Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hospitalized
Source: New York Times
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was admitted to Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore on Friday night after experiencing chills and fever earlier in the day, a Supreme Court spokeswoman said on Saturday.
Justice Ginsburg was initially evaluated at Sibley Memorial Hospital in Washington before being transferred to Johns Hopkins for further evaluation and treatment of any possible infection, the spokeswoman, Kathleen Arberg, said in a statement.
Justice Ginsburgs symptoms abated after treatment with intravenous antibiotics and fluids, Ms. Arberg said, adding the justice expected to be released from the hospital as early as Sunday morning.
Justice Ginsburg, 86, has had a series of health scares lately, including surgery for lung cancer and radiation treatment for pancreatic cancer in the last year. Over the years, Justice Ginsburg has also had surgery for early-stage pancreatic cancer in 2009 and treatment for colon cancer in 1999.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/23/us/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-hospitalized.html
Squinch
(51,010 posts)Princess Turandot
(4,787 posts)mahina
(17,697 posts)Love and rest, respect to you dear Judge Ginsberg, you are a heroine.
Response to mahina (Reply #4)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Funtatlaguy
(10,886 posts)Response to Calista241 (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
MBS
(9,688 posts)Wishing you a speedy recovery, Justice Ginsberg.
thenelm1
(854 posts)This point should be made loud and clear by the Dems starting NOW!!! And in no uncertain terms -
Response to thenelm1 (Reply #13)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)a SCOTUS judge next year
Response to NewJeffCT (Reply #19)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
cstanleytech
(26,319 posts)that the next few budgets will include significant cuts to spending in deep red states.
Response to cstanleytech (Reply #23)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
roamer65
(36,747 posts)I am sick of paying for their sorry asses.
Igel
(35,356 posts)But people misquote what was said--or, rather, they fail to reproduce the entire quote.
We heard the bit about not considering/confirming a SCOTUS nominee in the year before an election. What was omitted widely (by the NYT and a lot of others) was the condition he imposed on that--when the Senate and president are from different parties. Since it's material to the meaning of the proposition it has to be part of the quote--to omit it is to change the meaning. (Not quite as bad as saying, "I do ... support marriage equality," where the "..." replaces "not", but still it alters the material meaning of the sentence. Defending the NYT and others is that at the time the contingency was irrelevant--it was true and therefore omissible.)
The (R) also cited some historical bit about that having held true since some time in the late 1800s. (Whether this is deliberate principle or mere circumstance I'll leave for those concerned about such matters to decide, but I suspect it's convenient "circumstance." I'm also not sure it's anything more than him trying to play CYA.)
Brainfodder
(6,423 posts)JohnnyRingo
(18,641 posts)Unfortunately, losing her would help make Donald Trump "tired of all the winning". I wouldn't be able to bear the WH high fives.
Hang in there and get well soon.
Ligyron
(7,639 posts)For decades too most likely.
A depressing thought at a time when we are suppose to be thankful.
iluvtennis
(19,872 posts)mountain grammy
(26,653 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,365 posts)thinking that this could be a record-breaking speedy replacement. Susan Collins is fretting over how long to fret before voting for the right-wing religious replacement.
Trump, as usual, thinks about impeachment and golf.
kansasobama
(609 posts)Polls from Wisconsin is disheartening post-impeachment. What is the story with Michigan and Wisconsin. Are people there so hoodwinked by the cult figure they cannot think straight?
Also heard Joe Manchen and Arizona's Sinema are against impeachment. If Democrats do not vote for impeachment, we are screwed. Hope our friends from those states pressure them.
orangecrush
(19,617 posts)For her and the country.
sprinkleeninow
(20,255 posts)God grant you many years, Justice! 💛
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,898 posts)She's a decade younger than Jimmy, for Pete's sake! She has a long way to go.
EX500rider
(10,858 posts)United States/Life expectancy
78.69 years (2016)
sprinkleeninow
(20,255 posts)Fla Dem
(23,745 posts)SpankMe
(2,966 posts)Duppers
(28,127 posts)🙏
Susan Calvin
(1,649 posts)I would like to give her a hug.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)It's Time.
SleeplessinSoCal
(9,145 posts)McConnelll totally screwed America with his block of Garland
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)There's no time for the petty bullshit and purity contest.
This isn't time for a protest vote or to be plain old stupid.
It's going to be blue, no matter who for me...
Salviati
(6,008 posts)There should not be any more risks taken that might enable any further rightwing takeover of our government.
Laffy Kat
(16,386 posts)For her own sake, I wonder if she should retire. I know it would be devastating for the U.S., but she's done so much already, and I'd rather have her alive to enjoy her family in the time she has left. This is a terrible situation. I will absolutely support any decision she makes.
B Stieg
(2,410 posts)This person has given her all. She should retire.
We'll figure out how to rebalance the court, later.
Wabbajack_
(1,300 posts)Lame duck session before Cocaine Bitch and pals took over.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)B Stieg
(2,410 posts)PuffedMica
(1,061 posts)She will be back on the court in January.