Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

denem

(11,045 posts)
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 02:12 AM Jun 2020

Russia bounty intelligence 'may have been' in Trump brief but wasn't deemed 'actionable'

Source: NBC

Russia bounty intelligence 'may have been' in Trump brief but wasn't deemed 'actionable,' senior Republican says

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration told Republican members of Congress on Monday that intelligence about potential Russian bounties may have been included at some point in the President's Daily Brief but not conveyed to President Donald Trump in a formal threat briefing because it wasn't yet "actionable," the top Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee said.

"I believe it may have been" in the written President's Daily Brief, or PDB, Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, said in an interview.

Referring to the president, McCaul said: "I think the way the process works is that he gets briefed about three times a week on sort of actionable, credible items. And the decision was made that this was not at that point in time a credible, actionable piece of intelligence. And if at any point it did, it would be raised to his attention."

Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/russia-bounty-intelligence-may-have-been-trump-brief-wasn-t-n1232498



Still have not got their stories straight.
49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Russia bounty intelligence 'may have been' in Trump brief but wasn't deemed 'actionable' (Original Post) denem Jun 2020 OP
"I believe it may have been" in the written President's Daily Brief ... it wasn't yet "actionable," Botany Jun 2020 #1
"...it wasn't yet "actionable." WTF? That's word-salad-o-speak... brush Jun 2020 #16
He should be gone by noon today Botany Jun 2020 #24
There should be no way he can stay in office, but then there are... brush Jun 2020 #32
Oh Yes.. Nortbnd101 Jul 2020 #47
So Fat Donnie gets the "President's DAILY Brief" three times a week? LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jun 2020 #28
It comes out six days a week, and he might meet about it, but has only increased those meetings ancianita Jun 2020 #37
Here they go sliding down the slope to..."Sure he ignored it - it was the right thing to do!" lagomorph777 Jun 2020 #35
Whether to read or meet over the PDB is not a matter of group consensus. It's the president's #1 ancianita Jun 2020 #39
Rep. Sean Maloney: Every document the president has seen is stamped and dated - a record is kept. Botany Jun 2020 #41
Exactly. Now, let's see if any of those PDB's have been tampered with. ancianita Jun 2020 #43
If it's in the PDB... SergeStorms Jun 2020 #38
Exactly. ancianita Jun 2020 #40
Yes, and they think everyone will just buy their lies. brush Jul 2020 #48
Trump thought it was in reference to paper towels. C Moon Jun 2020 #2
Good thing Paul Revere wasn't named Donald Trump ArizonaLib Jun 2020 #3
Oooooookay...... SO. WHY. DID. HE. LIE. THEN? RockRaven Jun 2020 #4
Its simple..... louzke9 Jun 2020 #30
"I believe", "I think". Still looking for the spin to let Tru3off the hook. Arkansas Granny Jun 2020 #5
Oh yah, wait. Wait. It may have been... sprinkleeninow Jun 2020 #6
It was VP Bush I... agingdem Jun 2020 #19
And no one thought to get right on this - since 2019??!! Rhiannon12866 Jun 2020 #7
This kind of thing is no one's lookout. It's solely in the president's lap, no one else's. ancianita Jun 2020 #42
Doesn't make any sense to me. RDANGELO Jun 2020 #8
Well that's the whole scandal! That they decided not to act on it! unblock Jun 2020 #9
I guess because my brothers and sisters in arms didn't die of bones spurs. denbot Jun 2020 #10
Sounds familiar Nasruddin Jun 2020 #11
Either he knew or he didn't know. no_hypocrisy Jun 2020 #12
COVID is another 40 9-11s. Trump is like a 9-11 on every street corner. lagomorph777 Jun 2020 #36
Ya nice try to save their ass for deciding to do nothing but try that excuse to the service members cstanleytech Jun 2020 #13
Ignoring PDBs is a republican presidential tradition Midnightwalk Jun 2020 #14
I don't think Bill Kristol has been rehabilitated. SergeStorms Jun 2020 #44
I'm sure you noticed the other names as well Midnightwalk Jun 2020 #46
It was actionable enough that the Pentagon acted on it. keithbvadu2 Jun 2020 #15
"He gets briefed about three times a week..." regnaD kciN Jun 2020 #17
Glad to see I wasn't the only one questioning that! Maeve Jun 2020 #23
He doesn't read them anyway. SergeStorms Jun 2020 #45
Can't wait to see Tuesday's version of events. Grokenstein Jun 2020 #18
Bullshit Solly Mack Jun 2020 #20
But Pres. shouldn't have rewarded Putin offering G7 status and visit to DC wishstar Jun 2020 #21
Second Phase of Denial Lithos Jun 2020 #22
Raw Story is reporting gab13by13 Jun 2020 #25
Plus they had meetings on this and came up with a menu of options soothsayer Jun 2020 #26
all about damage control and the lying GOP will say anything, now. Next excuse beachbumbob Jun 2020 #27
Raw Story is reporting gab13by13 Jun 2020 #31
bolton needs to appear before a committee, so when do democrats form one? beachbumbob Jun 2020 #34
Sitting on his thumbs and making personal deals is what the president is best at. truthisfreedom Jun 2020 #29
The president's daily briefing should be read every day in its entirety by the president, period. chriscan64 Jun 2020 #33
Kick ck4829 Jul 2020 #49

