Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,068 posts)
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 09:28 PM Jun 2013

House leader proposes new postal reform plan

Source: Washington Post

The chief House architect of a Postal Service overhaul that failed to gain traction in the last Congress is back with new draft legislation that would allow the financially ailing agency to move to five-day delivery and ban it from entering no-layoff agreements with employees.

In an effort to broaden support for a bill criticized by Democrats as too partisan and anti-labor, House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) is attempting to soften opposition with his new proposal released Thursday. It would allow the Postal Service to scrap an annual $6 billion payment to pre-fund health costs for future retirees, a major concession that is likely to help the bill’s chances in the Senate.

The pre-funding requirement and plummeting mail volume pushed the mail agency into a $15.9 billion deficit in the last year alone, and postal officials have warned they will default on a third pre-funding payment this year.

But Issa’s new draft also keeps proposals that have divided lawmakers. Democrats are likely to oppose any language allowing layoffs, and members of both parties who represent rural districts have pushed back against five-day delivery.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/house-leader-proposes-new-postal-reform-plan/2013/06/13/8833d452-d464-11e2-a73e-826d299ff459_story.html

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

westerebus

(2,976 posts)
1. So another bite at the apple.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 09:45 PM
Jun 2013

Mr. Issa it's not the apple that's rotten, it is you that's rotten to the core.

SunSeeker

(51,771 posts)
2. Getting rid of that pre-funding of healthcare requirement is huge. I'd take that deal.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 09:47 PM
Jun 2013

Once the post office is in the black again, it can put Saturdays back. And hire back laid off workers. The Post Office was planning on going to 5 days without this deal anyway. We have got to save this Post Office, and this appears to be the only way to do it at the moment.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
5. Maybe, good about getting in order. But I see privatization getting the jobs, not postal workers.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 09:59 PM
Jun 2013

Strange. Where I live, we have 5 day service and they are hiring. Starting at $15 an hour.

Occulus

(20,599 posts)
3. Saw this coming, quit without notice.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 09:52 PM
Jun 2013

Seventeen years. And yes, it fucked me running. Oh well.

I will be very disappointed, but supremely unsurprised, if postal employees do not go on strike over this. Thing is, the unions completely and spectacularly abrogated their responsibility to adequately represent their members' interests in the most recent collective bargaining agreement by allowing the use of temps, officially, in their contracts, so even if they do strike, it will have very little effect.

If this is put into place, and the no-layoff clause is abolished, it will be the end of the last nationwide middle-class job with any real job security, and we will officially be a temp service nation.

It is the final fistfucking, the kill-you-off gangbang, the rape-you-dead corporate mentality brought to us all by that slimy, addled, racist, bigoted, glad-he's-dead-and-damn-his-ghost Ronald "I'm so stupid my ketchup is a vegetable" Reagan.

We. Are. Screwed.

tclambert

(11,087 posts)
8. But he wants to screw it up more. He wants to force privatization.
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 06:41 AM
Jun 2013

At every turn, he wants to hurt workers, especially public service workers. When the postal clerks' union settled on a contract with the USPS, Issa lamented that the Postmaster General had missed a good chance for cost savings. What that obviously means is he wanted concessions on benefits and cuts in pay for the postal workers.

5-day delivery is about cutting jobs. And he wants to do that when unemployment is high. Hell, we ought to go to 7-day delivery, if only as a way to create more jobs. Oh, I forgot, Republicans don't believe government can create any jobs.

 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
7. Here's an idea, Issa. RESCIND the goddamned requirement...
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 10:54 PM
Jun 2013

...that the USPS pre-fund its retirement program for 75 years - because that's the ONLY reason it's "broke" - thanks to this Repig-created albatross around its neck.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House leader proposes new...