Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,056 posts)
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 12:32 PM Sep 2012

Girls beat up Iran cleric over dress code

Source: CNN

Hojatoleslam Ali Beheshti said he encountered the girls on his way to the mosque in the village of Shahmirzad for noon prayers in late August.

He told one of the girls to cover up, the report said.

"She responded by telling me to cover my eyes, which was very insulting to me," Beheshti said. So he asked her a second time to cover up and also to put a lid on what he felt was verbal abuse.

She hit the man of the cloth, and he hit the ground.



Read more: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/09/20/1134375/-CNN-Girls-Beat-Up-Iran-Cleric-Over-Dress-Code

72 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Girls beat up Iran cleric over dress code (Original Post) kpete Sep 2012 OP
Good for her! nt valerief Sep 2012 #1
LOL! It's about time. Cleita Sep 2012 #2
YOU are making ME horny therefore YOU must cover up leftyohiolib Sep 2012 #3
The men are the weaker sex and can't control themselves. nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2012 #7
well it's hard to control how you feel - leftyohiolib Sep 2012 #16
It's about controlling actions (against women), not feelings, which can be kept private. nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2012 #24
that is exactly my point. controlling your (re)actions. you cant controll how you feel but you can leftyohiolib Sep 2012 #33
Especially when you are told you can do what ever BlueToTheBone Sep 2012 #57
Maybe that's true for clerics 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #29
Atta Girl!! leftynyc Sep 2012 #4
condoning violence are we. HE should a kept his mouth shut and SHE should a kept her hands 2 herself leftyohiolib Sep 2012 #14
This is a pretty naive post right here. (nt) Posteritatis Sep 2012 #21
YOU BET YOUR ASS leftynyc Sep 2012 #22
Violence is not the answer, but something has to be done. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2012 #27
So if someone is continually leftynyc Sep 2012 #31
Violence in response to violence is acceptable 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #32
Absolutely leftynyc Sep 2012 #34
And if you were speaking to me in such a snarky and condescending way in person 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #35
I met condescension with condescension leftynyc Sep 2012 #41
You consider condescending speech to not rise to the level of violence 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #44
Perhaps you live in a black and white leftynyc Sep 2012 #48
Quite frankly, the actions (even though only "verbal") of the "cleric".... PavePusher Sep 2012 #38
After a while you get tired of being pushed around by bullies. alfredo Sep 2012 #45
Who decides? 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #46
Well in this case, since the next step is often the beating, flogging or stoning of the women.... PavePusher Sep 2012 #56
So a preemptive strike based on the supposed history of the entity being attacked? 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #69
O.K., I'm being more than a little hyperbolic, obviously. PavePusher Sep 2012 #70
well in this article the only one doing the shit kicking was this woman and he did just take it leftyohiolib Sep 2012 #37
turn the other cheek and get you whole butt spanked! n/t neovente Sep 2012 #52
I love this cartoon Dash87 Sep 2012 #66
she TOOK nothing where does it say she stood there and took "it" what "it" are you refering to leftyohiolib Sep 2012 #36
Respect the laws leftynyc Sep 2012 #42
Those girls/women are awesome. Hope they won't get their eyes poked out. zonkers Sep 2012 #47
That would be wonderful leftynyc Sep 2012 #49
What a novel concept- holding the man responsible for his own actions arcane1 Sep 2012 #5
I think Imam Beheshti is a big fat liar, myself. MADem Sep 2012 #6
So you think he got beaten up otherwise and fabricated the story Cleita Sep 2012 #8
Maybe he was hitting on them and they hit back. louis-t Sep 2012 #10
Or just being a groping grabass--that is not uncommon in that culture. NT MADem Sep 2012 #20
It's entirely possible. I don't doubt he got hit, but "why" is a question. MADem Sep 2012 #18
Yeah marions ghost Sep 2012 #9
Not a holy man.... blackspade Sep 2012 #11
even heaven05 Sep 2012 #13
i wish there were video. n/t lies and propaganda Sep 2012 #12
I can't condone violence CreekDog Sep 2012 #15
A recent photo of the cleric here... hunter Sep 2012 #17
Those guys don't go for hotlinking, apparently. nt MADem Sep 2012 #19
I may be wrong but no, I think that picture was the intended one... nt DRoseDARs Sep 2012 #39
How odd--previously, all I was seeing was a blue box with a dot com address in it. MADem Sep 2012 #53
"She responded by telling me to cover my eyes" - Yessssss! (nt) Posteritatis Sep 2012 #23
Women, fuck yeah. nt Comrade_McKenzie Sep 2012 #25
"Mind your own business, asshole." nt bemildred Sep 2012 #26
That's an interesting turn of play 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #28
I love it but magic59 Sep 2012 #30
I don't condone violence, but it is good seeing a woman stand up for herself. AND alfredo Sep 2012 #40
This is why we shouldn't let Israel attack Iran--girl power will change them from within yurbud Sep 2012 #43
I salute them for their bravery but I fear for them now. trouble.smith Sep 2012 #50
Hmmm... defacto7 Sep 2012 #51
I will bet the cleric doesn't know the names (cough) of the girls. MADem Sep 2012 #54
Hopefully otherwise, they should have made him an Earl lonestarnot Sep 2012 #62
bastard had it coming! Ken Burch Sep 2012 #55
I don't condone violence BUT... Ash_F Sep 2012 #58
You go girl! BadGimp Sep 2012 #59
Whether or not any adult chooses to wear a burka or hijab should be up to the ZombieHorde Sep 2012 #60
Regrettably, your opinion is not shared by the ulema in Iran. MADem Sep 2012 #63
That is regrettable. nt ZombieHorde Sep 2012 #64
yes means nothing when no is not an option. n/t Scout Sep 2012 #67
I agree. I also believe the reverse is true. ZombieHorde Sep 2012 #68
Will they be stoned to death now? lonestarnot Sep 2012 #61
Iran is a pretty right-wing country, but... Ash_F Sep 2012 #71
I hope you are correct. lonestarnot Sep 2012 #72
I really fear for these women ibegurpard Sep 2012 #65

