Fearing Her Husband, She Took His Guns To Police. They Arrested Her.
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by JudyM (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: Huffington Post
06/21/2019 03:12 pm ET
Joseph Irby allegedly rammed his wifes car off the road. She ended up behind bars.
By Melissa Jeltsen
An alleged victim of domestic violence in Florida was arrested and charged with armed burglary after she removed her estranged husbands guns from his residence and brought them to a police department for safekeeping.
The case exemplifies the practical challenges of disarming domestic abusers, especially in a state like Florida where almost one-third of the population owns firearms.
On June 14, Courtney Irby was in court with her husband for a divorce hearing. According to an arrest affidavit, Joseph Irby followed his wife as she left the courthouse and began ramming his car into the back of her vehicle, ultimately driving her off the road. She called police uncontrollably crying and advised that she was in fear for her life, the affidavit reads. She also disclosed that shed had a number of protective orders against her husband in the past.
Police arrested Joseph Irby and charged him with aggravated battery with a deadly weapon. Courtney Irby applied for a temporary injunction for protection.
Read more: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/florida-irby-domestic-violence-guns_n_5d0d1163e4b0a394186200f8
Courtney Irby
Joseph Irby
rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)This is one story about a screwed up system. It protects his right to own guns over her right to stay alive.
susanna
(5,231 posts)What is most critical in this story is that SHE KNOWS THIS MAN BETTER THAN ANYONE. He has tried to kill her, after all.
So her taking those guns to the police was a desperate cry for help.
And this is what the cop did? FUCK that cop. Forever and ever.
He failed his duty.
Turbineguy
(37,291 posts)we got up one morning and collectively decided to do everything wrong.
Solly Mack
(90,758 posts)So tired of this. We'll be reading about her murder soon.
barbtries
(28,769 posts)his right to murder her supersedes her right to life and liberty.
boomer_wv
(673 posts)It's Florida, so had she taken one of his guns and killed him, then said that she was scared, she'd probably have walked without even being arrested.
Judi Lynn
(160,450 posts)susanna
(5,231 posts)They seem to be the only ones granted the 'stand your ground' loophole.
There was a black woman in Florida who was jailed for just shooting a gun at/near her abuser. She was convicted/jailed for quite a long time, IIRC.
That law only works for certain people, and they know who they are.
Igel
(35,274 posts)Not the least of which was that she went to his place and entered without his permission. "Stand your ground" presupposes that in some sense it's *your* ground. Just don't break and enter and there's no problem--otherwise every armed invasion robbery would qualify.
The black woman you're speaking of fits that description. She went to his place. They argued. The kids were there. She felt threatened, and *left the house* (going to the garage). There she got a firearm, *returned* to the interior of his house, and fired a shot. Now, even then the round wasn't aimed at him but a "warning shot" The shot could have hit the kids. The details matter. The details *always* matter, if only because they can dispel any "but what if" counter-assertions. However, they also keep people from taking the feel-good-but-wrong side. Alexander's husband was no gem, but victim status doesn't confer sovereign immunity on all further or past actions by the victim. The problem is that the half-truth forms a nice narrative, one that we empathize with (synonymous with "biased towards" . Half a truth is worse than a lie.
The article, and the court hearing the abused woman heard, told her what to do. He was barred from possessing firearms under court order. She should have contacted the police, sworn out an affidavit alleging he was in possession of firearms, and asked the police to enforce the court order. They'd have knocked on his door (before or after getting a warrant--I'm guessing "after" and he would have been found in default of the court order. His pretrial release would have been suspended, he'd be in jail, the police would be in possession of his weapons. Instead, *she* decided she was the law-enforcement officer and officer of the court and took the law, so to speak, into her own hands. Sometimes with "due process" you also need to just "do process."
...It might not be what most people here agree with or want to hear but everything you posted is 100% correct...
Response to ADX (Reply #56)
geralmar This message was self-deleted by its author.
