Amber Guyger found guilty of murder
Source: CNN
A jury has found former Dallas police officer Amber Guyger guilty of murder after less than 24 hours of deliberation.
Guyger was indicted last year after fatally shooting her unarmed neighbor, Botham Jean, in his apartment, which she said she mistook as hers.
Jurors were given the option of finding Guyger guilty of the lesser offense of manslaughter. With the murder conviction, Guyger, 31, now faces up to life in prison.
The verdict follows a case that has captured national attention and sparked outrage.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/amber-guyger-botham-jean-verdict/index.html?adkey=bn
no_hypocrisy
(46,020 posts)Castle Doctrine, my ass!
dalton99a
(81,392 posts)TeamPooka
(24,206 posts)Stand your ground in my HOUSE? Fuck you!
Also the idea that a cop can shoot anyone anywhere and get away with it was probably repugnant too.
hlthe2b
(102,119 posts)onetexan
(13,020 posts)without reason and without provocation. This is just a sad, horrible mess with lives broken on both sides.
Cha
(296,838 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)This verdict is for Trayvon Martin," he said, "its for Michael Brown, its for Sandra Bland, its for Tamir Rice, its for Eric Garner, its for Antwon Rose, its for Jemel Roberson, for EJ Bradford, for Stephon Clark, for Jeffrey Dennis, Genevieve Dawes, for Pamela Turner.
Cha
(296,838 posts)redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)Police are like doctors, they don't police their own very well. In this case there was justice.
BumRushDaShow
(128,441 posts)irisblue
(32,928 posts)cstanleytech
(26,230 posts)...now let's see what the sentence will be...
...
cstanleytech
(26,230 posts)Not that I feel any sympathy for her rather I felt sure they would refuse to do that and go for manslaughter instead as it seems police officers often do not get convicted even for cases that look like they should be.
irisblue
(32,928 posts)That 'Castle Doctrine' in someones elses' "Castle" sucked bilge water.
liberalhistorian
(20,814 posts)at the smug entitlement of her defense asserting that .What DID shock and anger me was the judge actually allowing it, when the victim was the one who was in his own apartment and SHE was the invader. I'm really glad the jury was able to see through that bullshit.
pazzyanne
(6,543 posts)I had trouble answering my door for a while after this happened. Nice to see justice done.
onetexan
(13,020 posts)dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)exboyfil
(17,862 posts)by specifying she intended to shoot Jean. Their argument was that it was a lawful action prompted by a mistake of fact (not her apartment).
Glad to see the conviction. Her getting home cooking from the Texas Rangers, the deletion of the text messages, and her utter lack of sympathy for the victim immediately following the shooting told me she deserved more than manslaughter. She didn't even view Jean as human as far as I am concerned.
It helped that Jean was a saint. It shouldn't, but it did. They did try to smear him though.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Texin
(2,590 posts)I think that keeping the trial in the same venue as the tragedy had a much larger role in getting this conviction. If they had allowed the case to be transferred to a more rural (read: white) area, the outcome might have been different.
MarcA
(2,195 posts)the definitions of murder and manslaughter in Texas law. Murder is usually
thought of, at least in popular culture, as a planned and executed killing.
cannabis_flower
(3,764 posts)She can get from 5 years up to life. I believe life is a minimum of 30 years in prison. This is one level below capital murder for which the sentence would be life without parole or the death penalty.
MarcA
(2,195 posts)LeftInTX
(25,126 posts)Haven't been following this because the verdicts are always depressing.
imavoter
(646 posts)it's Capital murder or murder.
Capital murder in Texas is death penalty. This was never an option.
The option was murder or a lesser charge.
Murder in Texas is sort of Murder 2nd degree
LeftInTX
(25,126 posts)I've lived in Texas for 40 years!!
imavoter
(646 posts)but a friend's wife is a lawyer
and I have another friend who is a lawyer
and they were both explaining.
I was watching the punishment phase today, and the state has text messages of her saying bad things about blacks.
It wasn't allowed in the trial, but is allowed in punishment phase.
This does not look good for her.
WFAA has live footage somewhere if you want to google it, as does most of the other local media outlets.
Guyger was taken into custody and punishment phase continues tomorrow.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)cstanleytech
(26,230 posts)would be a huge miscarriage of justice as she deserves at least 15 at a minimum in my opinion.
MarcA
(2,195 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)All that sobbing that "I'm going to live with this for the rest of my life", at least she still has the rest of her life to live.
