happens.. FarPoint May 2016 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author IHateTheGOP May 2016 #15
Now there's the right reason to vote for someone. KPN May 2016 #17
I have backed Hillary Clinton since 2008. FarPoint May 2016 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author IHateTheGOP May 2016 #55
I have been paying attention to the Repugs for quite some time now ... KPN May 2016 #75
This message was self-deleted by its author IHateTheGOP May 2016 #82
well unlike Trump PatrynXX May 2016 #24
Sure she has closed the Primary race.... FarPoint May 2016 #30
Maybe, her primary odds are pretty good MiaM May 2016 #53
This message was self-deleted by its author IHateTheGOP May 2016 #56
I've voted in every Presidential Election since 1984 markbark May 2016 #115
This message was self-deleted by its author IHateTheGOP May 2016 #117
Compared to Drumpf? markbark May 2016 #119
This message was self-deleted by its author IHateTheGOP May 2016 #120
That's nice, but she has no path to victory. basselope May 2016 #78
Well, tough toenails, because she is the one who WILL face Donald Trump. You know why? Squinch May 2016 #2
Which one? The California one? The New Jersey one? The West Virginia one? Gene Debs May 2016 #7
The national one. And I know what you are going to say but yes, she did win. Squinch May 2016 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author IHateTheGOP May 2016 #57
"...it's over. You people are like the tea party." FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #70
This message was self-deleted by its author IHateTheGOP May 2016 #83
Ohhh, math skills. SO do keep posting why people in those states shouldn't bother voting because of FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #114
This message was self-deleted by its author IHateTheGOP May 2016 #118
HRC supporters are quite bad at math and are panicked enough to believe anything... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #3
I love when you kids say that Hillary's supporters are panicked. Its so cute and silly! Squinch May 2016 #9
How come I get hides when I make remarks like this? KPN May 2016 #19
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #36
Talk about easy elections. Bernie in Vermont. redstateblues May 2016 #41
Bernie never had a job til he was 40. AlbertCat May 2016 #45
Pretty desperate there, eh AlbertCat? MrMickeysMom May 2016 #80
"A real sign of panic." Squinch May 2016 #54
.that^ 840high May 2016 #65
This message was self-deleted by its author IHateTheGOP May 2016 #58
Snide condescension really helps to unite the party. markbark May 2016 #116
You mean like "progressives" spreading every right wing smear in the service of a Squinch May 2016 #121
*tweet* markbark May 2016 #125
Bernie has only gotten 45% of the delegates so far but his math-challenged supporters think pnwmom May 2016 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author IHateTheGOP May 2016 #59
Yep. PatrynXX May 2016 #29
Hillary Clinton is the Moderate Right Candidate to Face Donald Trump. n/t Martin Eden May 2016 #4
And that's the problem........... mrmpa May 2016 #6
read various articles PatrynXX May 2016 #32
Piss on this! RBInMaine May 2016 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author IHateTheGOP May 2016 #60
Do NOT underestimate Trump. He will be RELENTLESS. Only Bernie can Win. zebonaut May 2016 #10
Because Trump would have a hard time attacking Sanders? JohnnyRingo May 2016 #11
Unfortunately, Hillary is not only carrying her baggage, she's carrying Bill's as well. jalan48 May 2016 #12
And Bernie's carrying Jane's. pnwmom May 2016 #27
ahh yes PatrynXX May 2016 #35
The person I was responding to was saying Hillary would carry Bill's baggage. pnwmom May 2016 #37
Bill isn't just Hillary's spouse. dchill May 2016 #105
He was a very popular President. It drove the Rethugs crazy that he was even more pnwmom May 2016 #106
Fail. Bill's got big time baggage. Jane's baggage is minor league stuff compared to his. jalan48 May 2016 #38
In your opinion. Since Jane's touted as his top advisor, her grandiose and hugely pnwmom May 2016 #51
Monica Lewinsky and impeachment. Burlington College? Nah, not even close. jalan48 May 2016 #61
Any Dem who was alive and paying attention during the impeachment proceedings pnwmom May 2016 #62
I don't disagree it was a witch hunt. jalan48 May 2016 #63
So? Hillary behaved admirably throughout the whole humiliating experience. pnwmom May 2016 #64
BJs from a young intern in the White House-extreme baggage. jalan48 May 2016 #74
She was an adult and a college graduate who to this day insists the relationship was consensual pnwmom May 2016 #81
Bill wasn't a 40+ sexist pig preying on a young woman? jalan48 May 2016 #85
Interesting that you aged her down. She was between 22 and 24 during the course of pnwmom May 2016 #87
Glad to hear it's all been worked out and that 90's baggage has been jettisoned. jalan48 May 2016 #88
It has for anyone who remembers that farce. I suspect you are young enough that you didn't pnwmom May 2016 #89
