Supreme Court blocks Trump from ending DACA
Source: CNN
Washington (CNN)The Supreme Court on Thursday blocked the Trump administration's attempt to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, an Obama-era program that protects hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the US as children from deportation.
The 5-4 ruling was written by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor.
The opinion marks the second time in a week when the Supreme Court -- bolstered with two of President Donald Trump's nominees -- has ruled against the Trump administration.
The court's ruling will allow the DACA recipients to continue to renew membership in the program that offers them work authorization and temporary protection from deportation.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/18/politics/daca-immigration-supreme-court/index.html
DACA is reinstated for now!!!
Department of Homeland Security decision to roll back DACA was "arbitrary and capricious"!!!!
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,446 posts)Supreme Court preserves DACA on 5-4 ruling written by Roberts, another rebuke to Trump this week.
Link to tweet
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/18-587_5ifl.pdf
George II
(67,782 posts)jayfish
(10,039 posts)GWB would end up saving us. Unfortunately, only slightly tongue-in-cheek.
mdelaguna
(471 posts)SCantiGOP
(13,870 posts)A portion of Thomas dissent without further comment.
MontanaMama
(23,314 posts)Cha
(297,220 posts)homegirl
(1,429 posts)always backfires. How is it they never remember the SCOTUS appointment is for life resulting in some very rational decisions from unexpected appointees.
Squinch
(50,949 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,977 posts)WaPo breaking -
By
Robert Barnes
June 18, 2020 at 10:05 a.m. EDT
President Trump has tried since 2017 to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which President Obama authorized through executive action in 2012 to protect law-abiding immigrants brought by their parents. The program does not provide a path to citizenship, but it does allow recipients to work legally.
This is a developing story and will be updated.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-rules-against-trump-administration-attempt-to-end-daca-a-win-for-undocumented-immigrants-brought-to-us-as-children/2020/06/18/4f0b6c74-b163-11ea-8758-bfd1d045525a_story.html
Botany
(70,504 posts)Maribelle
(4,783 posts)... 18 A good tree cant produce evil fruit, neither
can a corrupt tree produce good fruit.
Matthew 7:18
iluvtennis
(19,858 posts)sop
(10,177 posts)rurallib
(62,415 posts)Now I am so hopeful I almost can't contain myself.
Is it really possible?
bucolic_frolic
(43,161 posts)CJ Roberts is indicating by his votes that the American political middle will hold. Or is it too early to tell?
George II
(67,782 posts)...I hope he's well enough to celebrate this (temporary) decision!!
renate
(13,776 posts)Good people are so beautiful!
littlemissmartypants
(22,656 posts)ProudMNDemocrat
(16,785 posts)No, Trump is not going to be happy. He wants them in cages as well.
That is close to 1 million people Trump cannot immeadetely deport. They serve in the US Military, as First Responders, etc.
IronLionZion
(45,442 posts)Those 4 conservatives should know their days are numbered if Trump should lose reelection and GOP will hopefully lose the Senate. Clarence Thomas isn't getting any younger.
homegirl
(1,429 posts)SC Justice has been removed, let's work to make Clarence Thomas the second.
rsdsharp
(9,175 posts)Im only aware of Justice Chase being impeached but acquited during the Jefferson administration.
homegirl
(1,429 posts)Samuel Chase - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Chase - 183k - 12 hours ago - similar pages
Samuel Chase (April 17, 1741 ? June 19, 1811) was an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court ... the claim of exclusive judicial review, led his party's efforts to remove the Federalists from the bench. ... Of the eight votes cast, the closest vote was 18 for conviction/removal from office and 16 for acquittal in ...
Can a Supreme Court justice be forcibly removed from the bench? A ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com / news / answer-sheet / wp / 2015 / 12 / 12 / can-a-supreme-court-just / - similar pages
Dec 12, 2015 ... On May 15, 1969, Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas resigned under threat of impeachment hearings. Fortas, appointed to the bench in 1965, ...
DinahMoeHum
(21,787 posts)#newrostrong
sheshe2
(83,758 posts)sop
(10,177 posts)Maribelle
(4,783 posts)Justice Clarence Thomas's opinion, concurring and dissenting in part, joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch.
Additionally, Justice Brett Kavanaugh's opinion concurring and dissenting in part.
sop
(10,177 posts)Justice Alito: "I join JUSTICE THOMASs opinion. DACA presents a delicate political issue, but that is not our business. As JUSTICE THOMAS explains, DACA was unlawful from the start, and that alone is sufficient to justify its termination."
aggiesal
(8,914 posts)If it was, lawsuits would have already deemed it so.
Instead their dissenting opinions is not based on law, but rather their personal opinions.
