Longtime CNBC anchor Michelle Caruso-Cabrera running against AOC
Source: CNN
Michelle Caruso-Cabrera, a former longtime CNBC correspondent and anchor, has launched a challenge against the phenom freshman Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, according to a filing with the Federal Election Commission.
"I am the daughter and granddaughter of working class Italian and Cuban immigrants," Caruso-Cabrera said in a statement to CNBC. "I am so lucky to have had such a wonderful career and I want everybody to have the opportunity that I've had. That's why I'm running."
Caruso-Cabrera would run as a Democrat to the right of Ocasio-Cortez, who has labeled herself a "democratic socialist" and supports Sen. Bernie Sanders in the presidential primary.
In Caruso-Cabrera's book, "You Know I'm Right: More Prosperity, Less Government," Caruso-Cabrera unveiled her vision of limited government and explained why Ronald Reagan was her favorite president. (The forward to the book was written by Larry Kudlow, President Trump's National Economic Council director.) She serves as a member of the board of directors for financial services firm Beneficient.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/11/politics/michelle-caruso-cabrera-aoc-challenger/index.html
AOC definitely will not be asleep at the switch the way Crowley was, but I wondering if the voters will want someone with more of a local focus and a cooperative approach to legislation.
bucolic_frolic
(43,154 posts)AOC should win hands down in that district.
Running as a Democrat??? She belongs in the libertarian party. Can't democrats keep her out?
rurallib
(62,412 posts)other than the voters.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)There's no magic pixie dust that makes you be a Democrat, just calling yourself one.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Imagine that in places like Chicago it happened
Sometimes they win
https://chicago.suntimes.com/2019/2/14/18314057/larouche-remembered-in-illinois-for-an-election-democrats-would-rather-forget
But I think AOc got this against that person
At least cant blame dnc or something for a challenger
msongs
(67,405 posts)getagrip_already
(14,743 posts)I don't think she will win, but it will make aoc look over her shoulder and temper her enthusiasm for the extreme.
Nobody should feel invincible in their districts. All congress critters should have to work to represent all of their constituents.
Cartoonist
(7,316 posts)Which side are you on?
George II
(67,782 posts)It's unbelievable that someone should be bashed because he/she is contributing to a DEMOCRATIC candidate's campaign.
To quote you: "Which side are you on?"
Cartoonist
(7,316 posts)Is that the side you're on?
ArizonaLib
(1,242 posts)I recommend you contribute to a Democratic candidate that needs the money more. Otherwise contributing to a self described conservative makes you a conservative donor.
JudyM
(29,236 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"I'm more passionate and invested in what I hate than I am passionate and invested in what I support..."
tenderfoot
(8,426 posts)Such as?
Cartoonist
(7,316 posts)She's a repub. Is she actually getting support here?
msongs
(67,405 posts)DaDeacon
(984 posts)LOl, doesn't matter this is such a ridiculous challenge supporting her in order to teach AOC a lesson is the most bass-ackwards action I could imagine. Many here are starting to push for Republican-lite news flash... I don't work~!
ArizonaLib
(1,242 posts)CNBC belongs on one of Murdoch's channels anyway. I don't think actual liberals want AOC to 'temper' much if anything. Limbaugh for years has fooled his listeners into thinking that in all circumstances that the further right a candidate runs, the more electable the candidate. I know you already know this, Cartoonist - I mainly repeat this for others reading this thread.
LonePirate
(13,419 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)That was a lot of really well-paying jobs. We'll see, though.
Rider3
(919 posts)has earned her spot.
ChiTownDenny
(747 posts)That's the funniest thing I've heard all day.
Gothmog
(145,184 posts)Hekate
(90,674 posts)I know she has expressed some dissatisfaction with her committee assignments, but has she tried to find out how they relate to her goals? She could ask Maxine Waters about how to make that work.
I know she has spent a fair amount of time travelling the country and is considered a protege of Bernie Sanders, but has she spent an equal amount of time back home with the people who elected her in the first place? They have needs that are very local.
The cheering crowds elsewhere on the continent do not have a vote in New York.
I don't personally know the answers to these questions. I live in California. But if the dynamic Ms AOC would like to continue her Congressional career, she needs to be able to answer them.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Other celebrated freshmen such as Sharice Davids had accomplished much more for her constituents... and has done so without feeling the need to be someone else's high-profile protege and without chasing headlines. She's been truly busy representing her constituents in meaningful and substantive ways. She's not a "look at me me me" public servant... she's an "I work for you you you" type. Clearly she values ACTION over rhetoric. She puts her constituents before herself and before her own fame. I really admire her for that. The people of Kansas' 3rd Congressional District are very fortunate to have her.
https://davids.house.gov/
Community Engagement: Shortly after taking office, Davids opened two district offices: one in Johnson County, and one in Wyandotte County, where there hadnt been in a district office in nearly a decade.
To further reach constituents in all corners of the 3rd District, Davids staff held 27 pop-up office events, where staff members are available to assist constituents with issues like stalled tax refunds, backlogged Veterans benefits, passports, and more. In addition, Davids staff have held informational workshops for community members with experts on topics such as tax filing and Medicare enrollment.
