Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zorro

(15,740 posts)
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 08:44 PM Mar 2014

State TV says Russia could turn US to 'radioactive ash'

Source: AFP

A leading anchor on Russian state television on Sunday described Russia as the only country capable of turning the United States into "radioactive ash", in an incendiary comment at the height of tensions over the Crimea referendum.

"Russia is the only country in the world realistically capable of turning the United States into radioactive ash," anchor Dmitry Kiselyov said on his weekly news show on state-controlled Rossiya 1 television.

Kiselyov made the comment to support his argument that the United States and President Barack Obama were living in fear of Russia led by President Vladimir Putin amid the Ukraine crisis.

His programme was broadcast as the first exit polls were being published showing an overwhelming majority of Crimeans voting to leave Ukraine and join Russia.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/state-tv-says-russia-could-turn-us-radioactive-212003397.html



Sounds as if Russian state TV is the equivalent of Fox News.
74 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
State TV says Russia could turn US to 'radioactive ash' (Original Post) Zorro Mar 2014 OP
Maybe we can get Russian state TV and Foxnews to box it out for victory. Rex Mar 2014 #1
I was just thinking that: O'Reilly and this guy in Thunderdome. But it would be more like Squinch Mar 2014 #32
I'm 70 years old. The only thing I see possibly developing here is a mutual agreement between enough Mar 2014 #2
+1 orwell Mar 2014 #4
I'll be 60 in a few months' time. What's new this time around... Ghost Dog Mar 2014 #10
I'll be 66 this year. I remember the 'nuclear attack drills in elementary school' olddad56 Mar 2014 #14
I'll be 61 this year - I don't think I can bend myself into the "duck and cover" position anymore dflprincess Mar 2014 #19
Same here. :) nt Mojorabbit Mar 2014 #24
No need to bother. NutmegYankee Mar 2014 #53
Im 58 and can get down there but not back up rickyhall Mar 2014 #69
Nowadays in school they do that about "armed intruders." Still futile. Squinch Mar 2014 #33
And the citizens of both nations, and the third world, get to suffer for it. /nt Ash_F Mar 2014 #22
Well I'm 28 and I don't want to have to live through what you guys lived totodeinhere Mar 2014 #35
You're smart. Dem4ever27 Mar 2014 #67
agreement kardonb Mar 2014 #40
The Cold War was largely laughable for both sides. chrisa Mar 2014 #66
Uh... orwell Mar 2014 #3
Merry Christmas from PM Rogozin jakeXT Mar 2014 #5
SBIRS is up and running. joshcryer Mar 2014 #43
I would love to know more about stuff like kinetic weapons jakeXT Mar 2014 #45
I was reading the ABM wiki article earlier. joshcryer Mar 2014 #48
This Kiselyov is an idiot blackspade Mar 2014 #6
The Pentagon is getting so drunk tonight BeyondGeography Mar 2014 #7
Perfect! Turbineguy Mar 2014 #8
Newscorp got any shares? RT's AJ, FNN and the GOP work for the Koch JBS crowd. freshwest Mar 2014 #9
I can still remember Khrushchev banging his shoe.......... Capt.Rocky300 Mar 2014 #11
I remember that warrant46 Mar 2014 #13
I don't think anything we saw in Vietnam had anything to do with Russia. olddad56 Mar 2014 #15
Were you there ? warrant46 Mar 2014 #16
Yeah, iamthebandfanman Mar 2014 #25
I suspect they were flying some of the NV aircraft as well. 7962 Mar 2014 #41
Hell, who supplied them with MIGs? NutmegYankee Mar 2014 #51
A friend of mine was a POW....... Capt.Rocky300 Mar 2014 #21
In the south we fought the Russian's proxies, but as the story goes HereSince1628 Mar 2014 #23
"I don't think anything we saw in Vietnam had anything to do with Russia." greiner3 Mar 2014 #62
+1 warrant46 Mar 2014 #70
I was told that the context of what Khrushchev was referring to in that speech is USSR lostincalifornia Mar 2014 #31
I'm 75 - remember 840high Mar 2014 #39
That was at the UN, wasn't it? I remember seeing that as a kid. And the Cuban missile crisis. freshwest Mar 2014 #73
Go nuke scares! Sell more survival bunkers and freeze dried food! Call Infowars now for details! freshwest Mar 2014 #12
Ah... actually, Americans cannot afford those luxuries anymore. T. J. Kong Mar 2014 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author freshwest Mar 2014 #44
Uhm... T. J. Kong Mar 2014 #47
This message was self-deleted by its author freshwest Mar 2014 #50
Absolutely! And I am sooooooo thankful that those right-wing THUGs did not get the helm! T. J. Kong Mar 2014 #52
Someone should give Dmitry Kiselyov yuiyoshida Mar 2014 #17
He didn't say this without clearance at the highest levels. Dem4ever27 Mar 2014 #68
*sigh* Is this the best human history can do? Alhena Mar 2014 #18
What a moron. iamthebandfanman Mar 2014 #20
Agreed! T. J. Kong Mar 2014 #36
Neah neah-neah neah neah booga booga booga. . . DinahMoeHum Mar 2014 #26
ROFLMAO. I think you got it. n/t freshwest Mar 2014 #72
There goes the planet! hrmjustin Mar 2014 #27
Time for Realism and Common Sense on Ukraine T. J. Kong Mar 2014 #28
At least they didn't ruin the Olympics. blkmusclmachine Mar 2014 #29
Ash is sufficient. Why the radioactivity? Sheesh. Eleanors38 Mar 2014 #34
Not possible. Lint Head Mar 2014 #37
Yeah, and we're the only country that can glass Russia. krispos42 Mar 2014 #38
All I can think of is Tom Lehrer and his WW3 song. Nanjing to Seoul Mar 2014 #42
Man, I miss the good old days when "Stratcom" was "SAC" OmahaBlueDog Mar 2014 #46
They obviously don't read DU mindwalker_i Mar 2014 #49
First we have to get 316,000,000 desks to hide under. Then we fight. n/t jtuck004 Mar 2014 #54
yah well, the US could, twice over and not even seriously deplete its stockpile. delrem Mar 2014 #55
Like many here... 3catwoman3 Mar 2014 #56
K&R DeSwiss Mar 2014 #57
So, does this mean Kristol/Giuliani/Palin et. al. go on fellating Putin for being so "manly" hatrack Mar 2014 #58
beware of escalation. politicman Mar 2014 #59
And cockroaches will rule the earth. jsr Mar 2014 #60
Well, it's true. tabasco Mar 2014 #61
Ditto, Putin, ditto. Beacool Mar 2014 #63
Yes, yes, we've heard this story before. Arkana Mar 2014 #64
Because Fukushima is turning out so well. Orsino Mar 2014 #65
And so would they too right afterward treestar Mar 2014 #71
It is worse than FOX. There is no secret that all Russian TV is an arm of Putin. snagglepuss Mar 2014 #74
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
1. Maybe we can get Russian state TV and Foxnews to box it out for victory.
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 08:48 PM
Mar 2014