Kittycow
(2,396 posts)on YouTube. That guy is really sharp-minded. I'm so happy that they didn't overcharge her which seems to often get the culprit off.
Now we wait for the jury to decide her punishment.
whopis01
(3,491 posts)You said you were happy they didnt overcharge her. What could they have charged her with beyond murder?
LeftInTX
(25,126 posts)(I wasn't following this case or the charges because the verdicts always depress me)
Looking that the Texas statutes just posted, I guess manslaughter would be the expected verdict. (If she truly mistook the apartment and I believe she did, but she was also in "cop mode" and she also saw, "black guy" and didn't think about the possibility that she was in the wrong apartment. I wonder if she would have realized she was in the wrong apartment if she saw a white guy?)
qazplm135
(7,447 posts)and when you testify as an accused you often are in an all or nothing scenario...they either believe you and go light or acquit, or they don't and you get hammered. There's no middle ground usually.
liberalhistorian
(20,814 posts)police officer fairy dust didn't work this time with this jury.
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)At least we're starting to see some police being held accountable for killing unarmed POC. I hope the message is heard and makes a difference.
Haggis for Breakfast
(6,831 posts)that SHE has to live with this everyday. I almost fell off the chair.
WHAT ARROGANCE !!
liberalhistorian
(20,814 posts)during her own testimony? What arrogant stupidity!
Haggis for Breakfast
(6,831 posts)While on the stand. It's a part of her testimony. If there's a transcript, you can read it. But I saw it in a video of her testimony.
The Mouth
(3,145 posts)I hope it's life with no possibility of parole.
cannabis_flower
(3,764 posts)Sentence can be between 5 years and life. Life without parole is only for capital murder which can also get the death penalty.
The Mouth
(3,145 posts)If you screw up and someone dies, you get out when they come back to life.
Why "intent" or psychological state has anything to do with jurisprudence is strictly Christian/Buddhist psychobabble that one's state of mind matters.
All of these different types of "murder", and "manslaughter"... silly.
A person's dead by the results of your actions, why should it make a difference if you simply weren't paying attention or if you'd planned it for a decade.
She should never see the outside of a jail cell, just like the drunk that hit my roomate, I don't give a damn about anyone's excuse for anything.
Sorry, just venting.
bucolic_frolic
(43,044 posts)for "crimes of passion". So when you come home and find your wife in bed with her boyfriend, it's a crime of passion, and I guess they got a bit lighter on you. So at least in that instance, intent does matter, to the French. And why shouldn't intent matter to some extent? Premeditation is a sign of cunning and evil, conspiracy too. Intent is known at that point. But if it happens because of circumstances, as one thing leads to another, it's not premeditated. I know, I hear you, someone's still dead. Courts in some ways try to fit the punishment to the crime, but it's rarely a perfect fit.
forgotmylogin
(7,520 posts)A defense of "I didn't know what I was doing based on faulty situational awareness" is no defense. It means you're a dangerous person. And a police officer should be a person who falls back on training reflex. If that reflex is "shoot without assessing the situation" at BARE MINIMUM that person should not be licensed to carry a weapon, nor be a police officer, nor be around people where she might decide she doesn't know quite where she is and cause injury or death to bystanders based on a faulty snap judgment.
LeftInTX
(25,126 posts)stopdiggin
(11,242 posts)Oh, I don't know -- maybe something like -- JUSTICE?
So -- in your world, a child (or one with child like capacity) who accidentally causes the death of a playmate -- should be hanged .. stoned to death .. imprisoned for the rest of their life?
I don't think (sincerely hope!) you really believe that.
Response to George II (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Jedi Guy
(3,175 posts)It was literally all about her, and not a thought spared for the man she killed and the family he left behind. She also didn't attempt to save Mr. Jean, and instead went immediately into damage control mode. The deleted texts also surely didn't help her credibility.
I'm surprised she didn't opt for a bench trial. I'm also curious if her attorney tried to get her a plea bargain. I couldn't find any news reports saying so, so I guess if they tried it the DA declined.
I don't believe she intended to kill Mr. Jean when she got to the building, but neither did she accept any responsibility for what she did, or show any remorse for anyone but herself.
I hope his family can at least feel some measure of peace at justice being done.
Response to Jedi Guy (Reply #21)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
LeftInTX
(25,126 posts)Prosecutors don't like to try these cases and would probably jump at the chance.
