SEILA LAW LLC v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Omaha Steve (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: US Supreme Court
In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, Congress established the Con- sumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), an independent regula- tory agency tasked with ensuring that consumer debt products are safe and transparent. See Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank), 124 Stat. 1376. Congress transferred the administration of 18 existing federal statutes to the CFPB, including the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and the Truth in Lending Act; and Congress enacted a new prohibition on unfair and deceptive practices in the consumer-finance sector. 12 U. S. C. §5536(a)(1)(B). In doing so, Congress gave the CFPB extensive rulemaking, enforcement, and adjudicatory powers, including the au- thority to conduct investigations, issue subpoenas and civil investiga- tive demands, initiate administrative adjudications, prosecute civil ac- tions in federal court, and issue binding decisions in administrative proceedings. The CFPB may seek restitution, disgorgement, injunc- tive relief, and significant civil penalties for violations of the 19 federal statutes under its purview. So far, the agency has obtained over $11 billion in relief for more than 25 million consumers.
Unlike traditional independent agencies headed by multimember boards or commissions, the CFPB is led by a single Director, §5491(b)(1), who is appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, §5491(b)(2), for a five-year term, during which the President may remove the Director only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office, §§5491(c)(1), (3). The CFPB receives its funding outside the annual appropriations process from the Federal Reserve, which is itself funded outside the appropriations process through bank assessments.
In 2017, the CFPB issued a civil investigative demand to Seila Law LLC, a California-based law firm that provides debt-related legal services to clients. The civil investigative demand (essentially a sub- poena) sought information and documents related to the firms business practices. Seila Law asked the CFPB to set aside the demand on the ground that the agencys leadership by a single Director removable only for cause violated the separation of powers. When the CFPB declined, Seila Law refused to comply with the demand, and the CFPB filed a petition to enforce the demand in District Court. Seila Law renewed its claim that the CFPBs structure violated the separation of powers, but the District Court disagreed and ordered Seila Law to comply with the demand. The Ninth Circuit affirmed, concluding that Seila Laws challenge was foreclosed by Humphreys Executor v. United States, 295 U. S. 602, and Morrison v. Olson, 487 U. S. 654.
Held: The judgment is vacated and remanded.
Read more: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-7_n6io.pdf
leftieNanner
(15,074 posts)Is this a good thing or a bad thing?
FBaggins
(26,727 posts)Despite the original intent of the legislators that the CFPB would have some independence from the rest of the executive branch.
Essentially... the part of the law setting that independence up was unconstitutional.
The decision was essentially 5-4 (along the lines you would probably guess)... but the four "no" votes still agreed that this portion of the law was "sever-able" from the rest of the implementing legislation... so the CFPB itself is not unconstitutional.
3Hotdogs
(12,358 posts)"Nuts and bolts. We got screwed."
CFPB was on our side. They lost.
Grins
(7,203 posts)Vacated: The decision of the Ninth Circuit is void.
Remanded: Sent back to the Ninth; essentially a do-over.
It aint over.
Beakybird
(3,332 posts)FBaggins
(26,727 posts)It means that Biden won't be stuck with Trump's CFPB director. He can replace Kraninger
BumRushDaShow
(128,702 posts)could not be "fired" (removed) by the President based on the way Dodd-Frank was written making that part of the law unconstitutional (but not the agency itself).
Omaha Steve
(99,556 posts)This post does not fit the format required in LBN.
Statement of Purpose
Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.