Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,450 posts)
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 12:39 AM Jun 2019

Fearing Her Husband, She Took His Guns To Police. They Arrested Her.

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by JudyM (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: Huffington Post

06/21/2019 03:12 pm ET

Joseph Irby allegedly rammed his wife’s car off the road. She ended up behind bars.

By Melissa Jeltsen


An alleged victim of domestic violence in Florida was arrested and charged with armed burglary after she removed her estranged husband’s guns from his residence and brought them to a police department for safekeeping.

The case exemplifies the practical challenges of disarming domestic abusers, especially in a state like Florida where almost one-third of the population owns firearms.

On June 14, Courtney Irby was in court with her husband for a divorce hearing. According to an arrest affidavit, Joseph Irby followed his wife as she left the courthouse and began ramming his car into the back of her vehicle, ultimately driving her off the road. She called police “uncontrollably crying and advised that she was in fear for her life,” the affidavit reads. She also disclosed that she’d had a number of protective orders against her husband in the past.

Police arrested Joseph Irby and charged him with aggravated battery with a deadly weapon. Courtney Irby applied for a temporary injunction for protection.





Read more: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/florida-irby-domestic-violence-guns_n_5d0d1163e4b0a394186200f8





Courtney Irby



Joseph Irby
75 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fearing Her Husband, She Took His Guns To Police. They Arrested Her. (Original Post) Judi Lynn Jun 2019 OP
He tried to hit her with his car. rusty quoin Jun 2019 #1
Agree. susanna Jun 2019 #25
It's as if Turbineguy Jun 2019 #2
SMH Solly Mack Jun 2019 #3
that's what i figure. barbtries Jun 2019 #48
Stand your ground boomer_wv Jun 2019 #4
"Stand your ground" is a big fave in Florida for far less threatening situations. n/t Judi Lynn Jun 2019 #5
No, that would not work because she is not a man. susanna Jun 2019 #26
It wouldn't work for a bunch of reasons. Igel Jun 2019 #36
Great post... ADX Jun 2019 #56
This message was self-deleted by its author geralmar Jun 2019 #67
Let's look at the facts of that case Jake Stern Jun 2019 #72
No dear, you have to not be in the middle of a crime. X_Digger Jun 2019 #53
This message was self-deleted by its author mr_lebowski Jun 2019 #6
WTF? you are saying that she is a meth addict without evidence or proof. Nice. TeamPooka Jun 2019 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author mr_lebowski Jun 2019 #20
That is such a bizarre statement to make. LisaL Jun 2019 #21
She looks fine, except for being mistreated by the police. You also claim to not be judging, TeamPooka Jun 2019 #23
This message was self-deleted by its author mr_lebowski Jun 2019 #41
"to do what she did" wtf are you talking about? She didn't do drugs, she is an abused woman who TeamPooka Jun 2019 #42
Well, since you've gone there, I'll follow. susanna Jun 2019 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author mr_lebowski Jun 2019 #40
Her mistake was radical noodle Jun 2019 #7
You're assuming she broke in, the article doesn't say that. She probably has a key. SunSeeker Jun 2019 #17
See post 30. She'd never been there. n/t X_Digger Jun 2019 #32
The charging officer's statement says she went in through the front door. SunSeeker Jun 2019 #49
She admitted breaking in, and never having been there. X_Digger Jun 2019 #51
Other articles I've read radical noodle Jun 2019 #39
5 kids together? Polybius Jun 2019 #47
The cops put a mother of 5 kids in jail for protecting her kids. Sickening. SunSeeker Jun 2019 #50
My parents and my partners parents have a key to our house Jake Stern Jun 2019 #73
he needs to be evaluated KT2000 Jun 2019 #8
Holy shit you are right.. AZ8theist Jun 2019 #43
My god the overcharging Loki Liesmith Jun 2019 #9
I want a follow up report. Since the cops knew he had guns and was under order to relinquish them ProudLib72 Jun 2019 #10
Yes, they gave them back! The article notes he now has "full access" to his "arsenal." SunSeeker Jun 2019 #12
