Girls beat up Iran cleric over dress code
Source: CNN
Hojatoleslam Ali Beheshti said he encountered the girls on his way to the mosque in the village of Shahmirzad for noon prayers in late August.
He told one of the girls to cover up, the report said.
"She responded by telling me to cover my eyes, which was very insulting to me," Beheshti said. So he asked her a second time to cover up and also to put a lid on what he felt was verbal abuse.
She hit the man of the cloth, and he hit the ground.
Read more: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/09/20/1134375/-CNN-Girls-Beat-Up-Iran-Cleric-Over-Dress-Code
valerief
(53,235 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)The irony is that it's okay for the cleric to insult the women by basically inferring that they are tramps, but not okay for them to insult him back. I hope Middle Eastern women fight back more often in the future. Time to end patriarchal customs around the world.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,075 posts)leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,075 posts)leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)controll how you act - that was my point
BlueToTheBone
(3,747 posts)you choose, because you are a man and have all power. Boys will be boys and girls are blamed.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)men in general though . . . no.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)My hope is all the women start to react the same way. I understand he was in the hospital for 3 days - she must have some right hook. Maybe he's learned his lesson but somehow I doubt it.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)what about men who belt their women cause SHE said something HE didnt like. "oh but that's different because of blah blah blah" . you dont get to hit each other over words. even though i think she was correct in telling him to close his eyes i hope he sues her and she should be arrested for assault
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)I CONDONE THIS. Women are treated as virtual slaves and you just want them to stand by and take it? Fuck that noise. It's very easy for you to sit in the comfort your home and pass judgement on women who have no control over their lives - your attitude sickens me.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,075 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)kicking the shit out you - literally and figuratively - you just take it?
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)IMO (I can understand absolute pacifists but I do not agree with them).
Violence in response to words is not.
Imagine a world where the only time anyone was willing to use violence was in self defense. They would never initiate it.
Wouldn't that be a better world than the one we have here?
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)And it rained peanut M&Ms, that would be fabulous also. Now if you want to talk about the reality of the lives many of these women are living in some of these middle eastern countries, do let me know.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)By your philosophy your safety would depend on how big I am compared to you.
By my personal philosophy you would be perfectly safe regardless.
Which do you prefer?
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)A world without violence? Is that the real world? It would also be nice if everyone had an education, a place to live and food in their kitchen. All those things would be lovely. Is it reality? Not even close.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)but since you've already determined that it is acceptable to use violence to respond to speech whether or not your condescending attitude warrants a beating is entirely up to the person you're talking to.
And you can't even disagree with their actions as they pummel you.
At best you could disagree with their standards for initiating violence based on speech.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)world but I live in a place filled with gray. There are no absolutes on what is acceptable and what isn't behavior. I will always support women fighting back against misogynistic clowns. Since the only statement available is from the cleric - who I see didn't press charges, I wonder why - we only have his word that he didn't touch these women. And even if he didn't, I support their right to fight back against a society that treats them as property. I don't think you live in the real world.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)I can't help but think that if verbally abusive fuckwads (no matter what nation or culture) got punched in the face more often, they'd keep their shit-nozzles closed more often. YMMV.
alfredo
(60,082 posts)4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)I doubt anyone would cry if the WBC got a beating at a funeral they were protesting.
What about someone protesting for abortion access?
To some this is common sense. To others it is advocating murder.
What about anti-war protesters. Or those who oppose GM crops or nukes. What about people who spout off about football in a crowded bar? Or people who make a point of saying "god bless you" to others they know are atheists?
Where do you draw the line on "verbal violence" that allows a physically violent response?
A lot of people probably deserve a beating. But I can't think of anyone qualified to determine that based solely on what they have to say.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)I'd say execution of the "cleric" would be fine.
The WBC ass-tards don't generally move on to violence. I suppose I should have been more clear on my dividing line.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)PavePusher
(15,374 posts)On the gripping hand, waiting until the call goes out to stone them to death will probably be too late.
Bottom line, we can gripe about their primitive culture until the goats come home, but any change will have to come from within their own society. The good news is that modern electronic communications mean you can't keep people ignorant forever. The changes are coming... the question is what forms they will take, how long it will take, and how much resistance will have to be overcome (and by what methods).
