Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,825 posts)
Sun Jan 12, 2020, 01:29 PM Jan 2020

Two States. Eight Textbooks. Two American Stories.

'We analyzed some of the most popular social studies textbooks used in California and Texas. Here’s how political divides shape what students learn about the nation’s history.

The textbooks cover the same sweeping story, from the brutality of slavery to the struggle for civil rights. The self-evident truths of the founding documents to the waves of immigration that reshaped the nation.

The books have the same publisher. They credit the same authors. But they are customized for students in different states, and their contents sometimes diverge in ways that reflect the nation’s deepest partisan divides.

Hundreds of differences — some subtle, others extensive — emerged in a New York Times analysis of eight commonly used American history textbooks in California and Texas, two of the nation’s largest markets.

In a country that cannot come to a consensus on fundamental questions — how restricted capitalism should be, whether immigrants are a burden or a boon, to what extent the legacy of slavery continues to shape American life — textbook publishers are caught in the middle. On these questions and others, classroom materials are not only shaded by politics, but are also helping to shape a generation of future voters.'>>>

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/12/us/texas-vs-california-history-textbooks.html?

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

kimbutgar

(21,103 posts)
4. My old neighbor moved their family from San Francisco to Austin Texas for work
Sun Jan 12, 2020, 03:37 PM
Jan 2020

They came back to visit the neighborhood and a friend who still lived on the block. The mother told me her kids hate Texas and then brought up how the textbooks were different this was last July) She has three school age children who attended public schools and when they do homework it’s nothing like what they did in San Francisco she said it was more dumbed down. She regrets they moved but it would be too expensive to move back.

Lonestarblue

(9,959 posts)
5. The obfuscation isn't just in history books.
Sun Jan 12, 2020, 03:48 PM
Jan 2020

The teaching of history has been whitewashed past the point of recognition in many cases. But other courses are affected also, especially science. The religious right has insisted, and gotten their way in some cases, on teaching the “science” of divine creation as a valid theory alongside evolution. Climate change cannot even be mentioned in books in many red states. And many states prevent schools from teaching real sex education, which is then replaced with the abstinence course called “Just don’t do it, which of course does not work at all. Having worked within the education community my whole career, I’m so frustrated with the state of US education. We need to get the religious nutcases and right-wing politicians out of education so we can educate students for their world, not the mythical world the right wing believes should exist.

erronis

(15,216 posts)
6. Thanks for this heads-up. It is a very revealing piece about how we teach our children.
Sun Jan 12, 2020, 03:57 PM
Jan 2020

As Texas is actually becoming somewhat "modern" and more liberal, I'd love to see comparisons with some of the other southern bible-belt states.

SeattleVet

(5,477 posts)
7. Texas schoolbooks have been a mess for many years...
Sun Jan 12, 2020, 04:13 PM
Jan 2020

in the 60's and 70's there was a couple, Mel and Norma Gabler, that pushed for specific changes in the textbooks used in the state based on their religious beliefs. Since Texas was one of the largest purchaser of textbooks, whatever got into the books there was pretty much by default pushed onto other school districts; at the time they didn't do different editions for different states.

Google them for a LOT of background information about how this one couple shaped what schoolchildren in Texas (and, by extension, children across the country) were taught for many decades.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
8. In college I took women's history
Sun Jan 12, 2020, 04:30 PM
Jan 2020

because it qualified as the American history prerequisite after years of attempting to finish the standard American History course which I hated with a passion.

I ended up loving the women’s history version because it was about the real human history of this country. It served to flesh out what has happened because of migration, because of the effects of all the wars on the people, not just the rote chanting of the wars. It talked about all the ethnic cultures, the Native Americans and the human expansion West and clashes, genocides, displacements and settlements. All races and ethnicities were included because that’s what women’s history is about. It talked about the immigrants and the changes they created and the industrial revolution in societal and human terms. It talked about slavery and the brave Black women who fought it and the Quackers who fought it and who started the feminist movement. It’s the real history which has never been mentioned In the standard American history textbooks or classes.

