Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Julian Englis

(2,309 posts)
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 06:35 PM Mar 2012

One Drug to Shrink All Tumors

Source: Science/AAAS

A single drug can shrink or cure human breast, ovary, colon, bladder, brain, liver, and prostate tumors that have been transplanted into mice, researchers have found. The treatment, an antibody that blocks a "do not eat" signal normally displayed on tumor cells, coaxes the immune system to destroy the cancer cells.

A decade ago, biologist Irving Weissman of the Stanford University School of Medicine in Palo Alto, California, discovered that leukemia cells produce higher levels of a protein called CD47 than do healthy cells. CD47, he and other scientists found, is also displayed on healthy blood cells; it's a marker that blocks the immune system from destroying them as they circulate. Cancers take advantage of this flag to trick the immune system into ignoring them. In the past few years, Weissman's lab showed that blocking CD47 with an antibody cured some cases of lymphomas and leukemias in mice by stimulating the immune system to recognize the cancer cells as invaders. Now, he and colleagues have shown that the CD47-blocking antibody may have a far wider impact than just blood cancers.

"What we've shown is that CD47 isn't just important on leukemias and lymphomas," says Weissman. "It's on every single human primary tumor that we tested." Moreover, Weissman's lab found that cancer cells always had higher levels of CD47 than did healthy cells. How much CD47 a tumor made could predict the survival odds of a patient.

To determine whether blocking CD47 was beneficial, the scientists exposed tumor cells to macrophages, a type of immune cell, and anti-CD47 molecules in petri dishes. Without the drug, the macrophages ignored the cancerous cells. But when the CD47 was present, the macrophages engulfed and destroyed cancer cells from all tumor types.

Read more: http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2012/03/one-drug-to-shrink-all-tumors.html?ref=hp



Amazing news if it can be developed for medical use.
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One Drug to Shrink All Tumors (Original Post) Julian Englis Mar 2012 OP
Guaranteed to be sold for megabucks to only those with Skidmore Mar 2012 #1
sounds very promising! Mosby Mar 2012 #2
My friend recently died of brain cancer. MADem Mar 2012 #3
+1 Fearless Mar 2012 #4
I agree. The sooner... YvonneCa Mar 2012 #7
Talk about a long goodbye. MADem Mar 2012 #13
My cousin had the same thing. It was so sad. She was only 43 when she died, leaving behind two IndyJones Mar 2012 #20
Amen to that DFW Mar 2012 #8
How dreadful to lose so many to the damned disease. MADem Mar 2012 #14
It's in our genes, it seems. Nothing we can do about that DFW Mar 2012 #27
Come on, cure! We'll address the other stuff as needed! nt MADem Mar 2012 #28
Dear DFW, me too. xtraxritical Mar 2012 #33
Sounds like we've been through the SAME mill! DFW Mar 2012 #37
As did my brother stevedeshazer Mar 2012 #11
I agree--the suffering is the worst. nt MADem Mar 2012 #15
Something that is available now that might work Bearware Mar 2012 #30
Neurofibromatosis ChazII Mar 2012 #5
...and in the darkness bind them. tanyev Mar 2012 #6
If it actually works in more trials seeviewonder Mar 2012 #9
Husband has had so many cancer deaths in his family Marthe48 Mar 2012 #10
Pharma isn't going to give up cancer. It makes too much money off it. nt valerief Mar 2012 #12
Exactly! There is just no incentive to give up this mega money making disease. crunch60 Mar 2012 #17
You got it! Doremus Mar 2012 #23
I wish my son and husband could have the chance to use this riverbendviewgal Mar 2012 #16
My sincere condolences on your profound losses. n/t Doremus Mar 2012 #22
Jesus! I can't imagine that pain. So sorry for your loss. MADem Mar 2012 #29
Hope it works in humans, but... Deep13 Mar 2012 #18
what pisses me off is that this will never be available even if it works. stlsaxman Mar 2012 #19
we lost.... unkachuck Mar 2012 #21
Hard to hear about all the break throughs and yet people do not get helped. glinda Mar 2012 #24
Wow thanks for posting this JE felix_numinous Mar 2012 #25
As this might actually greatly reduce cost of cancer care, insurance companies may well favor it Julian Englis Mar 2012 #26
My tin foil hat angel/devil says the Medical Industrial Complex would fight this AllyCat Mar 2012 #32
my husband has just been told his cancer is incurable mimitabby Mar 2012 #31
... YvonneCa Mar 2012 #35
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #34
That would be amazing....my wife just completed 6 months of chemo treatment for breast cancer... truebrit71 Mar 2012 #36
Let's move this thing along, FDA! Stuckinthebush Mar 2012 #38
When available it will cost the consumer sarcasmo Mar 2012 #39

