Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jgo

(932 posts)
Mon Nov 20, 2023, 10:19 AM Nov 2023

On This Day: DOJ sues Ma Bell, leading to breakup of conglomerate - Nov. 20, 1974

(edited from article)
"
20 November 1974: the US government launches an antitrust suit against AT&T

On this day in 1974, the US government launch an antitrust suit against AT&T to break its stranglehold on the American telephone network.
"
https://moneyweek.com/415954/20-november-1974-an-antitrust-suit-against-att

(edited from Wikipedia)
"
The Bell System

The Bell System was a system of telecommunication companies, led by the Bell Telephone Company and later by the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T), that dominated the telephone services industry in North America for over 100 years from its creation in 1877 until its antitrust breakup in 1983. The system of companies was often colloquially called Ma Bell (as in "Mother Bell " ), as it held a vertical monopoly over telecommunication products and services in most areas of the United States and Canada. At the time of the breakup of the Bell System in the early 1980s, it had assets of $150 billion (equivalent to $420 billion in 2022) and employed over one million people.

Beginning in the 1910s, American antitrust regulators had been observing and accusing the Bell System of abusing its monopoly power, and had brought legal action multiple times over the decades. In 1974 the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice brought a lawsuit against Bell claiming violations of the Sherman Act. In 1982, anticipating that it could not win, AT&T agreed to a Justice Department-mandated consent decree that settled the lawsuit and ordered it to break itself up into seven "Regional Bell Operating Companies" (known as "The Baby Bells " ). This ended the existence of the conglomerate in 1984. The Baby Bells became independent companies and several of them are large corporations today.

Breakup of the Bell System

The breakup of the Bell System was mandated on January 8, 1982, by a consent decree providing that AT&T Corporation would, as had been initially proposed by AT&T, relinquish control of the Bell Operating Companies, which had provided local telephone service in the United States. This effectively took the monopoly that was the Bell System and split it into entirely separate companies that would continue to provide telephone service. AT&T would continue to be a provider of long-distance service, while the now-independent Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs), nicknamed the "Baby Bells", would provide local service, and would no longer be directly supplied with equipment from AT&T subsidiary Western Electric.

This divestiture was initiated in 1974 when the United States Department of Justice filed United States v. AT&T, an antitrust lawsuit against AT&T. At the time, AT&T had substantial control over the United States' communications infrastructure. Not only was it the sole telephone provider throughout most of the country, its subsidiary Western Electric produced much of its equipment. Relinquishing ownership of Western Electric was one of the Justice Department’s primary demands.

Believing that it was about to lose the suit, AT&T proposed an alternative: its breakup. It proposed that it retain control of Western Electric, Yellow Pages, the Bell trademark, Bell Labs, and AT&T Long Distance. It also proposed that it be freed from a 1956 antitrust consent decree, then administered by Judge Vincent P. Biunno in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, that barred it from participating in the general sale of computers (retreat from international markets, relinquish ownership in Bell Canada, and Northern Electric a Western Electric subsidiary). In return, it proposed to give up ownership of the local operating companies. This last concession, it argued, would achieve the government's goal of creating competition in supplying telephone equipment and supplies to the operative companies. The settlement was finalized on January 8, 1982, with some changes ordered by the decree court: the regional holding companies got the Bell trademark, Yellow Pages, and about half of Bell Labs.

Effective January 1, 1984, the Bell System's many member companies were variously merged into seven independent "Regional Holding Companies", also known as Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs), or "Baby Bells". This divestiture reduced the book value of AT&T by approximately 70%.
"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_System
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breakup_of_the_Bell_System

---------------------------------------------------------

On This Day: Pres. Washington backs Britain amid cries of senility, impeachment - Nov. 19, 1794
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1016368528

On This Day: 15 women arrested for voting, landmark trial follows - November 18, 1872
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1016368443

On This Day: Elizabethan era, considered Golden Age, begins - Nov. 17, 1558
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1016368418

On This Day: All twelve Federal Reserve Banks open on the same day - Nov. 16, 1914
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1016368377

On This Day: Sherman begins March to the Sea - Nov. 15, 1864
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1016368333

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On This Day: DOJ sues Ma Bell, leading to breakup of conglomerate - Nov. 20, 1974 (Original Post) jgo Nov 2023 OP
at and t now is sbc global rebranded as att needs to be broken up again. wont happen. AllaN01Bear Nov 2023 #1
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»On This Day: DOJ sues Ma ...