Judge: Epstein civil filings name hundreds of third parties
Source: Associated Press
Jim Mustian, Associated Press
Updated 12:35 pm CDT, Wednesday, September 4, 2019
NEW YORK (AP) Sealed court records contain the names of at least hundreds of third parties who were mentioned in a civil case involving sexual abuse allegations against the late financier Jeffrey Epstein, a federal judge said Wednesday.
The third parties, including a man now identified only as John Doe, will be allowed to object to the release of the documents following a painstaking review of the materials, U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska said.
"In some of these documents there are literally a thousand people" mentioned, Preska said, referring to a tranche of filings that includes more than two dozen depositions.
The records also include hundreds of pages of investigative reports, said Jeff Pagliuca, an attorney for former Epstein girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell.
"There's some work involved in this," he said of the process the attorneys will follow in determining which names to black out.
Read more: https://www.chron.com/news/us/article/Judge-to-discuss-unsealing-new-trove-of-Epstein-14412076.php
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
BlueMississippi
(776 posts)Perseus
(4,341 posts)We may disappointed at some of the people on the list, but I don't care, they should have thought about what they were doing at the time.
dchill
(38,471 posts)Firestorm49
(4,032 posts)Hopefully, or perhaps regrettably, it will replace exceeding your expectations as the most overused, misinterpreted term in modern history.
The word redaction already makes my blood boil.
Grins
(7,212 posts)...without context. The casual mention of a name could bring loss of job, reputation, marriage, financial ruin - and a lawsuit. They are right to be careful.
Callmecrazy
(3,065 posts)The worst thing you can take from someone is their good name, and it never returns in as good a condition as when it left.
Check every name.
Igel
(35,300 posts)Except those who use their full legal name as their handle.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)You wouldn't believe the spam I get from using it here.
Just kidding.
Response to Grins (Reply #4)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
BigmanPigman
(51,584 posts)he no doubt is the first John Doe in a list of hundreds.
Eugene
(61,868 posts)Source: New York Times
One unidentified man asked a judge not to release his name and those of others, fearing damage to their reputations.
By Amy Julia Harris
Sept. 4, 2019
A trove of sealed court records names hundreds of people who are connected to Jeffrey Epstein, and one unnamed man has already asked a judge not to release his name or the names of others accused in the documents of wrongdoing, arguing it could unfairly damage their reputations.
The anonymous motion seeking to keep the records sealed underscored the sordid nature of the allegations against Mr. Epstein and the fear of people in his social circles that their standing could be harmed by any links to him.
Mr. Epstein killed himself in a federal jail cell last month while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges in Manhattan, but he left behind questions about who else might have been implicated in the alleged abuse.
There are hundreds of other people implicated in dockets, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, an attorney involved in the litigation, said on Wednesday during a hearing about releasing the records, in Federal District Court in Manhattan. There are a lot of people, your honor.
He said the people are named in 29 depositions, voluminous investigatory records and an address book that includes over 1,000 names.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/04/nyregion/jeffrey-epstein-case-address-book.html
Brainfodder
(6,423 posts)I don't care if it's my own family!
I do suspect so much wealth tied into this, that bringing them down a peg will be quite quite quite satisfying!
Besides, the fetishes of some of these freaks is bound to be funny as hell!
I needz laughs!