Intuitive Machines: Odysseus Moon lander 'tipped over on touchdown'
Source: BBC
2 hours ago
The Odysseus Moon lander is likely lying on its side with its head resting against a rock.
The US spacecraft, which made history on Thursday by becoming the first ever privately built and operated robot to complete a soft lunar touchdown, is otherwise in good condition. Its owner, Texan firm Intuitive Machines, says Odysseus has plenty of power and is communicating with Earth. Controllers are trying to retrieve pictures from the robot.
Steve Altemus, the CEO and co-founder of IM, said it wasn't totally clear what happened but the data suggested the robot caught a foot on the surface and then fell because it still had some lateral motion at the moment of landing. All the scientific instruments that planned to take observations on the Moon are on the side of Odysseus that should still allow them to do some work. The only payload likely on the "wrong side" of the lander, pointing down at the lunar surface, is an art project.
"We're hopeful to get pictures and really do an assessment of the structure and assessment of all the external equipment," Mr Altemus told reporters. "So far, we have quite a bit of operational capability even though we're tipped over. And so that's really exciting for us, and we are continuing the surface operations mission as a result of it."
Read more: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-68388695
Odysseus took this photo on approach some 10km above the surface
Had watched a replay of the briefing and apparently as it was about to land and was slowly descending while still moving horizontally, they believe one of the landing struts might have snagged the surface causing it to tip over onto an elevated part of the surface or a rock (apparently in a way that still allowed the solar array to face the sun and not completely blocking other instruments). They want to eject an "eagle cam" out of it so it goes some distance away enough to get a good pic of it and hopefully send that image back.
bucolic_frolic
(43,206 posts)Seriously, they didn't have this gamed out? Center of gravity, braking or lack thereof, not landing flat. They should have consulted AI for engineering.
BumRushDaShow
(129,165 posts)all trying to keep the antenna line-of-sight to Earth and the solar panels facing the sun. Definitely risky!
Ptah
(33,032 posts)Igel
(35,323 posts)It was still moving sideways as it approached the surface. A leg, they say, must have caught on something sticking up from the surface. A force at a distance from a pivot point ... That's an unbalanced torque.
This caused it to flip.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,013 posts)You can't protect against every eventuality or you would have a much heavier craft (unlaunchable) and no science or experiments.
It's not like the choice is no protection or 100% all contigencies protection. You have some engineering information that there are no shock absorbers?
Shock absorbers are for downward deceleration at the moment of landing. It seems that there was horizontal motion and those shock absorbers wouldn't help. There probably was some engineering to mitigate sideways forces.
Engineering is about economic tradeoffs. You could make cars 100% safe by keeping airbags constantly inflated, but nobody would buy them. You could make cars as crash resistant as a tank, but you couldn't get them to run for long at 65 mph due to weight.
Have YOU ever fallen? You have leg muscles for shock absorbers. You never fell over? Congratulations.
brush
(53,794 posts)so they wouldn't tip over, or a mechanism to right themselves.
BumRushDaShow
(129,165 posts)they were trying to do this in a cost-effective (relatively "cheap" ) manner to make it attractive for private companies to purchase for their own use. So they probably weren't looking at bells and whistles at this point. The fuel mix was unique though so they got to test that.
LastDemocratInSC
(3,647 posts)prodigitalson
(2,426 posts)RockRaven
(14,977 posts)on some rangefinder sensor prior to launch, which contributed to the excess lateral movement. If true, very "oops."
BumRushDaShow
(129,165 posts)and it seemed more of a "had the safety been removed then the sensor could have been deployed to do a correction" type of thing vs having been a cause per se.
ThoughtCriminal
(14,047 posts)But without knowing where the center of gravity is, I'm not sure.
Just my Kerbal experience at work here.
EndlessWire
(6,546 posts)of their accomplishment. This was welcome relief to the usual news, and I am grateful for it.
But, technically, they crashed on landing. They just didn't disintegrate, and apparently can salvage some of the mission. This is a learning experience. The next one will be better.
I noticed the spokespeople wearing little uniform shirts, and this added to my sense of "Star Trek Beginnings." They are trying to become a delivery service! I wish it could have been me. They made history!
dchill
(38,510 posts)Bummer, dudes!
Mawspam2
(734 posts)Hassler
(3,380 posts)lastlib
(23,252 posts)LudwigPastorius
(9,156 posts)Orrex
(63,216 posts)mahina
(17,679 posts)Like that brother did in Lahaina when the car, escaping the fires, hulid from the wind.
Might have to wait a little while
BumRushDaShow
(129,165 posts)mahina
(17,679 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,165 posts)(Dwayne Johnson) personified (in animation)!