Court Docs Reveal Duncan Hunter Used Campaign Funds to Carry Out 'Intimate' Affairs With Lobbyists
Source: Mediaite
By Ken MeyerJun 25th, 2019, 12:29 pm
New court documents from Duncan Hunters (R-CA) campaign finance violations case show that the embattled congressman illegally used those funds to facilitate a multitude of extramarital affairs.
USA Today justice reporter Brad Heath flagged several key passages from the cases newly-release documents on Tuesday, many of which show Hunter sticking with his claim that the case against him is a deep state plot by the Justice Department to punish him for supporting President Donald Trump.
Link to tweet
Things get more interesting, however, with the segments describing how Hunter allegedly falsified campaign reports to hide his illegal use of campaign funds on himself, which apparently includes several romantic liaisons.
Link to tweet
The documents go on to say that Hunter had personal situations with at least three lobbyists:
Link to tweet
Read more: https://www.mediaite.com/online/court-docs-reveal-duncan-hunter-used-campaign-funds-to-carry-out-intimate-affairs-with-lobbyists/
Faux pas
(14,644 posts)GusBob
(7,286 posts)I think that is hugely important
riversedge
(70,084 posts)Resign and then the Courts should #LOCKHIMUP
Prosecutors: Rep. Duncan Hunter used campaign funds to pursue affairs. Resign immediately.
Link to tweet
NCjack
(10,279 posts)between him and his GOPers.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)Artist Jon McNaughton released his new 'Crossing the Swamp' painting on Tuesday. Pictured are (left to right): Nikki Haley (gone), James Mattis (gone), Ben Carson, President Trump, Jeff Sessions (gone), Mike Pence, Melania Trump, Mike Pompeo, Sarah Huckabee Sanders (going), Ivanka Trump, John Bolton, Kellyanne Conway and John Kelly (gone).
That is one treacherous crossing...
Judi Lynn
(160,450 posts)The artist did this as a real labor of love for his country!
He illustrates the country's deep need for an honorable President as soon as it can be arranged.
Thanks for being the one who brought this masterpiece to D.U.!
Judi Lynn
(160,450 posts)I'll be dipped in a substance.
Who on earth would take it seriously? Why would he/she?
That's their native element! Everything in the "water" is excrement of one form or another!
Wonders never cease. Thanks!
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(57,290 posts)Before you throw the first stone, I ask. who among us has not used campaign funds to romance lovely lady lobbyists with fine wines, French perfumes, and a weekend at the Motel Six in Escondido?
Link to tweet
keithbvadu2
(36,655 posts)Wifey was willing to share the dollars but not the wifely duties, eh?
The Wizard
(12,536 posts)The women were crossdressing men. Make him talk about it. Make him deny it.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,266 posts)I note below that the Hunter filing ends with a minor mystery. After listing off multiple instances in which Hunter used campaign funds to pay for his affairs, the filing concludes by noting other non-work or campaign related activities paid for with campaign funds which are so prejudicial that prosecutors fear disclosing it might taint the jury pool. Since theyve just listed off numerous extramarital affairs Hunter expensed to his campaign, these other activities must be pretty prejudicial!
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/the-mystery-of-duncan-and-the-get-togethers
I think the more interesting part of the Duncan Hunter mystery get-togethers is likely to be the guest lists.
The government clearly has no problem with publicly embarrassing Hunter, who eminently deserves the public shaming, so if the issue was merely some other tawdry conduct on his part, its hard to imagine it not being spelled out. My guess (and it is only a guess) is that close personal friends is code for other members of Congress and that they were all up to no good. Maybe not criminal shenanigans, but activities both non-work related and deeply embarrassing for all involved. If that is the case, it would also explain why Hunter is still considering a stipulation related to those facts. A stipulation could be worded vaguely enough on some details to protect the identities of the close personal friends while still giving the government what it needs from a prosecutorial standpoint. You have to imagine hes in a shitstorm at home and might want to forestall having it spread to D.C. for as long as possible. Im hoping the discussions on a stipulation fail so that we can get the details on this in writing and soon.
The mystery here is that it has to be a) very sensitive, damaging, potentially tainting and yet b) presumably not illegal in itself, otherwise wed see charges. In terms of tainting a jury, making people deeply really hostile to the defendant, routinely using campaign funds to cheat on your wife seems pretty close to maxing out. Yes, we could all imagine some pretty crazy but yet non-criminal stuff. But protecting other public figures makes a lot more sense.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/answer-to-hunter-shagfund-mystery
(And I love "shagfund". That word should be hung round Hunter's neck forever.)
DeminPennswoods
(15,265 posts)That's what crossed my mind when TPM first flagged this section, this involves regular, randy - shall we say - "stag parties" with other male members of Congress.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)the ruination of America.