Oh crap! I didn't notice that the first time reading the article ProudLib72 Jun 2019 #13
The cops aided and abetted the abuser to violate a court order banning firearm possession! SunSeeker Jun 2019 #16
wow Demovictory9 Jun 2019 #14
And that's after a judge ordered that he was barred from possessing weapons!!! SunSeeker Jun 2019 #15
What the fuck is wrong with those cops?! She didn't keep the guns, she brought them to the police. SunSeeker Jun 2019 #11
So many glossing over that, yes? WTAF? n/t susanna Jun 2019 #28
Lakeland Police Department sounds like a bunch of fucking idiots. Legally Corrupt idiots. TeamPooka Jun 2019 #18
And a charge of armed burglary? LisaL Jun 2019 #22
Apparently they're claiming she was armed with his guns! But she didn't use them to rob him. SunSeeker Jun 2019 #24
A state lawmaker responds with help... KY_EnviroGuy Jun 2019 #29
Officer Behren's affadavit: sl8 Jun 2019 #30
Aren't police supposed to serve and protect? LisaL Jun 2019 #31
Supposed to? Maybe. Legally required? I don't think so. sl8 Jun 2019 #34
From her defense attorney: sl8 Jun 2019 #33
Sheriff's spokesperson, on firearm confiscation: sl8 Jun 2019 #35
Some things are logical but unfair. nt zanana1 Jun 2019 #37
There's nothing logical about jailing a wife for turning in guns her husband was ordered give up. nt SunSeeker Jun 2019 #69
Wow. That's f*d up. Honeycombe8 Jun 2019 #38
Justice system run amock Vegas Roller Jun 2019 #44
She did the right thing but sarisataka Jun 2019 #45
They were still married. The guns were probably marital property (community property). SunSeeker Jun 2019 #54
I have friends going through a divorce sarisataka Jun 2019 #58
OFFS. The judge knew he had the guns, that's why he ordered him to turn them in SunSeeker Jun 2019 #62
I had misread the article sarisataka Jun 2019 #68
She was defending hereself and her kids. He was not supposed to have the guns. SunSeeker Jun 2019 #70
I do not believe there is sarisataka Jun 2019 #71
Florida is NOT a community property state Jake Stern Jun 2019 #74
For a bunch of folks who decry 'taking the law into their own hands', there are some hypocrites here X_Digger Jun 2019 #46
OMFG. You're not married to your neighbor. Your neighbor did not repeatedly try to kill you. SunSeeker Jun 2019 #52
If a husband broke into his estranged wife's house, would that be kosher with you? X_Digger Jun 2019 #55
If she had been trying to kill him it woul be. You keep glossing over that. SunSeeker Jun 2019 #57
Because her attorney said so? How's that work? X_Digger Jun 2019 #60
Her lawyer is stating black letter law about what constitutes theft or conversion. SunSeeker Jun 2019 #64
I notice a few gunners posting, supporting police. Always protecting their gunz over life, kids, etc Hoyt Jun 2019 #59
Post removed Post removed Jun 2019 #61
You still don't get the point XDigger. You guys are always looking for a reason to shoot. Hoyt Jun 2019 #63
Yup. Rather than an abused woman trying to defend herself, some see a "gun grabber." SunSeeker Jun 2019 #65
On thing for sure.... Sancho Jun 2019 #66
Locking. JudyM Jun 2019 #75
 

rusty quoin

(6,133 posts)
1. He tried to hit her with his car.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 12:42 AM
Jun 2019

This is one story about a screwed up system. It protects his right to own guns over her right to stay alive.

susanna

(5,231 posts)
25. Agree.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 03:59 AM
Jun 2019

What is most critical in this story is that SHE KNOWS THIS MAN BETTER THAN ANYONE. He has tried to kill her, after all.

So her taking those guns to the police was a desperate cry for help.

And this is what the cop did? FUCK that cop. Forever and ever.

He failed his duty.

Turbineguy

(37,291 posts)
2. It's as if
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 12:43 AM
Jun 2019

we got up one morning and collectively decided to do everything wrong.

Solly Mack

(90,758 posts)
3. SMH
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 12:45 AM
Jun 2019

So tired of this. We'll be reading about her murder soon.

barbtries

(28,769 posts)
48. that's what i figure.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 12:53 PM
Jun 2019

his right to murder her supersedes her right to life and liberty.

