Louisiana takes aim at Jim Crow-era jury law
Source: Associated Press
Anthony Izaguirre, Associated Press
Updated 11:23 pm, Saturday, April 14, 2018
BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) Louisiana is one of only two states in the country allowing a non-unanimous jury to convict a defendant of a felony, and a Louisiana lawmaker says it is time for the practice to end.
Sen. J.P. Morrell says the unusual rule is a remnant of the Jim Crow era, stemming from a constitutional convention in 1898 and longstanding efforts to maintain white supremacy after the Civil War. And he wants a change.
"This is something that is wholly unnecessary that was born of this fusion of racism and disenfranchisement," he said. "It's a self-defeating, illogical position to have two jurors say 'we don't think he did it,' then prosecutors to say we met our reasonable doubt standard."
The New Orleans Democrat has proposed a constitutional amendment to require all 12 jurors in felony cases to agree on a verdict. The measure is gaining steam in the state Capitol.
Read more: https://www.chron.com/news/crime/article/Louisiana-takes-aim-at-Jim-Crow-era-jury-law-12834125.php
BumRushDaShow
(129,965 posts)and I had to hunt around to find that.
Glad they are looking into this as it needs to change and it needs to happen in Oregon as well.
MichMan
(12,002 posts)That's sarcastic, actually. It's an easy claim to make and the very idea of disputing it leads some to cry discrimination, but the claim as it stands could easily be post hoc ergo prompter hoc. Note that Oregon did have a sort of "whites only" mentality for quite a while after the Civil War, but I'm not aware of any great Louisiana-Oregon cultural cross-pollination.
gopiscrap
(23,767 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,965 posts)The "jury of peers" deciding something as critical as a felony should require all or nothing.