Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(36,055 posts)
Wed Jul 17, 2019, 10:34 PM Jul 2019

THE DETAILS OF TRUMP'S HUSH MONEY PAYMENTS ARE ABOUT TO GO PUBLIC

Source: VICE News

The documents must be posted by 11:00 am eastern on Thursday, July 18,

Judge William H. Pauley of the Southern District of New York wrote in a decision released Wednesday.

“The campaign finance violations discussed in the Materials are a matter of national importance. Now that the Government's investigation into those violations has concluded, it is time that every American has an opportunity to scrutinize the Materials,” Judge Pauley wrote.

Read more: https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/j5w7jb/the-details-of-trump-orgs-hush-money-payments-are-about-to-go-public



These unredacted documents could change everything.

Thank you, Judge Pauley.
42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
THE DETAILS OF TRUMP'S HUSH MONEY PAYMENTS ARE ABOUT TO GO PUBLIC (Original Post) ancianita Jul 2019 OP
Well, that should be interesting! CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2019 #1
Rachel gave me hope about this tonight. Today I've felt pretty hopeless. Tomorrow, tomorrow... ancianita Jul 2019 #2
I wish I could believe that they will change anything DavidDvorkin Jul 2019 #3
How can another court -- and what other court could-- stop this judge's ruling. Doesn't make sense. ancianita Jul 2019 #6
That doesn't mean he won't try! leftieNanner Jul 2019 #9
It's not structurally doable, is what I'm saying. ancianita Jul 2019 #11
You are correct leftieNanner Jul 2019 #13
Brett knows better. Whoever delivers the message wouldn't get past the secretary. ancianita Jul 2019 #29
Higher courts regularly overrule lower ones. DavidDvorkin Jul 2019 #22
If there had been a filing, we'd know by now. ancianita Jul 2019 #27
I think that we should not be saying that tRump is "immune" or everything drops off Doitnow Jul 2019 #15
I don't think that making an observation on DU has a significant effect. DavidDvorkin Jul 2019 #23
We know that. We're thinking together, that's all. And you never know the influence DU has elsewhere ancianita Jul 2019 #28
If these documents show that Barr shut down watoos Jul 2019 #4
I thought Barr's behind-the-scenes pressure caused this drop, which enraged Pauley. The ancianita Jul 2019 #8
My thoughts as well MFM008 Jul 2019 #39
And they lost! I want to send this judge a present, a token of my thanks. The more unredacted docs, ancianita Jul 2019 #40
This and Epstein. No wonder Trump is causing a diversion right now. Doodley Jul 2019 #5
Highly likely. ancianita Jul 2019 #7
Plus today was the originally scheduled leftieNanner Jul 2019 #10
Definitely. While scofflaw fakeprez runs his mouth, the Law will ensnare him. ancianita Jul 2019 #12
Lordy! leftieNanner Jul 2019 #14
Haha. Yes. I hope so, too. But hey, he was born for this. He'll die trying to do what he's doing now ancianita Jul 2019 #16
Ideally he'll have a prior engagement. Marcuse Jul 2019 #18
Oh, Marcuse! leftieNanner Jul 2019 #31
ding, ding, ding...we have a winner! ewagner Jul 2019 #42
I have a feeling a court injunction will come from another court stopping this release. kimbutgar Jul 2019 #17
Only a higher court can do this. What's a higher federal court to stop this? Name it. When a ancianita Jul 2019 #19
Thanks for being up on this kimbutgar Jul 2019 #20
Barr is going down behind this. ancianita Jul 2019 #36
I thought we already knew about these payments. richsonpoordad Jul 2019 #21
We don't know all of them. These redactions must name names, is what I'm thinking. It's a big deal ancianita Jul 2019 #25
Oh, and then customerserviceguy Jul 2019 #24
Yes, you're right. But that has nothing to do with the ammunition this gives the Democratic leaders. ancianita Jul 2019 #26
Thank you for all of your insight in this conversation ancianita leftieNanner Jul 2019 #32
I've been so depressed, this just jumped out at me. Thanks. ancianita Jul 2019 #35
The judge characterized this dump as significant. And he's pissed off. Grasswire2 Jul 2019 #30
That's how Rachel read it, too. He WAS pissed, regardless of neutral judicial wording. ancianita Jul 2019 #33
He is! leftieNanner Jul 2019 #34
Don't we already know all about this? Kablooie Jul 2019 #37
You really think that? We'll see who/what's revealed. Don't think ANY unredacted docs won't be read. ancianita Jul 2019 #38
Yep jberryhill Jul 2019 #41

DavidDvorkin

(19,477 posts)
3. I wish I could believe that they will change anything
Wed Jul 17, 2019, 10:53 PM
Jul 2019

But I don't. The man really is immune from everything.

Also, I wonder if his lawyers will be taking some kind of court action to stop the release.

leftieNanner

(15,091 posts)
13. You are correct
Wed Jul 17, 2019, 11:38 PM
Jul 2019

But I wouldn't want to be the one to tell him that!

"We'll take it to my buddy Brett at the Supreme Court. He can fix it!"

Doitnow

(1,103 posts)
15. I think that we should not be saying that tRump is "immune" or everything drops off
Wed Jul 17, 2019, 11:45 PM
Jul 2019

him "like teflon." The more we say that, the more people just accept it and so it continues. It becomes a fact in more peoples minds. It is NOT an acceptable thing.