You think Hannity would be game?

Squinch

(50,955 posts)
32. I was just thinking that: O'Reilly and this guy in Thunderdome. But it would be more like
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 10:20 PM
Mar 2014

Thunder Pen.

enough

(13,259 posts)
2. I'm 70 years old. The only thing I see possibly developing here is a mutual agreement between
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 08:50 PM
Mar 2014

two overblown "powers" to again become each other's big scary enemy, in order to reap all the benefits such a mutual fear-pact has previously provided. Both these fucking empires were a lot better off when they had each other to hate and fear.

It sounds too absurd to be true. I wouldn't believe it if I hadn't seen it before.





 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
10. I'll be 60 in a few months' time. What's new this time around...
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:03 PM
Mar 2014

... is that both "evil empires"' politico-military-financial establishments appear to have been recently planning within the context of the idea that the use of (¡sólo la puntita!) so-called 'tactical' or 'mini-' nuclear weapons is conceivable without inevitably shortly thereafter going totally MAD.

olddad56

(5,732 posts)
14. I'll be 66 this year. I remember the 'nuclear attack drills in elementary school'
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:18 PM
Mar 2014

like crawling under your desk was going to make a difference.

dflprincess

(28,079 posts)
19. I'll be 61 this year - I don't think I can bend myself into the "duck and cover" position anymore
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:35 PM
Mar 2014

much less get back out of it.

I really have to get back to yoga class.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
53. No need to bother.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 12:54 AM
Mar 2014

With the Hydrogen bombs of today, you'd just get vaporized in an uncomfortable position. Might as well be sitting in a nice chair.