Davids held six round table discussions on issues from prescription drug prices to gun safety, two town halls (called Community Conversations), two telephone town halls (called Call with your Congresswoman), 11 transportation and infrastructure site tours, and 11 Sharices Shifts where Davids shadowed workers at local businesses.
Constituent Services: Since January, Davids and her staff have assisted 683 constituents, and recovered more than $372,000 in federal dollars for the people of Kansas 3rd District. Her office also helped secure $650,000 in federal funding for Vibrant Health, an organization operating health centers in Wyandotte County, to increase access to affordable and quality health care services in the area. Furthermore, Davids has replied to more than 41,000 Kansas whove contacted her on everything from the environment to education.
Davids was pleased to welcome a staff member through the Wounded Warrior Fellowship Program, which provides opportunities for wounded and/or disabled veterans to work for Congress. The staff member assists military and veteran constituents with issues they may be having with the federal government, such as backlogged VA benefits.
Examples of constituents who Davids office has helped can be found on her website, davids.house.gov/connect-me/whowehavehelped.
Bipartisan Legislating: Davids has followed through on her commitment to work with anyone, regardless of party, who wants to tackle the issues most important to Kansas 3rd District. Of the over 200 bills she has co-sponsored since taking office, 78% are bipartisan.
Davids introduced five original pieces of legislation this session, four of which passed the House and one of which was signed into law by President Trump, including:
H.R. 5144, the Insurance Accountability and Transparency Act, which would help prevent surprise medical billing by requiring insurance companies to provide updated and accurate information to patients on a regular basis, so Kansans are aware of what their costs will be.
H.R. 3734, the Successful Entrepreneurship for Reservists and Veterans (SERV) Act, which would help veteran entrepreneurs succeed by examining the barriers they face, including lack of access to credit, and by increasing promotion of small business programs available to veterans.
This bill overwhelmingly passed the House.
H.R. 4405, the Womens Business Centers Improvement Act, which would increase funding for Women Business Centers, which offer a full range of critical counseling and technical training services for small businesses primarily owned by women.
This bill passed the House unanimously.
H.R. 1340, the Quindaro Townsite National Commemorative Site Act, which designates the Quindaro Townsite, a stop on the Underground Railroad in what is now Kansas City, Kansas, as a National Commemorative Site.
This bill was signed into law as part of the Natural Resources Management Act.
H.R. 1513, the Count the Vote Act, which would allow people to petition the Department of Justice to investigate voting complaints, helping to ensure that eligible voters are able to seek justice if they have been denied from the ballot box.
This bill passed the House as an amendment to the For the People Act.
Davids championed many of the more than 400 bills 275 of which are bipartisan passed by the House in 2019, including:
H.R. 1, the For the People Act, which would put the American people back in charge of our democracy by ending the dominance of big money in politics, expanding and protecting the right to vote, and ensuring our elected officials are working in the public interest.
H.R. 3, the Lower Drug Costs Now Act, which would give Medicare the power to negotiate with drug companies for lower drug prices, and make those lower prices available to those with private insurance.
H.R. 986, the Protecting Americans with Pre-existing Conditions Act, which would protect against short-term, limited-duration health plans commonly referred to as junk insurance plans that charge higher premiums for people with pre-existing conditions and dont cover essential medical services, such as maternity care.
H.R. 5430, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act, which would implement an updated trade agreement to bolster Kansas economy, protect American workers and the environment, and ensure our trading partners live up to their commitments.
H.R. 1585, the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act, which would improve the services and programs available to survivors of violence, help stop convicted abusers from obtaining firearms, and address the epidemic of missing and murdered Indigenous women.
H.R. 8, the Bipartisan Background Checks Act, which would institute universal background checks on gun purchases./blockquote]
Hekate
(90,674 posts)Last edited Wed Feb 12, 2020, 12:46 AM - Edit history (1)
Bob Lagomarsino had been in office 20 years at that point. Now, I reflexively wasn't going to vote for him, but I have to say my interactions with his local office were prompt and pleasant.
Then Came The Huffingtons. They spent a record amount of money to unseat a fellow Republican, and Mike H was elected. However, they were quite new to the area, and really did not know our local needs. They moved into the most pricey neighborhood by far -- not that much of a problem unless you don't know that the local rich traditionally take an interest in what could broadly be called charities and involve themselves one way or another in the local community. Mike H was an oil man; again, probably not that much of a problem unless you are utterly clueless that nobody, left, right, or center, wants oil drilling off our beaches. Santa Barbara Oil Spill, anyone?
And so it went, the opportunistic Arianna Huffington trying to position her closeted husband to run for POTUS -- a short, inglorious, political career. He went back to his quieter private life (and came out) and she went on to found Huff Post.
Our next 3 Congresscritters have been Democrats who live in middle class neighborhoods. They were/are quiet on the national stage, but work diligently in Congress for things Democrats believe in. The current guy, as the others before him, runs a responsive local office, understands local concerns, shows up at local events, and so on.
