Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
1986 SCOTUS: Bowers v. Hardwick 478 U.S. 186, gay people having sex in private is BAD
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowers_v._HardwickBowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986), is a United States Supreme Court decision, overturned in 2003, that upheld, in a 54 ruling, the constitutionality of a Georgia sodomy law criminalizing oral and anal sex in private between consenting adults when applied to homosexuals.[1]
The majority opinion, written by Justice Byron White, argued that the Constitution did not confer "a fundamental right to engage in homosexual sodomy."[1] A concurring opinion by Chief Justice Warren E. Burger cited the "ancient roots" of prohibitions against homosexual sex, quoting William Blackstone's description of homosexual sex as an "infamous crime against nature", worse than rape, and "a crime not fit to be named." Burger concluded: "To hold that the act of homosexual sodomy is somehow protected as a fundamental right would be to cast aside millennia of moral teaching."[2] Justice Lewis F. Powell later said he regretted joining the majority, but thought the case of little importance at the time.
The majority opinion, written by Justice Byron White, argued that the Constitution did not confer "a fundamental right to engage in homosexual sodomy."[1] A concurring opinion by Chief Justice Warren E. Burger cited the "ancient roots" of prohibitions against homosexual sex, quoting William Blackstone's description of homosexual sex as an "infamous crime against nature", worse than rape, and "a crime not fit to be named." Burger concluded: "To hold that the act of homosexual sodomy is somehow protected as a fundamental right would be to cast aside millennia of moral teaching."[2] Justice Lewis F. Powell later said he regretted joining the majority, but thought the case of little importance at the time.
Actual bad decision here: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=478&page=186
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1347 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
1986 SCOTUS: Bowers v. Hardwick 478 U.S. 186, gay people having sex in private is BAD (Original Post)
steve2470
Mar 2015
OP
Gothmog
(145,794 posts)1. Lawrence v. Texas in 2003 overruled this case effectively
Lawrence was an attempt to enforce the Texas sodomy law which made it illegal for gay people to make love. Lawrence was arrested at home in bed with his partner in a failed drug bust. Lawrence was prosecuted under the Texas sodomy law which the SCOTUS ruled was invalid
steve2470
(37,457 posts)2. thank god for Lawrence v. Texas! :) nt
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)3. The GOP would love to overturn Lawrence. "Small government," y'know?!?!
Gothmog
(145,794 posts)4. That used to be part of the Texas GOP party platform