Does the US Navy have its robot-warship concept all wrong?
Related thread: https://www.democraticunderground.com/1016245768
From https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2020/01/10/does-the-us-navy-have-its-robot-warship-concept-all-wrong/
By: David B. Larter ? 3 days ago
The Navy's plans for a large unmanned surface vessel should look less like a big Sea Hunter, shown, and a bit more like a traditional corvette, according to a new study from the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.
WASHINGTON The U.S. Navys plans for unleashing robot warships on the worlds oceans may need some work, according to a new study.
The way the Navy describes its planned large unmanned surface vessel, or LUSV, is as an external missile magazine that can significantly boost the number of missile tubes fielded for significantly less money than buying Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, which cost nearly $2 billion per hull.
The problem? China is pumping out warships like its going out of style: A recent photo of a Chinese shipyard taken by an airline passenger showed nine destroyers under construction and an aircraft carrier. In 2018, China surpassed the U.S. Navy as the worlds largest naval force.
That has led the U.S. Navy to aggressively push toward an LUSV equipped with a vertical launching system, or VLS, to get the punch of a missile-shooting frigate for less money.
[...]
C_U_L8R
(44,998 posts)These things look like big lumbering robot targets. Old school.
Blues Heron
(5,931 posts)unreal really. What a waste. All 8 billion of us really need to cooperate from here on out.
marble falls
(57,077 posts)to project power anywhere on the planet.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)including through area-denial in home waters.
marble falls
(57,077 posts)there's not a freaking thing effective thing they could do about it short of initiating nuclear war.
Its headquartered in Yokosuka, Japan; less than five hundred miles from North Korea or China.
My money is on the USN in any sort of naval confrontation with China.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)to do that?
marble falls
(57,077 posts)has developed parity with other world fleets, that they might be a challenge on the white water.
The US uses its fleets around the world for policy reasons, including in the Persian Gulf, the Indian Ocean not because they have the intent to use it but to remind other political entities it is there to use in case of the need to use it.
We rattle sabers with it. If there were a US or an ally's ship confiscated in the Chinese aggressive claims of territorial sovereignty in the South Chinese Seas, where the US has sent warships through to underline our claims that the area is international waters, the 7th Fleet would definitely make a presence. Just like with the Russians in other places there have been "incidents" with Chinese Naval vessels in the South China Seas. The Chinese understand not to push it too far.
NickB79
(19,233 posts)Thats a concern among current and former defense officials and military analysts, one of whom told Breaking Defense earlier this year that in war games simulating great-power conflict in which the United States fights Russia and China, the United States gets its ass handed to it.
snip
It has missiles that can sink ships. It has missiles that can down airplanes. And it has missiles that could theoretically reach U.S. regional bases in Japan and Guam, leaving planes and runways vulnerable to attack. Many Chinese observers suggest that missile strikes on air bases would be part of the opening salvos of a war, notes Rands U.S.-China Military Scorecard. Shutting down such a base even for a matter of days, according to Rand, could be enough to change the course of the conflict.
snip
If the U.S. were to deploy an aircraft carrier near the strait when there was a real possibility of conflict, Brose said, lets put it this way, I wouldnt want to be on that aircraft carrier.
marble falls
(57,077 posts)than anywhere in China.
NickB79
(19,233 posts)A full compliment of support ships didn't prevent the carriers from being hit hard by Chinese anti-ship missiles.