You are wrong. I lived through it and followed it. jalan48 May 2016 #91
It WAS a right wing conspiracy. Yes, Monica was real and Bill did mess around with her. pnwmom May 2016 #92
Ken Starr was a perv I think. He seemed to enjoy relating the salacious details. jalan48 May 2016 #97
I don't see why it should affect Hillary anymore than Jane's baggage will affect Bernie. pnwmom May 2016 #100
so why did he lie about it appalachiablue May 2016 #130
Either he lied because he didn't want to admit it to the world and Hillary OR pnwmom May 2016 #131
failing to acknowledge; that's good appalachiablue May 2016 #129
Trump is making it front 840high May 2016 #66
Her super delegates better put on their thinking caps. Pauldg47 May 2016 #94
Better than all the video with lies that Hillary has told. eom zalinda May 2016 #13
The only thing that can turn around an anti-Trump vote... JohnnyRingo May 2016 #14
Communist is not the big scarey thing that it was back in the day zalinda May 2016 #16
So is this why you support Hillary? KPN May 2016 #21
No, that's why Bernie can't win JohnnyRingo May 2016 #99
Can't argue with your point about the average voter. KPN May 2016 #104
Very reasonable point... JohnnyRingo May 2016 #108
*cough*tax increase*cough*socialized medicine*cough*welfare*cough* jmowreader May 2016 #107
"Disheveled little bundle" JohnnyRingo May 2016 #109
You know who he actually reminds me of? jmowreader May 2016 #110
Bernie farts rainbows Lil Missy May 2016 #111
That's dust. JohnnyRingo May 2016 #122
.... Lil Missy May 2016 #123
I don't think only Bernie can win but Hillary had better take the campaign seriously. Kablooie May 2016 #26
Relentless with who? skepticscott May 2016 #33
Millions of voters and hundreds of delegates disagree with you. She's the one. pnwmom May 2016 #18
We shall see. KPN May 2016 #23
We already know. FarPoint May 2016 #25
The Rethugs only hope was that Bernie would somehow be the nominee. AlbertCat May 2016 #39
"Everyone who would vote for a commie" would not comprise a winning coalition. nt pnwmom May 2016 #43
a winning coalition. AlbertCat May 2016 #46
She will. He won't. pnwmom May 2016 #50
No they would just run the video of Bernie promising to raise taxes redstateblues May 2016 #47
bookmarking for later. I agree with the premise, though. nt silvershadow May 2016 #28
Democratic voters do not agree with you. That's why Sanders lost despite his shameful pandering. Trust Buster May 2016 #31
Democratic voters do not agree with you. AlbertCat May 2016 #42
Oh snap. FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #71
Let me guess, without even watching this... liberal N proud May 2016 #34
Whenever I see the little rolling laughing man emoticon, I know whoever posted it is a child. Gene Debs May 2016 #48
This message was self-deleted by its author liberal N proud May 2016 #112
Is that the best you have? liberal N proud May 2016 #113
I am saving this for after Clinton wins the Presidency. wisteria May 2016 #40
This afternoon I went to our town community center for lunch underthematrix May 2016 #49
Love to hear BSS say Hillary is a weak candidate. What does that make Bernie? redstateblues May 2016 #44
So let me ask this, in all seriousness. What exactly is it about Hillary Clinton that makes Gene Debs May 2016 #52
Crickets.... 840high May 2016 #67
At least I was expecting crickets. Gene Debs May 2016 #68
For me, it's her ability to frustrate her detractors. LuvLoogie May 2016 #79
What the hell are you talking about? Do you have any idea how utterly nonsensical Gene Debs May 2016 #86
I also think she has a great sense of humor and an infectious laugh. LuvLoogie May 2016 #90
This is the sound of something whose nest should be destroyed before it lays eggs. I guess Gene Debs May 2016 #93
Shame on you! Birdie Sanders wouldn't like that at all! LuvLoogie May 2016 #95
Welcome to my ignore list. Gene Debs May 2016 #96
Still waitin' for an answer. Gene Debs May 2016 #124
The real scary thing about a Hillary-Donald SheilaT May 2016 #69
Sadly, this is probably a very accurate prediction. FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #72
And even more sadly, the Hillarybots SheilaT May 2016 #76
and neither do you jamese777 May 2016 #84
And how many voters will be so offended by the nastiness that they'll be completely turned off Rhiannon12866 May 2016 #98
Grrr. Bill Clinton did NOT win because of Ross Perot. ptownbro May 2016 #73
If this isn't an attack on our own nominee then it belongs in GD: Primary. RandySF May 2016 #77
Scott Adams, the cartoonist behind Dilbert, has a very odd article regarding Trump and what he mikehiggins May 2016 #101
Donald Trump will win in a landslide. *The mind behind ‘Dilbert’ explains why. PADemD May 2016 #102
Especially if your name is Donald Drumpf ffr May 2016 #103
I'm very much worried that you may be right. thucythucy May 2016 #126
Who is the right than? ElenaElena May 2016 #127
Bernie Pastiche423 May 2016 #128

