Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

G_j

(40,366 posts)
Wed Feb 5, 2020, 06:28 AM Feb 2020

Hundreds of Salvadorans deported by US were killed or abused, report reveals

Source: Guardian UK


Human Rights Watch says 138 Salvadorans were murdered from 2013 to 2019 and 70 others were abused or sexually assaulted

At least 200 Salvadoran migrants and asylum seekers have been killed, raped or tortured after being deported back to El Salvador by the United States government which is turning a blind eye to widely known dangers, a new investigation reveals.

Human Rights Watch has documented 138 deported Salvadorans murdered by gang members, police, soldiers, death squads and ex-partners between 2013 and 2019. The majority were killed within two years of deportation by the same perpetrators they had tried to escape by seeking safety in the US.

The report, Deported to Danger: United States deportation policies expose Salvadorans to death and abuse, also identifies more than 70 others who were subjected to beatings, sexual assault and extortion – usually at the hand of gangs – or who went missing after being returned.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/05/salvadorans-deported-us-killed-abused-report

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hundreds of Salvadorans deported by US were killed or abused, report reveals (Original Post) G_j Feb 2020 OP
A feature, not a bug, of deportation in Trump's Amerika ck4829 Feb 2020 #1
Look at the years of those deportations. surrealAmerican Feb 2020 #2
Yes! Eom LittleGirl Feb 2020 #3
Trump Justice bronxiteforever Feb 2020 #5
The problem is the UN definitions of who qualifies for asylum ripcord Feb 2020 #4
How about human definitions? How about American definitions? lagomorph777 Feb 2020 #7
Mission accomplished. lagomorph777 Feb 2020 #6
The US "Americans" who want to feed people seeking haven right back into that meat grinder Judi Lynn Feb 2020 #8
Great post, Judi Lynn! Lots of blood on lots of Old Hands. Kid Berwyn Feb 2020 #9
Bananas Kid Berwyn Feb 2020 #10

bronxiteforever

(9,287 posts)
5. Trump Justice
Wed Feb 5, 2020, 02:18 PM
Feb 2020

Two U.S. attorney general decisions, one by Jeff Sessions and one by William Barr, narrowed the categories of people who can claim asylum in ways that particularly affect Salvadorans. The decisions limited the ability to seek asylum for those fleeing gang and gender-based violence or fleeing because a relative was assaulted or killed — all common reasons Salvadorans leave their country, according to the report.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/hundreds-deported-u-s-el-salvador-have-been-killed-or-n1126906

ripcord

(5,215 posts)
4. The problem is the UN definitions of who qualifies for asylum
Wed Feb 5, 2020, 10:37 AM
Feb 2020

Unfortunately people who are the victims of gang violence and spousal abuse do not qualify.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
7. How about human definitions? How about American definitions?
Wed Feb 5, 2020, 02:41 PM
Feb 2020

We should interpret international law in the narrowest possible terms, whatever favors the crazy base of our ruling party? We don't have morals or common sense? And given all the times we've flouted international law to go on killing sprees (e.g. Iraq War), now we get to say "We only protect people if they meet very exact UN criteria (according to us)?" Nazis scrupulously followed the letter of the law as they deported, imprisoned, enslaved, and murdered millions of Europeans. Are we any better than Nazis?

Judi Lynn

(160,415 posts)
8. The US "Americans" who want to feed people seeking haven right back into that meat grinder
Wed Feb 5, 2020, 06:09 PM
Feb 2020

have NO grasp of the history of US involvement in each of the Central American countries, and it's not a good look for anyone who has chosen to hate them without a shred of information to guide him/her through his/her hatred.

What these countries have suffered continually since 1954, when Dwight D. Eisenhower's CIA and military overthrew the beloved leader of Guatemala, Jacobo Arbenz, has been a living hell daily.

Quick and easy wildly condensed version of a very small part of what the hell happened:

Wikipedia Death Squad

Central America
El Salvador

. . .