 

boomer_wv

(673 posts)
4. Stand your ground
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 12:45 AM
Jun 2019

It's Florida, so had she taken one of his guns and killed him, then said that she was scared, she'd probably have walked without even being arrested.

Judi Lynn

(160,450 posts)
5. "Stand your ground" is a big fave in Florida for far less threatening situations. n/t
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 01:00 AM
Jun 2019

susanna

(5,231 posts)
26. No, that would not work because she is not a man.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 04:03 AM
Jun 2019

They seem to be the only ones granted the 'stand your ground' loophole.

There was a black woman in Florida who was jailed for just shooting a gun at/near her abuser. She was convicted/jailed for quite a long time, IIRC.

That law only works for certain people, and they know who they are.

Igel

(35,274 posts)
36. It wouldn't work for a bunch of reasons.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 09:51 AM
Jun 2019

Not the least of which was that she went to his place and entered without his permission. "Stand your ground" presupposes that in some sense it's *your* ground. Just don't break and enter and there's no problem--otherwise every armed invasion robbery would qualify.

The black woman you're speaking of fits that description. She went to his place. They argued. The kids were there. She felt threatened, and *left the house* (going to the garage). There she got a firearm, *returned* to the interior of his house, and fired a shot. Now, even then the round wasn't aimed at him but a "warning shot" The shot could have hit the kids. The details matter. The details *always* matter, if only because they can dispel any "but what if" counter-assertions. However, they also keep people from taking the feel-good-but-wrong side. Alexander's husband was no gem, but victim status doesn't confer sovereign immunity on all further or past actions by the victim. The problem is that the half-truth forms a nice narrative, one that we empathize with (synonymous with "biased towards&quot . Half a truth is worse than a lie.

The article, and the court hearing the abused woman heard, told her what to do. He was barred from possessing firearms under court order. She should have contacted the police, sworn out an affidavit alleging he was in possession of firearms, and asked the police to enforce the court order. They'd have knocked on his door (before or after getting a warrant--I'm guessing "after&quot and he would have been found in default of the court order. His pretrial release would have been suspended, he'd be in jail, the police would be in possession of his weapons. Instead, *she* decided she was the law-enforcement officer and officer of the court and took the law, so to speak, into her own hands. Sometimes with "due process" you also need to just "do process."

 

ADX

(1,622 posts)
56. Great post...
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:04 PM
Jun 2019

...It might not be what most people here agree with or want to hear but everything you posted is 100% correct...

Response to ADX (Reply #56)

Jake Stern

(3,145 posts)
72. Let's look at the facts of that case
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 03:05 PM
Jun 2019

1. She had an order of protection against her which means she wasn't even supposed to be at that house.

2. She exited the house and entered her LOCKED vehicle to retrieve her firearm then returned to the house.

3. She not only shot "near" her husband she also risked the life of their son who was standing next to the husband

4. The bullet she fired passed THROUGH the wall and exited mere inches from where the daughter was sitting on her bed.

I sorely wish folks would stop using Marissa Alexander to make a point when it comes to SYG.

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
53. No dear, you have to not be in the middle of a crime.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 01:57 PM
Jun 2019
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0700-0799/0776/Sections/0776.013.html

The presumption set forth in subsection (2) does not apply if:
...
The person who uses or threatens to use defensive force is engaged in a criminal activity or is using the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle to further a criminal activity

Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

TeamPooka

(24,206 posts)
19. WTF? you are saying that she is a meth addict without evidence or proof. Nice.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:54 AM
Jun 2019

Response to TeamPooka (Reply #19)

LisaL

(44,972 posts)
21. That is such a bizarre statement to make.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 03:25 AM
Jun 2019

You can tell something from a photo?
Give me a break.

TeamPooka

(24,206 posts)
23. She looks fine, except for being mistreated by the police. You also claim to not be judging,
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 03:31 AM
Jun 2019

yet you are.
Even if you don't realize it.
Your posts are way out of line in this thread.
You should delete them

Response to TeamPooka (Reply #23)

TeamPooka

(24,206 posts)
42. "to do what she did" wtf are you talking about? She didn't do drugs, she is an abused woman who
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 11:20 AM
Jun 2019

turned in her husband's guns when the judge took them away.
It sounds like you're projecting your issues onto this woman.
Keep digging this hole of yours though, it looks good on you.

susanna

(5,231 posts)
27. Well, since you've gone there, I'll follow.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 04:09 AM
Jun 2019

His eyes are dead looking. Hers are haunted.

