Biden pledges support for Baltimore in wake of Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse
Source: ABC News
March 26, 2024, 12:52 PM
President Joe Biden gave remarks Tuesday on the Baltimore bridge collapse, telling residents "we're going to stay with you as long as it takes."
"It's my intention that the federal government will pay for the entire cost of reconstruction in that bridge. I expect the Congress to support my effort," Biden said from the White House.
"This is going to take some time," the president said, adding, "We're not leaving until this job gets done."
Personnel on the ship alerted the Maryland Department of Transportation that they lost control of the vessel, and local authorities were able to close the bridge before it was struck, "which undoubtedly saved lives," Biden told reporters.
Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/biden-remarks-francis-scott-key-bridge-collapse-baltimore-harbor/story?id=108510121
pfitz59
(10,381 posts)Shows how fragile even the largest structures can be.
BlueKota
(1,741 posts)brush
(53,784 posts)What is that about? Tugs could've stopped the ship, which lost power, from ramming into the bridge.
An investigation is in order.
BumRushDaShow
(129,064 posts)the tugs aren't usually out there escorting those types of ocean-going container ships.
I know here in Philly where we have the Port of Philadelphia and ships going up and down the Delaware River to the various piers (I worked near there and had an office with a view of the ships traversing the river), the only tugs out there were for barges or for something that is about to dock at a pier.
brush
(53,784 posts)Last edited Tue Mar 26, 2024, 04:03 PM - Edit history (1)
and I am sure we have a number of Navy, Coasties, or other water navigators on DU, I was told by my Coastie former co-worker while Sea-dooing on the OH River (yes I did Sea-doo in that river, getting there via a tributary located in Indiana that exited to the river ) that we were to "idle" while going under any bridge - basically drift with the original momentum as you pass under it. So I am guessing any powered ship would need to do that and since it's possible they were preparing to or had backed off the engines to do that, the engine might have stalled and they couldn't restart.
brush
(53,784 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,064 posts)or even hitting something with a sudden engine thrust. Plus the current will be different when the water is "squeezed" through pylons/bridge struts.
ETA - it's like a waterway "rule of the road" (river).
There were a couple pedestrian bridges that went over that tributary and each had little signs on them that said something like "Please idle" (or whatever warning wording was used) before you drifted under the bridge.
Deep State Witch
(10,427 posts)According to the press conference with Gov. Moore and Sec. Buttigieg.
IronLionZion
(45,447 posts)Trump can toss them a roll of paper towels.
This impacts shipping and driving infrastructure. Tons of cargo use the Baltimore port, tons of people use the bridge every day.
Deep State Witch
(10,427 posts)Probably would have withheld funding because Maryland is a blue state.
Cha
(297,275 posts)NowsTheTime
(690 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,064 posts)But as I also understand from various articles, the impetus is to get the work started NOW knowing that it will probably take years to settle the insurance claims for reimbursement.
NowsTheTime
(690 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,064 posts)and although obviously not to the same scale as a portion of a large bridge (here it was a significant part of a 10-lane highway and overpass), I found this about the company that owned the truck involved in the tragedy here (the driver was killed in the accident) -
A driver working for TK Transport, the firm linked to Sundays accident, was involved in a similar wreck in 2015.
by Ryan W. Briggs and Jason Laughlin
Updated Jun. 14, 2023, 10:54 a.m. ET | Published Jun. 13, 2023, 2:01 p.m. ET
(snip)
The condition of the tanker truck and whether it was well maintained would be key questions in such a suit, Mongeluzzi said. Tractor trailers have the equivalent of an airplanes black box in them to record the details of trips, and data gathered from that device will be critical to an investigation. Whether that device survived the fire any better than the highway bridge, though, is uncertain.
The problem, and Ive had this because Ive handled a multitude of fire cases, [is] they can be incinerated, Mongeluzzi said.
A company of TK Transports size, the lawyer said, likely has liability insurance with a cap around $10 million, which pales compared with the costs of highway reconstruction or lost revenue and added costs for businesses and commuters.
Youre talking about literally billions of dollars, he said. There is no way that a TK Transport could possibly have the insurance coverage for the assets to pay for that.
(snip)
https://www.inquirer.com/news/tk-transport-i95-closing-accident-history-moody-20230613.html
I expect this will be the same issue for the owner of that vessel multiplied by many billions due to the infrastructure costs alone and loss of commerce, including from the clearing of the debris, and more significantly, the closure of the port, with redirection of both ships and other vehicles. They won't have enough insurance to cover that.
I-695 is Baltimore's "beltway" so it was heavily used.
NowsTheTime
(690 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,064 posts)I saw an article this morning where the it was estimated that because of this, the Port of Baltimore would be losing upwards of $9 million per day of commerce.
Also heard a local news story this morning about how some mitigation construction had already been underway for one of our bridges over the Delaware River here in Philly - https://www.audacy.com/kywnewsradio/news/local/del-memorial-bridge-barriers-absorb-crashes-baltimore-cargo-ship-collapse
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)I question whether rebuilding this bridge is the best idea, however. It just doesn't look essential. It looks like a relic of a freeways-solve-everything era, and the hazard from the Port will remain.