Texas shooter evaded background check by purchasing weapon in private sale
Source: CBS
September 3, 2019 / 7:15 PM / CBS/AP
The 36-year-old gunman who killed seven people and wounded 22 others in West Texas on Saturday purchased his AR-style rifle from a private seller, federal law enforcement sources confirmed to CBS News. The purchase allowed the gunman to evade a federal background check. Sources also say the gunman was previously denied a gun purchase because he was determined to be mentally unfit.
The investigation into who sold the weapon is ongoing. Authorities said the gunman was killed by officers outside a busy movie theater in Odessa. It was at least the 38th mass killing this year.
Online court records show the gunman, identified as Seth Aaron Ator, was arrested in 2001 for a misdemeanor offense that would not have prevented him from legally purchasing firearms in Texas. Federal law defines nine categories that would legally prevent a person from owning a gun, which include being convicted of a felony, a misdemeanor domestic violence charge, being adjudicated as a "mental defect" or committed to a mental institution, the subject of a restraining order or having an active warrant. Authorities have said Ator had no active warrants at the time of the shooting.
Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/texas-shooter-purchased-assault-style-weapon-in-private-sale-evaded-background-check-2019-09-03/
Voltaire2
(13,009 posts)brer cat
(24,559 posts)Around where I live, guns are sold in yard sales. Unbelievable.
IronLionZion
(45,427 posts)Their answer to everything is always more guns. Doesn't matter to them who gets it or what they do with it.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)And fine the hell out of any gun profiteer who sells guns otherwise.
Nope, wont be 100% effective, but itll help.
MichMan
(11,910 posts)"Online court records show the gunman, identified as Seth Aaron Ator, was arrested in 2001 for a misdemeanor offense that would not have prevented him from legally purchasing firearms in Texas. Federal law defines nine categories that would legally prevent a person from owning a gun, which include being convicted of a felony, a misdemeanor domestic violence charge, being adjudicated as a "mental defect" or committed to a mental institution, the subject of a restraining order or having an active warrant. Authorities have said Ator had no active warrants at the time of the shooting."
NickB79
(19,233 posts)If you lie on the background check, that in itself is a felony. As it is, they are almost never looked into. There are potentially tens of thousands of felons out there today we have a solid paper trail to nail.
We don't even need to pass new laws for this! Just fund the ATF more thoroughly. Gun nuts say "enforce the laws we have"; do it.
Of course, we should also add universal background checks to close the private sale loophole.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Will have no charges against him.
Yeah, that a good system
Tom Yossarian Joad
(19,227 posts)Last edited Wed Sep 4, 2019, 09:08 AM - Edit history (1)
....knife crime, which is totally out of control in London. People are afraid to even walk the streets. He is a terrible mayor who should stay out of our business!"
Link to tweet
I think Wayne LaPierre has Trump's private number to feed the proper talking points. Tomorrow he will blame mental illness again.
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)Unfortunately, they are probably quite high.
yaesu
(8,020 posts)antique handguns, many capable of firing modern ammunition, through online auction houses and have them shipped right to their door. Pre-1899 firearms are exempt from the FFL Federal requirement & in most states and are not legally considered firearms. Basically treated as bb guns.
MichMan
(11,910 posts)by someone who wasn't legally allowed to buy a gun otherwise
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)(5 shot) that they stopped making ammo for in the 1920's, so I have to hand-make rounds, at a rough cost, brass included, of $20 a shot.
I'm trying to think of a black powder rifle from that era that isn't bolt-action, and I'm coming up empty. Someone help me out.
sir pball
(4,741 posts)Heck, the 1895 was designed for modern smokeless rounds.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Edit: (Ah, 'that isn't bolt action'. You are correct. Mostly equivalent to bolt action for cyclic speed though.)
sir pball
(4,741 posts)Not as fast as a semiautomatics or pumps, but definitely quite a bit faster than a bolt, you don't really need to do anything other than jack your wrist back and forth to reload.
S'why I'm in favor of limiting box magazines to just a few rounds, a levergun or pump rifle with an AR-style magazine would be pretty damned lethal.
jmowreader
(50,553 posts)Old Western TV show.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)startling speed as well.
rickyhall
(4,889 posts)Sue seller into bankruptcy?
hack89
(39,171 posts)which may be hard if the seller did not know the buyer beforehand.
MissMillie
(38,549 posts)I'm just saying.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Presumably the excise and other taxes specific to firearms were paid somewhere along the line before this rifle was transferred to the murderous nutbag.