Wherever your meth idea comes from, okay, I guess.

But even IF she is doing bad things, that should not result in a gun death by a crazy-ass boyfriend.

END OF STORY.

Response to susanna (Reply #27)

radical noodle

(7,997 posts)
7. Her mistake was
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 01:08 AM
Jun 2019

breaking into his house to get the guns. I don't care where you live, that's not legal to do under any circumstances.

SunSeeker

(51,512 posts)
17. You're assuming she broke in, the article doesn't say that. She probably has a key.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:18 AM
Jun 2019

They have kids together. It is quite possible, if not likely, that she has a key to his place, or knew how to get in without a key.

She took the guns not only to to protect herself but to protect her kids.

The police did not charge he withbreaking and entering. They arrested her for taking his guns without his permission.

From the article:

A judge granted Joseph Irby pretrial release with the condition that he not own, possess or carry firearms. Hearing this, Courtney Irby went to her husband’s residence and located his two guns ― an assault rifle and a handgun ― and took them to Lakeland Police Department.

According to court documents, she told the police officer on duty that her husband had been arrested the day before, and that she wanted to hand in his guns because she didn’t believe he would turn them in.

The police officer asked if she had taken her husband’s firearms without his permission. When she replied yes, he told her that she was confessing to a crime. Police arrested her and she was charged with armed burglary of a dwelling and grand theft of a firearm. 

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
32. See post 30. She'd never been there. n/t
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 09:05 AM
Jun 2019

SunSeeker

(51,512 posts)
49. The charging officer's statement says she went in through the front door.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 01:42 PM
Jun 2019

The officer's statement says the front door was locked. She didn't break the door down, or else the overzealous asshole would have charged her with property damage too. How did she get into the the locked front door unless she had a key?

She obviously knew where the apartment was and must have been there before to drop off kids, etc. Just because she may have said she had never been in the apartment (she may not have said that, there are errors in the report) does not mean she didn't have a key. Also, the officer's statement claimed Irby was her "ex-husband," when in fact they were still married. In CA, those guns would be community property, in Florida it would be called marital property. It would appear that she had a right to possess this property as his wife.

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
51. She admitted breaking in, and never having been there.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 01:51 PM
Jun 2019

Do you really think you have the right to break into your husband's apartment when you're separated?

Does that go both ways? If a husband enters his estranged wife's apartment and takes "her" things, is that okay with you, too? After all, they're still married, right?

Or does this only go one way?


radical noodle

(7,997 posts)
39. Other articles I've read
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 10:43 AM
Jun 2019

(and I live in Florida) say that's exactly what she did. I don't have first-hand knowledge, of course.

Polybius

(15,334 posts)
47. 5 kids together?
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 12:39 PM
Jun 2019

She barely looks 25. He looks young too, too bad the article didn't say their ages, I'm very curious.

SunSeeker

(51,512 posts)
50. The cops put a mother of 5 kids in jail for protecting her kids. Sickening.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 01:45 PM
Jun 2019

Wonder what happened to those poor kids when both of their parents were in jail. That cop endangered those kids by jailing her. This is so fucked up.

Jake Stern

(3,145 posts)
73. My parents and my partners parents have a key to our house
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 03:11 PM
Jun 2019

If they come in without our permission it's still unlawful entry whether the door was broken down or not. Looks like they hit her with the bigger charge of armed burglary instead.

KT2000

(20,568 posts)
8. he needs to be evaluated
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 01:08 AM
Jun 2019

low set ears are potential indicators of a whole set of problems including developmental disabilities. This is probably someone who should not own even one gun.

Neighbor's elderly husband experiencing mental decline started collecting weapons. She woke to find them stacked in the laundry room. She was scared and called the police. They told her she should move out of the house because they could not take the weapons from him. Guns rule.