 

Dem4ever27

(49 posts)
67. You're smart.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 11:32 AM
Mar 2014

The cold war was the cause of a deep sense of anxiety and dread that underlay all our thoughts and actions. The "end" of the cold war was an enormous relief for all of us. We do not want it back.

 

kardonb

(777 posts)
40. agreement
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 11:16 PM
Mar 2014

Putin acts just like that baby faced little punk in North Korea , a lot of saber rattling and hot air ,but not much else .

chrisa

(4,524 posts)
66. The Cold War was largely laughable for both sides.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 11:32 AM
Mar 2014

The Soviets for their failed image of being a moral, hardworking worker's paradise. In reality, when you weren't sitting around doing nothing in factories that produced nothing, you were living under an authoritarian kleptocracy.

The United States for pushing the meme that Russia could nuke/invade the US at any moment, had this massive army, and was spreading Communism everywhere (and only the US could stop them!).

I'm absolutely certain that these fairytales were invented by profiteers and political bs-artists on both sides for their own benefit. Watch "Red Dawn," for example, for the absolute absurdity of the Cold War.

orwell

(7,774 posts)
3. Uh...
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 08:53 PM
Mar 2014

...that's essentially correct.

Unfortunately, the entire planet would be little more than a whirling cinder block if a superpower nuclear exchange were to occur.

By all means, let's keep up the male testosterone display.

After all, it's worked so well up to now...

What could possibly go wrong?

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
5. Merry Christmas from PM Rogozin
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 08:57 PM
Mar 2014
?itok=5J-V8DmO

http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/24445/55/


I guess he's right, until the US finishes it's ABM shield and it's working, or China builds enough nuclear weapons.



The US intelligence community predicts that by the mid-2020s, Beijing could more than double the number of these warheads that threaten the US to more than 100.
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2013/11/20/2003577276

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
43. SBIRS is up and running.
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 11:50 PM
Mar 2014

The US shield is probably a lot more advanced than is let on. The US military space budget is more than NASA. It's insane and probably why so much emphasis is placed on intelligence to the point the US scrapes every piece of human submitted data on the internet.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
48. I was reading the ABM wiki article earlier.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 12:12 AM
Mar 2014

Got lost in Wiki and landed on the "Multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle" page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_independently_targetable_reentry_vehicle



Chilling.

Thanks for that NOVA doco link, I'll add to watch later (Sunday night shows are calling though!).

Turbineguy

(37,342 posts)
8. Perfect!
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 08:59 PM
Mar 2014

A Murdoch station over there and one over here. WWIII is almost guaranteed to come from a stupid fest.

Remember guys, in the contest of who's a bigger asshole, the object is to let the other guy win.

Now we may return to our regularly scheduled programming.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
9. Newscorp got any shares? RT's AJ, FNN and the GOP work for the Koch JBS crowd.
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:00 PM
Mar 2014
Half those guys love Putin, the other half want to nuke 'em. It's a winner either way for them. They make me

Capt.Rocky300

(1,005 posts)
11. I can still remember Khrushchev banging his shoe..........
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:03 PM
Mar 2014

on the table and saying the USSR would "bury" us.

warrant46

(2,205 posts)
16. Were you there ?
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:27 PM
Mar 2014

Didn't think so ---Who do you think was running the air defense system over Hanoi and firing the SA-2 Guidelines ? To shoot us down

iamthebandfanman

(8,127 posts)
25. Yeah,
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:43 PM
Mar 2014

the Russians had their hands in both the Korean war and the Vietnam war...
but most direct help (soldiers and weapons) was from china in vietnam, was it not? I know the Russians definitely helped with technical support .. logistics and training .. that sort of thing.. but physical troop involvement was way lower than in korea.
In the Korean war a lot of Chinese and russians came and fought for the north Koreans because a lot of Koreans had helped the communists with their revolution inside china.

sorry ya had to go over there..

my step dad was in the artillery and had to witness misfire/backfires that killed buddies of his on a couple of occasions.. and from his description of events the military was pretty heartless when addressing said events occurring..

but he does have some fond memories of supposedly shooting back and forth with our navy for fun :p

Capt.Rocky300

(1,005 posts)
21. A friend of mine was a POW.......
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:37 PM
Mar 2014

He learned to read and speak Russian from a Russian "advisor" to the Vietnamese guards at the Hanoi Hilton.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
23. In the south we fought the Russian's proxies, but as the story goes
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:38 PM
Mar 2014

that the Russians were on the ground. Russia Today covered reunions of advisors who served there.