Jake Stern
(3,145 posts)1. She had an order of protection against her which means she wasn't even supposed to be at that house.
2. She exited the house and entered her LOCKED vehicle to retrieve her firearm then returned to the house.
3. She not only shot "near" her husband she also risked the life of their son who was standing next to the husband
4. The bullet she fired passed THROUGH the wall and exited mere inches from where the daughter was sitting on her bed.
I sorely wish folks would stop using Marissa Alexander to make a point when it comes to SYG.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)...
The person who uses or threatens to use defensive force is engaged in a criminal activity or is using the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle to further a criminal activity
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
mr_lebowski This message was self-deleted by its author.
TeamPooka
(24,206 posts)Response to TeamPooka (Reply #19)
mr_lebowski This message was self-deleted by its author.
LisaL
(44,972 posts)You can tell something from a photo?
Give me a break.
TeamPooka
(24,206 posts)yet you are.
Even if you don't realize it.
Your posts are way out of line in this thread.
You should delete them
Response to TeamPooka (Reply #23)
mr_lebowski This message was self-deleted by its author.
TeamPooka
(24,206 posts)turned in her husband's guns when the judge took them away.
It sounds like you're projecting your issues onto this woman.
Keep digging this hole of yours though, it looks good on you.
susanna
(5,231 posts)His eyes are dead looking. Hers are haunted.
Wherever your meth idea comes from, okay, I guess.
But even IF she is doing bad things, that should not result in a gun death by a crazy-ass boyfriend.
END OF STORY.
Response to susanna (Reply #27)
mr_lebowski This message was self-deleted by its author.
radical noodle
(7,997 posts)breaking into his house to get the guns. I don't care where you live, that's not legal to do under any circumstances.
SunSeeker
(51,512 posts)They have kids together. It is quite possible, if not likely, that she has a key to his place, or knew how to get in without a key.
She took the guns not only to to protect herself but to protect her kids.
The police did not charge he withbreaking and entering. They arrested her for taking his guns without his permission.
From the article:
According to court documents, she told the police officer on duty that her husband had been arrested the day before, and that she wanted to hand in his guns because she didnt believe he would turn them in.
The police officer asked if she had taken her husbands firearms without his permission. When she replied yes, he told her that she was confessing to a crime. Police arrested her and she was charged with armed burglary of a dwelling and grand theft of a firearm.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)SunSeeker
(51,512 posts)The officer's statement says the front door was locked. She didn't break the door down, or else the overzealous asshole would have charged her with property damage too. How did she get into the the locked front door unless she had a key?
She obviously knew where the apartment was and must have been there before to drop off kids, etc. Just because she may have said she had never been in the apartment (she may not have said that, there are errors in the report) does not mean she didn't have a key. Also, the officer's statement claimed Irby was her "ex-husband," when in fact they were still married. In CA, those guns would be community property, in Florida it would be called marital property. It would appear that she had a right to possess this property as his wife.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Do you really think you have the right to break into your husband's apartment when you're separated?
Does that go both ways? If a husband enters his estranged wife's apartment and takes "her" things, is that okay with you, too? After all, they're still married, right?
Or does this only go one way?
radical noodle
(7,997 posts)(and I live in Florida) say that's exactly what she did. I don't have first-hand knowledge, of course.
Polybius
(15,334 posts)She barely looks 25. He looks young too, too bad the article didn't say their ages, I'm very curious.
SunSeeker
(51,512 posts)Wonder what happened to those poor kids when both of their parents were in jail. That cop endangered those kids by jailing her. This is so fucked up.
Jake Stern
(3,145 posts)If they come in without our permission it's still unlawful entry whether the door was broken down or not. Looks like they hit her with the bigger charge of armed burglary instead.
KT2000
(20,568 posts)low set ears are potential indicators of a whole set of problems including developmental disabilities. This is probably someone who should not own even one gun.
