Opinion: Who elects these clowns, exactly? As it turns out, almost none of us. - Karen Tumulty WaPo
Why does this keep happening? Why does the House keep finding itself in a situation in which a handful of clownish nihilists are calling the shots for their supposed leaders and risking the economic stability of the country while they are at it?
There are a couple of familiar forces that put the chaos caucus in charge: the Republicans razor-thin majority; the fact that Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) is beholden to the tiny minority for the gavel that it took 15 ballots for him to claim and thus to the extremism that has come to define the Republican Party in the Trump era. So it is appropriate to ask: To whom are these agents of havoc actually accountable? A surprisingly small sliver of voters, it turns out.
These days, only 82 of the 435 House districts across the country are competitive enough that both parties start out with a decent shot at winning, according to the Cook Political Reports David Wasserman. That is only half the number of swing districts that existed in 1999, and it has effectively eliminated much of the incentive that the two parties once had to find middle ground on contentious issues. Members of Congress know that playing to instincts and impulses of their populist bases are their surest tickets to reelection, and that they will have little protection if they dont.
You can blame aggressive gerrymandering, which plays a big role. But Wasserman and others say the greater driver of this realignment is a self-sorting of the electorate into like-minded communities, where Democratic voters are concentrated in cities that have turned deeper blue while Republicans are spread out across exurbs and rural areas that have become more reliably red.
Whatever the reason, the reality is that the vast majority of congressional elections are decided in the primaries. And that, as it turns out, puts outsize power in the hands of a tiny minority of highly engaged and intense partisans who bother to show up and vote in those often overlooked contests.
More..
https://wapo.st/3LL84lV (free)
relayerbob
(6,544 posts)the little towns with. nothing and no future, stripping them of their best and brightest. I've seen the self-sorting in progress, and it's the number one problem we have with the Senate right now, even moreso than the House, as States like Wyoming and West Virginia have a huge impbalance in voting power over States like California or New York
SharonAnn
(13,775 posts)for retirement, there was not the "vibrant core" of younger up-and-coming people and businesses here.
Just the "old mill families" who've run the towns around here for nearly 100 years, people beholden to them, and younger people on disability.
The best and brightest leave. Sometimes they come back to retire, having made their money and career elsewhere.
Metaphorical
(1,603 posts)Make all House Seats at-large seats and choose the president by popular vote.
I know, I know, won't happen, but it's what needs to happen.
Sneederbunk
(14,291 posts)BOSSHOG
(37,055 posts)The only reason the electoral college exists is to give the bad guys a chance. That scenario sadly has been proven.