During the Salvadoran civil war, death squads (known in Spanish by the name of Escuadrón de la Muerte, "Squadron of Death" ) achieved notoriety when a sniper assassinated Archbishop Óscar Romero while he was saying Mass in March 1980. In December 1980, three American nuns and a lay worker were gangraped and murdered by a military unit later found to have been acting on specific orders. Death squads were instrumental in killing thousands of peasants and activists. Funding for the squads came primarily from right-wing Salvadoran businessmen and landowners.[27] Because the death squads involved were found to have been soldiers of the Salvadoran military security forces, which were receiving U.S. arms, funding, training and advice during the Carter, Reagan and George H. W. Bush administrations, these events prompted some outrage in the U.S. Human rights activists criticized U.S. administrations for denying Salvadoran government links to the death squads. Veteran Human Rights Watch researcher Cynthia J. Arnson writes that "particularly during the years 1980–1983 when the killing was at its height (numbers of killings could reach as far as 35,000), assigning responsibility for the violence and human rights abuses was a product of the intense ideological polarization in the United States. The Reagan administration downplayed the scale of abuse as well as the involvement of state actors. Because of the level of denial, as well as the extent of U.S. involvement with the Salvadoran military and security forces, the U.S. role in El Salvador- what was known about death squads, when it was known, and what actions the United States did or did not take to curb their abuses- became an important part of El Salvador's death squad story.".[28] Some death squads, such as Sombra Negra, are still operating in El Salvador.[29]

The Salvadoran Army's U.S.-trained Atlacatl Battalion was responsible for the El Mozote massacre where more than 800 civilians were murdered, over half of them children, the El Calabozo massacre, and the murders of six Jesuits in 1989.[30]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_squad#El_Salvador

~ ~ ~

MAY 9-16, 2016 ISSUE
Time for a US Apology to El Salvador

Obama recently expressed regret for US support of Argentina’s “dirty war.” It’s time Washington did the same regarding our active backing of right-wing butchery in El Salvador.

By Raymond Bonner
APRIL 15, 2016

ver the ages, the United States has routinely intervened in Latin America, overthrowing left-wing governments and propping up right-wing dictators. President Obama pressed a reset button of sorts last month when he traveled to Cuba and Argentina. Now it’s time for him to visit a Latin America country that is geographically smallest but where Washington’s footprint is large and the stain of intervention perhaps greatest—El Salvador.

In Argentina, on the 40th anniversary of a military coup that ushered in that country’s “dirty war,” President Obama said it was time for the United States to reflect on its policies during those “dark days.” In the name of fighting communism, the Argentine government hunted down, tortured, and killed suspected leftists—sometimes throwing their bodies out of helicopters into the sea. “We’ve been slow to speak out for human rights and that was the case here,” Obama said.

That failure to speak out looks benign in contrast to the active role Washington played in the “dirty war” in El Salvador in the 1980s, which pitted a right-wing government against Marxist guerrillas. The United States sent military advisers to help the Salvadoran military fight its dirty war, as well as hundreds of millions of dollars in economic and military aid.

In Argentina, the security forces killed some 30,000 civilians. In El Salvador, more than 75,000 lost their lives during the civil war, which lasted from 1980 until the 1992 peace agreement. The guerrillas committed atrocities, but the United Nations Truth Commission, established as part of the accord, found that more than 85 percent of the killings, kidnappings, and torture had been the work of government forces, which included paramilitaries, death squads, and army units trained by the United States.

The United States went well beyond remaining largely silent in the face of human-rights abuses in El Salvador. The State Department and White House often sought to cover up the brutality, to protect the perpetrators of even the most heinous crimes.

In March of 1980, the much beloved and respected Archbishop Oscar Arnulfo Romero was murdered. A voice for the poor and repressed, Romero, in his final Sunday sermon, had issued a plea to the country’s military junta that rings through the ages: “In the name of God, in the name of this suffering people whose cries rise to heaven more loudly each day, I implore you, I beg you, I order you in the name of God: stop the repression.” The next day, he was cut down by a single bullet while he was saying a private mass. (In 2015, Pope Francis declared that Romero died a martyr, the final step before sainthood.)

Eight months after the assassination, a military informant gave the US embassy in El Salvador evidence that it had been plotted by Roberto D’Aubuisson, a charismatic and notorious right-wing leader. D’Aubuisson had presided over a meeting in which soldiers drew lots for the right to kill the archbishop, the informant said. While any number of right-wing death squads might have wanted to kill Romero, only a few, like D’Aubuisson’s, were “fanatical and daring” enough to actually do it, the CIA concluded in a report for the White House.

