Comey: I wrote about 3 presidents, 2 of whom illustrated 'ethical leadership'
Source: The Hill
BY REBECCA SAVRANSKY - 04/15/18 01:27 PM EDT
Former FBI director James Comey said Sunday that he wrote about three presidents in his new book, adding that two of them illustrated "ethical leadership."
Link to tweet
Comey did not identify the presidents he described. His book, "A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies and Leadership," will be released this month. Excerpts of it surfaced last week.
Comey compared Trump to a mob boss in the memoir, writing that Trump sought loyalty like Sammy the Bulls Cosa Nostra induction ceremony, a reference to the infamous mob boss.
The former FBI director also writes that the president asked Comey to probe an alleged tape detailing one of the most salacious parts of the dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele.
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/383249-comey-i-wrote-about-3-presidents-2-of-which-illustrated-ethical
Eliot Rosewater
(31,134 posts)remembering incorrectly?
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)Today, during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Comey detailed the extraordinary and potentially illegal efforts made by Alberto Gonzales and Andrew Card then White House counsel and chief of staff, respectively to attempt to force John Ashcroft to overrule Comey, despite the fact that Ashcroft was debilitated in a hospital with pancreatitis.
https://thinkprogress.org/comey-breaks-silence-white-house-tried-to-force-incapacitated-ashcroft-to-back-spying-program-66fb293ac29/
Eliot Rosewater
(31,134 posts)FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)...and an aristocratic identification with and resultant entitlement to, state power.
Trump, truly, has no ethics - his inhabitation of the office is a vehicle, not an identification.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,134 posts)yet it would take me all but 2 seconds to do the same on Obama.
Obama has one thing ONLY that I can recall and that was the use of drones. There might be more but compared to any other president EVER I think he was the most ethical.
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)Leaving that loaded gun on the table.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)starting in 2009. That's why there were compliance docs for Fast Eddie to swipe and flash around. The entire Snowald narrative was a crock of fake news but good luck trying to explain that to the FB faithful.
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)Eg
New rules issued by the Obama administration under Executive Order 12333 will let the NSAwhich collects information under that authority with little oversight, transparency, or concern for privacyshare the raw streams of communications it intercepts directly with agencies including the FBI, the DEA, and the Department of Homeland Security, according to a report today by the New York Times.
Thats a huge and troubling shift in the way those intelligence agencies receive information collected by the NSA. Domestic agencies like the FBI are subject to more privacy protections, including warrant requirements. Previously, the NSA shared data with these agencies only after it had screened the data, filtering out unnecessary personal information, including about innocent people whose communications were swept up the NSAs massive surveillance operations.
As the New York Times put it, with the new rules, the government claims to be reducing the risk that the N.S.A. will fail to recognize that a piece of information would be valuable to another agency, but increasing the risk that officials will see private information about innocent people.
Under the new, relaxed rules, there are still conditions that need to be met before the NSA will grant domestic intelligence analysts access to the raw streams of data it collects. And analysts can only search that raw data for information about Americans for foreign intelligence and counterintelligence purposes, not domestic criminal cases.
Howeverand this is especially troublingif analysts stumble across evidence that an American has committed any crime, they will send it to the Justice Department, the Times wrote. So information that was collected without a warrantor indeed any involvement by a court at allfor foreign intelligence purposes with little to no privacy protections, can be accessed raw and unfiltered by domestic law enforcement agencies to prosecute Americans with no involvement in threats to national security.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/01/obama-expands-surveillance-powers-his-way-out
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Most are, probably because FB/Cambridge Analytica/"the russians" didn't find it profitable to weaponize them LOL. Anyway here's what EFF had to say about Obama's efforts in this area in Sept 2009:
LEGISLATIVE ANALYSIS BY KEVIN BANKSTON
SEPTEMBER 17, 2009
On December 31, three provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act that broadly expanded government surveillance authority in the wake of 9/11 are set to expire.1 The Obama Administration made clear in a letter this week to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy that although the Justice Department supports reauthorization of those provisions, it is also open to discussing modifications to the law to provide additional protection for the privacy of law abiding Americans.
Today, Senators Russ Feingold and Dick Durbin along with eight other Senators have taken the Administration up on its offer by introducing the JUSTICE Act, which would rein in the worst excesses of PATRIOT and last years FISA Amendments Act (FAA). The announcement of the bills introduction, along with a fact sheet outlining the bill's details, is here; the text of the JUSTICE Act is here (the JUSTICE, if youre wondering, stands for Judiciously Using Surveillance Tools In Counterterrorism Efforts).
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/09/eff-supports-justice
What became of this particular effort I don't know but before Ted Kennedy passed away they got a lot of reforms through including senate confirmation of the DIA. Good luck finding hide nor hair of any of it on Google, though. Weird, or maybe not.
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)I think my EFF artciel from 2017 might serve the function of a retrospective on the Obama administrations accomplishments better than yours, from 2009.
Just sayin.
questionseverything
(9,666 posts)since the nsa gathers everything...how the heck does the fbi,cia,nsa let a criminal like trump run for the highest office in the land?
I am not saying the gathering is legal but if there was ever a need for it...trump pretty much personifies that need
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)From the link above:
(snip)
I went out in the hallway. Spoke to Director Mueller by phone. He was on his way. I handed the phone to the head of the security detail and Director Mueller instructed the FBI agents present not to allow me to be removed from the room under any circumstances. And I went back in the room.
Actually, the whole thing is worth reading. It reads like a Tom Clancy novel.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)who he seems to have despised, I strongly suspect for the obvious reason. And if Comey thinks Bushler illustrates the values at the heart of ethical leadership he's a bigger jerk than I realized.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,950 posts)by Obama for Director after Obama could not extend Mueller's term any further (Mueller's 10 year term was up in 2011 and Obama was able to get Congress to pass a special extension for an additional 2 years).
pecosbob
(7,548 posts)If you hadn't torpedoed Clinton we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,134 posts)Jesus man, just admit you hate the Clinton's and be done with it.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)questionseverything
(9,666 posts)we have got to stop worrying about what repubs might say