Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
Sat Jun 29, 2013, 05:41 PM Jun 2013

U.S. asks Ecuador to reject any asylum request from Edward Snowden

Source: CNN

(CNN) -- U.S. Vice President Joe Biden asked Ecuador "to please reject" the request for asylum from self-avowed National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden, according to Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa.

Snowden wasn't in Ecuador on Saturday, but if he does arrive there, the country will make a decision based on sovereignty, taking into account U.S. input, Correa said in his weekly broadcast on state TV.

Ben Rhodes, deputy director of the U.S. National Security Council, confirmed that Biden spoke with Correa about Snowden and the bilateral relationship, but Rhodes declined to provide details.

In a telephone conversation with Biden on Friday, Correa told him "what was the Ecuadorian position" and that Ecuador "can't even proceed with the request because Mr. Snowden is not in Ecuadorian territory."

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/29/politics/nsa-leak/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. asks Ecuador to reject any asylum request from Edward Snowden (Original Post) wtmusic Jun 2013 OP
How bloody pathetic! VP 'asks' a foreign country to reject a possible Refugee Claim because idwiyo Jun 2013 #1
What's bloody pathetic? Zorro Jun 2013 #2
Everything about it is pathetic. Including euphemism 'asked'. idwiyo Jun 2013 #3
Did you participate in the phone call? Zorro Jun 2013 #12
I challenge the premise of 'asking'. One doesn't 'ask' another to flatly ignore the law. Period. idwiyo Jun 2013 #13
I did not realize Zorro Jun 2013 #14
It's OK, nothing to be ashamed or sorry about. I am sure there are a lot of people out there who idwiyo Jun 2013 #15
We should what... Order them? Threaten them? Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #7
How about don't make an arse of yourself and don't encourage others to break an international law? idwiyo Jun 2013 #9
ahhhh... I mis-understood. I thought you were going off on some 'He's weak because he 'asked'' thing Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #10
NP, my apologies for writing an ambiguous post. I can see how one could get confused. idwiyo Jun 2013 #11
Hehehehe Iliyah Jun 2013 #4
And Ecuador replies, "It's *Opposites* Day!1 Whatever you ask we do Opposite!1 Ain't it fun?!1" n/t UTUSN Jun 2013 #5
I think its important for sovereign nations to follow their asylum criteria NoOneMan Jun 2013 #6
Ironically, if Snowden were from some other country, we'd probably grant him asylum here primavera Jun 2013 #23
Exclusive: Documents Illuminate Ecuador’s Spying Practices Zorro Jun 2013 #8
Wow, somebody's got egg on their face now!!! Major Hogwash Jun 2013 #16
You take the psyops bait so easily. wtmusic Jun 2013 #17
It's not bait if it is true. Major Hogwash Jun 2013 #19
And you know it's true, how? wtmusic Jun 2013 #20
. wtmusic Jun 2013 #21
Can you elaborate on what your point is? Ash_F Jun 2013 #18
Why don't you read the article before you automatically make excuses for Correa Zorro Jun 2013 #22
Why don't you make a lick of sense? Ash_F Jun 2013 #24

idwiyo

(5,113 posts)
1. How bloody pathetic! VP 'asks' a foreign country to reject a possible Refugee Claim because
Sat Jun 29, 2013, 05:49 PM
Jun 2013

Last edited Sat Jun 29, 2013, 06:30 PM - Edit history (1)

that's what US wants. Can't get any lower than that.

Zorro

(15,755 posts)
12. Did you participate in the phone call?
Sat Jun 29, 2013, 08:14 PM
Jun 2013

Are you challenging Correa's reported remark that "Biden asked?"

idwiyo

(5,113 posts)
13. I challenge the premise of 'asking'. One doesn't 'ask' another to flatly ignore the law. Period.
Sat Jun 29, 2013, 08:34 PM
Jun 2013

Zorro

(15,755 posts)
14. I did not realize
Sat Jun 29, 2013, 08:56 PM
Jun 2013

you were an expert in international law and US-Ecuador diplomatic relations.

