NRA finally speaks on Waffle House shooting, says man who stopped it should have used a gun
Source: Think Progress
For years the National Rifle Associations mantra has been that the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. So after a good guy without a gun bravely put an end to a deadly mass shooting at a Tennessee Waffle House on Sunday, the organization took some time to formulate a response.
On Monday, Grant Stinchfield, host for the organizations NRATV, praised James Shaw for his heroism, but simultaneously suggested that it would have been better if he had been armed and could have shot back.
I will say without a shadow of a doubt, that man saved countless lives, Stinchfield said. There would have been many people dead inside that Waffle House if it wasnt for James Shaw.
Read more: https://thinkprogress.org/nra-says-waffle-house-hero-should-have-carried-a-gun-1605081525a2/
Hey Stinchfield .........................go fuck yourself
Let me repeat this ................Go fuck yourself asshole
I am going to donate to the Gofundme page that Shaw created to help the victims
https://www.gofundme.com/5g07bvs
underpants
(183,036 posts)Thanks
AllaN01Bear
(18,798 posts)that narrative dosn, nor will it ever work.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,817 posts)Thank you for your great post, my dear turbinetree!
DRoseDARs
(6,810 posts)eom
Initech
(100,146 posts)Ha ha!
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)happened.
Screw the gun organizations including the NRA with their spokespeople like this gun-loving NRA Board Member.
?w=600
dalton99a
(81,707 posts)WhiteTara
(29,736 posts)ailsagirl
(22,908 posts)WhiteTara
(29,736 posts)ailsagirl
(22,908 posts)mbusby
(823 posts)Based on the past regarding this persons ethnicity, he would have been swiss cheese when the police showed up.
They should've just keep their mouths shut and sent some "thoughts and prayers"
Response to mbusby (Reply #9)
grumpyduck This message was self-deleted by its author.
grumpyduck
(6,293 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,719 posts)ailsagirl
(22,908 posts)grumpyduck
(6,293 posts)go buy guns to "protect themselves" against future attacks.
So the gun manufacturers and dealers win at the expense of (in this case) four innocent people. But then again, that's exactly what the NRA is about: lobbying for gun manufacturers no matter what the results.
I think that asshole's comment is disgusting in more ways than one.
jmowreader
(50,594 posts)Good (per the NRA): James Shaw opening fire on the gunman, possibly starting a firefight that would have killed many more people
Bad (per the NRA): James Shaw wrenching the gun from the shooter's Trump-like hands and throwing it behind the counter, therefore saving many lives with the least amount of additional bloodshed
REALLY bad (per the NRA): James Shaw beating the gunman to death with his own rifle before throwing it behind the counter. "The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy wielding the same gun like it was a baseball bat."
Cha
(298,049 posts)predictable.
Sancho
(9,072 posts)the cops would shoot him long before they went after the bad guy!
treestar
(82,383 posts)for a gun they don't have. Actually having one? SMH.
Paladin
(28,287 posts)Having followed the excesses of the NRA for so many years, I should have known better. What a sick, trashy organization.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)As is Shaw's.
They prefer that their mass shooters dispose of themselves quickly.
treestar
(82,383 posts)essentially admitting it was not needed as to the actual shooting.
What an outrageous suggestion - proves all they care about is selling more guns and that these occurrences are something they like, because they give them a chance to suggest more guns are the answer.
Va Lefty
(6,252 posts)NotASurfer
(2,157 posts)I had the same thought...It is the NRA and clearly their answer to a cavity would have to be "shoot the tooth".
The only way to stop bad teeth, is a good dentist with a gun?
SWBTATTReg
(22,214 posts)are obviously interested in selling guns, and don't care about public safety, nor the rights of those numerous Americans who don't believe in carrying guns. Why are our rights to not carry or have someone walking around w/ a gun on public property that we have to respect their rights ? How do we know as 'Joe/Jill Public' that they have a carry/conceal/etc. permit?
This is garbage logic, that one needs to have a gun everywhere!! If things were so bad according to the NRA, then crap, people would be getting stabbed and killed everywhere by the thousands and thousands daily.
But this is NOT happening. Society as a whole is doing good, thank you, and yeah, we don't have to carry gun(s) all of the time, and to be honest w/ you (in my opinion), 99.99% of us don't carry guns/knives/baseball bats/etc. We don't have to. We function for the most part in society, as 'treat me like I treat you, nice is, as nice does'. Some of us do have guns but I don't think we go 'overboard' w/ it. I myself, have a small pistol for protection at home in case someone breaks in, but don't ever, ever expect to see or use. Which is fine w/ me.
I'm being hyperbolic here (I apologize in advance here), but maybe if these gun 'nuts' knew to function in society better, there probably would be less gun crimes against persons, since they didn't have to suck on the barrels of their guns as a security blanket. Basically I'm saying that these gun carrying nuts are very paranoid and insincere, and are somewhat 'nuts' already. I've seen too many of these 'macho' shows where folks are strutting around, showing off their guns and so forth, and I get nervous when I see this kind of behavior. I kind think others do too.
How many gun accidents happen at home that accidently kill family or loved ones accidently? I myself had such an incident when I was a child, thank god that no one was hurt w/ the gun in question (had blanks in it instead of real bullets).