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
2. LOL! It's about time.
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 12:36 PM
Sep 2012

The irony is that it's okay for the cleric to insult the women by basically inferring that they are tramps, but not okay for them to insult him back. I hope Middle Eastern women fight back more often in the future. Time to end patriarchal customs around the world.

 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
33. that is exactly my point. controlling your (re)actions. you cant controll how you feel but you can
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 03:13 PM
Sep 2012

controll how you act - that was my point

BlueToTheBone

(3,747 posts)
57. Especially when you are told you can do what ever
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 09:12 PM
Sep 2012

you choose, because you are a man and have all power. Boys will be boys and girls are blamed.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
4. Atta Girl!!
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 12:40 PM
Sep 2012

My hope is all the women start to react the same way. I understand he was in the hospital for 3 days - she must have some right hook. Maybe he's learned his lesson but somehow I doubt it.

 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
14. condoning violence are we. HE should a kept his mouth shut and SHE should a kept her hands 2 herself
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 01:16 PM
Sep 2012

what about men who belt their women cause SHE said something HE didnt like. "oh but that's different because of blah blah blah" . you dont get to hit each other over words. even though i think she was correct in telling him to close his eyes i hope he sues her and she should be arrested for assault

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
22. YOU BET YOUR ASS
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 01:44 PM
Sep 2012

I CONDONE THIS. Women are treated as virtual slaves and you just want them to stand by and take it? Fuck that noise. It's very easy for you to sit in the comfort your home and pass judgement on women who have no control over their lives - your attitude sickens me.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
31. So if someone is continually
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 02:55 PM
Sep 2012

kicking the shit out you - literally and figuratively - you just take it?

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
32. Violence in response to violence is acceptable
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 02:59 PM
Sep 2012

IMO (I can understand absolute pacifists but I do not agree with them).

Violence in response to words is not.

Imagine a world where the only time anyone was willing to use violence was in self defense. They would never initiate it.

Wouldn't that be a better world than the one we have here?

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
34. Absolutely
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 03:25 PM
Sep 2012

And it rained peanut M&Ms, that would be fabulous also. Now if you want to talk about the reality of the lives many of these women are living in some of these middle eastern countries, do let me know.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
35. And if you were speaking to me in such a snarky and condescending way in person
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 03:29 PM
Sep 2012

By your philosophy your safety would depend on how big I am compared to you.

By my personal philosophy you would be perfectly safe regardless.

Which do you prefer?

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
41. I met condescension with condescension
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 04:09 PM
Sep 2012

A world without violence? Is that the real world? It would also be nice if everyone had an education, a place to live and food in their kitchen. All those things would be lovely. Is it reality? Not even close.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
44. You consider condescending speech to not rise to the level of violence
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 04:14 PM
Sep 2012

but since you've already determined that it is acceptable to use violence to respond to speech whether or not your condescending attitude warrants a beating is entirely up to the person you're talking to.

And you can't even disagree with their actions as they pummel you.