Terry_M
(745 posts)Nothing in the decision by the majority or the dissenting opinions is about the good or bad of DACA - this is all hinging on technicalities, the majority says that the Trump admin did not line up all of their ducks in a row and needs to go back and try again (if Trump wakes up tomorrow and feels like it he could say try again and this time the agency will have its ducks in a row and future court challenges will have NOTHING to hang on at all - the only hope in him NOT trying again is enough people yelling at him about the costs in votes during
an election year).
The dissenting opinions are basically that no - the trump admin was close enough to having its ducks in a row proceduraly, or that we're heading down a bad path where one admin can put in an executive order that another administration has to later meet high bars to undo.
The dissent from Thomas is something I'll be thinking back to when Trump issues 30 executive orders in January just before Biden takes over and Biden has to take 12 months to undo them slowly and carefully because of the precedent set here today over Thomas' dissent.
Response to George II (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
dalton99a
(81,486 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Take THAT bunker boy.
Bayard
(22,070 posts)I don't think he's such a good guy. But this is an excellent decision.
Mersky
(4,981 posts)Ive been smiling more this week thanks to SCOTUS.
sl8
(13,769 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)mcar
(42,329 posts)Another good, sound, realistic decision? What is happening?
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Only Dotard is so vindictive.
LeftInTX
(25,323 posts)I shared on FB and first thing I said was "Oh Happy Day"...I'm sure everyone is sharing this!!!
I totally did not expect this decision.
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)if he's not careful.
Dude is desperate not to be Melville Fuller.
iluvtennis
(19,858 posts)Roc2020
(1,616 posts)did not surprise me. frankly it's common sense and the justices are not stupid. not firing someone for being gay...common sense. not deporting people to any country they have never been since the age of 2..common sense.
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)based on the technicality the Dept Homeland Security did not touch all the bases before implementing the policy. The decision did not rule the policy was good, bad or indifferent, just that the change wasn't done correctly.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,446 posts)Toorich
(391 posts)that DACA is law, not executive order, passed by a Democratic majority Congress and signed by
President Biden before a new round of litigation can get started.
George II
(67,782 posts)DesertRat
(27,995 posts)Yay!
honest.abe
(8,678 posts)I do believe Roberts is going to vote with us on any of the Trump related cases that push the limits of the law.
llmart
(15,539 posts)So much winning! Is Donnie getting tired of all this "winning"? Are his brain dead supporters tired of all this winning yet?
This was another slap down to Dimwit Donnie. I can't stand Bolton, but he was right when he said he was incompetent. We've known that from the start.
KS Toronado
(17,235 posts)came from because the Der Hair Furer doesn't like them because they'll vote Democrat if given the chance.
Lonestarblue
(9,988 posts)They grew up here. They should be allowed to become citizens and end this craziness of not knowing their future.
KWR65
(1,098 posts)Trump can now follow the proper procedure to end DACA.
George II
(67,782 posts)...and hopefully won't be in place until Joe Biden gets sworn in.
Blasphemer
(3,261 posts)and capricious. So, not only does the Trump admin need to go back to the drawing board but their reasoning has to pass the smell test. At any rate, it all comes down to the election.
sinkingfeeling
(51,457 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(175,735 posts)Upthevibe
(8,048 posts)Great news to wake up to today.....
Judi Lynn
(160,528 posts)It would be hazardous to try to put too much faith in it, yet, as the adversary is relentless, but it's beyond imagination by now!
May I add the original version of the same song, same choir, different singers, which appeared during the living hell of the VietNam war? It was the transcendent moment for millions, undoubtedly, hearing it for the first time. It had the power to lift a person's entire spirit out of the moment, out of the world, for just that time.
I am certain anyone who loves it will drop everything to hear it through to its end every time!
Thank you, so much, for celebrating a totally shocking moment in this country's history with exactly the song which transfixed so many human beings then, during the darkness in the world.
Can't replace the original, although the current ones are ideal, too.
Same original people in concert:
What a day, and you broke the news to D.U. Thank you, so much, George II.
George II
(67,782 posts)...try to do it again before then or even muster the resources to do it properly, and if America wakes up he won't be around to do it in January.
Judi Lynn
(160,528 posts)November isn't so close, at all, as you mentioned.
Hope time will weigh heavily on his hands, and he can't get any real "mo" going.
DENVERPOPS
(8,820 posts)it is nothing more than a "head fake". The reality is what will they do after the election when it comes back to the Supremes......
treestar
(82,383 posts)Which they don't have to be - that's why they are appointed for life.
The number one reason we need Biden to win, of course. So we don't give the right 5-4 and the ability to put their partisan agenda above the law.
Cha
(297,220 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,591 posts)Luciferous
(6,079 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Luciferous
(6,079 posts)Volaris
(10,271 posts)a valid constitutional argument for overturning a law. As it were, if Obama had passed a law that said 'America Loves Babies', trump would be all in favor of Baby Hate.
Besides. DACA gets these people into the legal economy, where they might otherwise not be. And Robert's isnt dumb enough to shut off a tax and economic revenue stream that's just sitting there pumping tax dollars into the system.