Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(131,276 posts)
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 04:49 PM Jun 2014

Inequality Is Not Inevitable by Joseph Stiglitz

AN insidious trend has developed over this past third of a century. A country that experienced shared growth after World War II began to tear apart, so much so that when the Great Recession hit in late 2007, one could no longer ignore the fissures that had come to define the American economic landscape. How did this “shining city on a hill” become the advanced country with the greatest level of inequality?

One stream of the extraordinary discussion set in motion by Thomas Piketty’s timely, important book, “Capital in the Twenty-First Century,” has settled on the idea that violent extremes of wealth and income are inherent to capitalism. In this scheme, we should view the decades after World War II — a period of rapidly falling inequality — as an aberration.

This is actually a superficial reading of Mr. Piketty’s work, which provides an institutional context for understanding the deepening of inequality over time. Unfortunately, that part of his analysis received somewhat less attention than the more fatalistic-seeming aspects.. .

Over the past year and a half, The Great Divide, a series in The New York Times for which I have served as moderator, has also presented a wide range of examples that undermine the notion that there are any truly fundamental laws of capitalism. The dynamics of the imperial capitalism of the 19th century needn’t apply in the democracies of the 21st. We don’t need to have this much inequality in America.

Our current brand of capitalism is an ersatz capitalism. For proof of this go back to our response to the Great Recession, where we socialized losses, even as we privatized gains. Perfect competition should drive profits to zero, at least theoretically, but we have monopolies and oligopolies making persistently high profits. C.E.O.s enjoy incomes that are on average 295 times that of the typical worker, a much higher ratio than in the past, without any evidence of a proportionate increase in productivity.

If it is not the inexorable laws of economics that have led to America’s great divide, what is it? The straightforward answer: our policies and our politics.

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/06/27/inequality-is-not-inevitable/?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=c-column-top-span-region®ion=c-column-top-span-region&WT.nav=c-column-top-span-region

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Inequality Is Not Inevitable by Joseph Stiglitz (Original Post) elleng Jun 2014 OP
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #1
You're welcome, Joe. elleng Jun 2014 #2
I believe this is important as well. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #3
Another, greater man completed an 18 yr, 2,500 page analysis of capitalism and disagrees. fasttense Jun 2014 #4
It is at least current, however. elleng Jun 2014 #5
True that. n/t fasttense Jun 2014 #7
... Scuba Jun 2014 #6
 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
4. Another, greater man completed an 18 yr, 2,500 page analysis of capitalism and disagrees.
Sun Jun 29, 2014, 07:44 PM
Jun 2014

Marx took 18 years and wrote over 2,500 pages analyzing capitalism and he came to the conclusion that numerous, very fatal flaws are inherit in that economic system.

I doubt Mr. Piketty's work is as extensive or as thorough.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Inequality Is Not Inevita...