At best you could disagree with their standards for initiating violence based on speech.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
48. Perhaps you live in a black and white
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 04:56 PM
Sep 2012

world but I live in a place filled with gray. There are no absolutes on what is acceptable and what isn't behavior. I will always support women fighting back against misogynistic clowns. Since the only statement available is from the cleric - who I see didn't press charges, I wonder why - we only have his word that he didn't touch these women. And even if he didn't, I support their right to fight back against a society that treats them as property. I don't think you live in the real world.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
38. Quite frankly, the actions (even though only "verbal") of the "cleric"....
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 03:51 PM
Sep 2012
were violence, towards women. And thus violence in defense was absolutely appropriate.

I can't help but think that if verbally abusive fuckwads (no matter what nation or culture) got punched in the face more often, they'd keep their shit-nozzles closed more often. YMMV.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
46. Who decides?
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 04:16 PM
Sep 2012

I doubt anyone would cry if the WBC got a beating at a funeral they were protesting.

What about someone protesting for abortion access?

To some this is common sense. To others it is advocating murder.

What about anti-war protesters. Or those who oppose GM crops or nukes. What about people who spout off about football in a crowded bar? Or people who make a point of saying "god bless you" to others they know are atheists?

Where do you draw the line on "verbal violence" that allows a physically violent response?

A lot of people probably deserve a beating. But I can't think of anyone qualified to determine that based solely on what they have to say.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
56. Well in this case, since the next step is often the beating, flogging or stoning of the women....
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 07:42 PM
Sep 2012

I'd say execution of the "cleric" would be fine.

The WBC ass-tards don't generally move on to violence. I suppose I should have been more clear on my dividing line.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
70. O.K., I'm being more than a little hyperbolic, obviously.
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 03:27 PM
Sep 2012

On the gripping hand, waiting until the call goes out to stone them to death will probably be too late.

Bottom line, we can gripe about their primitive culture until the goats come home, but any change will have to come from within their own society. The good news is that modern electronic communications mean you can't keep people ignorant forever. The changes are coming... the question is what forms they will take, how long it will take, and how much resistance will have to be overcome (and by what methods).

 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
37. well in this article the only one doing the shit kicking was this woman and he did just take it
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 03:38 PM
Sep 2012

so by your logic he should kicked the shit out of her b/c otherwise he's would just be "taking it"

 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
36. she TOOK nothing where does it say she stood there and took "it" what "it" are you refering to
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 03:32 PM
Sep 2012

he opened his mouth and she told him to stfu.since when did this become about women "who have no control over their lives" this particular woman seem to have plenty of control. she wasnt cowering she wasnt being pushed around. she responded verbally to a verbal situation and that's where it should have ended. you take this one instance and try to make this into some kind of win in the war for female rightousness it isnt,this was an assault. she over reacted and she should be arrested. that's not me sitting in a chair passing judgement it's the law and you should try and respect it. otherwise what's to stop any violence.


btw i dont care what my attitude does to you.

 

zonkers

(5,865 posts)
47. Those girls/women are awesome. Hope they won't get their eyes poked out.
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 04:44 PM
Sep 2012

Hope this impacts other women. Hope this is Rosa Parks moment.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
49. That would be wonderful
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 04:59 PM
Sep 2012

but they could just as easily hang for it although I see the cleric has not pressed charges (wondering why). I still support what they did and can't think of a reason at all to change my mind on that.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
5. What a novel concept- holding the man responsible for his own actions
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 12:43 PM
Sep 2012

If you're offended, look away. It's easy to do when one is a mature adult

MADem

(135,425 posts)
6. I think Imam Beheshti is a big fat liar, myself.
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 12:43 PM
Sep 2012

We never learn the names of "the girls" in this article--we're not talking about a big city, we are talking a very small town, where everyone knows everyone else. In Iran, there's none of that "we don't name the underaged child in the newpaper" stuff--heck, they'll name 'em with no issue whatsoever.

From the CNN article:

Tehran, Iran (CNN) -- They may be a far cry from their Western counterparts fighting for the acceptance to breast-feed -- or go topless -- in public, but two girls clobbered a cleric recently in a small town in Iran when he admonished one of them to cover herself more completely.
The cleric said he asked "politely," but the girl's angry reaction and some pugilistic double-teaming with her friend landed the holy man in the hospital, according to an account Monday in the semiofficial Mehr News Agency.

...Beheshti, who emerged from the infirmary three days later, said he did not file a complaint against the girls.
But he doesn't mind the local prosecutor's investigation into the matter either "as long as the case helps the cause of Islamic hijab."


http://edition.cnn.com/2012/09/20/world/meast/iran-hijab-fisticuffs/index.html?hpt=hp_t3

The truth of the matter is this--if you are of the female gender in Iran, and your hijab is found to be wanting, you are more likely to be verbally abused or even physically assaulted if you fail to follow directives to adjust your coverings than not. This story is getting play because it's "Dog Bites Man" type news, not because there's a sudden impetus by women to fight back against the absurd dress code (though it would behoove the culture if that were the case).