Response to FarPoint (Reply #1)

KPN

(15,677 posts)
17. Now there's the right reason to vote for someone.
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:23 PM
May 2016

Doesn't matter what the candidate's positions, record, style, philosophy are. If the Party nominates him/her, its just gotta be the right choice. Because the other alternatives are always worse.

Is it just me, or do others see the mental handcuffs at work in this thinking?



FarPoint

(12,484 posts)
20. I have backed Hillary Clinton since 2008.
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:26 PM
May 2016

We had 2 dynamic candidates then...Now, Hillary has the lead and will be our Democratic Nominee... I'm 100% behind the election of President Hillary Clinton.

Response to KPN (Reply #17)

KPN

(15,677 posts)
75. I have been paying attention to the Repugs for quite some time now ...
Mon May 9, 2016, 11:06 PM
May 2016

in both Parties.

You would do well to do the same if you care about the future of our democracy.

Response to KPN (Reply #75)

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
24. well unlike Trump
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:27 PM
May 2016

she hasn't wrapped it up yet so until California has it's say nothings in stone yet. or I'll play Han Solo "Never tell me the odds"

Response to MiaM (Reply #53)

markbark

(1,563 posts)
115. I've voted in every Presidential Election since 1984
Tue May 10, 2016, 08:53 AM
May 2016

.... and every election since 1981 (even when it was a PITA... absentee ballots weren't exactly advertised to us grunts when stationed in Germany)

Once.... just ONCE. I'd like to vote FOR a candidate rather than going with the lesser of two evils.

I guess I'm joining PJ O'Rourke on this one. I'm voting for HRC (if she's the nominee) because I'm faced with the choice between "Wrong on a number of things but sane" versus "Bugfuck nuts"

Response to markbark (Reply #115)

markbark

(1,563 posts)
119. Compared to Drumpf?
Tue May 10, 2016, 10:00 AM
May 2016

There IS no comparison.
Drumpf is Sarah Palin with a penis.
There's no fscking WAY that man should be let anywhere near the levers of power.

That being said, I'm still gonna pull for Bernie until Philly is a done deal.
There are a pile of folks on DU who say that makes me delusional, but they are welcome to drink the accumulated sweat from my left testicle. I thought authoritarianism was the hallmark of the OTHER side of the aisle.

Response to markbark (Reply #119)

Squinch

(51,087 posts)
2. Well, tough toenails, because she is the one who WILL face Donald Trump. You know why?
Mon May 9, 2016, 05:55 PM
May 2016

Because she won the primary.

Response to Gene Debs (Reply #7)

FailureToCommunicate

(14,033 posts)
70. "...it's over. You people are like the tea party."
Mon May 9, 2016, 10:34 PM
May 2016

Tell that to the primary voters in WVa, NJ, California...

I take it you're from a state that has already voted?

Response to FailureToCommunicate (Reply #70)

FailureToCommunicate

(14,033 posts)
114. Ohhh, math skills. SO do keep posting why people in those states shouldn't bother voting because of
Tue May 10, 2016, 07:37 AM
May 2016

"TEH MATH!"

Response to FailureToCommunicate (Reply #114)

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
3. HRC supporters are quite bad at math and are panicked enough to believe anything...
Mon May 9, 2016, 06:02 PM
May 2016

... including how many voters are UNDECIDED.

I know this because I just got off the phone bank for yet another state who will be voting tomorrow (WV)

Want to know how many voters are undecided, but before they hang up, say, "I just don't want Hillary Clinton in"?

