Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 09:26 PM Jun 2013

Glenn Greenwald Destroys MSNBC's Attempted Propaganda

Glenn Greenwald Destroys MSNBC's Attempted Propaganda


Guardian reporter Glenn Greenwald, who broke the stories on the NSA's phone and internet surveillance programs last week and helped reveal on Sunday the identity of Edward Snowden, the former CIA employee who is behind the NSA leaks, speaks with Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski about his interviews with Snowden.
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Glenn Greenwald Destroys MSNBC's Attempted Propaganda (Original Post) Catherina Jun 2013 OP
The question wasn't propaganda. Greenwald is an arrogant jerk. Now he will be releasing still_one Jun 2013 #1
Yeah, He Didn't "Destroy" MSNBC..... Grassy Knoll Jun 2013 #3
It says a lot about you that you choose to side with Mika a conservative over Mr. Greenwald and rhett o rick Jun 2013 #13
Awww, Raspberries, Love em ! Grassy Knoll Jun 2013 #16
"Mika a conservative over Mr. Greenwald " grantcart Jun 2013 #39
Mika treated Mr. Greenwald as a hostile witness and not like a guest. rhett o rick Jun 2013 #40
I wouldn't bother to waste my time with either Mika or Greenwald on tape. I will read Greenwald but grantcart Jun 2013 #42
I disagree with your "facts" as you laid them out. Apparently you approve of her attempts rhett o rick Jun 2013 #43
Its your facts that have no basis in reality grantcart Jun 2013 #45
All messingers are arogrant jerks zeemike Jun 2013 #8
Calling Mr. Greenwald names is childish and a poor attempt to distract from the issue. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #12
I call it as I see it, you call it as you see it. Simple as that. The simple fact is it was legal. still_one Jun 2013 #15
SPOT ON!!!! DaDeacon Jun 2013 #20
"The simple fact is that it was legal" whathehell Jun 2013 #25
Some people might find the way you think rather truedelphi Jun 2013 #27
Exactly. whathehell Jun 2013 #28
The fact that something of this nature can even be deemed "Legal" NorthCarolina Jun 2013 #32
I keep hearing that argument nineteen50 Jun 2013 #33
And you know it's "legal" how? There seems to be some question but apparently rhett o rick Jun 2013 #44
Right wing tools focus on the individuals' personalities to distract from the NSA abuses. limpyhobbler Jun 2013 #2
I'm grateful for moments like this when people clearly show which side they're on Catherina Jun 2013 #7
Lets, see I state an personal view, and you say I am a right-wing tool because you don't like it. still_one Jun 2013 #17
I wasn't talking to you. limpyhobbler Jun 2013 #35
Awe, ad-homineming like Greenwald railsback Jun 2013 #26
LOL nah bye nt limpyhobbler Jun 2013 #36
Greenwald calling people questioning his 'reporting' 'WH cronies' railsback Jun 2013 #41
Destroyed?? MikeDE Jun 2013 #4
Welcome to DU. GeorgeGist Jun 2013 #5
LMAO! Catherina Jun 2013 #6
Cool story! Iggo Jun 2013 #9
it's a non-story, that's why the establishment and their apologizers.. frylock Jun 2013 #11
no one is "crapping" their pants. This IS an old story, that is a fact, not an apology. The still_one Jun 2013 #18
Quite a few attempts have been made to amend the Patriot Act. Laelth Jun 2013 #30
shitting. their. pants. frylock Jun 2013 #37
DU is for "liberal thinking people", are you sure you are in the correct place? rhett o rick Jun 2013 #14
So are you saying if someone does not care for mr. greewald, they are not "liberal thinking"? still_one Jun 2013 #19
No what I am saying is that calling him names is childish. It means you probably have nothing rhett o rick Jun 2013 #21
Not to your discussion still_one Jun 2013 #22
Why are you so afraid of looking deeper into this issue? Are you afraid of what daylight may bring? rhett o rick Jun 2013 #23
I am not afraid, but I do not like greenwald, and it was long before this that I made my mind up still_one Jun 2013 #24
It has been around for years nineteen50 Jun 2013 #34
I don't know if he destroyed them - but he did put up a solid and vigorous argument Douglas Carpenter Jun 2013 #10
k&r for exposure. n/t Laelth Jun 2013 #29
Greenwald owned the show MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #31
Glenn is very well-spoken navarth Jun 2013 #38
What's with Scarborough constantly clearing his throat? WhoIsNumberNone Jun 2013 #46

still_one

(92,489 posts)
1. The question wasn't propaganda. Greenwald is an arrogant jerk. Now he will be releasing
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 09:46 PM
Jun 2013

