Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,499 posts)
Sat Jan 18, 2020, 09:11 AM Jan 2020

California teachers sue after jetliner dumps fuel on schools

Source: AP

By STEFANIE DAZIO

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Four teachers from a Los Angeles-area school sued Delta Air Lines on Friday, saying they were exposed to jet fuel when a plane with engine trouble dumped its fuel over a densely populated area, including several schools, while making an emergency return to the airport.

At a news conference, the teachers described the fuel as drizzling down like raindrops with “overwhelming” fumes. They said their panicked students screamed and cried.

“The plaintiffs could feel the fuel on their clothes, their flesh, their eyes and their skin,” said the teachers’ attorney, Gloria Allred, who noted that her firm may add teachers or students to the lawsuit.

“Fuel penetrated their mouths and noses as well, producing a lasting and severe irritation, and a lasting and a noxious taste and smell,” Allred said.



Attorney Gloria Allred, lower left, listens as one of four Park Avenue Elementary School teachers talks about her experiences when a Delta Airlines jet dumped fuel over their school Tuesday, Jan. 14, 2020, at a Los Angeles news conference Friday, Jan. 17, 2020. The four plaintiffs in a lawsuit against Delta - Lisette Barajas, Laura Guzman, Mariana De La Torre and Anabel Samperio - appeared at the news conference but declined to be identified individually when they spoke. The teachers plan to file a lawsuit after a commercial airliner with engine trouble dumped jet fuel over a densely populated area. (AP Photo/Stefanie Dazio)


Read more: https://apnews.com/020cc162d06034820c51c4fb43c45b08

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California teachers sue after jetliner dumps fuel on schools (Original Post) Omaha Steve Jan 2020 OP
I saw this on the tee vee Ohiogal Jan 2020 #1
If they didn't dump fuel during the emergency landing, what would the outcome have been? Baclava Jan 2020 #3
It's a requirement. Quackers Jan 2020 #4
No choice. Codeine Jan 2020 #7
Completely Delta's Fault PuppyBismark Jan 2020 #10
Jet fuel is nasty stuff with all sorts of health effects IronLionZion Jan 2020 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Mosby Jan 2020 #17
Jet fuel is more like diesel. Angleae Jan 2020 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author Mosby Jan 2020 #19
This is a tough situation. The pilot did what he had to do. Coventina Jan 2020 #5
No the pilots did not have to do it when they did. PuppyBismark Jan 2020 #12
And if there is a problem common to both engines that you find out about while dumping fuel? Bearware Jan 2020 #14
8000 over the Pacific Ocean is acceptable PuppyBismark Jan 2020 #15
No bad guys here. Codeine Jan 2020 #6
I agree... VarryOn Jan 2020 #11
There was probably Rebl2 Jan 2020 #8
Doubt it. Igel Jan 2020 #9
The LA Basin? Codeine Jan 2020 #13
That's one of the things I hate about real estate Quackers Jan 2020 #16

Ohiogal

(31,914 posts)
1. I saw this on the tee vee
Sat Jan 18, 2020, 09:27 AM
Jan 2020

Totally unacceptable! What was this jet pilot thinking, dumping fuel in a heavily populated area! I’m glad they’re suing.

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
3. If they didn't dump fuel during the emergency landing, what would the outcome have been?
Sat Jan 18, 2020, 10:23 AM
Jan 2020

Crash landing with a too heavy fuel load?

If you were on that plane and the pilot announced they had a problem with one their engines and would have to return to LAX to land immediately, but, oh, first, we will be circling out over the ocean for 20 minutes to dump fuel, away from populated areas, keep your seat belts fastened, and make sure you know where your life vests are, would you feel better?

Quackers

(2,256 posts)
4. It's a requirement.
Sat Jan 18, 2020, 10:25 AM
Jan 2020

It was an international flight, fully fueled, fully loaded. It declared an emergency after taking off. Takeoff weight is allowed to be heavier than landing weight, especially on international flights where more fuel is needed.

Attempting to land an overweight aircraft, especially while under an emergency decree, can result in a crash. The actions taken by the pilot were correct. It sucks people were injured by the fuel, but it would suck a lot more if that jet turned into a fireball while trying to land. This is one of the biggest problems with people living near airports. In a perfect world, there would be no people or buildings near an aircrafts flight path.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
7. No choice.
Sat Jan 18, 2020, 10:50 AM
Jan 2020

The plane had to land because of engine failure. They were too heavy to land so they dumped fuel — it happens all the time and normally it dissipates, but this time it didn’t.