 

greiner3

(5,214 posts)
62. "I don't think anything we saw in Vietnam had anything to do with Russia."
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 09:10 AM
Mar 2014

From Wiki;

" Machine guns, mortars and interchangeable ammo. Also of key importance to communist units was the interchangeability of the 7.62mm ammunition between the AK-47 and other types of weapons. The 7.62mm round not only chambered in the SKS carbine but also could be used in the Soviet RPD light machine gun, another standard infantry weapon of the VC/NVA, capable of 650 rounds per minute. Heavier machine guns were sometimes used but often in set piece assaults, or in fixed mode such as anti-aircraft weapons, due to their weight. Communist units also employed mortars frequently, with the Soviet 82mm and its Chinese variants being the most common. French 60mm mortars also saw some use.

Rockets and RPGs. The VC/NVA also made extensive use of the excellent Soviet designed anti-tank grenade launcher, the RPG. Originally designed to fight against armor, it was adapted for anti-personnel use to good effect. They also made use of the Soviet/Chinese 122mm rocket which was used effectively against populated areas and large installations such as airfields. While inaccurate compared to more sophisticated weapons, the 122mm rocket made an effective terror weapon when deployed against civilian targets. Other rocket types included tube-launched Chinese 107mm and Soviet 140mm variants.

Anti-aircraft missiles and batteries. The VC/NVA relied heavily on heavy machine guns and standard Soviet designed anti-aircraft batteries like the ZPU-series for air defense functions. In the latter year of the conflict, field units of the VC/NVA deployed hand-held Soviet designed anti-aircraft missiles that presented a significant challenge to US air dominance, particularly helicopters. For strategic aerial defense, the North deployed one of the densest and most sophisticated air-defense systems in the world based on Soviet surface-to-air missile missiles and radar batteries.

Tanks and artillery. Fighting a mobile guerrilla war much of the time, the VC/NVA could not deploy large quantities of heavy artillery or tanks. Exceptions were the set piece siege battles such as at Khe Sanh or heavy artillery duels against US batteries across the DMZ. It was only after the shift to conventional warfare in the 1972 Easter Offensive, and the final conventional campaign in 1975 (when US airpower had vacated the field) that tanks and heavy batteries were openly used in significant numbers. When using heavy artillery, the VC/NVA relied on high quality Soviet-supplied heavy 122mm and 130mm guns that outranged American and ARVN opposition.
"

And the list goes on and on.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viet_Cong_and_Vietnam_People%27s_Army_logistics_and_equipment

We supplied troops and a lot of weapons and the Russians and Chinese supplied weapons, sometimes much better than the Americans, their rifles vs our infamous M-16s, and 'advisors', observers and training.

I can't remember that movie and subsequent sequels of the 80s showing Russian 'advisors' still in Vietnam doing 'bad things' to American POWs and the lone American goes over there and kills Brazillions of Vietnamese troops and saves the POWs; anyone?

lostincalifornia

(3,639 posts)
31. I was told that the context of what Khrushchev was referring to in that speech is USSR
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 10:19 PM
Mar 2014

would bury the U.S. economically.

Regardless, one thing that was viewed at the time by both countries was the context of peaceful coexistence, "mutually assured destruction"

However, it did not stop the Cuban missile crisis from occurring, which was actually precipitated by our missiles in Turkey.

The fact remains, "mutually assured destruction" still exists, and it is even worse with China, Pakistan, India, and others in that club.

God forbid if a country actually thought winning a nuclear war was feasible.

If those missiles actually started flying, it would come from everywhere, Europe, India, China, Russia, and the US, and the result would be the end of civilization as we know it.

This is just their propaganda machine at work as you pointed out from the cold war reference, which almost seems like an instant replay

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
73. That was at the UN, wasn't it? I remember seeing that as a kid. And the Cuban missile crisis.
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 01:29 AM
Mar 2014

They taught all of us to get under our desks and kiss our ass good bye. Issued us dog tags at the school and told us in so much words we were all gonna die since we'd be one of the first targets.

