..the dismantling of the administrative state is taking place under Secretary Ben Carson.
Last edited Tue Aug 22, 2017, 02:06 PM - Edit history (1)
this story is devastating---and heartbreaking. Carson is hollowing out HUD---like the State department.
Seems his family --his wife and son are very much involved in the going on's of administrating HUD.
Is Anybody Home at HUD?
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/08/ben-carson-hud-secretary.html
A long-harbored conservative dream the dismantling of the administrative state is taking place under Secretary Ben Carson.
By Alec MacGillis
Photograph by Mark Peterson
August 22, 2017 8:00 am
This story is a collaboration between New York and ProPublica, an independent nonprofit newsroom.
........................................
Now, however, HUD faced an existential crisis. The new presidents thenchief strategist, Steve Bannon, had called in February for the deconstruction of the administrative state. It was not hard to guess that, for a White House that swept to power on a wave of racially tinged rural resentment and anti-welfare sentiment, high on the demolition list might be a department with urban in its name. The administrations preliminary budget outline had already signaled deep cuts for HUD. And Donald Trump had chosen to lead the department someone with zero experience in government or social policy the nominee whose unsuitability most mirrored Trumps lack of preparation to run the country.
...........................................................
November 9 brought open weeping in the halls of HUD headquarters,........................................
..........................................the department made homelessness reduction a priority. Under Donovans successor, Julián Castro, the former mayor of San Antonio, HUD embarked on a major initiative to address residential segregation by requiring cities and suburbs to do more to live up to the edicts of the Fair Housing Act of 1968.
Before the election, Hillary Clintons campaign sent over a large team of policy experts to study up on HUD and prepare to take the baton on these efforts. The Trump campaign sent one person. And everyone was joking, Well, hell be gone on November 9, one staffer told me.
....................................................
..................................
.............
Ben Carson Jr., right, and an entrepreneur pitching a guns-for-bail venture to HUD, in East Baltimore, at an appearance by Carsons father. Photo: Mark Peterson/mark peterson/redux pictures 2017
........................................On March 6, Carson arrived for his first day of work at headquarters. In introductory remarks to assembled employees, after hed gotten the mic back from his wife, he surprised many by asking them to raise their hands and take the niceness pledge.
He also went on a riff about immigrants arriving at Ellis Island, capped by this: Thats what America is about, a land of dreams and opportunity. There were other immigrants who came here in the bottom of slave ships, worked even longer, even harder, for less. But they, too, had a dream that one day their sons, daughters, grandsons, granddaughters, great-grandsons, great-granddaughters, might pursue prosperity and happiness in this land.
The assembled employees stifled their reaction to this jarringly upbeat characterization of chattel slavery. But in HUDs Baltimore satellite, where many in the heavily African-American office were watching the speech on an online feed at their desks, the gasps were audible.
Carsons arrival brought with it a reckoning for career employees:............................
To the extent that the new leadership was providing any guidance at all, it was often actively discouraging initiative on the part of employees. Shortly after the inauguration, a directive came down requiring employees to get tenth-floor approval for any contacts outside the building professional conferences, or even just meetings with other departments. Ann Marie Oliva, a highly regarded HUD veteran whod been hired during the George W. Bush administration and was in charge of homeless and HIV programs, was barred from attending a big annual conference on housing and homelessness in Ohio because, she inferred, some of the other speakers there leaned left.
The department leadership was also actively slowing down new initiatives simply by taking a very long time to give the necessary supervisory approvals for the development of surveys or program guidance. In some cases, this appeared to be the result of mere negligence and delay. In other cases, it appeared more willful. For one thing, there was the leaderships strong hang-up about all matters transgender-related. The tenth floor ordered the removal of online training materials meant, in part, to help homeless shelters make sure they were providing equal access to transgender people. It also pulled back a survey regarding projects in Cincinnati and Houston to reduce LGBT homelessness. And it forced its Policy Development and Research division to dissociate itself from a major study it had funded on housing discrimination against gay, lesbian, and transgender people the study ended up being released in late June under the aegis of the Urban Institute instead.