The majority of them... that's how many.

Response to Squinch (Reply #9)

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
45. Bernie never had a job til he was 40.
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:50 PM
May 2016

He didn't have a political job until he was 38.

He worked many other jobs before in NY and VT.... like a regular person. This is why he "gets it"... and Hillary doesn't. She was busy being a Republican early on.... and still is.

Response to Squinch (Reply #9)

markbark

(1,563 posts)
116. Snide condescension really helps to unite the party.
Tue May 10, 2016, 08:59 AM
May 2016

....and I'll bet that if HRC falls to the Buffoon come November that you'll be the first to point at the "Bernie Bros" before first looking long and hard in the mirror.

Squinch

(51,087 posts)
121. You mean like "progressives" spreading every right wing smear in the service of a
Tue May 10, 2016, 10:51 AM
May 2016

primary candidate who lost by a landslide unites the party?

Kay. Seems like none of us is really trying that hard to unite the party, doesn't it?

markbark

(1,563 posts)
125. *tweet*
Tue May 10, 2016, 11:38 PM
May 2016

Last edited Wed May 11, 2016, 10:31 AM - Edit history (1)

Ten yard penalty for logical fallacy mixed with classic deflection.

I've spread no smears so I know not to whom you are referring.
The "run along little boy, the "adults" are talking now" attitude is grating (not to mention patently false) and you wonder why folks take issue?

....and anyone who wants to play "more progressive than thou?" Do you REALLY wanna go there? (comparing HRC with Bernie?)

The Hillbot CHORFs are getting pretty thick on the ground around here if someone doubts the inevitability of the coronation

pnwmom

(109,024 posts)
22. Bernie has only gotten 45% of the delegates so far but his math-challenged supporters think
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:26 PM
May 2016

he can manage 65% of the remaining pledged delegates -- including in California, where the latest CNN poll put Hillary 19 points ahead; and NJ, where she is even farther ahead.

Response to pnwmom (Reply #22)

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
29. Yep.
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:29 PM
May 2016

problem is alot of them are angry. couldn't convince someone who's angry even if it was right in front of their face Republicans and Independents and some Democrats love Bernie the youth vote on the Right (the youth Right!) went totally full in on Trump because he's the great deceiver , er well 1 of 2 I know

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
32. read various articles
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:31 PM
May 2016

saying this the better Republican to win. meanwhile Plump is courting the left, right up to raising taxes on the rich . which is not suprise because he's a moderate. He sorta totally destroyed the Tea Party. It might not exist now

Response to RBInMaine (Reply #5)

JohnnyRingo

(18,693 posts)
11. Because Trump would have a hard time attacking Sanders?
Mon May 9, 2016, 06:50 PM
May 2016

I guess there's really nothing in Bernie's record that could be used against him *cough*communist*cough*cough*

pnwmom

(109,024 posts)
27. And Bernie's carrying Jane's.
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:28 PM
May 2016

Jane, whose grandiose plans for Burlington College caused her to take out millions of dollars in loans and drove its finances into the ground.

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
35. ahh yes
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:33 PM
May 2016

attack the women makes it okay . then you harp on us doing the same to Hillary. bonk. Innocent till proven guilty. Unless Iran bought the USA which is possible that and Saudi Arabia tried to do something similar with Clinton and Bush's help (families help) in 2005 it fell thru in 2006 because of the kurfuffle

pnwmom

(109,024 posts)
37. The person I was responding to was saying Hillary would carry Bill's baggage.
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:37 PM
May 2016

So why isn't it fair to mention that Sanders's spouse has plenty of her own baggage?

pnwmom

(109,024 posts)
106. He was a very popular President. It drove the Rethugs crazy that he was even more
Tue May 10, 2016, 02:49 AM
May 2016

popular after the impeachment proceeding than before.

So his political baggage isn't a problem.

P.S. Most of the stuff that DUers think is political baggage -- like signing the Crime Bill that Bernie voted for -- won't be political baggage in the General Election.

pnwmom

(109,024 posts)
51. In your opinion. Since Jane's touted as his top advisor, her grandiose and hugely
Mon May 9, 2016, 09:08 PM
May 2016

unsuccessful plans for Burlington College would certainly be significant.

pnwmom

(109,024 posts)
62. Any Dem who was alive and paying attention during the impeachment proceedings
Mon May 9, 2016, 09:43 PM
May 2016

knows they were nothing but a show, the US version of Les Miserables, with Ken Starr playing the part of Inspector Javert.