MADem

(135,425 posts)
3. My friend recently died of brain cancer.
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 06:43 PM
Mar 2012

It would have been wonderful if this research could have been plumped out and working to stop the progression of the disease. It was a valiant fight, the same thing that killed Ted Kennedy. Terribly sad. Awful end. The sooner they can apply this, the better.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
13. Talk about a long goodbye.
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 07:55 PM
Mar 2012

I felt for his family, they were so devastated. He was a youngster, relatively speaking, in his early fifties--way too young to go, but towards the end of a very valiant fight (he lasted three years and change after his diagnosis--tried EVERYTHING) it was time. Sad as hell, but time.

IndyJones

(1,068 posts)
20. My cousin had the same thing. It was so sad. She was only 43 when she died, leaving behind two
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 09:12 PM
Mar 2012

kids and her husband. She was a local teacher. Would be great to get that drug out and working for people.

DFW

(54,334 posts)
8. Amen to that
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 07:19 PM
Mar 2012

I lost my brother-in-law, my cousin and my aunt to brain cancer, my dad to pancreatic cancer, another aunt to breast cancer, and my mom and my wife had breast cancer, although a stroke got my mom first, and my wife has beat her breast cancer so far (11 years this year).

With my family history, I'm almost a lock to get cancer of some sort, and so are my daughters. I'm skeptical as all hell about this, but VERY willing to be proven wrong.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
14. How dreadful to lose so many to the damned disease.
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 07:58 PM
Mar 2012

I hope you all dodge the genetic predisposition. I'd love it if they could come up with a vaccine!

Now that would be a thing!

DFW

(54,334 posts)
27. It's in our genes, it seems. Nothing we can do about that
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 12:33 AM
Mar 2012

I'd love to be able to play a little "Beat The Reaper," although if 15% of the population
suddenly starts living 25 years longer, we had better make Planned Parenthood a Cabinet
position, or else start subsidizing food.

In the meantime, we eat a LOT of raw veggies and broccoli!

 

xtraxritical

(3,576 posts)
33. Dear DFW, me too.
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 01:00 PM
Mar 2012

I lost my Mom to throat cancer, after a bout with colon cancer. I lost my Dad to pancreatic cancer. My Dad's sister was lost to brain cancer. I guess we've been thru the mill, I sure hope there's truth to these findings. God bless you and yours, hang tough.

DFW

(54,334 posts)
37. Sounds like we've been through the SAME mill!
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 03:01 PM
Mar 2012

Almost anyway. Dad had pancreatic cancer, his sister died of brain cancer--we have certainly traveled portions of the same road.

You hang tough, too (like we have a choice!).

stevedeshazer

(21,653 posts)
11. As did my brother
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 07:47 PM
Mar 2012

I spent fourteen long, agonizing months with his suffering.

Please, please let this be true. No one should suffer like that.

Bearware

(151 posts)
30. Something that is available now that might work
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 12:42 AM
Mar 2012

There is an orphan drug called Dichloroacetate (DCA) that was experimentally used for children with mitochondrial problems. It has been out for so long it cannot be patented so big Pharma will not deal with it directly . However in the last year someone filed a patent for a one of the latest chemotherapy drugs with two DCA's attached to it.

I believe there is one journal paper out on someone who refused chemo but decided to use DCA and his oncologist tracked his progress with blood tests. It is not a silver bullet and will not fix everything. DCA not chemo and is far less debilitating. It is relatively cheap but you must find a quality source - probably the UK but definitely not Mexico.

The following amateur site has tried to track it. If you are interested then you need to read most of what is on the site and PAY ATTENTION to warnings. Milligrams matter. Someone with a gioma took too much to fast and died when it killed the tumor too quickly.

www.thedcasite.com

I have been following it for some years but do not have any direct experience with it's use.

ChazII

(6,204 posts)
5. Neurofibromatosis
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 06:50 PM
Mar 2012

Hopefully it will work on the tumors caused by neurofibromatosis.