PuppyBismark

(594 posts)
10. Completely Delta's Fault
Sat Jan 18, 2020, 02:13 PM
Jan 2020

The 777-200 can fly just fine on one engine and could have been vectored over the ocean at a high altitude to dump fuel. In fact ATC asked them if they needed to dump fuel and they said no. They are not to dump fuel at low altitudes. They never told ATC they were dumping fuel. If you want to get more detailed information watch these:



IronLionZion

(45,380 posts)
2. Jet fuel is nasty stuff with all sorts of health effects
Sat Jan 18, 2020, 09:32 AM
Jan 2020
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_fuel#Health_effects
Evidence of the health effects of jet fuels comes from reports on both temporary or persisting biological from acute, subchronic, or chronic exposure of humans or animals to kerosene-based hydrocarbon fuels, or the constituent chemicals of these fuels, or to fuel combustion products. The effects studied include: cancer, skin conditions, respiratory disorders, immune and hematological disorders, neurological effects, visual and hearing disorders, renal and hepatic diseases, cardiovascular conditions, gastrointestinal disorders, genotoxic and metabolic effects.


Response to IronLionZion (Reply #2)

Angleae

(4,480 posts)
18. Jet fuel is more like diesel.
Sun Jan 19, 2020, 06:49 PM
Jan 2020

AvGas, which is used in most propeller powered aircraft is high-octane gasoline. They are not interchangeable.

Response to Angleae (Reply #18)

Coventina

(27,059 posts)
5. This is a tough situation. The pilot did what he had to do.
Sat Jan 18, 2020, 10:39 AM
Jan 2020

This probably is a case where government regulation could help.
Maybe have a compensation fund for situations like this?

PuppyBismark

(594 posts)
12. No the pilots did not have to do it when they did.
Sat Jan 18, 2020, 02:16 PM
Jan 2020

The Boeing 777-200 flies just fine on one engine and the airplane could have stayed at a high altitude and dumped fuel over the ocean. Remember this flight took off from LAX to the west over the ocean. Delta will have to pay for a issues and I suspect the pilots, there were three, may lose their jobs.

Bearware

(151 posts)
14. And if there is a problem common to both engines that you find out about while dumping fuel?
Sun Jan 19, 2020, 12:15 AM
Jan 2020

If they lost the other engine when they were coming back for a landing after dumping fuel, they could have crashed into a school or maybe several.

When a crew reacts to a serious emergency with many lives at risk but no one is killed or seriously injured, second-guessing is not helpful.

P.S. I thought the aircraft was at 8000' and would have to climb substantially on the remaining engine to dump fuel according to the rules.

PuppyBismark

(594 posts)
15. 8000 over the Pacific Ocean is acceptable
Sun Jan 19, 2020, 04:55 PM
Jan 2020

I suggest you watch the two videos above and will learn that there was no serious emergency.

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
6. No bad guys here.
Sat Jan 18, 2020, 10:48 AM
Jan 2020

The plane had an emergency and had to dump fuel. Usually the fuel dissipates but not this time. It’s not as if the airliner deliberately crop dusted a school.

The students and teachers are unlikely to experience any deleterious long term effects from their exposure but they deserve to be compensated for their discomfort and anxiety. They’ll sue, the airline will settle, and the situation will be resolved.

No need for outrage; just a bad situation with no easy decisions. Now they clean up the mess and move on — that’s just part of doing business.

 

VarryOn

(2,343 posts)
11. I agree...
Sat Jan 18, 2020, 02:14 PM
Jan 2020

I can’t even believe this is an outrage. Sometimes bad things have to happen. The outcome was much better than a crash.

Of course, Gloria Allred can only help matters. Someone smells “payday” rather than jet A fumes.

Igel

(35,274 posts)
9. Doubt it.
Sat Jan 18, 2020, 12:58 PM
Jan 2020

Between there and the airport it's solid city.

The only real option was to fly out over the water. The malfunction, people are saying after the fact, wasn't that serious.

The dump lasted a few miles and hit a few schools--but the wider the dispersion area, the less concentrated the fuel would have been. And at least one of the schools was a mile or so off the plane's path so it probably just got fumes and perhaps fine spray. It's always hard to get the facts when nerves are on edge.

Quackers

(2,256 posts)
16. That's one of the things I hate about real estate
Sun Jan 19, 2020, 05:17 PM
Jan 2020

Check this image out. People build houses right up to the side of the airport. Add in all of the other air traffic in the area and it become overwhelming real quick in an emergency.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»California teachers sue a...