More revelations in the coming weeks. Oh boy, this might be a series like game of thrones, or dexter

So anything mr. Greenwald doesn't like to hear is propaganda




 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
13. It says a lot about you that you choose to side with Mika a conservative over Mr. Greenwald and
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:45 PM
Jun 2013

openness. Pres Obama has prosecuted more than two times the whistle-blowers of all previous presidents. But you dont care about violations of our Constitution you want us to hate Mr. Greenwald.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
39. "Mika a conservative over Mr. Greenwald "
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 01:25 PM
Jun 2013

For the record Mika is a Democrat and Greenwald does not consider himself either a liberal or a Democrat.

Mika for example:



Mika Brzezinski is no poker face, regularly letting her feelings show as she reacts to the stories of the day. But when it comes to emoting, the Morning Joe co-host outdid herself today, reacting to the criticism the panel leveled at Jimmy Carter for his ungracious bashing of the late Ted Kennedy.

In a 60 Minutes interview with Lesley Stahl, a clip from which Morning Joe aired, an embittered Carter flatly says the failure to get national health care during his administration was Ted Kennedy's "fault." Carter accused Kennedy of "deliberately blocking" Carter's proposed legislation, in order to deny him a major legislative achievement.

Mika, daughter of Carter's National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, has a history of defending Carter on the show. Check the video as Mika grimaces in discomfort, and interjects various rebuttals, as her fellow panelists unload on the 39th president.


Read more: http://newsbusters.org/people/mika-brzezinski?page=6#ixzz2W1TeDvcW



Greenwald for example:





http://web.archive.org/web/20070927000806/http://www.workingforchange.com/webgraphics/HowWouldAPatriot_preface.pdf

I held views on some matters that could be defined as conservative, views on others that seemed liberal. But I firmly
believed that our democratic system of government was sufficiently insulated from any real abuse, by our Constitution and by the checks and balances afforded by having three separate but equal branches of government.

. . .

I believed that Islamic extremism posed a serious threat to the country, and I wanted an aggressive response from our government. I was ready to stand behind President Bush and I wanted him to exact vengeance on the perpetrators and find ways to decrease the likelihood of future attacks. During the following two weeks, my confidence in the Bush administration grew as the
president gave a series of serious, substantive, coherent, and eloquent speeches that struck the right balance between aggression and restraint. And I was fully supportive of both the president’s ultimatum to the Taliban and the subsequent invasion of Afghanistan when our demands were not met. Well into 2002, the president’s approval ratings remained in the high 60 percent range, or even above 70 percent, and I was among those who strongly approved of his performance.

. . .

(regarding Bush's invasion of Iraq) I still gave the administration the benefit of the doubt. I believed then that the president was entitled to have his national security judgment deferred to, and to the extent that I was able to develop a definitive view, I accepted
his judgment that American security really would be enhanced by the invasion of this sovereign country.





Greenwald does display a clear hatred of the President and an affection for Ron Paul and for many the former is all you need to be an outstanding liberal and the latter is conveniently forgotten.

In any case Greenwald goes to some lengths to explain that he is not a liberal and this is one time I think we should take him at his word.
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
40. Mika treated Mr. Greenwald as a hostile witness and not like a guest.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 01:57 PM
Jun 2013

She was desperately trying to push an agenda and visibly not happy when she couldnt get him to say what she wanted. She turned to help from that nitwit that could only say that the terrorists make us spy.

Mika tried to equate Snowden with Manning. When Mr. Greenwald pointed out that the criticism of Manning was that he flooded the media with data without knowing the damage it might do. Greenwald tried to point out that Snowden and journalists carefully review the data released and didnt release any data that might be damaging to the nation or operatives. Mika kept trying to interrupt this explanation as it clearly didnt fit her agenda.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
42. I wouldn't bother to waste my time with either Mika or Greenwald on tape. I will read Greenwald but
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 03:59 PM
Jun 2013

have found him prone to cherry pick his facts so I prefer to read exactly what he says.