 

watoos

(7,142 posts)
4. If these documents show that Barr shut down
Wed Jul 17, 2019, 11:06 PM
Jul 2019

the investigation he needs to do some explaining. Maybe another reason to impeach Barr.

ancianita

(36,055 posts)
8. I thought Barr's behind-the-scenes pressure caused this drop, which enraged Pauley. The
Wed Jul 17, 2019, 11:16 PM
Jul 2019

published redactions could also move Pelosi closer to allowing the start of formal impeachment inquiry.

ancianita

(36,055 posts)
40. And they lost! I want to send this judge a present, a token of my thanks. The more unredacted docs,
Thu Jul 18, 2019, 02:36 AM
Jul 2019

Last edited Thu Jul 18, 2019, 01:35 PM - Edit history (1)

the more Americans are respected.

The better decisions they will make.

leftieNanner

(15,091 posts)
10. Plus today was the originally scheduled
Wed Jul 17, 2019, 11:30 PM
Jul 2019

Mueller testimony. That's why he planned his rally so he could deflect attention to him. He will probably do another rally next week for the same reason.

leftieNanner

(15,091 posts)
14. Lordy!
Wed Jul 17, 2019, 11:40 PM
Jul 2019

I hope so! It must be totally exhausting to be Donald trump. Always trying to stay one step ahead of the posse!

ancianita

(36,055 posts)
16. Haha. Yes. I hope so, too. But hey, he was born for this. He'll die trying to do what he's doing now
Wed Jul 17, 2019, 11:46 PM
Jul 2019

Can you imagine how much money he'll make as a former president, running this poison called Republican politics?

He will embody the worst of global branding used to capture democracies. He'll thrive.

Disgusting. But electoral college elections have consequences.

leftieNanner

(15,091 posts)
31. Oh, Marcuse!
Thu Jul 18, 2019, 01:19 AM
Jul 2019

This is fabulous. Orange is the new Orange.

Maybe an idea for a new reality show - The trumps in prison. Call it Orange Acres maybe?

ancianita

(36,055 posts)
19. Only a higher court can do this. What's a higher federal court to stop this? Name it. When a
Thu Jul 18, 2019, 12:09 AM
Jul 2019

prosecutor drops a case, they drop all claims to what the judge does with the documents.

The documents then belong to whomever the judge determines they serve the public interest in such a national case, under the law, and not the claimant.

kimbutgar

(21,144 posts)
20. Thanks for being up on this
Thu Jul 18, 2019, 12:12 AM
Jul 2019

I look forward to the release tomorrow and am glad Barr can’t stop the release of these documents.

ancianita

(36,055 posts)
25. We don't know all of them. These redactions must name names, is what I'm thinking. It's a big deal
Thu Jul 18, 2019, 12:33 AM
Jul 2019

when it comes to what the First Branch can now do, publicly, and how media sees the wisdom of courts, and The Law.

We'll see.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
24. Oh, and then
Thu Jul 18, 2019, 12:32 AM
Jul 2019

Trump supporters will see what an asshole he is, and lose support for him.

NOT.

They consider Stormy Daniels to be a prostitute who simply asked for more money after the deed was done. Anybody who cares about the morality of this situation has already left Trump a long time ago.

ancianita

(36,055 posts)
26. Yes, you're right. But that has nothing to do with the ammunition this gives the Democratic leaders.
Thu Jul 18, 2019, 12:45 AM
Jul 2019

The actual naming of "Individual #1" frees Congress to move, especially after the House interviews Mueller.

Socially, you're right. But in terms of the Law and preserving democracy, it's more important than the average American cares to know. Because a nation of laws can still move the Senate to be more than followers of a nation of men.

It also adds pressure to the Senate to live up to the Law, to prove itself superior to House Republicans who showed party commitment to racist politics.

Remember that Senate Republicans, if only somewhat less than Democrats, historically exist to show superior American statesmanship over the rabble's politics that the Senate was established to ameliorate.

History allows me to dream. Because they're lawyers, it could happen.

leftieNanner

(15,091 posts)
32. Thank you for all of your insight in this conversation ancianita
Thu Jul 18, 2019, 01:21 AM
Jul 2019

It has been very helpful and expanded my understanding.

leftieNanner

(15,091 posts)
34. He is!
Thu Jul 18, 2019, 01:22 AM
Jul 2019

And he's probably pissed off because he has seen all of the evidence and can't believe that Barr shut it all down.

Kablooie

(18,634 posts)
37. Don't we already know all about this?
Thu Jul 18, 2019, 01:58 AM
Jul 2019

We may not have had the actual documents but the core information was news months ago.
And the actual docs won't be read by hardly anyone so it's a futile move that won't affect a thing.

ancianita

(36,055 posts)
38. You really think that? We'll see who/what's revealed. Don't think ANY unredacted docs won't be read.
Thu Jul 18, 2019, 01:59 AM
Jul 2019
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
41. Yep
Thu Jul 18, 2019, 06:44 AM
Jul 2019

Absent an inexplicable failure to charge Cohen with something particularly good, your take seems bang on.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»THE DETAILS OF TRUMP'S HU...