Except, instead of having killed a man, Bill was only guilty of failing to disclose his sexual relationship with a consenting adult.

jalan48

(13,910 posts)
63. I don't disagree it was a witch hunt.
Mon May 9, 2016, 09:49 PM
May 2016

Unfortunately, Bill's affair became public and it did happen and was very tawdry.

pnwmom

(109,024 posts)
64. So? Hillary behaved admirably throughout the whole humiliating experience.
Mon May 9, 2016, 10:01 PM
May 2016

The investigations and faux scandals began the minute Bill took office, because the real establishment was so offended that upstart Bill had knocked out George the first.

So there was, in no particular order, the travel office scandal, the Christmas list scandal, the Vince Foster "murder," Rose Hill law firm, Whitewater, and on and on till some Rethug showed up with Paula Jones -- who never proved her allegations, by the way. And then the Rethugs turned their Independent investigator loose to follow up in a whole new direction.

And after years of investigation the best they could come up with was Bill failing to acknowledge that he'd had legal sex with Monica Lewinsky.

And what did Bill do during his Presidency? He turned the country around economically. The years of Bush and Reagan had tripled our national debt but Bill managed to produce budget surpluses by the end of his Presidency. And his popularity after the impeachment was even higher than it had been before. Because the American people couldn't care less about "tawdry."

pnwmom

(109,024 posts)
81. She was an adult and a college graduate who to this day insists the relationship was consensual
Mon May 9, 2016, 11:25 PM
May 2016

and that she initiated it.

jalan48

(13,910 posts)
85. Bill wasn't a 40+ sexist pig preying on a young woman?
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:01 AM
May 2016

It was an infatuated 20 year old's fault? Really?

pnwmom

(109,024 posts)
87. Interesting that you aged her down. She was between 22 and 24 during the course of
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:20 AM
May 2016

their relationship, a smart college graduate who even today, as a middle aged woman, says the relationship was completely consensual.

And she is in the best position to know.

pnwmom

(109,024 posts)
89. It has for anyone who remembers that farce. I suspect you are young enough that you didn't
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:53 AM
May 2016

live through the Ken Starr horror show, as an adult anyway. Am I wrong?

jalan48

(13,910 posts)
91. You are wrong. I lived through it and followed it.
Tue May 10, 2016, 01:00 AM
May 2016

Like Hillary I thought it was a right wing conspiracy. When I found out Bill was engaging in sexual acts with an intern in the White House I was shocked. Is this really the best the Democratic Party has to offer now? Clinton II? No thanks.

pnwmom

(109,024 posts)
92. It WAS a right wing conspiracy. Yes, Monica was real and Bill did mess around with her.
Tue May 10, 2016, 01:02 AM
May 2016

But the whole Ken Starr investigation was a RW conspiracy and a terrible ordeal for hundreds of innocent people who were collateral damage. People like Julie Hiatt Steele. Remember her?

jalan48

(13,910 posts)
97. Ken Starr was a perv I think. He seemed to enjoy relating the salacious details.
Tue May 10, 2016, 01:30 AM
May 2016

But, Bill actually did the things he was accused of with Monica. It's a fact. It won't effect how I will vote but it will effect Hillary. It's just one more reason she could well lose to Trump. Bernie stands a better chance of winning, plus he doesn't carry the baggage the Clinton's do.

pnwmom

(109,024 posts)
100. I don't see why it should affect Hillary anymore than Jane's baggage will affect Bernie.
Tue May 10, 2016, 01:53 AM
May 2016

Jane is supposed to be his closest advisor. Well, this close advisor gave her own college terrible advice, got them into debt for millions of dollars they couldn't pay back -- after submitting false loan documents claiming that a future bequest was a current donation -- and was finally asked to leave.

pnwmom

(109,024 posts)
131. Either he lied because he didn't want to admit it to the world and Hillary OR
Sat May 14, 2016, 09:44 PM
May 2016

(and I think this was a real possibility) he misread the definition of sexual relations. It doesn't specifically mention contact with the mouth or lips. The first time I read it I also thought it didn't apply to oral sex. Then I realized that it did. But I had to read it twice to understand that.

So I don't know whether he lied and I don't much care. No President has EVER been investigated for sex with consenting adults before and Monica Lewinsky did NOT want to be involved in that whole farce. The whole investigation should never have gone in that direction.

JohnnyRingo

(18,693 posts)
14. The only thing that can turn around an anti-Trump vote...
Mon May 9, 2016, 07:17 PM
May 2016

... is a communist.