Neighbor's elderly husband experiencing mental decline started collecting weapons. She woke to find them stacked in the laundry room. She was scared and called the police. They told her she should move out of the house because they could not take the weapons from him. Guns rule.
AZ8theist
(5,409 posts)I never knew of this before but you have hit on something:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-set_ears
Down syndrome[2]
Turner syndrome
Noonan syndrome[3]
Patau syndrome[4]
DiGeorge syndrome[5]
Cri du chat syndrome
Edwards syndrome
Fragile X syndrome
This guy might be an imbecile who should be BANNED from owning any firearms.
Unfortunately, I fear his "wife" will be the next one DEAD. Sad.
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)Charged with armed burglary because what she took were firearms.
Thats not what the statute is for.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)what were their next steps? Did they hand the guns back to him or did they keep the guns? Next thing we will hear is a story about how it was perfectly legal to wait outside the police station with a loaded weapon waiting for your estranged wife to get out of jail.
SunSeeker
(51,512 posts)ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)Now I see it at the very end. What a bunch of idiots!
SunSeeker
(51,512 posts)From the article:
According to court documents, she told the police officer on duty that her husband had been arrested the day before, and that she wanted to hand in his guns because she didnt believe he would turn them in.
The police officer asked if she had taken her husbands firearms without his permission. When she replied yes, he told her that she was confessing to a crime. Police arrested her and she was charged with armed burglary of a dwelling and grand theft of a firearm.
Demovictory9
(32,421 posts)SunSeeker
(51,512 posts)From the article:
According to court documents, she told the police officer on duty that her husband had been arrested the day before, and that she wanted to hand in his guns because she didnt believe he would turn them in.
The police officer asked if she had taken her husbands firearms without his permission. When she replied yes, he told her that she was confessing to a crime. Police arrested her and she was charged with armed burglary of a dwelling and grand theft of a firearm.
SunSeeker
(51,512 posts)Last edited Sat Jun 22, 2019, 02:23 AM - Edit history (2)
A judge had banned her husband from.possessing firearms-- she was carrying out the court's wishes!
From the article:
According to court documents, she told the police officer on duty that her husband had been arrested the day before, and that she wanted to hand in his guns because she didnt believe he would turn them in.
The police officer asked if she had taken her husbands firearms without his permission. When she replied yes, he told her that she was confessing to a crime. Police arrested her and she was charged with armed burglary of a dwelling and grand theft of a firearm.
susanna
(5,231 posts)TeamPooka
(24,206 posts)This was a choice to arrest her on trumped up charges while she was complying with a court order.
LisaL
(44,972 posts)Where is the armed burglary? She went into his dwelling when he wasn't there.
What are they claiming she was armed with?
SunSeeker
(51,512 posts)The charging was ridiculous. The charges should be thrown out and the cops arrested for false imprisonment. They only jailed her abuser one day, but had her in jail over 5 days before she was granted bond. Unfuckingbelievable.
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,488 posts)By Kathy Leigh Berkowitz, The Ledger (Lakeland, FL)
Posted Jun 21, 2019 at 4:43 PM
Link: https://www.theledger.com/news/20190621/state-lawmaker-outraged-over-lakeland-womans-arrest
Eskamani issued a statement Friday saying, The case of Courtney Taylor Irby demonstrates once more the dangerous linkage between intimate partner violence and access to firearms. Court records show that Irby applied for a temporary injunction against her husband and the two were in the process of a divorce. She was actively protecting herself and her family from an estranged husband who had not turned over his firearms to law enforcement, and was arrested for it. We should be outraged by her arrest, and Irby should not be prosecuted by the local State Attorneys office.
Eskamani also noted that in 2018, Florida lawmakers passed a risk protection order law. In Florida, only a law enforcement officer or agency can file a petition for a risk protection order, which should have happened in this case, she said. Federal gun laws already protect women from domestic abusers by prohibiting gun possession for people convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence or subject to a final domestic violence restraining order. But dangerous gaps and weaknesses in the system remain at the state level.
