Trump asked Sessions about closing case against Arpaio, an ally since 'birtherism'
Source: The Washington Post
By Philip Rucker and Ellen Nakashima August 26 at 6:45 PM
As Joseph Arpaios federal case headed toward trial this past spring, President Trump wanted to act to help the former Arizona county sheriff who had become a campaign-trail companion and a partner in their crusade against illegal immigration.
The president asked Attorney General Jeff Sessions whether it would be possible for the government to drop the criminal case against Arpaio, but was advised that would be inappropriate, according to three people with knowledge of the conversation.
After talking with Sessions, Trump decided to let the case go to trial, and if Arpaio was convicted, he could grant clemency.
So the president waited, all the while planning to issue a pardon if Arpaio was found in contempt of court for defying a federal judges order to stop detaining people merely because he suspected them of being undocumented immigrants. Trump was, in the words of one associate, gung-ho about it.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-asked-sessions-about-closing-case-against-arpaio-an-ally-since-birtherism/2017/08/26/15e5d7b2-8a7f-11e7-a94f-3139abce39f5_story.html
LonePirate
(13,437 posts)L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)riversedge
(70,414 posts)about a criminal case.. whow. damn, he is stupid but Repugs do not care
Link to tweet
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-asked-sessions-about-closing-case-against-arpaio-an-ally-since-birtherism/2017/08/26/15e5d7b2-8a7f-11e7-a94f-3139abce39f5_story.html?utm_term=.f5e6b728a796
Sessions about closing case against Arpaio, an ally since birtherism
Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph Arpaio gestures to the crowd while delivering a speech at the Republican National Convention on July 21, 2016, in Cleveland. (John Moore)
By Philip Rucker and Ellen Nakashima August 26 at 6:45 PM
As Joseph Arpaios federal case headed toward trial this past spring, President Trump wanted to act to help the former Arizona county sheriff who had become a campaign-trail companion and a partner in their crusade against illegal immigration.
The president asked Attorney General Jeff Sessions whether it would be possible for the government to drop the criminal case against Arpaio, but was advised that would be inappropriate, according to three people with knowledge of the conversation.
After talking with Sessions, Trump decided to let the case go to trial, and if Arpaio was convicted, he could grant clemency.
So the president waited, all the while planning to issue a pardon if Arpaio was found in contempt of court for defying a federal judges order to stop detaining people merely because he suspected them of being undocumented immigrants. Trump was, in the words of one associate, gung-ho about it.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,398 posts)riversedge
(70,414 posts)YUP
.....................Trumps spring inquiry about intervening in Arpaios case is consistent with his alleged attempts to influence the federal investigation of Michael Flynn, the former national security adviser. Trump also made separate appeals in March to Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats and National Security Agency Director Michael S. Rogers to publicly deny the existence of any evidence of collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.
[Trump pardons former Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio]
Trumps pardon of Arpaio was his backhand way of doing what he wanted to do at the front end, said Robert Bauer, a former White House counsel in the Obama administration. He just wanted to kill the prosecution off. He couldnt do it the one way, so he ended up doing it the other way. This is just another vivid demonstration of how far removed from an appropriate exercise of the pardon power this was.
C Moon
(12,225 posts)riversedge
(70,414 posts)think it has to some extent. So many things I did not know about the sheriff are coming to light (I knew some but certainly not many of his vile misdeeds)
BigmanPigman
(51,649 posts)and which are designated dislike Sessions days for the fake prez? I can't seem to keep it straight but neither can he and that is part of his strategy...create chaos and keep it continuing everywhere at all times.
bluestarone
(17,101 posts)this nightmare end
mobeau69
(11,167 posts)"Presidents can set law enforcement priorities, but they are expected to steer clear of involvement in specific cases to avoid the perception of politicizing the impartial administration of justice.
Trump backed off the Arpaio case after being advised it would be inappropriate, but that he even tried is beyond the pale, said Chiraag Bains, a former senior counsel in the Justice Departments Civil Rights Division.
Bains said he believes Trump has a sense that the chief executive controls everything in the executive branch, including the exercise of criminal power. And that is just not the way the system is set up.
spiderpig
(10,419 posts)for this cretin?
I'd quit and apply for work at the nearest McDonald's.