Botany

(70,490 posts)
1. "I believe it may have been" in the written President's Daily Brief ... it wasn't yet "actionable,"
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 02:17 AM
Jun 2020

n/t

brush

(53,764 posts)
16. "...it wasn't yet "actionable." WTF? That's word-salad-o-speak...
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 03:11 AM
Jun 2020

that repugs spin out of their mouths but means absolutely nothing. It does fill up the airwaves and takes up time to say though while at the same time it takes time for the listener to go "huh?", and understand that it's bullshit because it sounds like actual words and it takes time from the interviewers time which doesn't allow he/she to reclaim his/her time or allow another panelist to get in some actual non-word-salad-o-speak to refute it because all of the air is being filled and used by word-salad-o-speak that sounds like words but don't mean anything. Understand?

Oops,sorry, that's all the time we have, folks.

Botany

(70,490 posts)
24. He should be gone by noon today
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 07:06 AM
Jun 2020

Trump knew that Vlad/Russia was paying to kill Americans, he did nothing about it, and when caught
he and the White House said that he was never briefed "on it" even though he had been briefed "on it."


But I still think he should have gone for a number of other reasons including the fact that he and Kush-Turd
went to make money on the C-19 Pandemic with their H.C.Q. and their own C-19 test kits instead of getting
the nation and the world ready for and set up to fight the virus
.

brush

(53,764 posts)
32. There should be no way he can stay in office, but then there are...
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 09:03 AM
Jun 2020

the spineless repugs who won't do their duty to the nation to get an actual Russian agent out of the White House—a Russian asset who has known since March of 2019 when Bolton personally told him. The info was of course in the PDB but he doesn't bother, or can't, read that.

He should be gone but the repugs are circling the wagons still to protect him. McEnany said when she took over the press sec. position that she would never lie to the press. But that's all she's done on this matter.

Nortbnd101

(13 posts)
47. Oh Yes..
Wed Jul 1, 2020, 04:34 AM
Jul 2020

...yes yes yes amigo...Some people spend so much and their valuable attention
on the surgery of CNN and etc.-style reporting...Ain't really all that much there
to pick apart...And what's with the items showing interviewer, subject both
2 small squares on the left of the screen, and the other 4/5ths on a big globby
close-up of Frumpo trying to look concerned..?

28. So Fat Donnie gets the "President's DAILY Brief" three times a week?
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 07:47 AM
Jun 2020

Why don't they just rename it the "Once in a While When He's Not Tweeting or Golfing or Talking With Putin Brief" )?

ancianita

(36,023 posts)
37. It comes out six days a week, and he might meet about it, but has only increased those meetings
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 11:19 AM
Jun 2020

to 3 times a week from the previous three years of 1 to 2 times a week, and maybe not even that.