Now I know Sanders isn't a commie, but I'm more informed than most of the voters. Trump will have a billion dollars to blast the "Bernie is a communist" message into every home in America, and that will frighten the great majority that would sooner watch Big Bang Theory than Meet The Press.

As for Hillary, try telling average people to research Hillary's videos on the internet. Most of the "lies" are her saying things that make her sound like a centrist, the perfect weapon to use against Trump and certainly nothing he wants to advertise. If Hillary loses the entire fringe left and gains in the moderate middle, she wins, if only by being the sane one.

I have to add... in the video, Farron states that Hillary is the 2nd least popular candidate to ever run for office, with Donald Trump as the absolute most unpopular. I don't know how he arrived at that consensus, but I can think of at least one democratic candidate who is less popular than Hillary Clinton, if we tally up the votes cast.

zalinda

(5,621 posts)
16. Communist is not the big scarey thing that it was back in the day
Mon May 9, 2016, 07:39 PM
May 2016

And as for the videos, all the Republicans have to do is run the 2 versions of the 'truth' that Hillary has said, side by side. You don't think there is enough video with Hillary to make at least 25 political commercials?

Hillary supporters here have been throwing out slams against Bernie for months, as soon as Bernie was a threat to Hillary. Nothing has been able to stick on Bernie. Even his foibles are much ado about nothing.

So Hillary is the second least popular candidate to run for office, what an accomplishment! Congratulations to her. Why yes, it makes sense to run her as the Democratic candidate. What could go wrong with this scheme?

Z

And, as always, a Hillary supporter tends to forget that Bernie is one the most respected politicians in the nation.

KPN

(15,677 posts)
21. So is this why you support Hillary?
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:26 PM
May 2016

Because Bernie can't win because in your view he can easily be branded a "communist"?

JohnnyRingo

(18,693 posts)
99. No, that's why Bernie can't win
Tue May 10, 2016, 01:49 AM
May 2016

That was the original point, whether Clinton can win the GE or not. Some seem to think the voters would overlook his socialist roots, or that the American people are too smart to be fooled by dirty campaign tactics. Others even point out that there are videos of Hillary "lying", ignoring that Sanders often addressed himself as a socialist on camera.

Now I know he's not a communist, but you'll never go broke betting on the ignorance of the average voter. Frankly, I support Clinton because she has a chance against the billion dollar GOP smear machine. She's endured it most of her adult life. That and I got totally turned off by the overbearing and "more liberal than thou" nature of the Berniacs here on DU.

His supporters, and Bernie Bros in particular, really haven't done much for recruiting. They helped make up my mind a few months ago.

KPN

(15,677 posts)
104. Can't argue with your point about the average voter.
Tue May 10, 2016, 02:30 AM
May 2016

No offense, but in this particular case, I feel like many Hillary supporters fall into that category.

I don't buy the "she's been tested, she's endured years of GOP attacks, etc." theory. The fact that you've been attacked and are still standing means nothing today ... especially in that she has never done that in a Presidential election. She's got no more advantage than Bernie in that regard in my view. Bernie has more support among Independents than Hillary by far (few Republican leaning Rs would vote for Hillary but many support Bernie over Trump). So basically, that stuff is at best a wash in my view.

The turn off stuff goes both ways to be fair. I was told by many here at DU why Bernie couldn't possibly win way back in December-January -- well before the first primary. Shortly after that, probably by February after the first two primaries in Iowa and NH, I was told by Hillary folks to enjoy chasing rainbows and unicorns while they did the real work of getting a legitimate candidate elected.

I suspect you already had your mind made up about Hillary, just as I did about Bernie before a lot of the name calling began. I don't agree with your arguments for Hillary, and you probably don't buy mine for Bernie. But I'm going with Bernie all the way to the convention.

And I definitely will not vote for Hillary in the GE. In my view, she's just a Republican of a different color based on her record.

JohnnyRingo

(18,693 posts)
108. Very reasonable point...
Tue May 10, 2016, 04:16 AM
May 2016

...until that last sentence.

There's no way I'd refuse to vote for Bernie and let Trump win if he somehow pulled it off. That seems to be one defining difference between the two candidate's supporters. It's absolutely absurd to say that anyone to the right of Bernie is Republican Lite.