Those were the days of people putting bomb shelters in their backyards, weekly air raid drills and sirens. One week a plane from the nearby air force base fly low over the school while we were under our desks for the full effect.

The only thing worried me was not seeing my family again, as they figured out distances and said that only the kids in our elementary school within a close range would be allowed to run home to say goodbye. I was on the list to die at school.

Other than that, I really couldn't have cared less. I realized by then the world was being run by idiots.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
12. Go nuke scares! Sell more survival bunkers and freeze dried food! Call Infowars now for details!
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:14 PM
Mar 2014
http://www.infowarsshop.com/Survival-Seed-Vault_p_927.html

They somehow neglect to say that with a nuclear winter, they won't have enough sun to grow plants. This happened in past events that were non-nuclear. So, FAIL.

And how are they going to watch the DVDs when we're all back to trading chickens for medical care and all of that stuff? There won't be electricity in their post apocalyptic utopia. They think that's great, because they wanna Go Galt. Yes, they are Libertarians, the faux intellectuals of the RWNJs. FAIL.

Besides, how are they gonna get a fair price for their gold? Oh, waot, the guns and ammo will take care of all the shortages! That'd be a FAIL when the inevitable occurs:



 

T. J. Kong

(46 posts)
30. Ah... actually, Americans cannot afford those luxuries anymore.
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 10:15 PM
Mar 2014






Though, I'm sue it will be real good for the MIC...





and so it goes...

Response to T. J. Kong (Reply #30)

 

T. J. Kong

(46 posts)
47. Uhm...
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 12:05 AM
Mar 2014

I thought I was agreeing with you, I probably didn't express myself well, and I apologize.

The point I was trying to make, poorly, was that yes... I agree... and that as a matter of fact we have been there, done that, and that this kind of saber rattling is to primarily benefit the MIC.

Response to T. J. Kong (Reply #47)

 

T. J. Kong

(46 posts)
52. Absolutely! And I am sooooooo thankful that those right-wing THUGs did not get the helm!
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 12:52 AM
Mar 2014

But I am still very concerned that they may have a chance to get in, as they are working hard to create crisis, both faux and real, to get weak minded people, who are looking for 'strong' leaders to follow.

That is their only hope for success, crisis, and that is what scare me about these very dangerous, extreme, reTHUG, politicians, that they will do anything, even harm US to regain power

BTW: no worries, as a newbie I still don't have my 'sea-legs', so to speak, and thanks for the heads-up about your journal, I will check it out

yuiyoshida

(41,831 posts)
17. Someone should give Dmitry Kiselyov
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:29 PM
Mar 2014

A shoe to bang on the table... His statement isn't emotional enough!!

 

Dem4ever27

(49 posts)
68. He didn't say this without clearance at the highest levels.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 11:39 AM
Mar 2014

The head of the state news agency did not say this offhandedly or without approval from above.

Alhena

(3,030 posts)
18. *sigh* Is this the best human history can do?
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:32 PM
Mar 2014

Didn't we already go this crap for several decades? I'm really starting to wonder whether this species and long-term survivability go hand in hand.

iamthebandfanman

(8,127 posts)
20. What a moron.
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:35 PM
Mar 2014

I kinda hope Russian leadership is as 'strong' and full of 'strength' as some folks suggest.. cause it definitely lacks any and all intelligence

DinahMoeHum

(21,794 posts)
26. Neah neah-neah neah neah booga booga booga. . .
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:56 PM
Mar 2014

This ain't nothin' but cock-wagging by a big mouth with a teeny weenie.
Silly little schmuck.

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
38. Yeah, and we're the only country that can glass Russia.
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 10:55 PM
Mar 2014

So maybe we had better not start down that particular path, m'kay?

 

Nanjing to Seoul

(2,088 posts)
42. All I can think of is Tom Lehrer and his WW3 song.
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 11:50 PM
Mar 2014

This year we've been celebrating the hundredth anniversary of the Civil War and the fiftieth anniversary of the beginning of World War I and the twentieth anniversary of the end of World War II. So all in all, it's been a good year for the war buffs. And a number of LPs and television specials have come out capitalizing on all this nostalgia, with particular emphasis on the songs of the various wars.

I feel that if any songs are gonna come out of World War III, we'd better start writing them now. I have one here. Might call it a bit of pre-nostalgia.