It's not about what others decide. He's always been able to decide to make the PDB meeting a daily priority or not but he could still read it in digital form every day if he choses.

ancianita

(36,023 posts)
39. Whether to read or meet over the PDB is not a matter of group consensus. It's the president's #1
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 11:25 AM
Jun 2020

classified briefing daily. No one else but him decides what "the right thing to do" is.

So their excuse is a death star load of bullshit.

SergeStorms

(19,193 posts)
38. If it's in the PDB...
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 11:22 AM
Jun 2020

it's actionable. Nothing goes into the President's Daily Briefing unless it's been completely vetted, therefore actionable. Republicans think no one but themselves have ever been in positions of power before.

brush

(53,764 posts)
48. Yes, and they think everyone will just buy their lies.
Wed Jul 1, 2020, 12:15 PM
Jul 2020

That new press sec. McEnany promised the press she'd never lie to them when she first took the job.

Well, that's all she's done since she took the job.

C Moon

(12,212 posts)
2. Trump thought it was in reference to paper towels.
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 02:18 AM
Jun 2020

"Still have not got their stories straight."
You'll know when they get their stories straight, when McConnell backs it.

RockRaven

(14,959 posts)
4. Oooooookay...... SO. WHY. DID. HE. LIE. THEN?
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 02:20 AM
Jun 2020

The White House didn't say initially that "it wasn't actionable," they said " he wasn't briefed on it. "

Big fucking difference, and the lie betrays their consciousness of guilt.

louzke9

(296 posts)
30. Its simple.....
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 08:19 AM
Jun 2020

Did the Russians offer bounties, yes or no? If they did, then that itself ALONE is ACTIONABLE. Do we actually have to have dead bodies as proof before we respond? HELL NO! Were we waiting for videos of money changing hands first or expecting to see Wanted Dead posters plastered on buildings in Afgan villages?

agingdem

(7,845 posts)
19. It was VP Bush I...
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 04:10 AM
Jun 2020

Last edited Tue Jun 30, 2020, 07:58 AM - Edit history (2)

Iran-Contra.."out of the loop"..he was a former director of the CIA...Bush was the loop..

ancianita

(36,023 posts)
42. This kind of thing is no one's lookout. It's solely in the president's lap, no one else's.
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 11:28 AM
Jun 2020

No one else has the authority to act on a military matter but civilian command close to him, and not without consulting the prez, and if he's not available or won't take someone's concern from the Pentagon seriously, it's still all on him.

RDANGELO

(3,433 posts)
8. Doesn't make any sense to me.
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 02:44 AM
Jun 2020

It it wasn't actionable, why would the put in the PDB? In any event, this contradicts what has been reported that there were briefings, and even that John Bolten briefed him on it. So we have multiple people reporting to multiple news organizations over nothing. I doubt it.

denbot

(9,899 posts)
10. I guess because my brothers and sisters in arms didn't die of bones spurs.
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 02:52 AM
Jun 2020

I’m sure that would have gotten his attention.

Nasruddin

(752 posts)
11. Sounds familiar
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 02:57 AM
Jun 2020

Sounds a lot like George Bush & Condoleeza Rice.
https://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/11/911.investigation/
'President Bush said Sunday that an intelligence memo he read shortly before September 11, 2001, contained no "actionable intelligence" that would have helped him to try to prevent the 9/11 attacks.'

no_hypocrisy

(46,080 posts)
12. Either he knew or he didn't know.
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 03:00 AM
Jun 2020

Same result.

This shows that another 9-11 could get past Trump. * was briefed on OBL months before 9-11 happened.

cstanleytech

(26,283 posts)
13. Ya nice try to save their ass for deciding to do nothing but try that excuse to the service members
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 03:06 AM
Jun 2020

that were killed because you decided not to do anything.