It's especially sad that you've already made up your mind to abstain or vote otherwise because you may have noticed that outside the Bernie Bubble, Sanders is already an "also-ran". No one in any major media market is still taking his campaign seriously except on internet forums. Even Bernie himself has alluded that he's just running as a thorn in the side of establishment Democrats.

There's a reason no one prints a bumper sticker that says: "Don't blame me, I threw my vote away".

jmowreader

(50,594 posts)
107. *cough*tax increase*cough*socialized medicine*cough*welfare*cough*
Tue May 10, 2016, 03:52 AM
May 2016

Bernie is truly a dream candidate. He is everything bad the Republicans have ever said about Democrats all rolled up into one disheveled little bundle. The Republicans won't have to make up lies about how Bernie's going to raise your taxes, give away a ton of free stuff and execute a government takeover of half the economy...because all those things are in Bernie's campaign platform.

JohnnyRingo

(18,693 posts)
109. "Disheveled little bundle"
Tue May 10, 2016, 04:25 AM
May 2016

I hate to admit how much physical image matters in presidential campaigns, but it's true. Looking good in a suit is part of what we see as a requisite to the office. We don't elect people who look like a community college English professor.

True as well that the billion dollar GOP hit machine would eat Bernie alive if he wasn't so useful to them at the moment. Some foolishly seem to think Sanders is unassailable.

jmowreader

(50,594 posts)
110. You know who he actually reminds me of?
Tue May 10, 2016, 04:49 AM
May 2016

This is Sir Martyn Poliakoff, who runs the Chemistry Department at the University of Nottingham in England.



Glasses, fucked-up hair (which Sir Martyn loves to joke about)...he's like Bernie's brother who made something of himself.

Kablooie

(18,647 posts)
26. I don't think only Bernie can win but Hillary had better take the campaign seriously.
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:28 PM
May 2016

I think Bernie would probably have an easier time than Hillary but the mathematical odds of Bernie winning are so small that I expect Hillary to be our candidate.

It's going to be a horrific race. Two candidates, neither popular with the general public. Trump wallowing in personal attacks will force Hillary on the defensive and the only way out is to attack Trump in like form and try to put him on the defense. The problem with that is Trump doesn't have to defend himself because apparently any scandal you throw at him is ignored by his supporters. If they found a cache of children's skeletons under his house it probably wouldn't affect his voters.

At least it will be one for the history books.
Either candidate winning will set a new precedent.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
33. Relentless with who?
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:31 PM
May 2016

Women? Blacks? Hispanics? Intelligent people?

Saying that "Only Bernie can Win" is delusional and disconnected from reality. Bernie isn't even beating Hillary.

pnwmom

(109,024 posts)
18. Millions of voters and hundreds of delegates disagree with you. She's the one.
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:24 PM
May 2016

The Rethugs only hope was that Bernie would somehow be the nominee.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
39. The Rethugs only hope was that Bernie would somehow be the nominee.
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:43 PM
May 2016

They can't WAIT for Hillary!

So much baggage! Like someone else said...plus her husband's! There are so many targets all over her pant suits! They've been preparing for this for decades!


They wouldn't know what to do with Sanders. They'd scream "COMMIE" and everyone who would vote for a liberal in the 1st place will just go .

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
47. No they would just run the video of Bernie promising to raise taxes
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:51 PM
May 2016

On the middle class. Last Dem to do that was Mondale. He won one state

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
42. Democratic voters do not agree with you.
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:45 PM
May 2016

Democratic voters are not the only ones voting in the general.

liberal N proud

(60,352 posts)
34. Let me guess, without even watching this...
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:32 PM
May 2016

The man who is lost to her by a large number is the right man for the task?



Response to Gene Debs (Reply #48)

 

wisteria

(19,581 posts)
40. I am saving this for after Clinton wins the Presidency.
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:44 PM
May 2016

She is the strongest, and the most vetted candidate to take on Trump. Add that to her experience, and knowledge, and she is in the best position to take Trump on.

underthematrix

(5,811 posts)
49. This afternoon I went to our town community center for lunch
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:54 PM
May 2016

and all I saw were Hillary signs everywhere in my small NorCal suburban town. Didn't see any other political signage.

Exciting times! I'm so excited about casting my DEM ballot! #ImWithHer

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
44. Love to hear BSS say Hillary is a weak candidate. What does that make Bernie?
Mon May 9, 2016, 08:47 PM
May 2016

What is worse than weak? Maybe the weakest. He couldn't even win his own party's nomination

 

Gene Debs

(582 posts)
52. So let me ask this, in all seriousness. What exactly is it about Hillary Clinton that makes
Mon May 9, 2016, 09:11 PM
May 2016

her most breathless supporters so on fire to see her become President? And I mean something substantive, not the vague sense that she's "awesome" that seems to be the cornerstone of so many of her supporters' convictions.