This is the song that some of the boys sang as they went bravely off to World War III:

So long, mom,
I'm off to drop the bomb,
So don't wait up for me.
But while you swelter
Down there in your shelter
You can see me
On your TV.

While we're attacking frontally
Watch Brinkally and Huntally
Describing contrapuntally
The cities we have lost.
No need for you to miss a minute of the agonizing holocaust. Yeah!

Little Johnny Jones, he was a US pilot,
And no shrinking violet was he.
He was mighty proud when World War III was declared.
He wasn't scared, no siree!

And this is what he said on
His way to Armageddon:

So long, mom,
I'm off to drop the bomb,
So don't wait up for me.
But though I may roam,
I'll come back to my home
Although it may be
A pile of debris.

Remember, mommy,
I'm off to get a commie,
So send me a salami
And try to smile somehow.
I'll look for you when the war is over,
An hour and a half from now!

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
46. Man, I miss the good old days when "Stratcom" was "SAC"
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 12:02 AM
Mar 2014

Back when Offutt AFB had a squadron of nuclear armed B-52s ready to fly off to their fail-safe points at a moment's notice.

Take us to DefCon 2....

mindwalker_i

(4,407 posts)
49. They obviously don't read DU
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 12:37 AM
Mar 2014

or they wouldn't bother.

For all of those who have their panties in such a twist that it would give a Calabi Yau space an aneurysm, yes, I'm joking

delrem

(9,688 posts)
55. yah well, the US could, twice over and not even seriously deplete its stockpile.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 01:28 AM
Mar 2014

Perhaps it's nothing but blather, because it seems that that the US is intent on putting a nuclear threat in the Ukraine....

3catwoman3

(24,006 posts)
56. Like many here...
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 01:51 AM
Mar 2014

I was a kid in the 50s and 60s, and remember well all those damn "duck-and-cover" drills. Even as a 10 yr old, I wondered what good hiding under my desk would do if a nuclear bomb got dropped anywhere nearby. It was scary. I'd eally rather nothave to go thru that shit all over again.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
57. K&R
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 04:05 AM
Mar 2014
- Yeah, you stupid fuck that'll solve all the problems.

K&R

''...a consecutive struggle against four great rackets, namely the exploitation of the fear of the unknown, the exploitation of violence, the exploitation of the monopolization of cultivable land, and the exploitation of money. ~Ezra Pound, Pound Money Pamphlets

hatrack

(59,587 posts)
58. So, does this mean Kristol/Giuliani/Palin et. al. go on fellating Putin for being so "manly"
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 04:58 AM
Mar 2014

Gee, I hope so!

 

politicman

(710 posts)
59. beware of escalation.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 07:06 AM
Mar 2014

The issue is not the U.S or Russia launching a nuclear attack straight off the bat.

The worry is that if a conflict develops between these 2 nations, a military conflict I mean, then that can escalate to the side that is losing deciding to use tactical nukes as a way to come out on top in a certain battle, and it just escalates from there.

We need to understand that these countries view economic warfare as the same as actual warfare, I cannot see Russia being hit economically and not responding by either threatening or actually punishing the west by invading more countries.

After all, Russia knows that its arsenal of nukes will stop the west from using military means to directly confront any new invasions.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
61. Well, it's true.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 08:48 AM
Mar 2014

But he forgot to mention that Russia would be a molten, radioactive asphalt pit if that ever transpired.

Arkana

(24,347 posts)
64. Yes, yes, we've heard this story before.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 10:04 AM
Mar 2014

They do know they'd get turned to radioactive ash just as quickly, right? Seriously, they're not still buying into that "THE WEST IS DECADENT AND CORRUPT" BS from the Cold War, are they?

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
65. Because Fukushima is turning out so well.
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 10:06 AM
Mar 2014

Sure, they could nuke the US...and live on what planet afterward?

treestar

(82,383 posts)
71. And so would they too right afterward
Mon Mar 17, 2014, 04:46 PM
Mar 2014

What a dumbass thing to say. Sounds like they have their version of Fox anchors.

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
74. It is worse than FOX. There is no secret that all Russian TV is an arm of Putin.
Tue Mar 18, 2014, 10:51 AM
Mar 2014

The opinion expressed comes directly from Putin.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»State TV says Russia coul...