Midnightwalk

(3,131 posts)
14. Ignoring PDBs is a republican presidential tradition
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 03:08 AM
Jun 2020

Don't forget Bush

Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US

[link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bin_Ladin_Determined_To_Strike_in_US|]

Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US was the title of the President's Daily Brief prepared by the Central Intelligence Agency and given to U.S. President George W. Bush on Monday, August 6, 2001. The brief warned, 36 days before the September 11 attacks, of terrorism threats from Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda, including "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for a hijacking" of U.S. aircraft.[1]

The President's Daily Brief (PDB) is a brief of important classified information on national security collected by various U.S. intelligence agencies given to the president and a select group of senior officials. On August 6, 2001, the Central Intelligence Agency delivered a President's Daily Brief to President Bush, who was vacationing at his ranch in Crawford, Texas.[2][3]

President Bush's response of "All right. You've covered your ass." has been erroneously linked to this PDB. This response, however, came from a separate PDB linked to Bin Laden from several months earlier. During 2001, CIA analysts produced several reports warning of imminent attacks by Bin Laden and al Qa'ida. Senior officials, including Vice President Dick Cheney and staff from Donald Rumsfeld's office at the Department of Defense, questioned whether these reports might not be deception on the part of Al-Qaeda, purposely designed to needlessly expend resources in response. After reevaluating the legitimate risks of these recent reports, CIA analysts produced a report titled "UBL [Usama Bin Laden] Threats Are Real". It was after this report that the president gave that now-infamous response.[4]


[link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bin_Ladin_Determined_To_Strike_in_US|]

Same excuse only the particulars are different.

But I don't believe the excuse. There were ulterior motives.

For Bush there were members of his cabinet who were aching for war with Iraq. PNAC (btw does anyone remember Bill Kriston before he was rehabilitated) advocated for regime change starting in 1998.

In 1998, Kristol and Kagan advocated regime change in Iraq throughout the Iraq disarmament process through articles that were published in the New York Times.[25][26] Following perceived Iraqi unwillingness to co-operate with UN weapons inspections, core members of the PNAC including Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, R. James Woolsey, Elliot Abrams, Donald Rumsfeld, Robert Zoellick, and John Bolton were among the signatories of an open letter initiated by the PNAC to President Bill Clinton calling for the removal of Saddam Hussein.[19][27] Portraying Saddam Hussein as a threat to the United States, its Middle East allies, and oil resources in the region, and emphasizing the potential danger of any weapons of mass destruction under Iraq's control, the letter asserted that the United States could "no longer depend on our partners in the Gulf War to continue to uphold the sanctions or to punish Saddam when he blocks or evades UN inspections." Stating that American policy "cannot continue to be crippled by a misguided insistence on unanimity in the UN Security Council," the letter's signatories asserted that "the U.S. has the authority under existing UN resolutions to take the necessary steps, including military steps, to protect our vital interests in the Gulf."[28] Believing that UN sanctions against Iraq would be an ineffective means of disarming Iraq, PNAC members also wrote a letter to Republican members of the U.S. Congress Newt Gingrich and Trent Lott,[29] urging Congress to act, and supported the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (H.R.4655)[30][31] which President Clinton signed into law in October 1998.


[link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century|]

Yeah remember back when Bill Kristol wasn't "rehabilitated"? I do. I just don't remember him being rehabilitated.

In Trump's case he has been allied with Russia for years. From memory:

The debt. The stolen election. The private Oval Office interview with only Russian press. Lifting sanctions. Interfering in Ukraine. Withdrawing troops from Syria. Many private meeting with Putin. Refusing to impose new sanctions. Inviting them to G7. Telling the pentagon to withdraw 9500 troops from Germany.

I'll add in the July 4th meeting of republican senators in Moscow.

I can go back further in time as well.

There is a long republican tradition of supporting causes against America's interest.

Maybe 2020 is the year we begin smashing bad traditions.