I love it that California has several Congressmen who actually are known to the nation: Lieu, Swallwell, and Schiff. They are spectacular, imo. But as far as I can tell, they aren't spending much, if any, time travelling the nation to the cheers of crowds.
PatrickforO
(14,573 posts)But then, I still like AOC as well. Different styles, and I know some have heartburn because AOC backed someone else against Davids - not sure what to say to that.
We'll see how AOC does. I saw a push poll designed to sway voters in her district against her because of the Amazon issue. But, then, I'm an economist and work very closely with economic developers in my state. I helped frame our answer to the Amazon HQ2 RFP. And you know what? Many people in my neck of the woods really had some doubt as to whether our infrastructure could absorb a whale like Amazon. Privately, a number of people told me they hoped we 'didn't get it.'
The truth beyond the rhetoric about Amazon and Queens NYC is that Amazon was going to come in on the strength of massive 'give away the farm' tax incentives, and not going to be asked to do much of anything about the transportation infrastructure or affordable housing. Their RFP claimed they would bring in 50,000 new jobs within a couple years, and very few places can absorb that many new people without hiccups.
AOC simply pointed this out, and it was not surprising at all that she got nailed for it.
But from an economic development standpoint she was correct, and I can defend that position line by line.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Hekate
(90,674 posts)Indeed it is
PatrickforO
(14,573 posts)I like AOC a lot, because I'm quite progressive.
But the job involves representing your constituents. If she isn't doing that, then she will end up being defeated. As it is, she'll be systematically rat-f-you-know-what-ed all the way up to the election. So will the rest of the Squad. The establishment doesn't like them, because they are not more circumspect in speaking truth to power and that worries Wall Street.
Wall Street is powerful. The oligarchs who got the giant tax cut are powerful. In fact, the pendulum has swung way too far in their favor. I thought the regulatory response to the Great Recession would clip their wings a bit and even the playing field, but no - if anything, the massive transfer of wealth from the many to the (too) few has continued and even accelerated.
There's always hope, but at this point I'm not sure if our republic will survive. As much as many on here dislike AOC, she's small potatoes next to what is systematically happening to us. And it doesn't look like we're stopping it. Almost like the proverbial Dutch kid with his finger in the dike - he plugs one hole and another springs up.
Well...............I'm not feeling particularly cheerful this evening. My arthritis is acting up. Hard to use my right hand.
Best to you!
George II
(67,782 posts)...and her Queens office is open intermittently (after opening six months late)
Her constituents (of whom I know several) have been virtually ignored. Seems people elsewhere in the country are more important than those in the 14th District.
Grins
(7,217 posts)What are you talking about?
When have Republicans ever been "cooperative" and not singularly focused on implementing the Reich's agenda in its entirety - and without compromise?
MarcA
(2,195 posts)Maxheader
(4,373 posts)spit her out....Voters are tired of wingers exaggerating their heritage
cloudythescribbler
(2,586 posts)Of course, there are many interests, especially national ones, who will use local interests as a front to try to bring AOC down (faux populism is America's de facto state religion). But rationally there's no reason why members of Congress SHOULDN'T champion national progressive issues (if not they then who?), and no reason to assume AOC is a whit less effective than anyone else in her spot would be for the locals. The real target (cultivated by numerous forces w/leverage in msm) is to stir up ressentiment, just the potential for hatred of anyone in the public eye who doesn't just keep their head down & be quiet.
frankly, doubt that the opponents of AOC will gain much traction in the district; OTOH, after a number of years maybe she cd look to replacing Gillibrand or Cuomo, which wd be a nice change. We also need a squad w/not 4 but 40 members as the next step -- then the national Democratic leadership will have more trouble totally blowing off the relatively progressive wing of the Party, as Perez has been doing. Some may think it divisive to criticize nat'l party leadership instead of uniting against Trump, but if not during primary season, then when?
PatrickforO
(14,573 posts)And good for the people.
GETPLANING
(846 posts)defending her office. She is about as working class as Trump. It is a purely tactical strike, financed by - Big Finance.
TryLogic
(1,723 posts)RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)That'll end this sham.
appalachiablue
(41,131 posts)marble falls
(57,081 posts)PatrickforO
(14,573 posts)As Caruso-Cabrera's policies are the same trickle-down shit the Chicago School has been ramming down our throats since Reagan. Just more Republican corporate crap.
I know some people on here don't like AOC, but she is a Democrat, and as far as I'm concerned, is a Democrat in good standing. People in the center tend not to like her, and of course the Republicans have waged a massive campaign of hatred and ridicule for her. Yet she still stands.
I'd sure rather have her for a representative than another GOP corporate shill supply-sider.
Mr.Bill
(24,284 posts)That man was a monster, a polished Trump.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)That's just a waste of money.
-Laelth
Response to brooklynite (Original post)
RandiFan1290 This message was self-deleted by its author.
truthisfreedom
(23,146 posts)AOC is a freakin' hero. Your only hope for attention is if you accept an endorsement from a soon-to-be twice-impeached idiot.
George II
(67,782 posts)Her website is now up and running:
https://badrunkhan.com/