Aristus

(66,307 posts)
9. I attended public schools in Texas.
Mon Jan 13, 2020, 12:32 PM
Jan 2020

I was nearly an adult before I discovered that the defenders of the Alamo weren't plucky pioneers fighting for freedom, but slave-owners fighting to expand slavery into Mexico, which had recently abolished the practice.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,360 posts)
10. How history textbooks are changed to meet the standards of different states.
Mon Jan 13, 2020, 01:34 PM
Jan 2020
Kevin M. Kruse Retweeted

“Who lives, who dies, who tells your story?”



Terrific @nytimes piece on how history textbooks are changed to meet the standards of different states.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/12/us/texas-vs-california-history-textbooks.html



This is a story long in the making.

If you’ve never read this 1982 @TexasMonthly piece on conservative textbook activists in Texas, check it out:



NOVEMBER 1982

The Guardians Who Slumbereth Not

Meet Mel and Norma Gabler of Longview. They want to tell your children what to read.

BY WILLIAM MARTIN
DATE NOV 1, 1982
ISSUE NOVEMBER 1982

Nothing about the pinkish brick home on the oak-shaded street in Longview distinguished it from its neighbors or suggested that it housed one of the most controversial educational organizations in America. No marker, not even a doorbell plaque, indicated that this was the home of Mel and Norma Gabler and their nonprofit textbook-screening organization, Educational Research Analysts—though a construction-paper stop sign in the window, perhaps placed there by a grandchild, served as an apt symbol of the activities within. A neat young woman met me at the door, led me past a bookshelf crammed with copies of Reader’s Digest and National Geographic into a kitchen-family room, and introduced me to Norma Gabler, who was dressed in the weekday uniform of middle-aged Texas church ladies: a vested pantsuit with a polka-dot blouse. In a few moments Mel Gabler came in from another room, looking less like a celebrated educational gadfly than the retired Exxon clerk he is. I had seen their pictures and read about them for years, but it was still disarming to realize that this quiet man padding about in house slippers and this cheery woman carrying on about a device that makes one cup of brewed coffee—“It is the most amazing thing we have come up with”—are the same folk who cause textbook publishers to quake with anxiety, liberal educators to fume with indignation, and indignant conservative parents to regard them as heroes in the struggle against humanism, communism, evolution, and moral relativity.

“We don’t censor anything,” Norma said, raising the issue I had planned to get into only after covering some less sensitive matters. “We don’t care what the publishers put out. We just don’t have to buy everything they put out. I don’t think that’s wrong. If you have a choice between books, why not get the best?” Critics of the Gablers dismiss that defense as sophistry, insisting that censorship is not defined by the point at which it occurs in the communication process. But whatever one calls their attempts to control or heavily influence the selection and content of textbooks that our children will use in school, the Gablers go about their work with such dedication, thoroughness, and persistence as to make plausible the claim by one censorship expert that they are “the two most powerful people in education today.”

Norma and Mel Gabler entered the field of textbook reform twenty years ago, after their son Jim came home from school disturbed at discrepancies between the 1954 American history text his eleventh-grade class was using and what his parents had taught him. The Gablers compared his text to history books printed in 1885 and 1921 and discovered differences. “Where can you go to get the truth?” Jim asked.

“Well,” Norma told me, “I’m Irish, and that got my Irish up.” When the Gablers approached the superintendent, he explained that the school was permitted to purchase only those textbooks that had been screened and placed on an approved list by the State Board of Education. Then, in one of those casual comments that change history, he suggested, “Why don’t you go to Austin? That’s where you can have some impact.” Norma did indeed go to Austin, and for the past two decades few people have had greater impact on what American schoolchildren read than Mel and Norma Gabler.

{snip}

The 2012 documentary “Revisionaries” does a good job showing the textbook battle in TX.


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Two States. Eight Textboo...