Is it her trade policy? Because that sucks. Is it her foreign policy experience? Because that's nothing to be proud of either. Is it her stances on minimum wage and income inequality and gay rights? Because she came late to all those parties, too, and when she got there you could tell she still wants to be somewhere else. Is it because she's a woman? if that's the case, I can only conclude that they'd be equally happy with Carly Fiorina or Sarah Palin. Is it her pledge to "take on" Wall Street? Because that one's laughable on its face.

So please tell me, because I don't get it.

LuvLoogie

(7,073 posts)
79. For me, it's her ability to frustrate her detractors.
Mon May 9, 2016, 11:20 PM
May 2016

That gregarious work ethic that leaves people whining, wishing, and dripping with sweat.

 

Gene Debs

(582 posts)
86. What the hell are you talking about? Do you have any idea how utterly nonsensical
Tue May 10, 2016, 12:06 AM
May 2016

and completely substance-free that post is?

Seriously, go back and read what you just wrote, and then see if you wanna try again.

 

Gene Debs

(582 posts)
93. This is the sound of something whose nest should be destroyed before it lays eggs. I guess
Tue May 10, 2016, 01:07 AM
May 2016

I'll continue to wait for that substantive answer. I can't say I ever expect to get it.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
69. The real scary thing about a Hillary-Donald
Mon May 9, 2016, 10:30 PM
May 2016

GE, is that Donald will spend 90% of his time being totally vulgar, disprespectful, mysogynist, and rude beyond words to her. He will not bring up anything of substance, such as her policies or anything she's actually done in the past. He'll call her ugly (he thinks all women who aren't 22 year old bimbos are ugly), stupid, he'll spend a lot of time on Bill's infidelities, and maybe even complain about how she decorated the White House when she was living there.

And don't for one minute think she'll respond with anything substantive. She'll get sucked into that crap, accuse him of being a sexist pig (although to her credit she'll word it more diplomatically) and never get around to discussing any of her successful past policies, positions, or achievements, let alone put forth her vision for this country going down the road.

It will be a campaign of utter trivial bullshit, and not a single voter will become any more enlightened as to why he or she should actually vote for either person.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
76. And even more sadly, the Hillarybots
Mon May 9, 2016, 11:08 PM
May 2016

are sufficiently delusional that they keep on crowing about how she will wipe the floor with him. They haven't a clue.

jamese777

(546 posts)
84. and neither do you
Mon May 9, 2016, 11:32 PM
May 2016

No one can predict what's going to happen when 135 million people go to the polls six months from now.
What is certain is that thus far Hillary Clinton has gotten 12,561,272 votes and Donald Trump has gotten 10,717,357 votes.

Rhiannon12866

(206,826 posts)
98. And how many voters will be so offended by the nastiness that they'll be completely turned off
Tue May 10, 2016, 01:43 AM
May 2016

And stop paying attention to his so-called campaign? I certainly can't stand to hear one more offensive word from him, turn off the TV or change the channel whenever he appears (which is far too often!). And how many will be so disengaged after all this that they won't even bother to vote??

 

ptownbro

(27 posts)
73. Grrr. Bill Clinton did NOT win because of Ross Perot.
Mon May 9, 2016, 10:43 PM
May 2016

I wish people would stop buying into that made up right wing talking point. If you look at thr poling from back then and remember history correctly (vs the Republican revision) ... Ross Perot was pulling as much votes from Clinton than Bush and in some cases more!

Geesh. Everytime I hear this it's annoying because it's completely made up and false.

Rachael maddow did a very good video on this.


http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/ross-perot-myth-reborn-amid-rumors-third-party-trump-candidacy

mikehiggins

(5,614 posts)
101. Scott Adams, the cartoonist behind Dilbert, has a very odd article regarding Trump and what he
Tue May 10, 2016, 02:08 AM
May 2016

is up to.

I didn't save the link but you could probably find it easily on Google.

Sort of scared me because he brought something up that I'd never heard before.

And that is not all that easy.

thucythucy

(8,132 posts)
126. I'm very much worried that you may be right.
Tue May 10, 2016, 11:43 PM
May 2016

And the prospect of losing this election has me truly terrified.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Hillary Clinton Is Not Th...