In any case my point is that you castigated the poster for choosing a conservative over a liberal or a Republican over a Democrat and you felt that it "said a lot about the poster" that they would make that choice.

Now that you know that your facts are wrong and in fact you are the one that is choosing a libertarian Rand supporter who hates Obama over an established Democratic pundit (whose father served in the Carter administration) do you still feel that it "says a lot to the poster" or do you think it might be judicious to change your rather patronizing comment that was based on an assumption that you were 100% wrong on?

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
43. I disagree with your "facts" as you laid them out. Apparently you approve of her attempts
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 04:10 PM
Jun 2013

at "killing the messenger". She was rude and tried to direct his answers.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
45. Its your facts that have no basis in reality
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 04:26 PM
Jun 2013



Your words:

It says a lot about you that you choose to side with Mika a conservative over Mr. Greenwald



I am aware that many feel that hatred for Obama and criticism of national security seems like bona fides for a liberal but Greenwald, in the preface to his book, admits to warm and supportive feelings for President Bush up to and after the invasion of Iraq. He consistently praises Rand.

Your characterization of Greenwald as a liberal is not consistent with his own words where he says "some of my positions are conservative".

The issue is not Mika's treatment of Greenwald, which may or may not be true (but I find it odd that Greenwald, a well established litigation attorney graduating from the hard knock NYU law school would have difficulty with a television personality) but your patronizing comments to Grassy knoll and your expansive view of being able to judge that his/her comment "says a lot" about the poster indicating some type of deep moral disapprobation based on favoring a 'conservative' over a 'liberal' when in fact the reverse is true.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
8. All messingers are arogrant jerks
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:12 PM
Jun 2013

that is why they must be shot.
Squealing on them when they are doing there crimes is proof of their arrogance and jerkiness

still_one

(92,489 posts)
15. I call it as I see it, you call it as you see it. Simple as that. The simple fact is it was legal.
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:55 PM
Jun 2013

that isn't a distraction, and if people had made an issue of it when the patriot act was passed, or they turned out to vote this would not be an issue today.

Greenwald is another Chris Hitchinson, and the names that I apply to both of them is how I feel.

I also think Nader is another one who believes in his own importance beyond what it really is.



whathehell

(29,100 posts)
25. "The simple fact is that it was legal"
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 03:14 AM
Jun 2013

Many things were legal (child labor and poll taxes come to mind) before enlightened people made them illegal.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
27. Some people might find the way you think rather
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 03:27 AM
Jun 2013

"Deep." I mean, this program is funding an awful lot of Mercedes and upscale homes and people who point out that "just because it's legal might not mean it's moral or desirable" need to realize how sad it would be if all those folks at Booz had to get real jobs.

whathehell

(29,100 posts)
28. Exactly.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 04:00 AM
Jun 2013

I don't know about the "deep" part (I assume you were being facetious) but you're right.

Just because something is "legal" in one country or another, at a given period of time, doesn't mean it's

morally correct, or that it will remain legal.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
32. The fact that something of this nature can even be deemed "Legal"
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 08:59 AM
Jun 2013

is the most troubling aspect. Is this America or China?

nineteen50

(1,187 posts)
33. I keep hearing that argument
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 11:00 AM
Jun 2013

it was legal as if that makes it right and we should just forget that our privacy and fourth amendment is nothing but shite paper.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
44. And you know it's "legal" how? There seems to be some question but apparently
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 04:12 PM
Jun 2013

you have the truth. Where did you learn the truth?

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
2. Right wing tools focus on the individuals' personalities to distract from the NSA abuses.
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 09:52 PM
Jun 2013

Lots of right wing tools inhabit Democrat web forums.

still_one

(92,489 posts)
17. Lets, see I state an personal view, and you say I am a right-wing tool because you don't like it.
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:59 PM
Jun 2013

Whose tool are you, that you decide that you should personally insult me. I am not a public figure, nor do I make policy. I just have an opinion like you, but I do not go saying you are "someones tool"

You don't like my opinion, that is your choice, but I won't call you a tool.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
35. I wasn't talking to you.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 11:14 AM
Jun 2013

Was talking about people trying to discredit Greenwald & Snowden with personal smears.

People who do that are right-wing tools.

I don't even know what you wrote.