AZ8theist

(5,409 posts)
43. Holy shit you are right..
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 11:56 AM
Jun 2019

I never knew of this before but you have hit on something:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-set_ears

Down syndrome[2]
Turner syndrome
Noonan syndrome[3]
Patau syndrome[4]
DiGeorge syndrome[5]
Cri du chat syndrome
Edwards syndrome
Fragile X syndrome

This guy might be an imbecile who should be BANNED from owning any firearms.

Unfortunately, I fear his "wife" will be the next one DEAD. Sad.

Loki Liesmith

(4,602 posts)
9. My god the overcharging
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 01:12 AM
Jun 2019

Charged with armed burglary because what she took were firearms.

That’s not what the statute is for.

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
10. I want a follow up report. Since the cops knew he had guns and was under order to relinquish them
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 01:21 AM
Jun 2019

what were their next steps? Did they hand the guns back to him or did they keep the guns? Next thing we will hear is a story about how it was perfectly legal to wait outside the police station with a loaded weapon waiting for your estranged wife to get out of jail.

SunSeeker

(51,512 posts)
12. Yes, they gave them back! The article notes he now has "full access" to his "arsenal."
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 01:44 AM
Jun 2019

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)
13. Oh crap! I didn't notice that the first time reading the article
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 01:58 AM
Jun 2019

Now I see it at the very end. What a bunch of idiots!

SunSeeker

(51,512 posts)
16. The cops aided and abetted the abuser to violate a court order banning firearm possession!
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:15 AM
Jun 2019

From the article:

A judge granted Joseph Irby pretrial release with the condition that he not own, possess or carry firearms. Hearing this, Courtney Irby went to her husband’s residence and located his two guns ― an assault rifle and a handgun ― and took them to Lakeland Police Department.

According to court documents, she told the police officer on duty that her husband had been arrested the day before, and that she wanted to hand in his guns because she didn’t believe he would turn them in.

The police officer asked if she had taken her husband’s firearms without his permission. When she replied yes, he told her that she was confessing to a crime. Police arrested her and she was charged with armed burglary of a dwelling and grand theft of a firearm. 

Demovictory9

(32,421 posts)
14. wow
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:02 AM
Jun 2019

SunSeeker

(51,512 posts)
15. And that's after a judge ordered that he was barred from possessing weapons!!!
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:12 AM
Jun 2019

From the article:

A judge granted Joseph Irby pretrial release with the condition that he not own, possess or carry firearms. Hearing this, Courtney Irby went to her husband’s residence and located his two guns ― an assault rifle and a handgun ― and took them to Lakeland Police Department.

According to court documents, she told the police officer on duty that her husband had been arrested the day before, and that she wanted to hand in his guns because she didn’t believe he would turn them in.

The police officer asked if she had taken her husband’s firearms without his permission. When she replied yes, he told her that she was confessing to a crime. Police arrested her and she was charged with armed burglary of a dwelling and grand theft of a firearm. 

SunSeeker

(51,512 posts)
11. What the fuck is wrong with those cops?! She didn't keep the guns, she brought them to the police.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 01:34 AM
Jun 2019

Last edited Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:23 AM - Edit history (2)

A judge had banned her husband from.possessing firearms-- she was carrying out the court's wishes!



From the article:

A judge granted Joseph Irby pretrial release with the condition that he not own, possess or carry firearms. Hearing this, Courtney Irby went to her husband’s residence and located his two guns ― an assault rifle and a handgun ― and took them to Lakeland Police Department.

According to court documents, she told the police officer on duty that her husband had been arrested the day before, and that she wanted to hand in his guns because she didn’t believe he would turn them in.

The police officer asked if she had taken her husband’s firearms without his permission. When she replied yes, he told her that she was confessing to a crime. Police arrested her and she was charged with armed burglary of a dwelling and grand theft of a firearm. 

susanna

(5,231 posts)
28. So many glossing over that, yes? WTAF? n/t
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 04:13 AM
Jun 2019

TeamPooka

(24,206 posts)
18. Lakeland Police Department sounds like a bunch of fucking idiots. Legally Corrupt idiots.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:47 AM
Jun 2019

This was a choice to arrest her on trumped up charges while she was complying with a court order.

LisaL

(44,972 posts)
22. And a charge of armed burglary?
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 03:29 AM
Jun 2019

Where is the armed burglary? She went into his dwelling when he wasn't there.
What are they claiming she was armed with?