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)so by your logic he should kicked the shit out of her b/c otherwise he's would just be "taking it"
neovente
(24 posts)Dash87
(3,220 posts)Every woman's experience.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)he opened his mouth and she told him to stfu.since when did this become about women "who have no control over their lives" this particular woman seem to have plenty of control. she wasnt cowering she wasnt being pushed around. she responded verbally to a verbal situation and that's where it should have ended. you take this one instance and try to make this into some kind of win in the war for female rightousness it isnt,this was an assault. she over reacted and she should be arrested. that's not me sitting in a chair passing judgement it's the law and you should try and respect it. otherwise what's to stop any violence.
btw i dont care what my attitude does to you.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)that are geared against women? Never.
zonkers
(5,865 posts)Hope this impacts other women. Hope this is Rosa Parks moment.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)but they could just as easily hang for it although I see the cleric has not pressed charges (wondering why). I still support what they did and can't think of a reason at all to change my mind on that.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)If you're offended, look away. It's easy to do when one is a mature adult
MADem
(135,425 posts)We never learn the names of "the girls" in this article--we're not talking about a big city, we are talking a very small town, where everyone knows everyone else. In Iran, there's none of that "we don't name the underaged child in the newpaper" stuff--heck, they'll name 'em with no issue whatsoever.
From the CNN article:
The cleric said he asked "politely," but the girl's angry reaction and some pugilistic double-teaming with her friend landed the holy man in the hospital, according to an account Monday in the semiofficial Mehr News Agency.
...Beheshti, who emerged from the infirmary three days later, said he did not file a complaint against the girls.
But he doesn't mind the local prosecutor's investigation into the matter either "as long as the case helps the cause of Islamic hijab."
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/09/20/world/meast/iran-hijab-fisticuffs/index.html?hpt=hp_t3
The truth of the matter is this--if you are of the female gender in Iran, and your hijab is found to be wanting, you are more likely to be verbally abused or even physically assaulted if you fail to follow directives to adjust your coverings than not. This story is getting play because it's "Dog Bites Man" type news, not because there's a sudden impetus by women to fight back against the absurd dress code (though it would behoove the culture if that were the case).
Cleita
(75,480 posts)about the girls to cover up what might be an embarrassment to him? I wonder what that could have been. I mean if I were a man, it would embarrass me to be beaten up by a woman.
louis-t
(23,315 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)He might have been interfering with one of the girls and the other came to her aid. He invented the story to cover his actions, and then plays the "religious forgiveness" card by not wanting to take action against them. He HAS to know who they are--these aren't strange girls in a city of millions, this is a small town, like a Cheers bar without the booze, a place where everybody knows your name.
It's impossible for a female to get a fair shake in Iran, unless they have powerful male relatives. Hopefully the girls have an Ayatullah in the family--otherwise, they will not be believed and they could receive a very brutal punishment for simply defending themselves.
it's a bit far-fetched. We'd all love to think it's true but the retaliation for such a thing would be severe.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)A holier than thow man.
What a tool.
if it is not true, this is what some of those 'religious leaders' deserve
lies and propaganda
(3,337 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)but...
hunter
(38,353 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)DRoseDARs
(6,810 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Now I see the pic, and yes, that could very well be the cleric!
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)it's usually the girls that get beaten.
I don't really think that warranted violence but I would have been willing to look the other way.
magic59
(429 posts)I wouldn't believe anything a religious fanatic says either here or overseas. He is probably trying to get a few girls stoned (and I don't mean high) so he can get his rocks off.
alfredo
(60,082 posts)A simple act like that could snowball, just as that Tunisian shop keeper who burned himself to death in protest.
Her act could embolden more women to defy those assholes.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)trouble.smith
(374 posts)Iran will likely feel a need to make an example out of them and that example will be sickening.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)I wonder how many will die or be tortured over this one?
The most likely situation here is that this is incitement of rage for political purposes and it seems it has worked here anyway.
How many times are we going to walk into their religious traps?
Maybe it happened. Maybe it didn't. All I know is that it took just one cleric lying about a crippled girl to get her thrown in jail and possibly stoned to death.
That's the art of incitement.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Even though it is a small town where everyone knows your name.
He's given out a story that will ensure the girls do not come forward, because the cleric will be believed first.
That said, I don't think what he said happened, happened.
The girls probably ran home and told their parents that the Imam tried to touch one of them, their daddies went to the masjid and nosed around a bit, found out what was being said about the girls, and went home and told the kids to zip it and to avoid that pervert in the future.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)I hope the hell they offer that girl asylum at some embassy, those wackos never let these things go.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)...that is one hilarious headline.
BadGimp
(4,024 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)individual in my opinion.
Some think those clothes should be compulsorily, and some think those clothes should be illegal, but I think each adult should decide for them themselves.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Women do get accosted and punished for "infractions" of dress. Immodesty is a crime in Iran. It has been for decades.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)Scout
(8,624 posts)ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)"No" means nothing when "yes" is not an option.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)Ash_F
(5,861 posts)...not even in the same ball-park as our great Allies Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, and now Iraq. Most of the stories of stonings that people read about come from those countries and those who are not familiar with the region tend to clump all those cultures into a single morass. Iran never got that bad and is, in fact, trending the other way.
The cleric sounds like he wants to let it go. The fact of which, I believe, is evidence that the country is trending the other way. I think the women will be fine.
I hope.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)but I cannot express how much this story delighted me.
I hope they will be OK.