MikeDE

(9 posts)
4. Destroyed??
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 09:54 PM
Jun 2013

This guy didn't destroy anything except his own reputation. Glen Greenwald is an out right asshole who if you look at his past reporting is never about the story just about protecting it or himself. This story has been around for years and your a moron or just wasn't paying attention that it was going on. The only people upset this now are Republicans who are only interested in damaging the president and Democrats who for what ever reason are upset that someone maybe reading or listening in or their thoughts about the reality show of the day. By the way before you attack me, I have voted democrat in every Election along with monetary doantions and volunteer work.

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
6. LMAO!
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:05 PM
Jun 2013
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
11. it's a non-story, that's why the establishment and their apologizers..
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:32 PM
Jun 2013

are shitting their pants. yep.

still_one

(92,489 posts)
18. no one is "crapping" their pants. This IS an old story, that is a fact, not an apology. The
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 11:06 PM
Jun 2013

question is after 13 years why has one made an attempt to change the Patriot Act?

I can tell you right now, the current congress has no inclination to change, and the only way that will happen is electing people who will, but until a significant number of people with a common goal can organize, it isn't going to happen

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
30. Quite a few attempts have been made to amend the Patriot Act.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 07:09 AM
Jun 2013

The enlightened amendments failed. You are right to say that, for the moment, Congress has no desire to amend the act, but with enough public pressure (both domestic and foreign) this could change very rapidly.

I hope the President chooses wisely, gets out in front of this issue, and sides with the people and the Constitution.

Here's why I think it would be wise for him to do so: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022979078

-Laelth

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
14. DU is for "liberal thinking people", are you sure you are in the correct place?
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 10:48 PM
Jun 2013

Calling Mr. Greenwald names is not very open minded. It's childish and an attempt at distraction from the issue.

still_one

(92,489 posts)
19. So are you saying if someone does not care for mr. greewald, they are not "liberal thinking"?
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 11:09 PM
Jun 2013

Because I can refer you to a lot of posts on DU, where Greenwald is not thought very highly of.

I don't agree with your litmus test

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
21. No what I am saying is that calling him names is childish. It means you probably have nothing
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 11:15 PM
Jun 2013

to add to the discussion.

The issue is what is our government doing spying on us?


 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
23. Why are you so afraid of looking deeper into this issue? Are you afraid of what daylight may bring?
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 11:42 PM
Jun 2013

This isnt about Mr. Greenwald and calling him names is a pathetic way of trying to distract from the real issue.

Is our government spying on us? You seem to want to put your fingers in your ears, close your eyes and scream expletives at Mr. Greenwald.

If you favor a democracy then you should at least keep an open mind and when someone reports possible Constitutional violations, you should want it investigated in the open and straightened out one way or the other. Of course there is the other choice. To live in ignorant bliss as offered by authoritarian rule. It does make you life easier. Let Big Brother do your thinking.

"Fascism is painless, it takes on many changes..."

still_one

(92,489 posts)
24. I am not afraid, but I do not like greenwald, and it was long before this that I made my mind up
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 12:51 AM
Jun 2013

As far as regarding the NSA issues, by all means, it is way over due to being discussed, but greenwald is no hero to me, he is a publicity hound, and until he shows some real substance instead of what we have already known for years, he is just the little boy crying wolf

As far as constitutional violations, that is not a done deal either. I can almost guarantee that congress won't do squat about it, and I am a little dubious about the Supreme Court doing something about it since they have allowed the patriot act to stand


nineteen50

(1,187 posts)
34. It has been around for years
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 11:06 AM
Jun 2013

so lets forget it and kòu tóu to the power elite and just go back to our porridge. Could I have more please?

navarth

(5,927 posts)
38. Glenn is very well-spoken
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 01:07 PM
Jun 2013

and I am a bit dismayed to read people calling him a jerk. I've seen him speak a number of times and he's never been a jerk. Makes me wonder about the people calling him names.

WhoIsNumberNone

(7,875 posts)
46. What's with Scarborough constantly clearing his throat?
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 02:59 AM
Jun 2013

I assume that's also him shuffling papers and tapping his mic, too- But only while Greenwald is talking.

And don't even get me started on that "no way the Congress would have passed this in 2001" bullshit...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Glenn Greenwald Destroys ...