State Sen. Lori Berman, D-Boynton Beach, and Eskamani filed SB1206/HB941 to close the gaps, according to Eskamani in a statement to The Ledger. Our bill requires a person convicted of a misdemeanor offense of domestic violence to surrender (when convicted) all firearms and ammunition in his or her possession to law enforcement. Our bill never got a hearing, but we plan to refile it in 2020.
According to Polk County Jail records, Joseph Irby was released on $10,000 bail the day after his arrest on June 14.
Taken into custody June 15, Courtney Taylor Irby was released from the county jail on $7,000 bond Thursday.
I hope this woman has a safe place to stay. Protective orders do not stop bullets.....
Perhaps this guy should be wearing a government-issue Rolex until the trial is over. Makes no sense he's even out on bail considering he's had numerous protective orders against him in the past, and just committed a dangerous act against the woman......
sl8
(13,665 posts)LisaL
(44,972 posts)This woman brings guns to police because she wants to be protected, and what do they do? Arrest her.
sl8
(13,665 posts)At least, not for any particular individual
sl8
(13,665 posts)From https://heavy.com/news/2019/06/courtney-irby/
[div chttps://heavy.com/news/2019/06/courtney-irby/lass="excerpt"]
[...]
Her attorney, Lawrence Shearer, said in a court motion that the action did not constitute theft because Joseph would have been able to retrieve his guns from the police, LkldNow reported. He added that Courtney turned the guns over and had no intention to appropriate the property to her own use or the use of any person not entitled to the use of the property.
Shearer also cited Courtneys lack of criminal history and her great many ties to the community, to be demonstrated at a hearing on this motion. Shearer said in the filing that the officer calling Joseph Irby her ex-husband, was inaccurate because they are still married.
You can see the court filing below:
[...]
More at link.
sl8
(13,665 posts)From https://www.lkldnow.com/woman-arrested-after-turning-in-estranged-husbands-guns-to-lpd/
We really dont have authority to take firearms from people unless they are surrendered or there is a court order, Bruchey said.
If a person, upon receiving an injunction or a pre-trial release agreement, say they have no firearms to hand over, thats pretty much it, Bruchey said. We cant do anything, unless they willfully do it release them to us.
There is no indication in court documents that the existence of the guns was in question, or that Joseph Irby had intended to conceal their existence or retain them despite the court orders.
Technically if the person does have firearms they are in violation of the injunction or pre-trial release but its one of those things its kind of hard to enforce, really. Youd have to have somebody to say I know exactly where they are and youd have to get a search warrant for it. Its one of those things you hope people do the right thing and surrender their guns, Bruchey said.
The Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School Safety Act, passed in 2018, gave police departments the power to request risk protection orders to take guns away from people who may be a danger to themselves or others.
[...]
More at link about Florida RPDs.
zanana1
(6,102 posts)SunSeeker
(51,512 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)But she did have to "break and enter" his house (apparently they had separate residences), to get the guns. That's against the law. So they got her on that for sure.
I agree w/the lawyer that she didn't "steal" the guns, because she gave them to the police.
There's something really wrong here. Next time I hope she marries someone who isn't as violent and messed up.
Vegas Roller
(704 posts)Instead of common sense and using it to protect and serve, it is out to protect the gun nuts.
sarisataka
(18,483 posts)In the wrong way. Lawyerese aside, going into someone's residence and taking their property is theft. (Although calling it armed burglary seems ridiculous)
SunSeeker
(51,512 posts)Seems to me she had a right to possess those guns.
The officer in his statement inaccurately said Irby was her "ex-husband." They weren't divorced.
sarisataka
(18,483 posts)The papers not yet signed so they are still legally married.