Yet, D’Aubuisson continued to be welcomed at the US embassy in El Salvador, and when Elliott Abrams, the State Department’s point man on Central America during the Reagan administration, testified before Congress, he said he would not consider D’Aubuisson an extremist. “You would have to be engaged in murder,” Abrams said, before he would call him an extremist. But D’Aubuisson was engaged in murder, and Washington knew it. (He died of throat cancer in 1992, at the age of 48. Abrams was convicted in 1991 of misleading Congress about the shipment of arms to the anti-Sandinista forces in Nicaragua, the so-called “Iran/Contra” affair. He was pardoned by President George H.W. Bush, later served as special adviser to President George W. Bush on democracy and human rights, and is now a foreign-policy adviser to GOP presidential candidate Ted Cruz.)

More:
https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/time-for-a-us-apology-to-el-salvador/

A crowd gathered outside a cathedral to mourn the assassination of Archbishop Oscar Romero, it became the target of death squad government soldiers led by Roberto D'Aubuisson, commonly known as "Blowtorch Bob." Here's a video showing how quickly they emptied the plaza:










Roberto D'Aubuisson, creator of the Conservative Party Alianza Republicana Nacionalista, (ARENA),
in El Salvador

(Blowtorch Bob)

One of many sadists involved in keeping the fascists in control in the Americas.

Kid Berwyn

(14,760 posts)
9. Great post, Judi Lynn! Lots of blood on lots of Old Hands.
Thu Feb 6, 2020, 08:55 PM
Feb 2020
The Integrity of Ambassador Robert White

January 17, 2015

At the start of the Reagan administration, Ambassador Robert White refused to cover up the rape-murders of four American churchman in El Salvador and paid for his integrity with the end of his career. His death last Tuesday at age 88 marked the passing of a courageous diplomat, writes ex-CIA analyst Melvin A. Goodman.

By Melvin A. Goodman
ConsortiumNews.com

The death of Ambassador Robert E. White is a reminder of what an American envoy can do to advance our principles and to guide our foreign policy. As an ambassador to Paraguay and El Salvador in the 1970s and 1980s, White demonstrated a commitment to social justice and human rights. Sadly, he was dismissed from the Foreign Service by Secretary of State Alexander Haig because the Reagan administration had decided on a policy of militarism in Central America.

Bob White was the ambassador in El Salvador in December 1980 when four American churchwomen were raped and murdered by the armed forces of the U.S.-backed Salvadoran government. The evening before their murders, two of the women had dinner at White’s home to discuss the problems that relief workers were having in El Salvador. At the grave site for two of the women, White repeated over and over again that “This time they are not going to get away with it.”

White took what started as a clandestine assassination attempt and turned it into a full-fledged international incident. He filed cables to the State Department and testified to the Congress. Secretary of State Haig suppressed White’s cables from El Salvador, and FBI Director William Webster refused to release any documents related to the murders.

The Reagan administration made sure that the efforts of the families of the murdered women could get no access to documents from the State Department, the FBI, and the CIA. In 1989, the CIA even relocated to Miami the Salvadoran defense minister complicit in the murder of the American nuns.

CONTINUES...

https://consortiumnews.com/2015/01/17/the-integrity-of-ambassador-robert-white/

Kid Berwyn

(14,760 posts)
10. Bananas
Thu Feb 6, 2020, 09:03 PM
Feb 2020
The Devil’s Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America’s Secret Government

Joseph Palermo
L.A. Progressive, Jan. 12, 2016

In The Devil’s Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America’s Secret Government, David Talbot, the journalist who founded Salon.com in 1995 and wrote a great book on the lives of John and Robert Kennedy, Brothers (2007), has produced another page-turner that unearths mountains of new evidence about the seamier side of the rise of the United States’ Cold War national security state.

Talbot has achieved something rare in our scholarly discourse these days on the origins of the Central Intelligence Agency and the men who were responsible for shaping the Cold War ethos that for decades dominated American foreign policy in the 20th Century. By presenting the contours of Allen Dulles’s life and his everlasting imprint on the nature of the CIA in a cogent and highly readable way, Talbot offers us a new and sophisticated analysis of America’s secret Cold War history.

The Devil’s Chessboard is quite simply the best single volume I’ve come across that details the morally bankrupt and cynical rise of an activist intelligence apparatus in this country that was not only capable of intervening clandestinely in the internal affairs of other nations but domestically too.

Talbot’s exhaustive research, lively prose, strong moral conviction, and the ability to convey history’s relevance to our contemporary politics make The Devil’s Chessboard an invaluable contribution to our understanding of the institutional transformation that took place in this country at a time when rabid anti-communism dominated the thinking of foreign policy elites.

CONTINUES...

https://www.laprogressive.com/allen-dulles/
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hundreds of Salvadorans d...