Sorry.

idwiyo

(5,113 posts)
15. It's OK, nothing to be ashamed or sorry about. I am sure there are a lot of people out there who
Sat Jun 29, 2013, 09:05 PM
Jun 2013

think there is nothing wrong with 'asking' others to ignore (or outright break) the law.

Have a cup of tea and relax. It will be OK.

idwiyo

(5,113 posts)
9. How about don't make an arse of yourself and don't encourage others to break an international law?
Sat Jun 29, 2013, 08:00 PM
Jun 2013

The decision on who gets and doesn't get a Refugee Status is governed by international law and should be decided without bullying by one of the world's biggest superpowers.

Ohio Joe

(21,776 posts)
10. ahhhh... I mis-understood. I thought you were going off on some 'He's weak because he 'asked'' thing
Sat Jun 29, 2013, 08:05 PM
Jun 2013

Not what you were saying though, my apologies.

UTUSN

(70,781 posts)
5. And Ecuador replies, "It's *Opposites* Day!1 Whatever you ask we do Opposite!1 Ain't it fun?!1" n/t
Sat Jun 29, 2013, 06:54 PM
Jun 2013
 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
6. I think its important for sovereign nations to follow their asylum criteria
Sat Jun 29, 2013, 07:03 PM
Jun 2013

After all, if they just do what other nations want, what is the point of offering asylum? A program to let people in if their origin country doesn't mind (who then therefore do not need asylum)?

Let Ecuador figure it out. They are big boys, as much as the US is.

primavera

(5,191 posts)
23. Ironically, if Snowden were from some other country, we'd probably grant him asylum here
Sun Jun 30, 2013, 01:15 AM
Jun 2013

The definition of a refugee under US law is "any person who is outside any country of such person's nationality or, in the case of a person having no nationality, is outside any country in which such person last habitually resided, and who is unable or unwilling to return to, and is unable or unwilling to avail himself or herself of the protection of that country because of persecution or a well founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion."

Snowden is a.) outside his home country and b.) unable to return to the US because of a well-founded fear that he will be persecuted on account of his political belief that the US government is violating domestic and international law through its national security surveillance practices.

Zorro

(15,755 posts)
8. Exclusive: Documents Illuminate Ecuador’s Spying Practices
Sat Jun 29, 2013, 07:58 PM
Jun 2013

The country where anti-surveillance hero Edward Snowden wants to take refuge spent half a million dollars on an Israeli-made “GSM interceptor” in a deal brokered by a U.S. middleman. Seeking the capacity to “intercept text messages, falsify and modify the text messages” among other tricks.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/exclusive-documents-illuminate-ecuadors-spying-practices

Whoops!

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
16. Wow, somebody's got egg on their face now!!!
Sat Jun 29, 2013, 09:29 PM
Jun 2013

It's not 'spying' if the other guy is doing it.

What a complete fool Correa has made of himself.

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
18. Can you elaborate on what your point is?
Sat Jun 29, 2013, 09:43 PM
Jun 2013

It would appear you are trying to point to some apparent hypocrisy. You are going need make a complete argument to show that.

That is a common law enforcement tool that should be used after there is sufficient evidence of probable cause, on paper, with signed affidavits from known investigators and witnesses, approved by a known judge, in writing. What I described is a proper and just warrant process. All of which is subject to public scrutiny and review so that the judges and investigators can be replaced through legal or political means if need be.

The real controversy over PRISM is not about the technology, but the abuse of it. The lack of oversite. The lack of a paper trail. The lack proper warrant practices. The total lack of the public's ability to obtain accountability due to the fact that it was hidden from them in the first place.

Do you have evidence that the new government in Ecuador has committed all of those abuses? Or any at all? The old government did, and it got replaced.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. asks Ecuador to reje...