There is definitely "his" stuff and "her" stuff. He cannot at this point enter her house (which was previously "their" house) to get his stuff without her permission. Likewise she cannot enter his current apartment to take anything she believes he was not entitled to take. Disputed property must be listed and submitted for mediation.
In this case she should have told the judge he had the firearms at the hearing or told the police when her husband was arrested for assaulting her. A search warrant could have been obtained while he was in jail and the guns removed by the police.
SunSeeker
(51,512 posts)This woman was protecting herself and her kids. There is no mechanism in Florida for taking guns away from someone ordered to turn them in. It is a crazy, pro-gun gap in Florida law that legislators are trying to fix.
Your friends' divorce proceedings analogy does not work, unless one of them is trying to kill the other with a sofa.
sarisataka
(18,483 posts)I thoughtful it said Florida did have a mechanism to report firearms that should have been removed. My bad.
I would have no objection to such a law.
Still under the current law she did commit a crime. Was it a good choice? Probably, I would likely have helped her do it; jail is better than dead. But to try to twist it to claim taking someone else's property, be it a gun or sofa, for "safe keeping " is not theft is simply being disingenuous.
SunSeeker
(51,512 posts)Big difference from your divorce analogy. Defending yourself is not a crime. And she did not deprive him of access to the guns, so it's not theft.
sarisataka
(18,483 posts)Any legal basis for preemptive self defense on the idea a person might do something in the future.
Many people have things they should not, from weapons to drugs to stolen goods and on. That does not give anyone the right to enter the residence and remove those items.
Jake Stern
(3,145 posts)By that logic a man can take his wife's priceless heirloom ring without asking her and pawn it without repercussion. After all it's "community property".
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)If I know my neighbor has an arrest warrant out on them, if I tie them up and take them to the police station, it's still kidnapping.
Talk about the ends not justifying the means.
SunSeeker
(51,512 posts)A judge did not order your neighbor to turn in his guns because he had repeatedly tried to kill you. All of the above was the case with this woman. She was literally acting in her own and her children's self defense.
But you label her as basically a vigilante "taking the law into her own hands." That is not what she did.
She brought the guns to the cops. As the police said, they had no authority to take the guns from the husband's home, thanks to a ridiculous pro-gun gap in Florida law. So she was not usurping the role of the police. She was defending herself.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Of course not.
She broke into his apartment.
If I steal my neighbor's scooter, but then drop it off at the police because his license is expired, it's still fucking theft.
It doesn't matter one great goddamn what I do with stolen property, that doesn't make the theft go away.
Fucking duh.
SunSeeker
(51,512 posts)You also gloss over that fact that those guns may have been marital property that she has a right to.
And it does make a "great goddamn" what you do with the guns. As noted in the article:
Theft is to deprive someone of the right or benefit of property, he said. She didnt do either one of those. She was taking them to the police department for safekeeping.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Her lawyer will try to come up with anything as a defense. The fact that he's flying in the face of black letter law should tell you something.
If I steal pot from my neighbor to turn in to the police, it's still theft and breaking and entering.
There's no exception to the state statute that says, "it's okay if you turn it in to the police."
"Marital property" works both ways. Would you be okay with him breaking into her apartment, her having moved out?
Do tell.
SunSeeker
(51,512 posts)No, I would not be ok with him breaking into her apartment, since he tried to kill her, repeatedly, and there is a restraining order out on him.
She gave these guns to the police as an act of self defense. Why are you having such a hard time seeing that?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Response to Hoyt (Reply #59)
Post removed
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Read it in context.
Good to see you posting, even if only to protect your gunz.
SunSeeker
(51,512 posts)Sancho
(9,067 posts)I'm going to avoid going to Lakeland...meanwhile, with guns in schools and virtually no restrictions on purchases there will continue to be shootings in Florida.
JudyM
(29,192 posts)The forum hosts dont think this is important news of national interest as required for posting in the LBN forum. Feel free to post it in GD or local.