Chuck Grassley says his estate tax comments were misinterpreted
Source: Omaha World-Herald
Dec 4, 2017 Updated 1 hr ago
WASHINGTON (AP) A top Republican senator said Monday his comments were misinterpreted when he defended GOP efforts to scale back the federal estate taxes because it helps those who invest rather than people who spend their money on booze or women or movies.
My point regarding the estate tax, which has been taken out of context, is that the government shouldnt seize the fruits of someones lifetime of labor after they die, Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley said in a statement. The question is one of basic fairness, and working to create a tax code that doesnt penalize frugality, saving and investment.
The seven-term senator, a senior member of the Senate Finance Committee, made the comments about the estate tax late last week in an interview with the Des Moines Register. It has attracted attention since.
Grassley told the newspaper, I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether its on booze or women or movies.
Read more: http://www.omaha.com/news/iowa/chuck-grassley-says-his-estate-tax-comments-were-misinterpreted/article_42d431d0-d90b-11e7-96e9-efafdbce8100.html
renate
(13,776 posts)What a pathetic turd.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I've heard it so many times. Our conservative neighbors want to think they're talking about poor people who get government aid, but the demonizing is on all of us to excuse what they want to do to all of us.
I once listened from a nearby table (kids were out golfing in a heat I couldn't take) at a country club in the Bentonville/Walmart headquarters area of Arkansas to some apparently visiting, guessing very high-level execs--higher than Walmart requires vendors to actually live there to do business. They were talking about the subdivisions that had grown up in that area and others and how Americans are buying far larger houses than we need, which we then fill with years of extravagantly wasteful consumerism, instead of saving and building our personal "worth."
Won't exactly argue with any of these premises, but I had a huge problem with the underlying theme they were nodding over -- that employees across the nation were overpaid and couldn't handle the corruption of money well, were wasting by far most of it, and that previous generations worked harder and lived better, more moral lives on much less. As a real estate appraiser listening keenly, I translated one guy's description they were nodding at into the around 1000-1400 square 3-brm homes that were once common as a more appropriate size for our happier, more moral families. Has been and is for many, but their decision for us?
Every time scoundrels like Hatch come to mind, that smug and hypocritical conversation comes to mind. My experienced version of Romney's "47%" presentation.
47of74
(18,470 posts)...who got his or her ass called to the carpet for spewing bullshit.
chowder66
(9,093 posts)Abouttime
(675 posts)NOTHING should get done in the Senate until this evil man is gone.
marble falls
(57,404 posts)Horizens
(637 posts)I didn't say what I said and what I was accurately quoted as saying.
JHan
(10,173 posts)irisblue
(33,041 posts)really, time to go away.
JHan
(10,173 posts)Fullduplexxx
(7,873 posts)disalitervisum
(470 posts)This isn't 1925.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)And they are almost always old, white men.
dalton99a
(81,656 posts)irisblue
(33,041 posts)truthisfreedom
(23,160 posts)It affects a tiny percentage of our population.
dalton99a
(81,656 posts)Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)statement he made earlier about poor people. Honestly,knowing the Rural areas of Minnesota and Iowa and South Dakota,this is a theme used by thousands of older White people who tend to be feeling or playing the Victim Card. Ignorance is Bliss to these.
old guy
(3,284 posts)This is really a lame attempt, even worse than I expected.
Beartracks
(12,821 posts)... as what Rush Limbaugh called "punishing success." Because, as everyone knows, your value as an American is based on the size of your bank account.
============
Freethinker65
(10,082 posts)A majority of frugal American savers will never ever have anything close to 5 or 10 million dollars in their estates after working from their teen years to retirement age. While the estate tax cut/elimation will affect some current self-made entrepreneurs, its main goal is to keep family dynasties, which have accumulated their wealth on the backs of Ordinary Americans, in tact with future generations free to inherit and never give anything back in perpetuity.
FreeStateDemocrat
(2,654 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)They're pathetic, claiming they're so misunderstood!
Skittles
(153,243 posts)it's ALWAYS who they are
Corgigal
(9,291 posts)However, if it wasn't for us regular humans buying things for life along the way, our whole way of being would collapse, asshole.
I bought a pine candle today, cause holidays and I like it. Your ass should thank me for buying this silly little item, not belittle us. People who don't even understand how our economy works, should never be elected to a damn thing.
xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)many, many persons extremely angry with this self appointed overseer of the 99.8%!
Ferrets are Cool
(21,111 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,920 posts)is that a dead person can't own anything. And that NOTHING should be passed on to anyone until the estate has been settled.
I didn't know that until after I signed the deceased man's car over to someone, and gave away a bunch of personal possessions. However, since all bills have been settled, it doesn't matter that I broke the law.
I'm not in favor of total confiscation of a dead person't property and wealth, something I've seen suggested on occasion. But given that a person can pass on some $5.49million tax free under the current law, I think that's plenty generous enough.