How the Party of Lincoln Became the Party of Racial Backlash
'A few days after the assassination of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., the Republican governor of Maryland, Spiro T. Agnew, strode into a conference room in downtown Baltimore. In the hours after Kings death, violence had broken out in the city; along with Washington and Chicago, it was soon occupied by the United States Army. In response, Agnew called together the black community on April 11 for a frank and far-reaching discussion.
It wasnt a discussion. It was a trap. The governor tore into the crowd for standing by while rioters ransacked stores and set cars on fire. They claimed to speak for racial harmony, he boomed, but when the violence began, You ran.
Within minutes, most of the audience members had stormed out; at the door, they found a scrum of reporters, whom Agnew had tipped off. Within hours, Agnews confrontation was national news; within days, this once-obscure first-time governor was being assailed as a racist by the left and hailed as a rising star in the Republican Party. That summer, Richard Nixon picked him as his running mate.
Fifty years later, we remember Spiro Agnew, if at all, as a bumbling vice president who later pleaded no contest to tax evasion, resigned in disgrace and ended his career funneling military surplus to Saddam Hussein and Nicolae Ceausescu. But his rise during the spring of 1968 is instructive because suddenly it feels so familiar: a white Republican who claimed to speak against radicalism and for the forgotten man, but in fact ran on exacerbating racial animosity. Far from a bit player, Agnew marked a watershed moment in American history, when the Republican Party committed itself to the shift from being the party of Lincoln to the party of white racial backlash.
The shift was no accident. By the late 1960s, the Republicans were in a bind. Black voters, once loyal to the party, had fled to the Democrats, who had largely shed their Southern, racist faction in favor of civil rights liberalism. Racial conservatives in the South and working-class districts in the North were there for the picking, but aligning with outright racists like George Wallace was a dead end; he had an intense following, but he offended moderate voters, especially the millions of whites plowing into Americas postwar suburbs.'>>>
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/31/opinion/sunday/spiro-agnew-mlk.html?
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)because it appeals to racists from every state in the country.
Johnson said that the CRA would cause the Democrats to lose the South for a generation. He read the result but underestimated the pervasive appeal of racial hate.
Civic Justice
(870 posts)elleng
(131,277 posts)history must be taught.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,526 posts)Republicans are attacking public education in multiple ways. Recently, Kentucky legislators slipped a teachers' pension raiding bill through in a sewage bill.
Imagine history taught by Fox & Friends.
elleng
(131,277 posts)nothing like propaganda.