1 officer charged in George Floyd death seeks case dismissal
Source: AP
By AMY FORLITI
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) An attorney for one of four Minneapolis police officers charged in the death of George Floyd is asking to have his clients case dismissed, saying there isnt probable cause to charge him based on all of the evidence in the case and the law.
In court filings made public Wednesday, Thomas Lanes attorney, Earl Gray, painted an image of a rookie officer who trusted his senior officer after Floyd had been acting erratically, struggling and hurting himself. Gray said Lane had asked twice if officers should roll Floyd on his side, and the senior officer Derek Chauvin said no.
As part of his court filing, Gray filed transcripts from body camera footage recorded by Lanes camera and the camera of his partner, J. Kueng, as well as a transcript of Lanes interview with state investigators. Gray wrote that all of the evidence exonerates his client and that it is not fair or reasonable for Lane to stand trial.
Floyd, a Black handcuffed man, died May 25 after Chauvin, a white officer, pressed his knee into Floyds neck for nearly 8 minutes and held it there even after Floyd said he couldnt breathe and stopped moving.
Former Minneapolis police officer Thomas Lane, right, walks out of the Hennepin County Public Safety Facility on Monday afternoon June 20, 2020, in Minneapolis with his attorney, Earl Gray, after a hearing. Lane is one of four former officers charged in the death of George Floyd. (Glen Stubbe/Star Tribune via AP)
Read more: https://apnews.com/24f07a3f4c803166a4292c774f451f25
ck4829
(35,039 posts)ansible
(1,718 posts)pnwmom
(108,959 posts)than the others. Is there some lesser charge he can be charged with?
Codeine
(25,586 posts)and then maybe lesser charges can be discussed.
forgotmylogin
(7,521 posts)If he's not culpable, that's what a trial is designed to figure out.
It's like - just because you don't think you have COVID because you weren't that close to infected people doesn't mean you shouldn't still test for COVID.
Igel
(35,282 posts)More like having your nasopharyngeal cavity examined through your ear canal, if not through your anus.
Or, given that trials these days are dual, both in social media and in the courts, both at the same time.
atreides1
(16,067 posts)Or, is he an automaton...completely void of the ability to think on his own?
Less culpable, you say?
Mr. Lane isn't all that innocent...
https://www.insider.com/fired-minneapolis-police-officer-thomas-lane-had-criminal-record-2020-6
rocktivity
(44,572 posts)can be fatally hazardous to your health?
rocktivity
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)Yes, he should have done more, in retrospect. But I don't think the rookie bears as much responsibility as Chauvin.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)pnwmom
(108,959 posts)and the rookie asking Chauvin if they should turn him on his side. It was Lane's 4th day on the force, and Chauvin was his "training officer." Their two crimes don't seem to be equal.
Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)It seemed unlikely they would have a strong case for all of them. I suspected it was more based on public pressure then evidence, and the prosecutors figured they would sort it out later.