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
8. So you think he got beaten up otherwise and fabricated the story
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 12:47 PM
Sep 2012

about the girls to cover up what might be an embarrassment to him? I wonder what that could have been. I mean if I were a man, it would embarrass me to be beaten up by a woman.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
18. It's entirely possible. I don't doubt he got hit, but "why" is a question.
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 01:41 PM
Sep 2012

He might have been interfering with one of the girls and the other came to her aid. He invented the story to cover his actions, and then plays the "religious forgiveness" card by not wanting to take action against them. He HAS to know who they are--these aren't strange girls in a city of millions, this is a small town, like a Cheers bar without the booze, a place where everybody knows your name.

It's impossible for a female to get a fair shake in Iran, unless they have powerful male relatives. Hopefully the girls have an Ayatullah in the family--otherwise, they will not be believed and they could receive a very brutal punishment for simply defending themselves.

marions ghost

(19,841 posts)
9. Yeah
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 12:55 PM
Sep 2012

it's a bit far-fetched. We'd all love to think it's true but the retaliation for such a thing would be severe.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
53. How odd--previously, all I was seeing was a blue box with a dot com address in it.
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 06:29 PM
Sep 2012

Now I see the pic, and yes, that could very well be the cleric!

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
28. That's an interesting turn of play
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 02:43 PM
Sep 2012

it's usually the girls that get beaten.

I don't really think that warranted violence but I would have been willing to look the other way.

 

magic59

(429 posts)
30. I love it but
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 02:50 PM
Sep 2012

I wouldn't believe anything a religious fanatic says either here or overseas. He is probably trying to get a few girls stoned (and I don't mean high) so he can get his rocks off.

alfredo

(60,082 posts)
40. I don't condone violence, but it is good seeing a woman stand up for herself. AND
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 04:09 PM
Sep 2012

A simple act like that could snowball, just as that Tunisian shop keeper who burned himself to death in protest.


Her act could embolden more women to defy those assholes.

 

trouble.smith

(374 posts)
50. I salute them for their bravery but I fear for them now.
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 05:09 PM
Sep 2012

Iran will likely feel a need to make an example out of them and that example will be sickening.

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
51. Hmmm...
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 06:06 PM
Sep 2012

I wonder how many will die or be tortured over this one?

The most likely situation here is that this is incitement of rage for political purposes and it seems it has worked here anyway.

How many times are we going to walk into their religious traps?

Maybe it happened. Maybe it didn't. All I know is that it took just one cleric lying about a crippled girl to get her thrown in jail and possibly stoned to death.

That's the art of incitement.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
54. I will bet the cleric doesn't know the names (cough) of the girls.
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 06:34 PM
Sep 2012

Even though it is a small town where everyone knows your name.

He's given out a story that will ensure the girls do not come forward, because the cleric will be believed first.

That said, I don't think what he said happened, happened.

The girls probably ran home and told their parents that the Imam tried to touch one of them, their daddies went to the masjid and nosed around a bit, found out what was being said about the girls, and went home and told the kids to zip it and to avoid that pervert in the future.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
55. bastard had it coming!
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 06:40 PM
Sep 2012

I hope the hell they offer that girl asylum at some embassy, those wackos never let these things go.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
60. Whether or not any adult chooses to wear a burka or hijab should be up to the
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 10:39 PM
Sep 2012

individual in my opinion.

Some think those clothes should be compulsorily, and some think those clothes should be illegal, but I think each adult should decide for them themselves.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
63. Regrettably, your opinion is not shared by the ulema in Iran.
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 11:31 PM
Sep 2012

Women do get accosted and punished for "infractions" of dress. Immodesty is a crime in Iran. It has been for decades.

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
71. Iran is a pretty right-wing country, but...
Fri Sep 21, 2012, 03:41 PM
Sep 2012

...not even in the same ball-park as our great Allies Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, and now Iraq. Most of the stories of stonings that people read about come from those countries and those who are not familiar with the region tend to clump all those cultures into a single morass. Iran never got that bad and is, in fact, trending the other way.

The cleric sounds like he wants to let it go. The fact of which, I believe, is evidence that the country is trending the other way. I think the women will be fine.







I hope.

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
65. I really fear for these women
Thu Sep 20, 2012, 11:46 PM
Sep 2012

but I cannot express how much this story delighted me.
I hope they will be OK.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Girls beat up Iran cleric...