SunSeeker

(51,512 posts)
24. Apparently they're claiming she was armed with his guns! But she didn't use them to rob him.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 03:37 AM
Jun 2019

The charging was ridiculous. The charges should be thrown out and the cops arrested for false imprisonment. They only jailed her abuser one day, but had her in jail over 5 days before she was granted bond. Unfuckingbelievable.

KY_EnviroGuy

(14,488 posts)
29. A state lawmaker responds with help...
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 04:40 AM
Jun 2019
State lawmaker ‘outraged’ over Lakeland woman’s arrest
By Kathy Leigh Berkowitz, The Ledger (Lakeland, FL)
Posted Jun 21, 2019 at 4:43 PM

Link: https://www.theledger.com/news/20190621/state-lawmaker-outraged-over-lakeland-womans-arrest

LAKELAND — The story on the arrest of Courtney Taylor Irby for gathering her estranged husband’s guns to turn them over to the Lakeland Police Department while he was being held in the Polk County Jail on domestic violence charges aroused the attention of Rep. Anna Eskamani, D-Orlando, from the 47th District in Orange County.

Eskamani issued a statement Friday saying, “The case of Courtney Taylor Irby demonstrates once more the dangerous linkage between intimate partner violence and access to firearms. Court records show that Irby applied for a temporary injunction against her husband and the two were in the process of a divorce. She was actively protecting herself and her family from an estranged husband who had not turned over his firearms to law enforcement, and was arrested for it. We should be outraged by her arrest, and Irby should not be prosecuted by the local State Attorney’s office.”

Eskamani also noted that in 2018, Florida lawmakers passed a risk protection order law. “In Florida, only a law enforcement officer or agency can file a petition for a risk protection order, which should have happened in this case,” she said. “Federal gun laws already protect women from domestic abusers by prohibiting gun possession for people convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence or subject to a final domestic violence restraining order. But dangerous gaps and weaknesses in the system remain at the state level.”

State Sen. Lori Berman, D-Boynton Beach, and Eskamani filed SB1206/HB941 to close the gaps, according to Eskamani in a statement to The Ledger. “Our bill requires a person convicted of a misdemeanor offense of domestic violence to surrender (when convicted) all firearms and ammunition in his or her possession to law enforcement. Our bill never got a hearing, but we plan to refile it in 2020.”

According to Polk County Jail records, Joseph Irby was released on $10,000 bail the day after his arrest on June 14.

Taken into custody June 15, Courtney Taylor Irby was released from the county jail on $7,000 bond Thursday.

I hope this woman has a safe place to stay. Protective orders do not stop bullets.....

Perhaps this guy should be wearing a government-issue Rolex until the trial is over. Makes no sense he's even out on bail considering he's had numerous protective orders against him in the past, and just committed a dangerous act against the woman......

sl8

(13,665 posts)
30. Officer Behren's affadavit:
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 08:46 AM
Jun 2019

LisaL

(44,972 posts)
31. Aren't police supposed to serve and protect?
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 09:04 AM
Jun 2019

This woman brings guns to police because she wants to be protected, and what do they do? Arrest her.

sl8

(13,665 posts)
34. Supposed to? Maybe. Legally required? I don't think so.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 09:25 AM
Jun 2019

At least, not for any particular individual

sl8

(13,665 posts)
33. From her defense attorney:
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 09:17 AM
Jun 2019

From https://heavy.com/news/2019/06/courtney-irby/


[div chttps://heavy.com/news/2019/06/courtney-irby/lass="excerpt"]
[...]

Her attorney, Lawrence Shearer, said in a court motion that the action did not constitute theft because Joseph would have been able to retrieve his guns from the police, LkldNow reported. He added that Courtney turned the guns over and had no intention to “appropriate the property to her own use or the use of any person not entitled to the use of the property.”

Shearer also cited Courtney’s lack of criminal history and her “great many ties to the community, to be demonstrated at a hearing on this motion.” Shearer said in the filing that the officer calling Joseph Irby her “ex-husband,” was inaccurate because they are still married.

You can see the court filing below:



[...]