Also her attorneys were probably counting on the "fool proof, police don't get convicted" strategy.
obamanut2012
(26,046 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,142 posts)She was screwing her face up, but my guess is her cheeks were dry. I noticed the same kind of response when I watched an interview with Juanita Broadrick talking about her alleged rape by Bill Clinton.
deurbano
(2,894 posts)Seedersandleechers
(3,044 posts)I've had neighbors come into my apartment drunk not realizing it wasn't their place and they didn't shoot me. I just showed them where they needed to go.
onetexan
(13,020 posts)Texin
(2,590 posts)She was clearly distracted. There were obvious visual clues that might have tipped her to the fact she was entering the wrong apartment. That red half-circle doormat in front of Jean's door should have been her first clue. It would not have escaped my notice. Seeing that, I would have turned around looked behind me toward the floor marker by the elevator, but she was not in-the-minute, so to speak. The poor man was sitting on the sofa eating a bowl of ice cream for goodness sake. She entered that apartment with her gun drawn and and her finger on the trigger and shot first.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)and the cops let her have three full days to get her story straight and get whatever out of her system before she turned herself in...
onetexan
(13,020 posts)likely she wasn't drinking. She was still in her uniform. Her lawyers had argued that she was exhausted from the long shift, but the fact she was sexting threw that out the window. I do think the jury convicted because she she stated on the stand that she shot to kill. She was way too eager to pull the trigger.
Agree that the Dallas PD botched the proper handling of this case. It was very badly handled. Dallas is a hotbed of police brutality and poor race relations. I do hope the contentious climate will improve going forward.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)she shot him.
onetexan
(13,020 posts)her stating she shot to kill showed clear intent.
LeftInTX
(25,126 posts)I think she was distracted, went to wrong apt, but that all went out the window when she saw a black guy. She suddenly thought, "black guy" "intruder".
After she shot him, she realized she wasn't in her apt. She realized what she had done and police mode went out the window.
obamanut2012
(26,046 posts)Sobbing about how her job was over. She never tried to save him -- and, he was alive when the EMTs got there. She also lied on the stand about trying to stem blood "with one hand," but she had zero blood on her.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)a 'safe' neighborhood.
Scalded Nun
(1,236 posts)there are no 'safe' neighborhoods.
And if you call them, for whatever reason, be prepared for someone to die.
LeftInTX
(25,126 posts)He may have tried to close it completely, but couldn't. I've got a door like that, it's frustrating.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Guyger's keys were in Jean's door when the first officers arrived. The doors at the apartments take an electronic lock, which turns like a normal key.
Jean hadn't locked his door when he returned home from running an errand. Crime scene photos show the strike plate, which is where the door latches closed, was slightly warped.
The door wasn't fully closed and latched the night of the shooting. Typically, the doors at the South Side Flats should fully close automatically, because of the way they are weighted.
Texas Ranger David Armstrong, the lead investigator on the case, testified that he tested the closing of Jean's door several times. It didn't consistently slam shut each time, he said.
( From: https://www.wfaa.com/article/news/special-reports/botham-jean/what-learned-in-the-amber-guyger-murder-trial/287-08dc486a-3dee-4f3e-ab51-ed4eb61f3387 )
sinkingfeeling
(51,438 posts)Voltaire2
(12,957 posts)imavoter
(646 posts)I'm in the Dallas area, and watching live coverage
right now.
Dominique Alexander, a local minister and activist was crying, surprised at the verdict. This is not a direct quote, but he said finally we have justice in the city of Dallas.
yaesu
(8,020 posts)Many officers take advantage of working long hours for very rewarding overtime pay, some making 6 digit salaries a year. I'm wondering if this played into it, over worked, not thinking right.
TheRealNorth
(9,470 posts)flying_wahini
(6,578 posts)I live nearby and have followed this story closely and GLAD its over.
I feel like she was tired from working a double and his game was on too loud for her to sleep.
She went up to complain and things escalated and she shot him in cold blood.
imavoter
(646 posts)I think she just fucking shot first, with an ask questions later attitude
I'm local too.
Did you know her former partner shot and killed someone in 2007? Weird.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)actually texted "I fucked up.
argyl
(3,064 posts)In the killing of a 15 y.o. African American kid. White cop got 15 years. It should have been more but he was on the job so that may have been a factor.
Ms. Guyger should receive a goodly number of years to atone for the murder of Mr. Jean.
Dallas County jurors are taking police shootings of civilians quite seriously.
imavoter
(646 posts)And she had just had deescaltion training.
She should have stepped back and called for help per her training.
And then she wound have fucking seen the red ass rug under her fucking feet.
