Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,358 posts)
Mon Jul 27, 2020, 01:48 PM Jul 2020

Houses approves Clyburn proposal to rename voting rights bill after John Lewis

Source: The Hill

The House on Monday approved a proposal from Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) to rename legislation meant to restore a key provision of the Voting Rights Act after the late Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.).

The lower chamber passed the proposal to rename H.R. 4 the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act by unanimous consent.

Lewis, who died at the age of 80 on July 17, played an instrumental role in the passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965, which established greater protections for people registering to vote in the South. The bill was passed shortly after Lewis helped lead a group of protesters in a march from Selma, Ala., to Montgomery as part of a push for greater voting rights.

Lewis and other protesters were met at the Edmund Pettus Bridge by hundreds of Alabama state troopers. Officers wielding clubs beat demonstrators as they dispersed the crowd in what is historically known as "Bloody Sunday." Lewis, 25 at the time, suffered a fractured skull after being beaten with a club by a state trooper.



Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/james-clyburn-to-propose-renaming-voting-rights-bill-after-john-lewis/ar-BB17f46d?li=BB141NW3&ocid=DELLDHP

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Houses approves Clyburn proposal to rename voting rights bill after John Lewis (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 2020 OP
Good - and by unanimous consent BumRushDaShow Jul 2020 #1
The GOPers know that it will not see the light of day in the Senate. JustABozoOnThisBus Jul 2020 #8
Appropriate! pandr32 Jul 2020 #2
Perfect! Cracklin Charlie Jul 2020 #3
agree this is far better than renaming the bridge nt yellowdogintexas Jul 2020 #6
Excellent news! nt iluvtennis Jul 2020 #4
Entirely fitting. K&R for visibility. crickets Jul 2020 #5
Excellent. I have a question about the mechanics of this. lagomorph777 Jul 2020 #7

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,375 posts)
8. The GOPers know that it will not see the light of day in the Senate.
Mon Jul 27, 2020, 04:30 PM
Jul 2020

McConnell *might* allow a vote on changing the name of the bill. But he won't allow the bill's passage to come to a vote.

Cracklin Charlie

(12,904 posts)
3. Perfect!
Mon Jul 27, 2020, 02:06 PM
Jul 2020

This is a fitting tribute.

Much better than re-naming some rickety old racist bridge after such an amazing man.

Just my opinion, but if they want to name a bridge after John Lewis, it should be a new bridge. A beautiful bridge, a technologically advanced bridge, a bridge that represents Rep. Lewis’ contributions to civil rights in this country. A bridge to properly represent his character...not just rename the bridge where he got his skull cracked open. It should be a place for people to come and learn.

Re-naming just seems too small for this titan.

Again, just my opinion. I want more for him.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
7. Excellent. I have a question about the mechanics of this.
Mon Jul 27, 2020, 03:09 PM
Jul 2020

If SCROTUS has ruled that we don't have a right to vote, how can legislation fix that (other than by changing the composition of SCROTUS, of course).

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Houses approves Clyburn p...