More at link.

sl8

(13,665 posts)
35. Sheriff's spokesperson, on firearm confiscation:
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 09:34 AM
Jun 2019

From https://www.lkldnow.com/woman-arrested-after-turning-in-estranged-husbands-guns-to-lpd/

[...]

We really don’t have authority to take firearms from people unless they are surrendered or there is a court order,” Bruchey said.

If a person, upon receiving an injunction or a pre-trial release agreement, say they have no firearms to hand over, “that’s pretty much it,” Bruchey said. “We can’t do anything, unless they willfully do it — release them to us.”

There is no indication in court documents that the existence of the guns was in question, or that Joseph Irby had intended to conceal their existence or retain them despite the court orders.

“Technically if the person does have firearms they are in violation of the injunction or pre-trial release but it’s one of those things — it’s kind of hard to enforce, really. You’d have to have somebody to say ‘I know exactly where they are’ … and you’d have to get a search warrant for it. It’s one of those things you hope people do the right thing and surrender their guns,” Bruchey said.

The Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School Safety Act, passed in 2018, gave police departments the power to request “risk protection orders” to take guns away from people who may be a danger to themselves or others.

[...]



More at link about Florida RPDs.

zanana1

(6,102 posts)
37. Some things are logical but unfair. nt
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 10:04 AM
Jun 2019

SunSeeker

(51,512 posts)
69. There's nothing logical about jailing a wife for turning in guns her husband was ordered give up. nt
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:35 PM
Jun 2019

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
38. Wow. That's f*d up.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 10:41 AM
Jun 2019

But she did have to "break and enter" his house (apparently they had separate residences), to get the guns. That's against the law. So they got her on that for sure.

I agree w/the lawyer that she didn't "steal" the guns, because she gave them to the police.

There's something really wrong here. Next time I hope she marries someone who isn't as violent and messed up.

 

Vegas Roller

(704 posts)
44. Justice system run amock
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 12:05 PM
Jun 2019

Instead of common sense and using it to protect and serve, it is out to protect the gun nuts.

sarisataka

(18,483 posts)
45. She did the right thing but
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 12:22 PM
Jun 2019

In the wrong way. Lawyerese aside, going into someone's residence and taking their property is theft. (Although calling it armed burglary seems ridiculous)

SunSeeker

(51,512 posts)
54. They were still married. The guns were probably marital property (community property).
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:00 PM
Jun 2019

Seems to me she had a right to possess those guns.

The officer in his statement inaccurately said Irby was her "ex-husband." They weren't divorced.

sarisataka

(18,483 posts)
58. I have friends going through a divorce
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:09 PM
Jun 2019

The papers not yet signed so they are still legally married.

There is definitely "his" stuff and "her" stuff. He cannot at this point enter her house (which was previously "their" house) to get his stuff without her permission. Likewise she cannot enter his current apartment to take anything she believes he was not entitled to take. Disputed property must be listed and submitted for mediation.

In this case she should have told the judge he had the firearms at the hearing or told the police when her husband was arrested for assaulting her. A search warrant could have been obtained while he was in jail and the guns removed by the police.

SunSeeker

(51,512 posts)
62. OFFS. The judge knew he had the guns, that's why he ordered him to turn them in
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:15 PM
Jun 2019

This woman was protecting herself and her kids. There is no mechanism in Florida for taking guns away from someone ordered to turn them in. It is a crazy, pro-gun gap in Florida law that legislators are trying to fix.

Your friends' divorce proceedings analogy does not work, unless one of them is trying to kill the other with a sofa.

sarisataka

(18,483 posts)
68. I had misread the article
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:30 PM
Jun 2019

I thoughtful it said Florida did have a mechanism to report firearms that should have been removed. My bad.
I would have no objection to such a law.

Still under the current law she did commit a crime. Was it a good choice? Probably, I would likely have helped her do it; jail is better than dead. But to try to twist it to claim taking someone else's property, be it a gun or sofa, for "safe keeping " is not theft is simply being disingenuous.

SunSeeker

(51,512 posts)
70. She was defending hereself and her kids. He was not supposed to have the guns.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:38 PM
Jun 2019

Big difference from your divorce analogy. Defending yourself is not a crime. And she did not deprive him of access to the guns, so it's not theft.

sarisataka

(18,483 posts)
71. I do not believe there is
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:54 PM
Jun 2019

Any legal basis for preemptive self defense on the idea a person might do something in the future.