More upsetting for many ambitious civil servants than the scattered nays coming from the tenth floor, though, was the lack of direction, period. Virtually all the top political jobs below Carson remained vacant. Carson himself was barely to be seen he never made the walk-through of the building customary of past new secretaries. It was just nothing, said one career employee. Ive never been so bored in my life. No agenda, nothing to move forward or push back against.
Just nothing.
On May 2, I went to the Watergate to see Carson address ......................................
This philosophy was frequently intertwined with allusions to the Creator so frequently that supervisors at one HUD division sent down word to employees that, yes, their new boss was going to talk a lot about God and theyd probably better just get used to it.
But Carsons address to the lawyers offered little further clarity on his agenda. He opened with a neurosurgery joke. He touched on his vague proposal for vision centers where inner-city kids could come to learn about careers. He repeated one of his favorite mantras, that the government needs to make sure people dont get unduly reliant on federal assistance, because everybody is either going to be part of the engine or part of the load. And then, in the heart of the speech, where a Cabinet secretary would normally get down to programmatic brass tacks, came this meandering riff:
You know, governments that look out for property rights also tend to look out for other rights. You know, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of all the things that make America America. So it is absolutely foundational to our success On Sunday, I was talking to a large group of children about whats happening with rights in our country. These are kids who had all won a Carson Scholar [an award of $1,000 that Carson has sponsored since 1994], which you have to have at least a 3.75 grade-point average on a 4.0 scale and show that you care about other people, and I said youre going to be the leaders of our nation and will help to determine which pathway we go down, a pathway where we actually care about those around us and we use our intellect to improve the quality of life for everyone, or the pathway where we say, I dont want to hear you if you dont believe what I believe, I want to shut you down, you dont have any rights. This is a serious business right now where we are, that juncture in our country that will determine what happens to all of us as time goes on. But the whole housing concern is something that concerns us all.
A few weeks later, it became clear that the housing concern perhaps did not concern everyone when the White House released its budget proposal for HUD. After word emerged in early March that the White House was considering cutting as much as $6 billion from the department, Carson had sent a rare email to HUD employees assuring them that this was just a preliminary figure. But as it turned out, Carson, as a relative political outsider lacking strong connections to the administration, was out of the loop: The final proposal crafted by Trump budget director Mick Mulvaney called for cutting closer to $7 billion, 15 percent of its total budget. Participants in the Section 8 voucher program would need to pay at least 17 percent more of their income toward rent, and thered likely be a couple hundred thousand fewer vouchers nationwide (and 13,000 fewer in New York City). Capital funding for public housing would be slashed by a whopping 68 percent this, after years of cuts that, in New York alone, had left public-housing projects with rampant mold, broken elevators, and faulty boilers.
......................................................................
The Trump cuts would mean that several programs would be eliminated entirely, including the home program, ....................................................HUD, for all its shrinking stature and insecurity complex, has over time worked its way into the fabric of ailing communities throughout the country, a role that has grown only larger as so much of Middle America has suffered decline, and as the capacity of so many state and local governments has withered amid dwindling tax bases and civic disengagement. On my travels through the Midwest Ive seen how many federally subsidized housing complexes there are on the edges of small towns and cities, places very far from the Bronx or the South Side of Chicago. People living in these places rely on a functioning, minimally competent HUD no less than do the Section 8 voucher recipients in Jared Kushners low-income complexes in Baltimore. In an age of ever-widening income inequality, the Great Society department actually plays an even more vital role than when it was conceived.
But if Carson was troubled by the disembowelment of his department, he showed no sign of it. ................................................................. Then, a day after the budget was released, Carson downplayed the importance of programs for the poor in a radio interview with Armstrong Williams, saying that poverty was largely a state of mind. This, more than anything, seemed to be a crystallization of the Carson philosophy of HUD: that privation would be solved by the power of positive thinking, that his own extraordinary rise was scalable and could be replicated millions of times over................................ ....................................
Eliot Rosewater
(31,131 posts)LonePirate
(13,431 posts)Carson and his counterparts in the other agencies are systematically destroying our government.
northoftheborder
(7,575 posts)riversedge
(70,382 posts)dalton99a
(81,656 posts)riversedge
(70,382 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Stay home, and this is who you cede power to...