Trump doubles down on 'impossibility' of obtaining bond for $464M judgment
Source: ABC News
March 21, 2024, 10:58 AM
Lawyers for former President Donald Trump are doubling down on their claim that securing a bond for his $464 million civil fraud judgment is impossible, according to a letter sent to New York's Appellate Division Thursday.
Trump attorney Clifford Robert described New York Attorney General Letitia James' suggestion Wednesday that Trump secure multiple smaller bonds or hand over property to the court as "illogical," "unconstitutional," "impractical," and "unjust."
"Perhaps worst of all, the Attorney General argues that Defendants should be forced to dispose of iconic, multi-billion-dollar real-estate holdings in a 'fire sale,'" Robert wrote in the letter.
Pushing back on the suggestion that Trump could hand over properties to the court, Robert said that the proposal was impractical and "functionally equivalent" to the Trump Organization's court-appointed monitor.
He argued that James' suggestion that Trump procure a series of smaller bonds would fail to resolve Trump's current predicament because lenders are still unwilling to offer a bond using both cash and property as collateral.
Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/US/trumps-attorneys-appeals-court-secure-464m-bond-fraud/story?id=108347165
Permanut
(5,608 posts)I'm trying to figure out how to use that scam if I get a parking ticket.
CRK7376
(2,199 posts)Don't cheat or break the laws and save money....I hope they take everything you own!
boyedav1969
(93 posts)...he had over $400M in cash, which was of course most likely a lie. Otherwise, all he'd have to borrow is the additional amount of bond he can't cover himself.
Not being able to cover bond for appeal isn't his biggest concern, it's that more people will realize that he isn't nearly as rich as his ego wants to project. That he's been one giant fraud the entire time.
bucolic_frolic
(43,166 posts)I hear there's a difference. Would these loan application constitute additional fraud? Is that the sticking point?
CrispyQ
(36,469 posts)Here's a really interesting article on what he actually owns.
"Trump owns the service areas." "Trump owns a 30% stake." "Trump owns the ground lease." "Trump may own some units."
https://www.curbed.com/article/trump-lawsuit-real-estate-nyc-letitia-james.html
Hope22
(1,839 posts)It seems that way to me too but maybe a fairy godmother can work it out for us! Stuff him in an orange pumpkin and get him the heck out of here!
Deuxcents
(16,221 posts)In the E Jean Carroll case and then, poof! He had the funds! Hes a liar and I think somethings up
prodigitalson
(2,422 posts)he made his bead
underpants
(182,806 posts)No one handles debt BIGLY like he does.
intheflow
(28,474 posts)Or at least enough to make him able to also borrow from other lenders. That says absolutely everything I need to know about Trump's personal finances and ability to pay the money back some day.
Prairie Gates
(1,010 posts)BWdem4life
(1,669 posts)He's got the "too big" part right.
prodigitalson
(2,422 posts)cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)Brainfodder
(6,423 posts)I will be eating a large box of my favorite DONuts when this A$$HOLE croaks THAT I guarantee you!
ArkansasDemocrat1
(1,193 posts)iluvtennis
(19,858 posts)mike_c
(36,281 posts)We have the very best thoughts and prayers.
apnu
(8,756 posts)Pay up or shut up Donald!
NanaCat
(1,128 posts)How do any of those hysterical accusations apply to what Ms James said? It's exactly what any lawyer who successfully sued you would tell you if you went crying poor mouth to them--Bond up, or pay up. There are no other options, and being a whingy titty baby about it doesn't change that.
Thousands of normal Americans who lose a lawsuit hear, 'Bond up or pay up' from lawyers and judges, every bloody day. None of the ordinary ones ever get their complaints about being a lawsuit L-O-S-E-R in the media. Nobody ever gives them fawning coverage about it.
They either bond up--or pay up.
And that is 100% the logical, constitutional, practical and just outcome that every lawsuit L-O-S-E-R has to face. Because it's always what happens to the L-O-S-E-R of a lawsuit. They bond up or pay up, and courts support that happening after a lawsuit ruling. Only an appeals court might--might--change that.
Bond up or pay up, Tangerine Twitler.