Also she and her partner deleted text messages to each other. Tampering with evidence.
No one should be shot while eating a bowl of ice cream.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)imavoter
(646 posts)imavoter
(646 posts)because the prosecution had a bunch of text messages that they had recovered.
They weren't allowed in trial, but they were allowed in the punishment phase.
A bunch of texts making fun of MLK being dead and joking about being racist. ick.
rocktivity
(44,572 posts)if she didn't live there. And it certainly wasn't clear to be if someone was SUPPOSED to be her apartment. I think they had some sort of relationship and she went there on purpose. Nonetheless, I would have been happy enough with manslaughter -- WAS there a plea deal offer?
rocktivity
imavoter
(646 posts)It was not latched properly or was not latched securely,
According to testimony.
I'd have to check news articles if there was a plea deal.
I think most thought she would walk. It's a shock but relief to local social justice advocates.
I don't believe they were having a relationship. There's no evidence of that. She shot first, ask questions later...
Her former partner shot and killed someone in 2007. Pretty weird.
rocktivity
(44,572 posts)Did one of them ever complain about the other making too much noise, for instance?
And did she try to unlock her door but couldn't, or unlock it but couldn't get past the latch?
And my biggest question: DID SHE LIVE ALONE -- that is, was someone SUPPOSED to be in the apartment? If not, why did she expect to be let in, and why not call for backup?
rocktivity
imavoter
(646 posts)No, there is no evidence that they knew each other. That's pretty uniformly understood locally.
The door was either ajar or not latched properly.
She lived alone. She wasn't fucking paying attention and...shot without asking any questions.
Edit: or she's lying about what happened, but I tend to believe somehow she was on the wrong floor because she did park on the wrong floor. It should be noted that Bo's sister doesn't believe he would have been in the dark, because he didn't like the dark. But only Amber knows. And Bo's dead. Either way, the jury make the right choice, imo.
Per her training, she should have fallen back and called for help. This is the crux of the issue, and why she's convicted.
Her whoops defense is not valid. The bullet traveled in a downward angle projection and he was already crouched or stooping when she shot him.
He was on his couch eating a bowl of fucking ice cream.
I'm watching the punishment phase live now on-line now.
imavoter
(646 posts)it wasn't her lock, that's why her key didn't work.
It supposedly wasn't latched properly. She testified that she could hear sound from outside the door.
She could and should have called.
Seems like she pretty much opened the door and went boom. surprised him while he was eating ice cream on his couch.
The bullet traveled in a downward trajectory so he was stooping or crouching when she shot him through the heart.
He wasn't really all that close to her, either.
No, they didn't know each other.
I do believe she was on the wrong floor, as she did park her car on that floor.
She was really out of it to not see that red rug of his...but this is why you call for back up.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)obamanut2012
(26,046 posts)He was sitting down eating ice cream when she shot him, and he was found barely alive still sitting on the couch, bleeding out, which she was on the phone crying about losing her job. So, no sounds.
WestLosAngelesGal
(268 posts)The jury did their duty.
That she felt more sorry for herself than the vic came off pretty clear.
SKKY
(11,792 posts)...the problem with Police work is that you usually only learn that fact when someone dies needlessly. Tragic.
cyndensco
(1,697 posts)IronLionZion
(45,380 posts)and murder them.
liberalhistorian
(20,814 posts)Given the difficulty of securing convictions in such cases and the judge's permitting the defense to use the ridiculous "Castle Defense" (never mind that she was NOT in her own damn apartment and if anyone should have been able to use that defense it was the victim, who was minding his own damn business in his own damn apartment), I was really worried that she'd join a LONG line of white police officer murderers who'd be let off the hook by a badge-sniffing racist jury.
I know it won't bring their son/brother back, but I hope this gives the family at least SOME feeling of relief that justice has been served. And FUCK Amber Guyger and all of her boot-licking ammosexual supporters. Maybe this will be the beginning of a turning point in obtaining justice in these cases.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)Hers did not.
Hello?
