Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
Thu May 26, 2016, 05:17 PM May 2016

More questions raised about OPM’s response to hack of background, personnel records database

[font size="+1"]... your consummately safe government computer systems at work...LOL![/font]



https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/05/26/more-questions-raised-about-opms-response-to-breaches-of-background-personnel-records/

A year after the government disclosed that personal information about millions of current and former federal employees and others had been stolen from two Office of Personnel Management databases, auditors remain skeptical of OPM’s steps to shut the cyber barn door.

“We continue to believe that there is a very high risk that the project will fail to meet its stated objectives of delivering a more secure environment at a lower cost,” the office of the agency’s inspector general said in a report issued Thursday.

The report is the latest in a series from the office criticizing OPM management for not carrying out standard planning steps for such a project, including exploring all the options first and fully understanding the project’s scope, its cost and how it will be funded.

The first of those reports shortly followed OPM’s acknowledgement of breaches of separate databases of federal employee personnel records and of background investigation records.

The former breach involved records of some 4.2 million current and former federal employees, including personal identifying information, educational background, work histories and similar information. The latter involved some 21.5 million current and former federal, military and contract personnel and others who had background investigations performed on them since 2000 and in some cases before. Those checks are performed for reasons including security clearance applications, which require disclosure of highly personal information such as financial or legal troubles, or to gain permission to enter certain government buildings.
(more)
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
More questions raised about OPM’s response to hack of background, personnel records database (Original Post) Bill USA May 2016 OP
Opm is outsourced to a contractor. Just like HILs SOS email server! elehhhhna May 2016 #1
Oh, I thought HRC's system was totally different from the rest of Government systems, so the meme Bill USA May 2016 #3
OPM outsources a lot of work KT2000 May 2016 #2
bill Clinton outsourced to carlyle group elehhhhna Jun 2016 #4
my friend worked in personnel KT2000 Jun 2016 #5

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
3. Oh, I thought HRC's system was totally different from the rest of Government systems, so the meme
Tue May 31, 2016, 06:10 PM
May 2016

goes, a completely home-brewed set-up, thus "far less safe and secure" (one word often heard in describing HRC's use of her own system was "reckless&quot than all the rest of Government systems???

No evidence of hack in Hillary Clinton's email

The IT specialist who set up Hillary Clinton's private email server has turned over security logs to the FBI that show no evidence of any foreign hacks into Clinton's email, a source close to the investigation confirmed to CBS News.




KT2000

(20,568 posts)
2. OPM outsources a lot of work
Thu May 26, 2016, 05:45 PM
May 2016

which may promote lack of responsibility. Everyone is watching the bottom line when they should be ever more watchful of quality and security. My guess is that is beyond the capabilities of most government agencies and businesses.

Managers are dogging the outsourcers for cheaper not safer.

KT2000

(20,568 posts)
5. my friend worked in personnel
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 05:27 PM
Jun 2016

in the government. Her department was outsourced to Northrup Grummon - a lovely defense contractor in charge of personnel files. She had to go there for "training" and ended up walking out, with others, because the trainer did not know anything.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»More questions raised abo...