Never-Before-Seen Trump Tax Documents Show Major Inconsistencies
Source: ProPublica
Documents obtained by ProPublica show stark differences in how Donald Trumps businesses reported some expenses, profits and occupancy figures for two Manhattan buildings, giving a lender different figures than they provided to New York City tax authorities. The discrepancies made the buildings appear more profitable to the lender and less profitable to the officials who set the buildings property tax.
For instance, Trump told the lender that he took in twice as much rent from one building as he reported to tax authorities during the same year, 2017. He also gave conflicting occupancy figures for one of his signature skyscrapers, located at 40 Wall Street.
Lenders like to see a rising occupancy level as a sign of what they call leasing momentum. Sure enough, the company told a lender that 40 Wall Street had been 58.9% leased on Dec. 31, 2012, and then rose to 95% a few years later. The company told tax officials the building was 81% rented as of Jan. 5, 2013.
A dozen real estate professionals told ProPublica they saw no clear explanation for multiple inconsistencies in the documents. The discrepancies are versions of fraud, said Nancy Wallace, a professor of finance and real estate at the Haas School of Business at the University of California-Berkeley. This kind of stuff is not OK.
Read more: https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-inc-podcast-never-before-seen-trump-tax-documents-show-major-inconsistencies
Not a good week from trump. ProPublica got the info from New York FOIA
tikka
(762 posts)and that was guessed by most people.
I rather thought this was common knowledge about Trump. I've read about it from several sources.
tblue37
(65,340 posts)PatSeg
(47,423 posts)previously, though who can keep up with this man's decades of corruption. Meanwhile, it certainly needs repeating, keep drumming it in so no one forgets.
pansypoo53219
(20,976 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)"They" being Don Jr. and Ivanka, and trump, to get approval and loans for their condos, they had to have a certain pre-sales rate.
They frauded the numbers to the banks and to prospective buyers, to create a picture of high demand.
BumRushDaShow
(128,933 posts)(paraphrased)
THIS is "standard practice". If you are selling, you make it appear that the property is worth far more than it really is to get a maximum price but when it comes to real estate taxes, you take all kinds of depreciation into account to reduce the assessed value.
Of course doing this with large properties is on a whole other order of magnitude than when done by a simple homeowner.
Maraya1969
(22,479 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,933 posts)It's a sortof loophole that (correctly) assumes that disparate entities that regulate this will not connect the dots. And in this particular case, it is in reference to property taxes (vs income taxes).
(ETA - many regular homeowners do the same)
pecosbob
(7,538 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,933 posts)The big boys do it because they are using the fraudulently increased value to offer the property as collateral to secure huge loans. It becomes a ponzi scheme and it seems folks like Kushner and his 666 5th Avenue was an example of this... And when he was at the end of his rope, his daddy-in-law's "relationship" (and all the illegalities of that) with the Saudis saved his day.
pecosbob
(7,538 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,933 posts)gademocrat7
(10,656 posts)mia
(8,360 posts)Trumps Riches and the Real-Estate Tax Racket
The industry where you really can make billions and pay no taxes.
Real-estate developers, like Trump, often take out big loans to finance their investments. I'm the king of debt. I'm great with debt. Nobody knows debt better than me, Trump said in a June interview. Indeed, a New York Times investigation found that Trump-owned companies hold at least $650 million in debtmore than twice the amount that could be surmised from his public filings.
https://prospect.org/power/trump-s-riches-real-estate-tax-racket/
wcast
(595 posts)Vinca
(50,269 posts)jcmaine72
(1,773 posts)for. Today, criminals like this can be President. Not what I'd call progress.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)This is a pretty idiotic stunt, easily discovered and prosecuted.