SergeStorms

(19,193 posts)
44. I don't think Bill Kristol has been rehabilitated.
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 11:35 AM
Jun 2020

He's worried Trump won't grease the right palms if there's another major shooting war. Only Kristol and his old PNAC buddies can truly be trusted with the safety of the United States, you know?

I have no faith in, nor do I trust, Bill Kristol for an instant. His efforts to dethrone Trump are only to bolster his own self-interests. Guaranteed.

Midnightwalk

(3,131 posts)
46. I'm sure you noticed the other names as well
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 11:57 AM
Jun 2020

Like Bolton.

The same bad actors who influence policy keep coming up. They screw up, get washed through lobbying jobs or worse pundit jobs, and then show up again.

Trump is the gangrenous pustule on the cancerous tumor that is the Republican Party.

regnaD kciN

(26,044 posts)
17. "He gets briefed about three times a week..."
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 03:40 AM
Jun 2020

Really? What part of "Presidential Daily Brief" don't you understand, Mikey?

SergeStorms

(19,193 posts)
45. He doesn't read them anyway.
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 11:42 AM
Jun 2020

If there's anything within the PDB his aides believe "will upset him" they don't tell him about it, either. Therefore, anything to do with Putin that wasn't complimentary to Trump's ego, would never have been discussed. Trump would have a hissy-fit, and he'd never believe it anyway because he thinks he and Putin are simpatico in every respect.

It sure would be nice to have a grown-up in the Oval Office again, wouldn't it?

wishstar

(5,268 posts)
21. But Pres. shouldn't have rewarded Putin offering G7 status and visit to DC
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 05:23 AM
Jun 2020

New AP reports Bolton briefed Trump in 2019 (but was classified so Bolton can't confirm) about bounties and $500,000 in cash was found by our military in hands of Taliban determined to have been paid by Russians. There are enough credible indicators of the likelihood Russia was behind bounties to certainly not consider rewarding Russia.

Lithos

(26,403 posts)
22. Second Phase of Denial
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 06:54 AM
Jun 2020

No longer that he did not see it, but that he couldn't do anything about it.

But that too falls flat on its face as the action was for Trump to do something.

Next phase of deniability will be that the issue was already resolved by Trump through a back channel with Putin.

Next phase of deniability is that it's Obama's fault because he created the situation.



gab13by13

(21,304 posts)
25. Raw Story is reporting
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 07:21 AM
Jun 2020

that John Bolton personally briefed Trump on March 2019. It was again put in the PDB Feb. 27th 2020.

 

beachbumbob

(9,263 posts)
27. all about damage control and the lying GOP will say anything, now. Next excuse
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 07:47 AM
Jun 2020

will be their wasn;t any pictures to convey to trump in the PDB so he couldn;t comprehend. PDB isn;t filled with info that isn;t actionable

gab13by13

(21,304 posts)
31. Raw Story is reporting
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 08:29 AM
Jun 2020

from the AP that John Bolton personally briefed Trump on the bounty in March of 2019.

truthisfreedom

(23,145 posts)
29. Sitting on his thumbs and making personal deals is what the president is best at.
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 07:53 AM
Jun 2020

There was no money in taking action on this, so he did nothing.

chriscan64

(1,789 posts)
33. The president's daily briefing should be read every day in its entirety by the president, period.
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 09:19 AM
Jun 2020

The real one, not the cartoons he has them make. The inability and/or unwillingness to do so is unacceptable. "He's unconventional" does not pass muster here. A computer programmer that puts WWE action figures on his desk is unconventional. One that doesn't learn the programming language or write any code is quickly dismissed. "Unfit for office" is not just something we say because he is in the other party.

Even though it's grounds for removal, that is the minor issue. It is a far more serious matter when the security apparatus of the nation is leery about sharing intel with the president out of fear he will blurt something out on twitter or worse get on the phone with Putin and bugger up the whole thing. Again, "threat to national security" is not just some slogan we toss around.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Russia bounty intelligenc...