This is wonderful news for those with tumors caused by other disorders.

seeviewonder

(461 posts)
9. If it actually works in more trials
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 07:26 PM
Mar 2012

it will only be a matter of time until Big Pharma latches on and doesn't let go. A few patents later and bam: expensive and cost-prohibitive medicine that few can afford. Gotta keep that bottom line looking good, you know!

Marthe48

(16,932 posts)
10. Husband has had so many cancer deaths in his family
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 07:31 PM
Mar 2012

I hope, I pray that this is the one we've all been waiting for.

 

crunch60

(1,412 posts)
17. Exactly! There is just no incentive to give up this mega money making disease.
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 08:30 PM
Mar 2012

And the poison they are putting in all of our food sources will make sure it continues. I have been reading about these trials of new drugs for years, so promising in mice although we humans never get to see them. There have been some new drugs for breast cancer, but the side effects are very debilitating. And other Chemo's will destroy many other organs in the quest to destroy cancer cells.
My Dad died of cancer at 48.

Doremus

(7,261 posts)
23. You got it!
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 09:35 PM
Mar 2012

The American diet is literally killing us.

The oligarchy and its bought-and-paid-for government agencies have a vested interest in maintaining status quo.

Our good health would kill their bottom lines.

riverbendviewgal

(4,252 posts)
16. I wish my son and husband could have the chance to use this
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 08:24 PM
Mar 2012

my son had glioblastma multiforme brain tumor and died in 1999 .
his dad had non Hodgkin's lymphoma and died in 2001..
They were diagnosed within two months of each other in 1998..

MADem

(135,425 posts)
29. Jesus! I can't imagine that pain. So sorry for your loss.
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 12:36 AM
Mar 2012

I know time smooths out the rough edges, but still...damn.

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
18. Hope it works in humans, but...
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 08:59 PM
Mar 2012

...any doctor can cure cancer in mice. For some reason that's really easy.

stlsaxman

(9,236 posts)
19. what pisses me off is that this will never be available even if it works.
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 09:04 PM
Mar 2012

there is way too much money to be made on the suffering and dying of others in this sick fucking nation of ours.

i lost one of my best friends in the world to cancer last Sunday....

FUCK BIG PHARMA- FUCK HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANIES... FUCK 'EM ALL.

(i fully expect to have this post banned by some hyper sensitive type who thinks my venting will offend people... go ahead- i don't fucking care anymore.)

 

unkachuck

(6,295 posts)
21. we lost....
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 09:23 PM
Mar 2012

....my wifes' youngest brother (age 43) to esophageal cancer two weeks ago....I feel the same way you do....

....there is no way to sugar-coat this anymore....people who won't support Medicare-for-all want to see people die, their fellows Americans die, their neighbors die....I have no patience and total contempt for these people....they are inhuman....

felix_numinous

(5,198 posts)
25. Wow thanks for posting this JE
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 10:34 PM
Mar 2012

I just read up on it and may change my mind on more chemo if this is available. I have IV stage lymphoma of a type that doesn't respond well to follow up treatments...but this may change everything.

Julian Englis

(2,309 posts)
26. As this might actually greatly reduce cost of cancer care, insurance companies may well favor it
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 11:32 PM
Mar 2012

Cancer care is very expensive. This would seem to have the potential of reducing the cost of it, so big insurance companies would favor.

AllyCat

(16,174 posts)
32. My tin foil hat angel/devil says the Medical Industrial Complex would fight this
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 12:34 PM
Mar 2012

They make a lot of money on this stuff. Wonder if the insurance industry would break from them.

Hope this goes forward and is applicable. Our neighbor is fighting breast cancer and is now losing the fight. She has a husband and two little kids.

mimitabby

(1,832 posts)
31. my husband has just been told his cancer is incurable
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 09:51 AM
Mar 2012

I hope they get this out while he's still alive. (sigh)

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
36. That would be amazing....my wife just completed 6 months of chemo treatment for breast cancer...
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 02:58 PM
Mar 2012

...and one of the drugs in the cocktail she was given was designed to hit one specific protein ONLY...truly amazing...

Stuckinthebush

(10,843 posts)
38. Let's move this thing along, FDA!
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 05:25 PM
Mar 2012

I'm a researcher and understand the need for a number of phases of tests. But, in situations where you have incurable cancers the harm should be minimal to get it out in the public sphere faster than the 20 year normal time-table for FDA approval.

Here is hoping that this procedure continues to hold up under further review!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»One Drug to Shrink All Tu...