Many people have things they should not, from weapons to drugs to stolen goods and on. That does not give anyone the right to enter the residence and remove those items.

Jake Stern

(3,145 posts)
74. Florida is NOT a community property state
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 03:19 PM
Jun 2019

By that logic a man can take his wife's priceless heirloom ring without asking her and pawn it without repercussion. After all it's "community property".

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
46. For a bunch of folks who decry 'taking the law into their own hands', there are some hypocrites here
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 12:25 PM
Jun 2019

If I know my neighbor has an arrest warrant out on them, if I tie them up and take them to the police station, it's still kidnapping.

Talk about the ends not justifying the means.

SunSeeker

(51,512 posts)
52. OMFG. You're not married to your neighbor. Your neighbor did not repeatedly try to kill you.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 01:56 PM
Jun 2019

A judge did not order your neighbor to turn in his guns because he had repeatedly tried to kill you. All of the above was the case with this woman. She was literally acting in her own and her children's self defense.

But you label her as basically a vigilante "taking the law into her own hands." That is not what she did.

She brought the guns to the cops. As the police said, they had no authority to take the guns from the husband's home, thanks to a ridiculous pro-gun gap in Florida law. So she was not usurping the role of the police. She was defending herself.

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
55. If a husband broke into his estranged wife's house, would that be kosher with you?
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:00 PM
Jun 2019

Of course not.

She broke into his apartment.

If I steal my neighbor's scooter, but then drop it off at the police because his license is expired, it's still fucking theft.

It doesn't matter one great goddamn what I do with stolen property, that doesn't make the theft go away.

Fucking duh.

SunSeeker

(51,512 posts)
57. If she had been trying to kill him it woul be. You keep glossing over that.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:07 PM
Jun 2019

You also gloss over that fact that those guns may have been marital property that she has a right to.

And it does make a "great goddamn" what you do with the guns. As noted in the article:

Her lawyer, Lawrence Shearer, told HuffPost that his client was upset and distressed. He said that her actions did not amount to theft under Florida law because she was not taking the guns for herself but rather transferring them to the police department, where her husband could collect them at a later date. 

“Theft is to deprive someone of the right or benefit of property,” he said. “She didn’t do either one of those. She was taking them to the police department for safekeeping.”  


X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
60. Because her attorney said so? How's that work?
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:13 PM
Jun 2019

Her lawyer will try to come up with anything as a defense. The fact that he's flying in the face of black letter law should tell you something.

If I steal pot from my neighbor to turn in to the police, it's still theft and breaking and entering.

There's no exception to the state statute that says, "it's okay if you turn it in to the police."



"Marital property" works both ways. Would you be okay with him breaking into her apartment, her having moved out?

Do tell.

SunSeeker

(51,512 posts)
64. Her lawyer is stating black letter law about what constitutes theft or conversion.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:21 PM
Jun 2019

No, I would not be ok with him breaking into her apartment, since he tried to kill her, repeatedly, and there is a restraining order out on him.

She gave these guns to the police as an act of self defense. Why are you having such a hard time seeing that?

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
59. I notice a few gunners posting, supporting police. Always protecting their gunz over life, kids, etc
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:12 PM
Jun 2019

Response to Hoyt (Reply #59)

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
63. You still don't get the point XDigger. You guys are always looking for a reason to shoot.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:19 PM
Jun 2019

Read it in context.

Good to see you posting, even if only to protect your gunz.

SunSeeker

(51,512 posts)
65. Yup. Rather than an abused woman trying to defend herself, some see a "gun grabber."
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:28 PM
Jun 2019

Sancho

(9,067 posts)
66. On thing for sure....
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:28 PM
Jun 2019

I'm going to avoid going to Lakeland...meanwhile, with guns in schools and virtually no restrictions on purchases there will continue to be shootings in Florida.

JudyM

(29,192 posts)
75. Locking.
Sat Jun 22, 2019, 03:24 PM
Jun 2019

The forum hosts don’t think this is “important news of national interest” as required for posting in the LBN forum. Feel free to post it in GD or local.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Fearing Her Husband, She ...