Pisces
(5,599 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Catch-me-up: Was she an "ex-cop" at the time of the shooting? Or was she a cop (then) and subsequently terminated (now) thus explaining why she's only referred to as an ex-cop?
rocktivity
(44,572 posts)though I can't swear to it in court!
rocktivity
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)Off duty. She got terminated after the shooting. She had just finished a 13 hour shift. She lived on the 3rd floor of a complex, he lived on the 4th right above her. If her accounting does have any truth to it, it's just a horrible situation all around. There were more than enough things "different", like the red welcome mat that the prosecution showed in front of his door. Having done 13 hour hard shifts in the past, I can somewhat empathize with how out of it she may have actually been, and I'm willing to believe it may have been an actual accident, but in this case Justice is done.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)imavoter
(646 posts)The main Dallas police station is across the street
She was fired 2 weeks? (I'd have to look it up) later
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)BluNoMatterHu
(31 posts)And this was definitely the right verdict, imo. This poor man was eating ice cream on his couch when she decided to come in, promptly assume he was an intruder and shot to kill. So sad for him and his family.
bucolic_frolic
(43,044 posts)If she erred, she still did the deed. If she was incompetent, she still did the deed. It's sad for her, but the man is dead.
I don't want LE to be hesitant in defending their lives or the public's, but they have to sort out situations a bit better.
iluvtennis
(19,833 posts)Last edited Tue Oct 1, 2019, 07:55 PM - Edit history (1)
"movement" behind the door of what she believed was her apartment. She chose to push the slightly ajar door fully open and shoot Botham Jean. She had the option to seek cover in the hallway (there were big thick fire doors adjacent to the apartment entrance) and call police station for backup -- in the trial, the DA provided officer testimony that this was an option from the Dallas PD official policy book.
imavoter
(646 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)and when the other cops showed up it was literally the first thing they tried to do
iluvtennis
(19,833 posts)beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)work. Even in Texas
Croney
(4,656 posts)onetexan
(13,020 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,142 posts)I didn't think they would but ... GOOD!
Neema
(1,151 posts)to realize her mistake before she killed someone. I am surprised it wasn't manslaughter, but so glad it was a conviction.
Nitram
(22,765 posts)onetexan
(13,020 posts)but did not mention their ethnicity.
Edit: Sorry folks i just found it: 5 black jurors, 5 Hispanic/Asian, 2 white (2 black & 2 white alternates).
Source: https://newsone.com/3887754/amber-guyger-jury-racial-makeup/
avebury
(10,951 posts)told 5 blacks, 5 Hispanic/Asian and 2 White.
Cha
(296,838 posts)LenaBaby61
(6,972 posts)FINALLY.
SOME JUSTICE!!
marble falls
(57,010 posts)the judge does seem hard nosed, I think she's facing some serious time.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)There was an unusual amount of sympathy for her.
marble falls
(57,010 posts)OnlinePoker
(5,717 posts)imavoter
(646 posts)I'm no bible thumper, but I've seen the power of the spirit in action.
I don't think it was sympathy.
The brother of Botham Jean, on the stand for the victim impact statment, chose to love Guyger, instead of condemn her...
you know, the loving part of Christianity that so many people miss out on.
I think it so moved the Judge, that she wanted to practice love in action (faith without works is dead).
Amber was open to it, and even all the lawyers said they had never seen anything like that in all of their careers.
No one had a dry eye. Not in the court room, not the commentators...any one who watched it live like I did. I was in tears, and I felt the
spirit of love and forgiveness.
It was a holy moment in the most unlikely of places. But that's what real love they neighbor is.
Brandt Jean is only 18 and so wise. I won't forget that moment for a long while.
And as an aside, this doesn't mean that she doesn't need to go to jail. She does.
But God can love her from prison. And I hope that Guyger spends the next 5-10 years and take the grace that was offered to her.
Dallas, as a city, has a lot of work to do, but it's a start. She's the 3rd Dallas County, (first for the city in 45 years) officer to go to jail for shooting and killing someone in the last year or so. Things are changing. Just need more. Dallas has a good set of community activists.
The other parts of town, well, they still need more prayer. But it's a start.
That's my 2 cents.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Usually judges don't seem to care why a defendant is in the courtroom. Prosecutors, judges, and defense attorneys seem to get along more with each other than the defendant who is just part of the job for them. Yes they can be fair & compassionate but I never seen it like this.
Judges have been known to reduce sentences in killer cop sentences so I guess this isn't as bad as that.
imavoter
(646 posts)and the defense had to decide that before hand. That's not decided after judgement.
so the judge had no say in how long her sentence would be.
Guyger can have the next 5-10 years to contemplate on her actions.
Everything was already done. It was a heart felt moment. I think that's ok.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)I didn't say she reduced her sentence. I'm saying it isn't as bad as reducing a cop's sentence which is known to happen a lot.
I was just saying it was unusual. I have seen people charged with far less serious crimes not receive any hugs from the judge.