Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(128,244 posts)
Thu Oct 31, 2019, 06:47 PM Oct 2019

December Hearing Set For 'Urgent' Question Over Bolton Aide's Impeachment Testimony

Source: TPM

A federal judge on Thursday set a Dec. 10 hearing date for what he said was the “urgent” matter of whether the House can enforce a subpoena for the testimony of a former White House official in its impeachment inquiry. Charles Kupperman filed a lawsuit against the House and President Donald Trump on Friday, after he was subpoenaed to testify in the ongoing investigation. Kupperman served as a top aide to then-National Security Adviser John Bolton and was acting national security adviser for a few days after Bolton’s departure last month.

Kupperman is asking the courts to settle whether he has to comply with the congressional subpoena, or whether the White House’s claim that it can prevent Kupperman’s testimony is valid. In court Thursday, Kupperman’s lawyer Charles Cooper said he had “no dog” in fight between the House and President Trump.

“Absent a definitive judgement from the Judicial Branch ‘say[ing] what the law is’ […] Plaintiff will effectively be forced to adjudicate the Constitutional dispute himself, and if he judges wrongly, he will inflict grave Constitutional injury on either the House or the President,” Kupperman’s lawsuit last week read.

At Thursday’s brief hearing, U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon asked Cooper whether the House impeachment resolution would affect his case. Cooper responded that he was still studying the effect of the resolution, which was approved by the House Thursday morning. Leon set a Nov. 14 deadline for defendants’ briefs and a Dec. 4 deadline for plaintiffs’ responses. Oral arguments will take place Dec. 10 at 3 p.m. ET.

Read more: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/december-hearing-set-for-urgent-question-over-bolton-aides-impeachment-testimony

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
December Hearing Set For 'Urgent' Question Over Bolton Aide's Impeachment Testimony (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Oct 2019 OP
"urgent" means 40 days RainCaster Oct 2019 #1
Check the Judge's bank accounts. nt DURHAM D Oct 2019 #2
GWBush appointee, Federalist Society, probably opus dei & old Barr pal fm Iran Contra days, called stuffmatters Oct 2019 #3
I suspect "Opus Dei" majdrfrtim Oct 2019 #5
Yes, thanks so much,, changed it. stuffmatters Nov 2019 #8
Urgent? WTF? In my book, mthat means tomorrow if not sooner. KPN Oct 2019 #4
Would be a huge power grab should the court decide to block the cstanleytech Oct 2019 #6
This ain't good--but Lulu KC Oct 2019 #7

stuffmatters

(2,574 posts)
3. GWBush appointee, Federalist Society, probably opus dei & old Barr pal fm Iran Contra days, called
Thu Oct 31, 2019, 07:47 PM
Oct 2019

Last edited Fri Nov 1, 2019, 04:50 AM - Edit history (1)

"the judge you want if you want to own the libs." Those are a few highlights from a quick google.

Lulu KC

(2,559 posts)
7. This ain't good--but
Thu Oct 31, 2019, 11:35 PM
Oct 2019

fortunately silly little Kupperman is not the only one who will be (or already has been) testifying.

It should have been dismissed as frivolous. Clearly, the occupant of the White House is breaking a law. Yet another law.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»December Hearing Set For ...