The Fog Machine of War - Chelsea Manning
The process of limiting press access to a conflict begins when a reporter applies for embed status. All reporters are carefully vetted by military public affairs officials. This system is far from unbiased. Unsurprisingly, reporters who have established relationships with the military are more likely to be granted access.
Less well known is that journalists whom military contractors rate as likely to produce favorable coverage, based on their past reporting, also get preference. This outsourced favorability rating assigned to each applicant is used to screen out those judged likely to produce critical coverage.Reporters who succeeded in obtaining embed status in Iraq were then required to sign a media ground rules agreement. Army public affairs officials said this was to protect operational security, but it also allowed them to terminate a reporters embed without appeal.
The embedded reporter program, which continues in Afghanistan and wherever the United States sends troops, is deeply informed by the militarys experience of how media coverage shifted public opinion during the Vietnam War. The gatekeepers in public affairs have too much power: Reporters naturally fear having their access terminated, so they tend to avoid controversial reporting that could raise red flags.
The existing program forces journalists to compete against one another for special access to vital matters of foreign and domestic policy. Too often, this creates reporting that flatters senior decision makers. A result is that the American publics access to the facts is gutted, which leaves them with no way to evaluate the conduct of American officials.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/06/15/opinion/sunday/chelsea-manning-the-us-militarys-campaign-against-media-freedom.html?referrer=
elleng
(131,253 posts)octoberlib
(14,971 posts)Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)So we read and we watched all the 'specially selected news
And we learned so much more 'bout the good guys